Man on the moon

[X-PASTER]

As far as I know man never landed on the moon.

Maelezo tafadhali!

 

[Madela Wa- Madilu]

Mpaka leo hakuna mtu ajuaye naman ya kujikinga na Solar wind radiation ambazo zina uwezo wa kuua mtu 10 time pale atokapo nje ya Magnetic shield ya dunia.
Nimeangalia coverage nyingi kuhusu Cosmology na hatari zake na maelezo yasiyopingika juu uwezo wa binadamu kutembea juu ya mwezi huku kavaa space suit tu bila kuathirika na kukaangwa na miozni ya sumu kutoka juani.

Hakuna Technolojia ya kurusha chombo kikubwa cha kubeba watu kutoka kwenye ardhi ya mwezi ili kurudi duniani kama ipo niambie ni technolojia gani hiyo?
Je unabeba fuel kutoka hapa duniani?
Wakati wa kutua unatua vipi ili kuhakikisha kwamba fuel ulobeba inasalimika?
Walibeba tani ngapi za hiyo fuel?

Warusi ambao ndo wakali na mapioneer wa anga za juu wanajua sana juu ya hatari za kwenda huko.

Si kwamba hakufikiki ila ni ukweli usiopingika kwamba technolojia ya kumlinda mtu na miali ya sumu haiko hata hivi niandikapo.

 

[ThinkPad]

Landing on moon mission ilifanyika studio.
Kwanza kama uliangalia pict au video zake utagundua ktk hiyo mazingira kuna shadow za uelekeo tofauti hapo means kulikua na zaidi ya chanzo cha mwanga kimoja.
Alama za kiatu ktk vacuum huwa haziwi strong kwenye moon hakuna wet soil mpaka uache nyayo vizuri.
Bendera haipepei ktk vacuum kama ilivyokuwa kwenye moon studio.
Kutembea kwa kuruka ruka vile inawezekana hata hukiwa kwenye ndege ukiwa umefungwa vitu vizito unaweza kuwa kutembea kama man onthe moon kama ndege jet ikienda ktk mwendo wa wave form.

 

[Shukuru]

Okey guys.... tel us more about that....

so ile ilikuwa ni theory to fool us or what..... I dont trust it.

 

[Shukuru]

Neil Alden Armstrong (born August 5, 1930) is an American aviator and a former astronaut, test pilot, university professor, and United States Naval Aviator. He was the first person to set foot on theMoon. His first spaceflight was aboard Gemini 8 in 1966, for which he was the command pilot. On this mission, he performed the first manned docking of two spacecraft together with pilot David Scott. Armstrong's second and last spaceflight was as mission commander of the Apollo 11 moon landing mission on July 20, 1969. On this mission, Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin descended to the lunar surface and spent 2½ hours exploring while Michael Collins remained in orbit in the Command Module. Armstrong is a recipient of the Congressional Space Medal of Honor.

jamani hizi ni story au adis?​

 

[Bluray]

Yeah right, and Tupac was recently seen in the Lower 9th Ward.

Apollo Moon Landing Hoax: NASA Fact or is it All in Our Heads? - Associated Content

[ame=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Moon_Landing_hoax_conspiracy_theories] - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax: NASA Fact or is it All in Our Heads?
As Time Stretches Between the Present and the Last Apollo Moon Landing, More People Are Beginning to Think it a Hoax
By saul relative
NASA may have given the conspiracy theorists that believe the Apollo moon landings are a hoax a little more ammunition. Believing that the Apollo moon landings were hoaxes is nothing new, but NASA has now admitted that they do not have the original footage of the first lunar landing. They believe they may have actually taped over the original film and now have asked Hollywood effects specialists to restore footage from four source tapes gathered from around the world.
It doesn't take but a handful of people gathered talking about the Apollo moon landing to find at least one person who believes it was all a hoax. The Apollo moon missions landed six lunar modules on the moon between 1969 and 1972. But, according to a Gallup poll taken in 1999, 6% of Americans believed that the Apollo landings were "staged," a public relations stunt set up by the American government to make the Soviet Union, who was also engaged in the space race, look bad in the eyes of the world.
According to CNN, that number may be increasing. A recent poll in the British magazine Engineering & Technology reported that 25% of the respondents did not believe that a human had ever set foot on the moon.
A documentary, "Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?," shown on Fox Television in 2001 attempted to prove that the Apollo moon landings were a hoax, showing many of the supposed inconsistencies in the visuals shown from the lunar landings. The American flag moves in one scene (no wind on the moon), intersecting shadows (suggestive that another light source is present), and no blast craters (propulsion should have left craters) are all used as "evidence." Many believe the enter production was filmed in a huge warehouse in the secret government facility Area 51. And all the supposed lunar rock specimens brought back are actually pristine meteorites from Antarctica.
A poll in 2005-2006 by NASA consultant Mary Lynne Dittmar found that over 25% of young people (ages 18 to 25) had doubts that the Apollo moon landings actually occurred. NASA felt the need to release the statemtent: "As the number of people who were not yet born at the time of the Apollo program increases, the number of questions
So when NASA admitted that they did not have the original footage of the Apollo 11 moon landing, they gave the conspiracy theorists one more piece of ammunition to add to their growing arsenal of negatives. Already believing that the lunar missions were filmed in a warehouse in a fabricated environment, bringing in the restorative experts that restored "Casablanca" added a little more. Continuing the hoax, as it were.
But how did the original moon landing videotape get lost or disappear? NASA officials believe it was taped over because the Apollo 11 moon landing was filmed on reusable film. A simple error erased mankind's greatest achievement.
The other five moon landings were not erased because they were recorded on non-reusable film.
It has been almost four decades since the last man stood on the moon. A couple of generations used to the brilliant and amazing special effects wizardry of Hollywood have no trouble believing that the government, "known" to have technology years in advance of the marketplace, could have staged and filmed a fake moon landing. But with all the footage from the space stations and the shuttles as precedent, would they believe that a future moon landing was a hoax as well?
That remains to be seen.
But for those who watched the Apollo missions, the moon landings, Neil Armstrong's famous "one small step," and all the other transmissions from the moon and subsequent space missions, there never was a hoax. Seeing was believing in 1969. The four decades since have just measured out to be a promise delayed.
Stuart Robbins, a Ph.D. candidate in astrophysics at the University of Colorado, defends NASA against hoax theorists, "Going to the moon and returning astronauts safely back to Earth is arguably one of the most profound achievements in human history, and so when people simply believe it was a hoax, they lose out on that shared experience and doubt what humans can do."
In the end, people believe what the want to believe. It comes down to experience, lack of ignorance, education, perspective, and interpretation.
You can believe that man has walked on the moon.
Or you can believe that the Apollo moon landing was a hoax, just like the band Diamond Rio once sang:

"...Don't ever trust what the government says
We never walked on the moon
Elvis ain't dead
You ain't going crazy
It's all in your head..."
******
Sources:
CNN.com
"It's All In Your Head," Diamond Rio (written by Tony Martin, Van Stephenson, Reese Wilson)

 

[Bluray]

From Wikipedia, as a starting point.

Conspiracy practicality

According to Dr. James Longuski, Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Engineering at Purdue University, the size and complexity of the alleged conspiracy theory scenarios make their veracity an impossibility.[22] More than 400,000 people worked on the Moon landing project for nearly ten years, and a dozen men who walked on the Moon returned to Earth to recount their experiences.[22] Hundreds of thousands of people (astronauts, scientists, engineers, technicians, and skilled laborers) would have had to keep the secret.[22] Longuski also contends that it would have been significantly easier to actually land on the Moon than to generate such a massive conspiracy to fake such a landing.[22]

 

[ThinkPad]

Angalia hii picha vizuri kisha tafakari kwanini huyo mtu na buti zake zisiwe na kimvuli kwanini?

hukiangalia kwa umakini hapo juu ya neno zisiwe kuna kimvuli kimeelekea upande mwingine tena.

You can tell Apollo was faked because ... only two astronauts walked on the moon at a time, yet in photographs such as this one where both are visible, there is no sign of a camera. So who took the picture?

