Muingereza awafananisha Watz na nguruwe

Muingereza awafananisha Watz na nguruwe

Huyo mama alaaniwe na achukuliwe hatua za kisheria coz ame2kosea sana. Hawezi ku2fananisha na nguruwe. Inakujaje. Viongozi mko wapi? Hamuoni kuwa hili ni tatizo! Msifumbe macho kuhusu hili. Nitafuatili kwa ukaribu zaidi kuhakikisha kuwa amechukuliwa ha2a za kinidhamu.
 
Hili suala linafanywa la kitaifa, kumbe ni la raia binafsi. Tafadhali tazama hii:-
5RB : Cases : Mengi v Hermitage (No 2)
Mengi v Hermitage (No 2)
Case Reference [2012] EWHC 3445 (QB)
Court High Court, Queen's Bench Division

Judge The Honourable Mr Justice Bean

Date of Judgment 30 Nov 2012


Summary
Libel - internet blog - justification - reply to attack qualified privilege


Facts
The Claimant is a prominent Tanzanian businessman who owns various media interests, including the Tanzanian ‘Guardian’ and ‘Nipashe’ newspapers, through his IPP group of companies. In 2004 the Defendant and her husband, Stewart Middleton, bought the lease to a farm in Tanzania from the Claimant’s brother, Benjamin Mengi. A dispute arose, in which Benjamin sought to have the lease assignment set aside. He mounted a campaign of harassment against Mr Middleton in particular, threatening to kill him, taking out vexatious court actions and involving the local police and courts in the issue of trumped up charges. Mr Middleton was as a result repeatedly arrested and then imprisoned. In 2008, the Defendant and Mr Middleton abandoned their farm and fled Tanzania in fear for their lives. In 2009 the Defendant set up a website which described the dispute. In relation to the Claimant, the Defendant alleged on her website that he had encouraged a campaign of “journalistic terrorism” in the form of deliberately inaccurate, abusive and defamatory attacks by his IPP media outlets against her and her husband, which campaign had facilitated Benjamin’s corruption of local officials and intimidation of the Defendant and Mr Middleton, and therefore assisted Benjamin in grabbing back the farm, and that the Claimant had “lied” during a meeting with the British High Commissioner to Tanzania in 2005, when he had made certain promises concerning the farm dispute and IPP’s coverage of it, which he had had no intention of keeping. The Defendant also made similar allegations in two emails about which the Claimant complained, which she sent to the Lutheran Church in Tanzania and to the African Media Initiative organisation.
Issue
Were the defences of justification and qualified privilege made out?
Held
The allegations of IPP’s “journalistic terrorism”, and the Claimant’s support through it of his brother’s corrupt campaign to grab the farm were substantially true.
5RB : Cases : Mengi v Hermitage (No 2)
 

Attachments

tujache unafiki hakuna jambo geni alilosema huyu mama sisi wenyewe tumekuwa vinara wa kupokea rushwa wakati wa uchaguzi matokeo yake ndio hayo huyo mama anastahili apongezwe kwa kusema ukweli
 
Mpuuzi tu huyu...we mwenyewe ana interest na Tanzania ndio maaana...na Mashamba yake yana mstress
 
Inawezekana Nyerere angemtimua lakini swali Nyerere angeruhusu huu upuuzi tunaouona kwenye serikali ya sasa?
 
She is ----ing Right hatuna tofauti na Vitimoto tungekuwa na akili timamu tusingekuwa tunaongozwa na viongozi wanaotuongoza,tusingekuwa Na Richmond,Epa na bado hamna aliyechukuliwa hatua zaidi ya usanii wa kesi tu
 
Sasa tumekuwa nguruwe?????? Mbona Nkamia alisema hazungumzi na mbwa (mbunge mwenzie) ila anazungumza na mwenye mbwa, sijasikia hatua zikichukuliwa na bunge wala chama chake sembuse huyu mama anaetuonea huruma? Kumbuka waziri mmoja huko England, bi Clare Shorts kama sijakosea, alitaka kujiuzuru kwa sakata la rada akituonea huruma. Je sisi wananchi tulifanya nini????????
 
Back
Top Bottom