Aliyekiri kumuua mpenzi wake aachiwa huru

[balibabambonahi]

Nadhani wakipatikana watu wa kukata rufaa na kuisimamia hiyo kesi huyu Jamaa anaenda jela maisha.

Ataenda vipi jela wakati ushahidi umeshindwa kukidhi vigezo vya ushahidi usiotia chembe ya shaka? Comfession na admission siyo conclusive evidence kwamba mtuhumiwa aliua na aliua maliciously.

 

[balibabambonahi]

Muuwaji anakiri alafu Hakimu anasema hakuna ushahidi wa kutoshaa...!! Aibuuuu

Hizo ni admission na comfession zinahitaji ushahidi wa Jamuhuri ili kumpata mtuhiwa na hatia.

 

[balibabambonahi]

Mambo ya sheria hayaenda hivyo kama unavyodhani.

Mahakama ya rufaa ni procedural court. And actually mahakama zote ni procedural courts.

Ndio maana inaitwa mahakama ya sheria. (court of LAW).

Hakuna kutia tia huruma wala blah blah za laymen kule....

The court operates upon procedures. Sio mafeelings ya watu.

Mzigo unalalia kwa Jamuhuri kuthibisha kwa ushahidi usiotia shaka .Watu humu wanaogea kwa kutumia hisia tu utadhan mahakama ni kibanda umiza.

 

[mgunga pori]

Wakate rufaa kwenda wapi wakati ilikuwa mahakama ya Rufaa ??

Hapo ni kuomba marejeo tuu

 

[Mtoto halali na hela]

Ajichunge asirudie kosa

 

[Kategele]

Mahakama ya Rufaa imemuachia huru Amani Justine, aliyekiri kumuua mpenzi wake Gaudencia Mabuli kwa kumchoma kisu baada ya kumtuhumu usaliti

Kwa siku tatu Gaudencia aliripotiwa kupotea na mwili wake uliokotwa barabarani, maeneo ya Vianzi Mei 23, 2012, akiwa na majeraha kwenye bega lake la kushoto, kwenye paji la uso na kiganjani

Askari aliyemkamata Justine, alisema kuwa alimkamata akiwa na T-shirt nyeusi iliyokuwa na damu. Aidha shahidi alisema Marehemu alikuwa na mtuhumiwa siku ya mwisho kabla ya kuripotiwa kupotea

Mtuhumiwa aliomba radhi kwa kusema kuwa ni shetani aliyempelekea kufanya hivyo. Jaji wa Mahakama ya rufaa alisema kisheria ushahidi wa aliyetuhumiwa hautoshi kuhitimisha kuwa ana hatia

===

The Court of Appeal has acquitted a resident of Mwajasi Village in Mkuranga District, Amani Justine, who had been condemned to death after confessing to killing his lover.

The prosecution’s case that Mr Justine purportedly killed a woman he was cohabiting with - Gaudencia Leonce Mabuli - was entirely built on his confession that he committed the crime after he allegedly caught her cheating with another man. But, the bench of Justices Shaban Lila, Sivangilwa Mwagesi and Barke Sehel said the prosecution’s case lacked material evidence for the court to believe there was a connection between the alleged confession and the prosecution’s evidence.

The body of the deceased [Gaudencia] was found lying on a roadside in the Vianzi area on 23 May 2012, with deep cut wounds on her left shoulder, forehead and palm, three days after she was reported missing.

Justine cohabited with Gaudencia at Malela area in Mkuranga Township for nearly three years that many people believed they were husband and wife.

In his appeal, the accused argued that the High Court Judge erred in convicting him without considering the defence of provocation and that the prosecution’s evidence was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

A witness had told the High Court during trial that he saw Mr Justine with the deceased walking towards Vikindu area the day the woman disappeared.

A police officer who appeared in court as a witness on the side of the prosecution told the court he arrested the accused, and that during the arrest the accused was found holding a black T-shirt stained with blood.

When cross-examined during the hearing of the case, the accused asked for forgiveness for causing the death of his partner.
“What transpired on that day was the devil’s work. I pray for forgiveness for having caused the death of the deceased. Yes, I was arrested in the house I used to cohabit with the decease,” he testified.

When the High Court further pressed for explanation, Mr Justine went on: “Yes, the devil pushed me to react because I suspected the deceased was cheating on me. I found the deceased [Gaudencia] with another man in the bush after which I took a knife and stabbed her on the neck and went to Magengeni. When I returned after a while, I found her dead.”

However, this admission was not sufficient evidence for the Court to uphold the death sentence against Mr Justine.
“Even so, the alleged admission of the appellant cannot be taken as a true admission on part of the appellant.

“As correctly submitted by counsels of both parties, legally speaking, the evidence of the accused could not lead to someone’s guilt,” the judge said.

“There is no scintilla of evidence from the prosecution to suggest that the appellant’s evidence carried the prosecution’s case further for the trial court to arrive to the conclusion that there was a true admission by the appellant,” the judge further added. The conviction of the accused was largely based on the elementary principle of law that if an accused person is alleged to have been the last person to be seen with the deceased, in absence of sufficient evidence to explain circumstances leading to the death, he or she will be presumed to be the killer.

“The finding of the trial court was based on the principle which we have stated (times) without numbers that, in a criminal trial, the very best of witnesses is an accused person who confesses to his guilt,” the Judge remarked.

A witness had told the court that the appellant and the deceased used to go to the same church and that Gaudencia was the church’s secretary.

CITIZEN TZ

Daah kumbe inawezekana na mwamba wa magunia mawili ya mkaa kigamboni atakuja kuachiwa huru au kupunguziwa adhabu.

 

[EINSTEIN112]

Mahakama ya Rufaa imemuachia huru Amani Justine, aliyekiri kumuua mpenzi wake Gaudencia Mabuli kwa kumchoma kisu baada ya kumtuhumu usaliti

Kwa siku tatu Gaudencia aliripotiwa kupotea na mwili wake uliokotwa barabarani, maeneo ya Vianzi Mei 23, 2012, akiwa na majeraha kwenye bega lake la kushoto, kwenye paji la uso na kiganjani

Askari aliyemkamata Justine, alisema kuwa alimkamata akiwa na T-shirt nyeusi iliyokuwa na damu. Aidha shahidi alisema Marehemu alikuwa na mtuhumiwa siku ya mwisho kabla ya kuripotiwa kupotea

Mtuhumiwa aliomba radhi kwa kusema kuwa ni shetani aliyempelekea kufanya hivyo. Jaji wa Mahakama ya rufaa alisema kisheria ushahidi wa aliyetuhumiwa hautoshi kuhitimisha kuwa ana hatia

===

The Court of Appeal has acquitted a resident of Mwajasi Village in Mkuranga District, Amani Justine, who had been condemned to death after confessing to killing his lover.

The prosecution’s case that Mr Justine purportedly killed a woman he was cohabiting with - Gaudencia Leonce Mabuli - was entirely built on his confession that he committed the crime after he allegedly caught her cheating with another man. But, the bench of Justices Shaban Lila, Sivangilwa Mwagesi and Barke Sehel said the prosecution’s case lacked material evidence for the court to believe there was a connection between the alleged confession and the prosecution’s evidence.

The body of the deceased [Gaudencia] was found lying on a roadside in the Vianzi area on 23 May 2012, with deep cut wounds on her left shoulder, forehead and palm, three days after she was reported missing.

Justine cohabited with Gaudencia at Malela area in Mkuranga Township for nearly three years that many people believed they were husband and wife.

In his appeal, the accused argued that the High Court Judge erred in convicting him without considering the defence of provocation and that the prosecution’s evidence was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

A witness had told the High Court during trial that he saw Mr Justine with the deceased walking towards Vikindu area the day the woman disappeared.

A police officer who appeared in court as a witness on the side of the prosecution told the court he arrested the accused, and that during the arrest the accused was found holding a black T-shirt stained with blood.

When cross-examined during the hearing of the case, the accused asked for forgiveness for causing the death of his partner.
“What transpired on that day was the devil’s work. I pray for forgiveness for having caused the death of the deceased. Yes, I was arrested in the house I used to cohabit with the decease,” he testified.

When the High Court further pressed for explanation, Mr Justine went on: “Yes, the devil pushed me to react because I suspected the deceased was cheating on me. I found the deceased [Gaudencia] with another man in the bush after which I took a knife and stabbed her on the neck and went to Magengeni. When I returned after a while, I found her dead.”

However, this admission was not sufficient evidence for the Court to uphold the death sentence against Mr Justine.
“Even so, the alleged admission of the appellant cannot be taken as a true admission on part of the appellant.

