Jus a msg

Jus a msg

Mshana Jr

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2012
Posts
376,456
Reaction score
872,090
1406648483028.jpg
 

No, I think you can, because of the fact that you still have the ability to read; you have the book and at your own discretion, are able and free to go to the next or previous chapters of your book.

I guess, rather than saying:

YOU CAN'T START THE NEXT CHAPTER OF YOUR LIFE IF YOU KEEP ON RE-READING THE CURRENT ONE (rather than saying the LAST as you have suggested, because if someone is reading the last chapter, there naturally cannot exist the NEXT ONE for him/her to go to because the chapter is the last).

You would better rephrase your statement to:

YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO START THE NEXT CHAPTER OF YOUR LIFE IF YOU KEEP ON RE-READING THE CURRENT ONE
 
No, I think you can, because of the fact that you still have the ability to read; you have the book and at your own discretion, are able and free to go to the next or previous chapters of your book.

I guess, rather than saying:

YOU CAN'T START THE NEXT CHAPTER OF YOUR LIFE IF YOU KEEP ON RE-READING THE CURRENT ONE (rather than saying the LAST as you have suggested, because if someone is reading the last chapter, there naturally cannot exist the NEXT ONE for him/her to go to because the chapter is the last).

You would better rephrase your statement to:

YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO START THE NEXT CHAPTER OF YOUR LIFE IF YOU KEEP ON RE-READING THE CURRENT ONE

Thanks but I believe there are many ways to deliver the same msg
 
Thanks but I believe there are many ways to deliver the same msg

Yes, I agree there can be more than one way of delivering the SAME MESSAGE with the SAME MEANING, but be careful that the meaning of the message I suggested is not the same as that of yours, but I guess you intended to mean what I have suggested, implying that you originally did not probably, perfectly convey the meaning you wanted. However, I stand here just as an-would-be editor if it were a book and you would still hold all the credits of an author. Thanks very much for the idea!
 
Yes, I agree there can be more than one way of delivering the SAME MESSAGE with the SAME MEANING, but be careful that the meaning of the message I suggested is not the same as that of yours, but I guess you intended to mean what I have suggested, implying that you originally did not probably, perfectly convey the meaning you wanted. However, I stand here just as an-would-be editor if it were a book and you would still hold all the credits of an author. Thanks very much for the idea!

Thanks again nimekuelewa vizuri
 
Back
Top Bottom