No star

ukiangali hii pics ipo studio ya hiyo kofia.

Ona sasa eangle alitua peacefully onthe moon surface na module is shown sitting on relatively flat, undisturbed soil. According to skeptics, the lander's descent should have been accompanied by a large dust cloud and would have formed a noticeable crate

You can tell Apollo was faked because ... the astronauts' prints are a bit too clear for being made on a bone-dry world. Prints that well defined could only have been made in wet sand.

You can tell Apollo was faked because ... with instruments such as the Hubble Space Telescope capable of peering into the distant recesses of the universe, surely scientists should be able to see the various objects still on the moon. But no such pictures of these objects exist.

The fact of the matter is ... no telescope on Earth or in space has that kind of resolving power. "You can calculate this," Plait said. "Even with the biggest telescope on Earth, the smallest thing you can see on the surface of moon is something bigger than a house."

Man on the moon just myth.

 

[Bluray]

Whats to stop me thinking that the pictures purpoting Apollo was faked were indeed faked?

How do you dispute shadows if you dont know where the source of light is?

The arguments are overly simplistic to warrant a serious rebuttal.

 

[Chapakazi]

It's true, evidence can be fabricated, especially considering the political backdrop at the time (Cold War and Space Race). Lakini nadhani Warusi ndio wangekuwa wa kwanza kujua hii kitu imekuwa fabricated na kutangaza kwa moyo wote. Huwezi kuniambia kuwa waliwakuwa hawajui especially uki-consider spy infiltration waliyokuwa nayo Marekani. For that, i chose to believe Man has been on the moon.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=40E14CFC722E45E3"]YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.[/ame]
Cheki hii playlist kutoka channel ya Discovery - Youtube.

 

[Eqlypz]

Hehehe, Ruskies walijaribu flyby wenzao wakafanya kweli, kama mtoto alivyosema ingekuwa hoax warusi wangeshafumua story nzima na isitoshe katika watu 400,000 walioshiriki kwenye Apollo project lazima mmoja wao angespill the bean.

Hizi evidence mnazotoa bado hazijaniconvince otherwise.

 

[Chapakazi]

You can tell Apollo was faked because ... with instruments such as the Hubble Space Telescope capable of peering into the distant recesses of the universe, surely scientists should be able to see the various objects still on the moon. But no such pictures of these objects exist.

The fact of the matter is ... no telescope on Earth or in space has that kind of resolving power. "You can calculate this," Plait said. "Even with the biggest telescope on Earth, the smallest thing you can see on the surface of moon is something bigger than a house."

Man on the moon just myth.

Na hii je?

New images of Moon landing sites

Science instruments (circled left) and the lunar module lower stage (circled right) are connected by a footprint trail


A US spacecraft has captured images of Apollo landing sites on the Moon, revealing hardware and a trail of footprints left on the lunar surface.
The release of the images coincides with the 40th anniversary of the first manned mission to land on the Moon.
The descent stages from the lunar modules which carried astronauts to and from the Moon can clearly be seen.
The image of the Apollo 14 landing site shows scientific instruments and an astronaut footpath in the lunar dust.
It is the first time hardware left on the Moon by the Apollo missions has been seen from lunar orbit.
The pictures were taken by Nasa's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) spacecraft, which launched on 18 June.

