Mkapa: EPA Pacts will derail Africa

Mkapa: EPA Pacts will derail Africa

Ng'wamapalala

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2011
Posts
6,811
Reaction score
6,506
Retired President Benjamin William Mkapa (pictured above) has argued Inter Action Council European members to press on their governments to ensure that the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) they are negotiating with African countries do not threaten the development aspirations of Africa.

Participating in the debate on the economic situation in the present state of the world in Manama, the Kingdom of Bahrain, President Mkapa said the European Union (EU) proposals seriously impede the development path of the African countries. In particular, they would lead to the de-industrialization, stop the value addition on their primary goods exports and deny them market success, while by insisting on removal of import tariffs and export taxes, deny government revenue for effective fair governance.

He pointed out that the EU – EPA proposals placed production risks for locally produced products at 51.3% in East African Community countries, 54.1% in ECOWAS countries and 80.5% in SADC countries.

Weighing gains against cost of signing the EPAs for Sub – Saharan African countries, he said under the most favoured nation clause (MFN), the countries would gain annually $ 946 million on average against costs of $ 3,385 million. In every instance he affirmed, the cost of EPA is higher than the benefit.

He told the Council that African countries had been given the deadline of January 2014 to sign. The underlining principle of this deadline and the proposals is the principle of equal undifferentiated responsibilities, and the imperative of reciprocity. Additionally, the EU has now come up with new issues for reciprocal action including; services, investment, intellectual property, labour and environment.

In the Final Communiqué, the Council asks: “The international community to recognize the centrality of the African Union on issues of African development and to encourage regional economic integration. Trade with investment is the most important factor to states seeking to reduce poverty and improve living standard of their people.”

“The IAC calls on entities negotiating new economic partnerships, such as the EU and other development partners, to ensure market access for African exports consistent with the realization of the Millennium Development Goals and promotion of an agreed post 2015 agenda”.

The InterAction Council (IAC) is an independent international organization comprising more than 30 former heads of state or government. It aims to foster international cooperation and action in areas of peace and security, revitalization of the world economy and the nexus of development, population and environment and universal ethics.

The Council is co- chaired by former Canadian Premier Jean Chretien and Dr. Franz Vranitzky, former Chancellor of Austria.
 
Sometimes, it makes me wonder, why our dear African leaders keeps doing the same mistakes over and over.

Why are they still looking up to Western world to solve our unending economic mess when every research have shown candidly that NO ANY country have ever benefited economically from policies dictated by western BIG BOYS.

First was The world bank and IMF 1944, the result was FAILURE. Second was World Trade Organisation (WTO) 1995, the result was the same. Now is Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs), I have no more to say!.

ARE THEY BEWITCHED?.

Ama kweli nchi za Africa ni shamba la vichaa
 
This is how things going on!.

Eastern African Community (EAC)
Current Status

Burundi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Kenya and Uganda initialled a framework EPA (mainly dealing with trade in goods) on 28 November 2007, and are now negotiating a comprehensive regional EPA. The framework agreement has not been signed or ratified.

Next Steps
Negotiations for the comprehensive regional EPA now focus on development co-operation, agriculture and rules of origin.
The latest senior official meeting in Mombasa from 4- 8 February 2013 made substantial progress and closed the development chapter. Next round at Senior officials level will hopefully allow substantial progress on all outstanding issues, paving the way to concluding the EPA.

Next round:

Technical talks in early May (confirmed). Senior Officials in May (tbc).
 
Whether or not Africa gets to benefit from development-based relations with overseas (especially the European nations) is a discussion to be held with fellow patriotic African leaders and scholars in areas of expertise; who would make sure strategies are put frontward to eradicate all sorts of deliberate disadvantaged settings.

Begging in whatever way to the Inter Action Council European members or any related European representative to meditate of what is best for us won't ever solve anything. Their aim with the Africa (especially developing nations) is nothing but the same since they first discovered Africa.
 
Ingekuwa vipi Mkapa angekuwa MCHUMI??????????
 
kumbukeni...Agenda wanazi-set wao....na siri wanaijua wao.....tunahitaji viongozi makini kwenye uwakilishi wa mazungumzo ya EPA.......we must do our home work good!..........
 
Ingekuwa vipi Mkapa angekuwa MCHUMI??????????

Mkapa ni kichwa, unapokuwa president unatakiwa kuwa na upeo mpana wa kutafakari mambo, sasa mwenzetu huyu kifuu cha nazi kasoma uchumi lakini hawezi kuintergrate uchumi into practice, kwanza yeye anabeliave kwamba Tanzania hatuwezi endelea bila msaada. Kwa hiyo ukimtuma akajadili maswala haya ya EPA do not expect any productive inputs coz mind yake inabeliecve on msaada. Well done my president Benjamin William Mkapa.
 
Whether or not Africa gets to benefit from development-based relations with overseas (especially the European nations) is a discussion to be held with fellow patriotic African leaders and scholars in areas of expertise; who would make sure strategies are put frontward to eradicate all sorts of deliberate disadvantaged settings.

Begging in whatever way to the Inter Action Council European members or any related European representative to meditate of what is best for us won't ever solve anything. Their aim with the Africa (especially developing nations) is nothing but the same since they first discovered Africa.

You are right Ashadii, but currently, it seems that we (LDCs) don have such kind of leaders and expertise. Therefore its better to develop "silent measures" without letting them know. (China Strategy).

Regarding EPAs: I think it would be better to wait (stop negotiating) until Doha Round resumed and concluded. Why? Doha Round was hoped to emphasis on development, which would create space to accommodate the specificity for LDCs in context of GATT/GATS. Since Doha is stalled, means WTO compatibility of the EPA "as regional trading arrangements" will be ruled by old rules designed 1947(as issue of Development was not given green light during Uruguay negotiation); which is absolutely bad and will take us back 60 years ago. EU pressurizes the signing of EPA by these ACPs because they know that China, Brazil and India (leading fellows to LDCs) will firmly negotiate "total development special needs" for ACP if Doha will be resumed.

Also these countries are likely to be against EPA. Note that EPA originated from Lome Convention which granted ACP goods tariff-free access into the EU. However, during those days, China and India were not much involved in global trading as what they are taking the lead now (means few options to ACPs). But now China is massively involving in ACP trading environment which is not in favor of EU. Bad enough, over 4oyears of Lome Convention, it failed to build capacity to make ACP countries to proper utilize the so called tariff-free Access.

On the other side, China's involvement to Africa seems to create better competing environment to developing countries than EU. China-Africa trade relations involve building economic infrastructures and projects-based programs which are crucial for African Development and crying for most African countries; a thing that EU does not like.
 
Back
Top Bottom