Don't you know the meaning of Hypothesis?
How can Hirji use hypothetical data to justify his critique? It is absurd!!! And you Nguruvi3 and your brothers in arms against Prof. M. Said are just pathetic bunch of diehards advocating the status quo and you want others to play parrots. It is pathetic!!
Prof. Karim Hirji ameandika kisomi sana,hajabeba jazba za kidini. Hivi ndivyo namna wasomi wanavyotakiwa kujitofautisha na walalamishi.
Alhabiby GS,
Prof anashindwa kutofautisha baina ya MAU MAU na MAJI MAJI.
:heh: :heh:
Chakochangu,
Hayo ni maoni yako na labda una ushahidi.
Mimi nimeandika kitabu kizima na nimetoa ushahidi wangu.
Napenda unifahamishe.
Hivi haya unayoyasoma hapa kwangu ulipata kuyasoma kokote
kabla?
Prof. Hirji hana ukweli wa kunitia mimi uchungu.
Mimi nimezaliwa na hao walioasisi TANU na wakapigania uhuru
wa Tanganyika.
Nayajua ambayo yeye hawezi kuyafahamu ila mimi nimweleze.
We kichwa upande nakushauri ukae pembeni usubiri sehemu za kusherehesha ushehereshe, this is big for you.
Hivi ukiambiwa useme ulipoona pamepotoshwa utaweza au upambe tu ? Hahaha eti pale ulipopotosha.
Nyie watu tukiwasisitiza mwende shule mnasema tunawatusi.
Mohamed Said
Prof yupo jamvini, njoo uongee naye kama ulivyohitaji siku mbili zilizopita
Mi nilidhani elimu bora ni ile inayokufanya kuwa mjinga?"Professor" kishakiri hapa hapa jamvini, tena post yake ya kwanza kwa jina lake, unless iwe si yeye kwani si verified member aliyejiita Hirji, kuwa alichokileta jamvini kina makosa na siyo full version na kaomba msamaha kwa hilo. Sasa unataka Mohamed Said ajibu nini zaidi?
Hivi hizo shule huwa mnaenda kusomea ujinga?
Kuna watu 'wanalewa' hivyo fikra zao mpaka wanakufa zitaegemea udini.
Kuna watu wanaamini maisha ni rushwa bila rushwa hamna maendeleo binafsi na familia
Kuna watu ambao wanaamini katika haki na usawa, hawapendelei dini yoyote, mtu au kikundi cha watu katika kufanya maamuzi.
Kuna watu wengine ni kupinga tu hata ukimkuta anakula atapinga, pia wapo watu wa aina nyingine
Hivyo basi wale walio na mitazano ya kuegamia upande fulani ili mradi tu huwa ni watu wabaya na ndiyo chanzo cha hata migogoro. Prof hirji yuko sahihi sana
Mi nilidhani elimu bora ni ile inayokufanya kuwa mjinga?
Mkuu, Heshima yako pokea.
Mimi ntakuuliza swali moja tu.
Hivi bila binaadamu kuwapo Uislamu hauwezi kuwapo?
Una haki ya kudhani chochote udhaniacho. Upo huru.
Wamalize wote halafu utapata jibu. Unangoja nini?
Don't you know the meaning of Hypothesis?
How can Hirji use hypothetical data to justify his critique? It is absurd!!! And you Nguruvi3 and your brothers in arms against Prof. M. Said are just pathetic bunch of diehards advocating the status quo and you want others to play parrots. It is pathetic!!
Teh teh teh!
Leo Kondoo mlevi anamuhimiza Muungwana kwenda shule? Dahh!
Dunia inaekea mwisho.
Wewe na Mchumba wako Nyakageni mnaweza kutusaidia ufahamu wa kiwango cha elimu yenu? Au hicho kipaimara pia imeshakuwa ni Elimu!
Mlevi nuksi wewe!
Kwa muda mrefu tumemueleza Mohamed kuwa anachoandika ni ukweli wa majina uliofungwa katika hisia na yeye kuita historia. Ndio maana, unapompa Mohamed kipande hicho hapo juu, hawezi ku-critique achilia mbali kujibu au kuzungumzia.
Mohamed, njoo hapa utupe upande wa Pili wa kipande hicho hapojuu. Kama unaafiki au unatofauti.
Dude, Prof Hirji's use of the so-called "hypothetical data" was for illustration purposes only as he clearly says so himself.
"Hypothetically...Data...", imaginary "four people" who "interpreted" the "hypothetically...data...", with imaginary questions and imaginary answers, you call that "ukweli"?
Mau Mau kapigana na Mjerumani, tena anasingiziwa kuwa Mohamed Said kaandika hivyo, ndiyo ukweli huo unaotaka Al Alama Mohamed Said aje kuujibu?
Amma kwa hakika upunguani ni jadi kwa wengine.
na omba msamaha wenu. Haata profesa anaweza kufanya kosa la kitoto. Maana yangu ilikuwa
maji maji lakini kwa haraka niliandika mau mau.
Lakini kosa dogo kimoja kama hilo haliwezi kupindua logic na ukweli wa makala mzima.
Ni wale ambao hawataki kufikiria mambo kwa kiundani ndiyo watayanganganyia makosa madogo
madogo.
Prof. Karim hiri
Dr Hirji KF,
I read with sadness your cheap argument/critique. But, more importantly, you too admitted that Dr Mohamed Said writings are not missing crucial facts!
I also noticed with horror your absurd comparison of unrelated phenomena, historical facts and/or triangular injustices!? Daah!
I just noted though, now you are trying to claim that your own article/critique to be "not the full version"!? Also you are "sorry" for mislead all of us by inserted a Maumau struggle at the place of Majimaji Warriors!?...that can't be just a typographical error, as you claimed!? Come on Professor, this is becoming too childish! Daah! Teeh! Teeh! Teeeh!
You sound bit exhausted and despair, Professor!? Where is your standard gonne,Sir!? Only few years of retirement taking its toll!?
It is allowed to have an opinion...however, simply having an opinion about a given topic and/or subject is not enough. You should know this, Prof Hirji!? Daah! So next time if you feel need to effectively criticize someone else's work/article, you must be educated enough about the particular topic/subject...Ok Sir!?
Your argument is the fallacy of relative privation, I mean is a form of the moral equivalence fallacy that takes note of the existence of things that are worse than what is actually under discussion, for different purposes...as outlined above from your critique/article.
I think it's popular with retired Professors, like yourself...who know perfectly well they're doing something wrong, being fully aware that they're doing something wrong...but, they feel compelled to attempt to justify it and do so by pointing to other(usually worse) actions and/or incidents! Daah!
Probably you have few different "valid" reasons why want to pull "a not as bad as" comparison!?
However, you put your argument in a more vulnerable position. Your explanation/s not only cheap to come from someone of your calibre, but the most blatantly fallacious form of the argument and is a hindsight version of the "not as bad as" argument, that states past actions can legitimise current actions!?
The existence of a worse or similar atrocity in the past and/or currently, however, doesn't actually justify anything...it merely point out that there have been similar thing in the past.
People like you Dr Hirji, who use this kind of argument as a justification may well be aware that it's fallacious but still use it as purely rhetoric or as a distraction!?
Or even worse...probably you decided to use this kind of absurd argument in your critique as a particularly underhanded emotional appeal, in an attempt to guilt-trip Dr Mohamed Said, in order to have him stop voicing his legitimate claim/s and/or his writings!? I'm afraid it is too late now, Professor!
Ahsanta sana!
This kind of half-ass attempt won't convince nobody. You'll need to do a whole lot more work than the gibberish above if you seriously intend to challenge Prof Hirji's thesis.