The Apollo 11 mission touched down on the Moon on 20 July 1969

The spacecraft is carrying three cameras on board: one low-resolution wide-angle camera and two high-resolution narrow-angle cameras mounted side-by-side.
These are known collectively as the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) instrument.
"The LROC team anxiously awaited each image," said the instrument's principal investigator Mark Robinson of Arizona State University.
"We were very interested in getting our first peek at the lunar module descent stages just for the thrill - and to see how well the cameras had come into focus. Indeed, the images are fantastic and so is the focus."
Astronaut trail
The camera instrument was able to capture five of the six Apollo sites, with the remaining Apollo 12 site expected to be photographed in the coming weeks.
Future LROC images from these sites will have two to three times greater resolution.
Long shadows from a low sun angle make the locations of the lunar modules' descent stages particularly evident.
The image of the Apollo 14 landing site had a particularly desirable lighting condition that revealed additional details.
The Apollo Lunar Surface Experiment Package, a set of scientific instruments placed by the astronauts at the landing site, is discernable, as are the faint trails between the module and instrument package left by the astronauts' footprints.
The LRO satellite reached lunar orbit on June 23 and captured the Apollo sites between July 11 and 15.
Though it had been expected that LRO would be able to resolve the remnants of the Apollo mission, these first images were taken before the spacecraft reached its final mapping orbit.
"Not only do these images reveal the great accomplishments of Apollo, they also show us that lunar exploration continues," said LRO project scientist Richard Vondrak of Nasa's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, US.
"They demonstrate how LRO will be used to identify the best destinations for the next journeys to the Moon."
Although the pictures provide a reminder of past lunar exploration, LRO's primary focus is on paving the way for the future.
Data returned by the mission will help Nasa identify safe landing sites for future explorers, locate potential resources, describe the Moon's radiation environment and demonstrate new technologies.

 

[Eqlypz]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHJ77RsnFXI]YouTube - Moon in Google Earth[/ame]

 

[Chapakazi]

Angalia hii picha vizuri kisha tafakari kwanini huyo mtu na buti zake zisiwe na kimvuli kwanini?

hukiangalia kwa umakini hapo juu ya neno zisiwe kuna kimvuli kimeelekea upande mwingine tena.

You can tell Apollo was faked because ... only two astronauts walked on the moon at a time, yet in photographs such as this one where both are visible, there is no sign of a camera. So who took the picture?

No star

ukiangali hii pics ipo studio ya hiyo kofia.

Ona sasa eangle alitua peacefully onthe moon surface na module is shown sitting on relatively flat, undisturbed soil. According to skeptics, the lander's descent should have been accompanied by a large dust cloud and would have formed a noticeable crate

You can tell Apollo was faked because ... the astronauts' prints are a bit too clear for being made on a bone-dry world. Prints that well defined could only have been made in wet sand.

You can tell Apollo was faked because ... with instruments such as the Hubble Space Telescope capable of peering into the distant recesses of the universe, surely scientists should be able to see the various objects still on the moon. But no such pictures of these objects exist.

The fact of the matter is ... no telescope on Earth or in space has that kind of resolving power. "You can calculate this," Plait said. "Even with the biggest telescope on Earth, the smallest thing you can see on the surface of moon is something bigger than a house."

Man on the moon just myth.

Mkuu, majibu ya hoax zako zote ulizotaja hapo zinapatikana hapa PHOTOS: 8 Moon-Landing Hoax Myths -- Busted

 

[agika]

Wakuuu mie naomba nishukuru kwa niaba ya wenzangu kama mimi kama wapo. nilikuwa ignorant kabisa na hii kitu ila kubishana kwenu kihoja kumenisaidia sana , na kwakweli naunga mkono hoja aslimia mia moja hizo hoja zinakubali kwamba kweli mwanadamu kafika mwezini,

 

[Osaka]

its forty years since man set foot on the moon.Ever since the man in question,Neil Armstrong has become a virtual recluse-shunning publicity,a loner etc etc.They say he is a confused individual due to-AS HE SET FOOT ON THE LUNAR SURFACE-he heard the muslim call to prayer"ALLAH AKBAR"booming in the vicinity-this call vibrates in his head to this day-he is torn between the faiths-they say he has converted

I see!

 

[Iselamagazi]

Hehehe, Ruskies walijaribu flyby wenzao wakafanya kweli, kama mtoto alivyosema ingekuwa hoax warusi wangeshafumua story nzima na isitoshe katika watu 400,000 walioshiriki kwenye Apollo project lazima mmoja wao angespill the bean.

Hizi evidence mnazotoa bado hazijaniconvince otherwise.

Ni mwaka wa 50 sasa tangu tukio hili lenye mashaka lilipofanyika. Pamoja na teknolojia kuwa kubwa sasa, mbona hawajarudi kunako mwezi?

 

[Mad Max]

Earth is FLAT.