Michezo magazetini leo...

Michezo magazetini leo...

Status
Not open for further replies.
David Bernstein urges FA Council not to resist changes in its structure

• Chairman tells FA 'to show we can embrace certain change'
• Calls for two non-executive directors to be added to board




  • Owen Gibson
  • The Guardian, Friday 25 March 2011 <li class="history">Article history
    David-Bernstein-007.jpg
    David Bernstein, the FA chairman, wants two non-executive directors to be added to the association's board. Photograph: Jan Kruger/The FA via Getty Images David Bernstein, the FA chairman, has made another small step towards reform of its board structure, telling the FA Council that the organisation needed "to show we can embrace certain change".
    Having already won support from the board, currently split 50-50 between representatives of the national game and the amateur game, for the addition of two non-executive directors, he made his case to the FA Council.
    "My advice, and you may accept it or not, is we need to show we can embrace certain change. On this independent non-executive directors issue we should not prevaricate," he told the 114 members of the FA Council. "This is a real issue and also a symbolic one. Our interests will not be served if this measure gets slowed down or ultimately rejected."
    Bernstein believes that while the issue is nowhere near radical enough for many who believe the FA requires fundamental reform, it must be approached with care. Barry Bright, the FA board member and recently elected leader of the council, also spoke out in support of the measure. If there is a positive response from the council, typically resistant to change, then the matter could be put to a general meeting in June.
    Critics point out that the addition of two non-executives, rather than the replacement of two existing board members, represents only incremental progress.
    Lord Burns, the Channel 4 chairman who recommended in a 2005 report that two non-executives join the board, admitted to the parliamentary committee currently examining football governance that he wished he had gone further. Both Lord Triesman, the former chairman, and Ian Watmore, the former chief executive, have called for wholesale reform of the FA's structure. Watmore, who quit in frustration, favours a fully independent board split between FA executives and non-executive directors.
    Bernstein, appointed in December in the wake of England's World Cup bid failure, has said he is in favour of "sensible, progressive reform". He will appear in front of the Culture, Media and Sport select committee at Wembley on Tuesday.
    Bernstein also told the council he had requested the manifestos of both Fifa presidential candidates, asking how they would benefit English football. He said he would make this information public before the board decided whether to back Sepp Blatter or Mohamed Bin Hammam.
    After FA board members had previously indicated they would support any challenger to Blatter, it was forced to issue a statement saying the matter had not been discussed at board level.

 
Plymouth Argyle loan hope disappears as window closes

&#8226; Loan window shuts with no money coming in
&#8226; Chances of agreeing settlement with creditors fading



  • Matt Scott
  • The Guardian, Friday 25 March 2011 <li class="history">Article history
    Plymouth-Argyle-Home-Park-007.jpg
    Players and staff at Plymouth are operating without wages as the Home Park club struggles with its finances. Photograph: Stephen Pond/Empics Sport Plymouth Argyle's last chance of funding itself through the rest of the season disappeared at 5pm on Thursday with the closure of the loan window. No money came in, since no tradeable players remain after three left in the January transfer window.
    The cash those transfers generated propped up a failing regime for only a few more weeks. Now the chances of the benighted club agreeing an amicable settlement with its creditors are also slipping away. Players and staff are operating without wages but bills such as taking the squad to the next match, at Leyton Orient on Tuesday week, will need to be paid.
    Prospective funding agreements are in place from two potential purchasers &#8211; one of them guaranteeing £1m of cash flow. But they cannot be finalised for as long as Mastpoint, the loans-and-investment vehicle led by Argyle's former chairman, Sir Roy Gardner, and executive director, Keith Todd &#8211; which has a mortgage on Home Park &#8211; refuses to accept the terms, which include deferred payment schedules.
    During talks with the administrator, Brendan Guilfoyle, on Wednesday evening Todd rejected these offers and is understood to have made a counter proposal. This in turn was rejected by both potential purchasers on Thursday, who have reiterated their original demands. Mastpoint, which is made up of 17 named, high-net-worth investors plus a wider base of individuals who put forward loan capital, is understood to be looking for a third potential purchaser.
    There seem to be three possible outcomes. Mastpoint either comes good and produces an alternative buyer, or it relents and accepts the purchasers' offer. The third is for the matter swiftly to head to court. If the administrator fails to persuade the courts that the Mastpoint stance is an unnecessary obstruction then Plymouth are likely to disappear. It has got that bad.
    Price is right for Germans

    German football's safe-standing areas and its 50+1 rule guaranteeing fans always retain a controlling ownership stake have led to the Bundesliga repeatedly being referred to as a utopian land in recent days. But surely the best aspect of German football is its cheap tickets, and these are born of another influence entirely: cost controls. According to Deloitte, in 1996-97 the wages-to-turnover ratio in England's top flight was 48%; in Italy 58%; in Spain 54%; in France 61%; in Germany 50%. Today in England the ratio has risen to 67%, in Italy to 73%, in Spain 63% and France 69%, proving that in these territories cost controls have proved elusive. In Germany the ratio is 51%. That is the 50+1 that counts the most.
    Taxing times

    The big four sports are set to lose more than £1m a year in tax relief on their headquarters as a result of Wednesday's Budget, according to a tax consultant who advises them on their capital allowances. Between them Wembley, Twickenham, Wimbledon and Lord's, have given football, rugby union, tennis and cricket's governing bodies up to £1.5m a year in relief on historical expenditure: money ploughed back into sports' grassroots. But after the Office of Tax Simplification called for abolition of the tax break, George Osborne, below, indicated this week that he will move to a consultation on the issue. The sports tax consultant Stephen Dunham said: "Sport, especially those sports providing the new generation of multi-sport venues, can ill afford to lose this level of cash given the current economic climate."
    Qatari deal could fall flat

    Twenty-four hours after a "multimillion-pound" Qatari sponsorship deal was announced with Flat racing's British Champions Series, Digger can reveal most of the 35 races feeding in to the event are facing a potential boycott over prize money. The Horsemen's Group, which represents the professional interests in racing, has set minimum tariffs for prize money and Sheikh Mohammed's Godolphin team have threatened to pull out of every underfunded race. One BCS board member told Digger that includes "many" on its fixture list. Karl Oliver, the BCS chief executive, stated that in their totality its fixtures are "more than £5m &#8211; or almost 70% &#8211; above tariff".

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom