Mlaleo
JF-Expert Member
- Oct 11, 2011
- 16,379
- 13,196
Habari kutoka Ghana zinasema Hakuna kitu kinachoitwa Ebola zaidi Mataifa ya Nje yanataka kuiba utajili wa africa tu kwani wote waliokufa walipigwa sindano na chama cha Red Cross kwani hawajaona watu wakifa au kuugua kama inavyotangazwa na cnn.
Sasa tuone watu wenye kuugua huo ugonjwa wanasemaje... au ndio maana hapa kwetu haujafika kama ule ugonjwa wa Homa ya Dengue
Home » news » From Ghana: Ebola is not real and the only people who have gotten sick are those who got shots from the red cross
From Ghana: Ebola is not real and the only people who have gotten sick are those who got shots from the red cross
19:14
දුටුනොදුටු
Editors note - This is not the editors opinion but the original author. The idea behind sharing this is to create a dialogue on activities of Red Cross in Africa & Missionary groups. It is not the first time the Christian movements claimed that US led powers are trying to control population in Africa for various reasons. Specially, Gates foundation was accused for carrying out various programmes to vaccinate African babies.
It may look like a conspiracy theory and in truth both Red Cross and Gates foundation may have a noble vision to create a better Africa. We know United States and Cuba are the two countries who have risked the most by sending health workers. Editor would like to hear your opinion on this piece which is going viral right now. Pleas note once more, sole purpose of sharing this is to create a dialogue and to hear our reader's perspective on same.
Other than the original facebook post, this web site is the first one to carry this and it needs to be spread, the future may be riding on this one, ARCHIVE, POST POST AND RE-POST!
Nana Kwame wrote:
People in the Western World need to know what's happening here in West Africa. THEY ARE LYING!!! "Ebola" as a virus does NOT Exist and is NOT "Spread". The Red Cross has brought a disease to 4 specificcountries for 4 specific reasons and it is only contracted by those who receive treatments and injections from the Red Cross. That is why Liberians and Nigerians have begun kicking the Red Cross out of their countries and reporting in the news the truth. Now bear with me:
REASONS:
Most people jump to "depopulation" which is no doubt always on the mind of the West when it comes to Africa. But I assure you Africa can NEVER be depopulated by killing 160 people a day when thousands are born per day. So the real reasons are much more tangible.
Reason 1:
This vaccine implemented sickness being "called" Ebola was introduced into West Africa for the end goal of getting troops on the ground in Nigeria, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. If you remember America was just trying to get into Nigeria for "Boko Haram" #BULLSHIT but that fell apart when Nigerians started telling the truth. There ARE NO GIRLS MISSING. Global support fell through the floor, and a new reason was needed to get troops into Nigeria and steal the new oil reserves they have discovered.
Reason 2:
Sierra Leone is the World's Largest Supplier of Diamonds. For the past 4 months they have been on strike, refusing to provide diamonds due to horrible working conditions and slave pay. The West will not pay a fair wage for the resources because the idea is to keep these people surviving on rice bags and foreign aid so that they remain a source of cheap slave labor forever. A reason was also needed to get troops on the ground in Sierra Leone to force an end to the diamond miners strikes. This is not the first time this has been done. When miners refuse to work troops are sent in and even if they have to kill and replace them all, the only desire is to get diamonds back flowing out of the country.
Of course to launch multiple campaigns to invade these countries separately would be way too fishy. But something like "Ebola" allows access to an entire area simultaneously…
Reason 3:
In addition to stealing Nigerian oil, and forcing Sierra Leone back to mining, troops have also been sent in to FORCE vaccinations (Deadly "Ebola" Poison) onto those Africans who are not foolish enough to take them willingly.
3000 troops are being sent in to make sure that this "poison" continues to spread, because again it is only spread through vaccination. As more and more news articles are released as they have been in Liberia, informing the populous of the US lies and manipulation, more and more Africans are refusing to visit the Red Cross. Troops will force these vaccinations upon the people to ensure the visible appearance of an Ebola pandemic. In addition to this they will protect the Red Cross from the Liberians and Nigerians who have been rightfully ejecting them from their countries.
Reason 4:
Last but not least, the APPEARANCE of this Ebola "pandemic" (should Americans not catch on) will be used to scare the countless millions into taking an "Ebola vaccine" which in reality is the pandemic. Already they have started with stories of how it has been brought to the U.S. and has appeared in Dallas, how white doctors were cured but black infected are not being allowed to be treated, etc.
ALL that will do is make blacks STRIVE to get the vaccine, because it appears that the "cure" is being held back from blacks. They will run out in droves to get it and then there will be serious problems. With all we have seen revealed about vaccines this year you would think we learned our lesson. All I can do is hope so, Because they rely on our ignorance to complete their agendas.
Ask yourself:
If Ebola really was spread from person to person, instead of controlled spread through vaccination – then WHY would the CDC and the US Government continue to allow flights in and out of these countries with absolutely no regulation, Or At All? We have got to start thinking and sharing information globally because they do not give the true perspective of the people who live here in West Africa. They are lying for their own benefit and there aren't enough voices out there with a platform to help share our reality. Hundreds of thousands have been killed, paralyzed and disabled by these and other "new" vaccines all over the world and we are finally becoming aware of it. Now what will we do with all this information?
Reference: Jim Stone Freelance via theeventchronicle.com | themindawakened.com
Read more at From Ghana: Ebola is not real and the only people who have gotten sick are those who got shots from the red cross - Living Buddhism
[video]<iframe width="640" height="390" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/1ZonCVRQ-2s" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>[/video]
We're Not Ghana Take It
Claim: The Ebola virus doesn't exist, victims of the disease previously got "shots" from the Red Cross, and the Ebola crisis was invented to rob Africa of her natural resources.
Examples: [Collected via e-mail, October 2014]
There is an article running around saying the people contacting ebola are those getting injections from the Red Cross. Here's a link to the story I saw.
From Ghana: Ebola is not real and the only people who have gotten sick are those who got shots from the red cross.
as The Red Cross is not a US organisation this claim appears flawed, could Snopes look into it please.
Hello. Came across this article. Wanted to know its validity. It says that ebola is fake, but doesn't look like satire. Any help is greatly appreciated
Origins: When the Ebola virus leapt onto front pages across
the globe in 2014, a great deal of confusion and uncertainty followed its seemingly sudden appearance. Ebola's relatively high mortality rate and eventual spread to a small number of patients in the United States brought with alacrity what was only recently a far-flung nightmare to the Western world's doorstep.
Whispers of a global conspiracy have dogged the 2014 outbreak of Ebola: the FEMA coffins rumor was attached to the story, buzz over forced vaccinations circulated, and allegations that an airborne strain of mutated Ebola exists are among some of the fears articulated by web users.
On 8 October 2014, a man identifying himself as a nurse in Ghana named Nana Kwame posted a Facebook note titled "Ebo-LIE." In the post, Kwame described an understandable climate of fear surrounding the Ebola outbreak of 2014 in his home country.
Kwame's Facebook post was quickly picked up by a number of conspiracy blogs. In his writing, Kwame laid out a number of reasons he believes "Ebola is fake." Himself aware of conspiracy rhetoric, Kwame rejected common "depopulation" claims in favor of a less-obvious subterfuge across several numbered points:
Kwame's post continued by asserting:
Ebola was first identified by researchers in 1976: an outbreak that year in South Sudan infected 284 people, 151 of whom died of the newly-identified virus. Experts have since surmised the 1976 outbreak in South Sudan infected relatively few victims because it was so virulent and deadly that "it killed people so fast that they didn't have much time to infect other people before they died." In addition, Ebola is only one of a number of hemorrhagic fevers known to medical science and is therefore not a unique horror unleashed on Africa.
While Kwame's suspicions of military intervention in Africa are understandable, they also begin to unravel when the history of Ebola is considered. An outbreak occurred in the Democratic Republic of Congo in 1995, and again in Uganda in 2000. A 2002-03 Ebola outbreak in Congo ultimately killed 90 percent of those who became infected with that strain.
Additional outbreaks of Ebola have occurred between its discovery in 1976 and the emergence of the strain that began to circulate in December 2013. None of these situations was used to steal oil, grab control of the diamond trade, or force vaccinations onto African people. Furthermore, the Red Cross itself is not solely an American humanitarian effort, nor is it an extension of, or an affiliate for, U.S. military branches. The International Committee of the Red Cross is a global entity with multiple initiatives spanning efforts towards hunger eradication, providing assistance to war zones, and aiding those affected by natural disasters. And anyone administering vaccinations for Ebola would automatically be suspect, as no known vaccine for Ebola exists, and all such treatment for the disease is currently considered "experimental."
What Kwame referenced in his post appears to be standard vaccinations, not vaccines specific to Ebola:
Another development in the 2014 Ebola outbreak weakened the claim that Ebola is fake illness spread through Red Cross vaccines: Two American nurses (Nina Pham and Amber Vinson) became infected with the virus while caring for patient Thomas Eric Duncan. Presumably neither woman received Red Cross vaccinations in Africa, yet both tested positive for Ebola.
Last updated: 16 October 2014
Urban Legends Reference Pages © 1995-2014 by snopes.com.
This material may not be reproduced without permission.
snopes and the snopes.com logo are registered service marks of snopes.com.
Buckwalter-Poza, Rebecca. "The Scariest Virus: Ebola Is Back, and It's Worse Than Ever." Pacific Standard. 2 August 2014. Cohen, Jon and Kai Kupferschmidt. "Tough Choices Ahead in Ebola Vaccine Trials." AAAS Science Insider. 7 October 2014. Johnson, Eric. "Blood Diamonds: The Conflict in Sierra Leone." EDGE. 6 December 2002.
Read more at snopes.com: Ebola Is Fake, Ghana Fights Back
Sasa tuone watu wenye kuugua huo ugonjwa wanasemaje... au ndio maana hapa kwetu haujafika kama ule ugonjwa wa Homa ya Dengue
Home » news » From Ghana: Ebola is not real and the only people who have gotten sick are those who got shots from the red cross
From Ghana: Ebola is not real and the only people who have gotten sick are those who got shots from the red cross
19:14
දුටුනොදුටු
Editors note - This is not the editors opinion but the original author. The idea behind sharing this is to create a dialogue on activities of Red Cross in Africa & Missionary groups. It is not the first time the Christian movements claimed that US led powers are trying to control population in Africa for various reasons. Specially, Gates foundation was accused for carrying out various programmes to vaccinate African babies.
It may look like a conspiracy theory and in truth both Red Cross and Gates foundation may have a noble vision to create a better Africa. We know United States and Cuba are the two countries who have risked the most by sending health workers. Editor would like to hear your opinion on this piece which is going viral right now. Pleas note once more, sole purpose of sharing this is to create a dialogue and to hear our reader's perspective on same.
Other than the original facebook post, this web site is the first one to carry this and it needs to be spread, the future may be riding on this one, ARCHIVE, POST POST AND RE-POST!
Nana Kwame wrote:
People in the Western World need to know what's happening here in West Africa. THEY ARE LYING!!! "Ebola" as a virus does NOT Exist and is NOT "Spread". The Red Cross has brought a disease to 4 specificcountries for 4 specific reasons and it is only contracted by those who receive treatments and injections from the Red Cross. That is why Liberians and Nigerians have begun kicking the Red Cross out of their countries and reporting in the news the truth. Now bear with me:
REASONS:
Most people jump to "depopulation" which is no doubt always on the mind of the West when it comes to Africa. But I assure you Africa can NEVER be depopulated by killing 160 people a day when thousands are born per day. So the real reasons are much more tangible.
Reason 1:
This vaccine implemented sickness being "called" Ebola was introduced into West Africa for the end goal of getting troops on the ground in Nigeria, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. If you remember America was just trying to get into Nigeria for "Boko Haram" #BULLSHIT but that fell apart when Nigerians started telling the truth. There ARE NO GIRLS MISSING. Global support fell through the floor, and a new reason was needed to get troops into Nigeria and steal the new oil reserves they have discovered.
Reason 2:
Sierra Leone is the World's Largest Supplier of Diamonds. For the past 4 months they have been on strike, refusing to provide diamonds due to horrible working conditions and slave pay. The West will not pay a fair wage for the resources because the idea is to keep these people surviving on rice bags and foreign aid so that they remain a source of cheap slave labor forever. A reason was also needed to get troops on the ground in Sierra Leone to force an end to the diamond miners strikes. This is not the first time this has been done. When miners refuse to work troops are sent in and even if they have to kill and replace them all, the only desire is to get diamonds back flowing out of the country.
Of course to launch multiple campaigns to invade these countries separately would be way too fishy. But something like "Ebola" allows access to an entire area simultaneously…
Reason 3:
In addition to stealing Nigerian oil, and forcing Sierra Leone back to mining, troops have also been sent in to FORCE vaccinations (Deadly "Ebola" Poison) onto those Africans who are not foolish enough to take them willingly.
3000 troops are being sent in to make sure that this "poison" continues to spread, because again it is only spread through vaccination. As more and more news articles are released as they have been in Liberia, informing the populous of the US lies and manipulation, more and more Africans are refusing to visit the Red Cross. Troops will force these vaccinations upon the people to ensure the visible appearance of an Ebola pandemic. In addition to this they will protect the Red Cross from the Liberians and Nigerians who have been rightfully ejecting them from their countries.
Reason 4:
Last but not least, the APPEARANCE of this Ebola "pandemic" (should Americans not catch on) will be used to scare the countless millions into taking an "Ebola vaccine" which in reality is the pandemic. Already they have started with stories of how it has been brought to the U.S. and has appeared in Dallas, how white doctors were cured but black infected are not being allowed to be treated, etc.
ALL that will do is make blacks STRIVE to get the vaccine, because it appears that the "cure" is being held back from blacks. They will run out in droves to get it and then there will be serious problems. With all we have seen revealed about vaccines this year you would think we learned our lesson. All I can do is hope so, Because they rely on our ignorance to complete their agendas.
Ask yourself:
If Ebola really was spread from person to person, instead of controlled spread through vaccination – then WHY would the CDC and the US Government continue to allow flights in and out of these countries with absolutely no regulation, Or At All? We have got to start thinking and sharing information globally because they do not give the true perspective of the people who live here in West Africa. They are lying for their own benefit and there aren't enough voices out there with a platform to help share our reality. Hundreds of thousands have been killed, paralyzed and disabled by these and other "new" vaccines all over the world and we are finally becoming aware of it. Now what will we do with all this information?
Reference: Jim Stone Freelance via theeventchronicle.com | themindawakened.com
Read more at From Ghana: Ebola is not real and the only people who have gotten sick are those who got shots from the red cross - Living Buddhism
[video]<iframe width="640" height="390" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/1ZonCVRQ-2s" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>[/video]
We're Not Ghana Take It
Claim: The Ebola virus doesn't exist, victims of the disease previously got "shots" from the Red Cross, and the Ebola crisis was invented to rob Africa of her natural resources.
| FALSE |
Examples: [Collected via e-mail, October 2014]
There is an article running around saying the people contacting ebola are those getting injections from the Red Cross. Here's a link to the story I saw.
From Ghana: Ebola is not real and the only people who have gotten sick are those who got shots from the red cross.
as The Red Cross is not a US organisation this claim appears flawed, could Snopes look into it please.
Hello. Came across this article. Wanted to know its validity. It says that ebola is fake, but doesn't look like satire. Any help is greatly appreciated
Origins: When the Ebola virus leapt onto front pages across
| |
Whispers of a global conspiracy have dogged the 2014 outbreak of Ebola: the FEMA coffins rumor was attached to the story, buzz over forced vaccinations circulated, and allegations that an airborne strain of mutated Ebola exists are among some of the fears articulated by web users.
On 8 October 2014, a man identifying himself as a nurse in Ghana named Nana Kwame posted a Facebook note titled "Ebo-LIE." In the post, Kwame described an understandable climate of fear surrounding the Ebola outbreak of 2014 in his home country.
Kwame's Facebook post was quickly picked up by a number of conspiracy blogs. In his writing, Kwame laid out a number of reasons he believes "Ebola is fake." Himself aware of conspiracy rhetoric, Kwame rejected common "depopulation" claims in favor of a less-obvious subterfuge across several numbered points:
Reason 1: This vaccine implemented sickness being "called" Ebola was introduced into West Africa for the end goal of getting troops on the ground in Nigeria, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. If you remember America was just trying to get into Nigeria for "Boko Haram" #BULLSHIT but that fell apart when Nigerians started telling the truth. There ARE NO GIRLS MISSING. Global support fell through the floor, and a new reason was needed to get troops into Nigeria and steal the new oil reserves they have discovered.
The Boko Haram kidnappings referenced by Kwame occurred on 14-15 April 2014 at the Government Secondary School in Chibok, Nigeria. A total of 276 female students were kidnapped, and 200 of those girls remain missing. However, the 2014 Ebola outbreak predates the Boko Haram kidnapping and began in December 2013. Had the Ebola outbreak been a plan B smokescreen, it would have been unleashed after the "fake" kidnappings were announced, not before.Kwame's post continued by asserting:
Reason 2: Sierra Leone is the World's Largest Supplier of Diamonds. For the past 4 months they have been on strike, refusing to provide diamonds due to horrible working conditions and slave pay. The West will not pay a fair wage for the resources because the idea is to keep these people surviving on rice bags and foreign aid so that they remain a source of cheap slave labor forever. A reason was also needed to get troops on the ground in Sierra Leone to force an end to the diamond miners strikes. This is not the first time this has been done. When miners refuse to work troops are sent in and even if they have to kill and replace them all, the only desire is to get diamonds back flowing out of the country.
Of course to launch multiple campaigns to invade these countries separately would be way too fishy. But something like "Ebola" allows access to an entire area simultaneously ...
Reason 3: In addition to stealing Nigerian oil, and forcing Sierra Leone back to mining, troops have also been sent in to FORCE vaccinations (Deadly "Ebola" Poison) onto those Africans who are not foolish enough to take them willingly.
It's fair to say Africa has been historically exploited for its abundant natural resources, and the diamond trade is notoriously corrupt and conflict-ridden. However, Ebola did not appear recently, nor is a surge in infections a new development for the virus.Of course to launch multiple campaigns to invade these countries separately would be way too fishy. But something like "Ebola" allows access to an entire area simultaneously ...
Reason 3: In addition to stealing Nigerian oil, and forcing Sierra Leone back to mining, troops have also been sent in to FORCE vaccinations (Deadly "Ebola" Poison) onto those Africans who are not foolish enough to take them willingly.
Ebola was first identified by researchers in 1976: an outbreak that year in South Sudan infected 284 people, 151 of whom died of the newly-identified virus. Experts have since surmised the 1976 outbreak in South Sudan infected relatively few victims because it was so virulent and deadly that "it killed people so fast that they didn't have much time to infect other people before they died." In addition, Ebola is only one of a number of hemorrhagic fevers known to medical science and is therefore not a unique horror unleashed on Africa.
While Kwame's suspicions of military intervention in Africa are understandable, they also begin to unravel when the history of Ebola is considered. An outbreak occurred in the Democratic Republic of Congo in 1995, and again in Uganda in 2000. A 2002-03 Ebola outbreak in Congo ultimately killed 90 percent of those who became infected with that strain.
Additional outbreaks of Ebola have occurred between its discovery in 1976 and the emergence of the strain that began to circulate in December 2013. None of these situations was used to steal oil, grab control of the diamond trade, or force vaccinations onto African people. Furthermore, the Red Cross itself is not solely an American humanitarian effort, nor is it an extension of, or an affiliate for, U.S. military branches. The International Committee of the Red Cross is a global entity with multiple initiatives spanning efforts towards hunger eradication, providing assistance to war zones, and aiding those affected by natural disasters. And anyone administering vaccinations for Ebola would automatically be suspect, as no known vaccine for Ebola exists, and all such treatment for the disease is currently considered "experimental."
What Kwame referenced in his post appears to be standard vaccinations, not vaccines specific to Ebola:
3000 troops are being sent in to make sure that this "poison" continues to spread, because again it is only spread through vaccination. As more and more news articles are released as they have been in Liberia, informing the populous of the US lies and manipulation, more and more Africans are refusing to visit the Red Cross. Troops will force these vaccinations upon the people to ensure the visible appearance of an Ebola pandemic. In addition to this they will protect the Red Cross from the Liberians and Nigerians who have been rightfully ejecting them from their countries.
The World Health Organization (WHO) is heavily involved in providing vaccines for many illnesses in Africa. Initiatives to vaccinate children in sub-Saharan Africa have resulted in tremendous gains in reducing infant and childhood mortality, and this progress stands to be significantly impeded if fears of Ebola transmission inhibit vaccine acceptance.Another development in the 2014 Ebola outbreak weakened the claim that Ebola is fake illness spread through Red Cross vaccines: Two American nurses (Nina Pham and Amber Vinson) became infected with the virus while caring for patient Thomas Eric Duncan. Presumably neither woman received Red Cross vaccinations in Africa, yet both tested positive for Ebola.
Last updated: 16 October 2014
Urban Legends Reference Pages © 1995-2014 by snopes.com.
This material may not be reproduced without permission.
snopes and the snopes.com logo are registered service marks of snopes.com.
Read more at snopes.com: Ebola Is Fake, Ghana Fights Back