“As correctly submitted by counsels of both parties, legally speaking, the evidence of the accused could not lead to someone’s guilt,” the judge said.

“There is no scintilla of evidence from the prosecution to suggest that the appellant’s evidence carried the prosecution’s case further for the trial court to arrive to the conclusion that there was a true admission by the appellant,” the judge further added. The conviction of the accused was largely based on the elementary principle of law that if an accused person is alleged to have been the last person to be seen with the deceased, in absence of sufficient evidence to explain circumstances leading to the death, he or she will be presumed to be the killer.

“The finding of the trial court was based on the principle which we have stated (times) without numbers that, in a criminal trial, the very best of witnesses is an accused person who confesses to his guilt,” the Judge remarked.

A witness had told the court that the appellant and the deceased used to go to the same church and that Gaudencia was the church’s secretary.

CITIZEN TZ

haya ndio madhara ya kesi kushukua miaka 18. ushahidi lazima upotee

 

[Mario Kejob]

The right of the victim has been defiled. May be the judge is from the same church too, and this is the only conclusion I can reach on this church based judgment. The devil has won here on earth but on day of final and true judgment, justice will prevail.
R.I.P. THE VICTIM.

 

[dendizzo]

Ana mungu maana amekiri kua ameua alafu tena ushahidi hautoshelezi makubwa

Sijui sana mambo ya sheria lakini nadhani hii kesi ilikua ishatolewa hukumu. Sasa inawezekana jamaa alikiri enzi hizo kwa sababu ya kipigo then akahukumiwa.
Baada ya hapo akakata rufaa ndo maana hukumu imetolewa na mahakama ya rufaa.
In a nutshell, alikiri kwenye maelezo akahukumiwa halafu akakata rufaa.

 

[Vesper-valens]

Mkuu kuua ni kitu kigumu sanaa unaweza UA mtu ukabaki umesimama pembeni ya maiti hadi ukakutwa hapo...!! Damu nzito sanaa...

Very true mkuu

One love

 

[road master]

Mambo ya sheria hayaenda hivyo kama unavyodhani.

Mahakama ya rufaa ni procedural court. And actually mahakama zote ni procedural courts.

Ndio maana inaitwa mahakama ya sheria. (court of LAW).

Hakuna kutia tia huruma wala blah blah za laymen kule....

The court operates upon procedures. Sio mafeelings ya watu.

Angekua mamaako kauwawa au dadaako usindeandika hayo

 

[road master]

Sheria sio soga za mtaani wewe, ..kinyume chake pia ni kua Kama mtuhumiwa angekataa na ushahidi upo usio na Shaka Basi angefungwa....hivo jaji hafuati mawazo binafsi..anafuata sheria na mwenendo wa kesi

Natamani auwawe maamaako halafu uandike haya

 

[Nafaka]

Sheria gani hapo mkuu??? Hivi ushahidi wa kwanza si Maneno anayokiri mtuhumiwaa mwenyewe au unataka unambie jamaa ana matatizo ya akili???

Mkuu nilikuwa najiulizaga sana kuwa kuna watu uwa wanafungwa hapa Tanzania kwa kukiri uongo tena muda mwingine kwa hiari tu maana mara kibao nimeona kesi nyingi huko marekani watu wana brag mauaji ambayo hawakuyafanya sasa sijajua uwa tatizo ni nini. Ila uwa wanawakamata na bado wanakiri kufanya mauaji ila baadae wanakuja kuachiwa baada ya upelelezi kuonyesha mashaka katika wanachodai mfano, ushahidi wanaotoa kutofautiana na phyisical evidence, mfano mtu anasema ameua wakati inagundulika siku ya mauaji hakuwepo, au anasema alimchoma kisu wakati ripoti ya daktari inaonyesha silaha iliyotumika ni bisibisi.

 

[road master]

Nanda wewe.

Angekua mamako kauwawa na MTU na akakiri na akaachiwa usingeropoka kamaunavyoropoka kmmk

 

[BAK]

Inashangaza na kusikitisha sana, angekuwa lenient kwa kutompa adhabu kubwa kwa kukiri kama yeye ndiye muuaji angeeleweka lakini kumuachia huru eti hakuna ushahidi wa kutosha? 😳😳😳

Muuwaji anakiri alafu Hakimu anasema hakuna ushahidi wa kutoshaa...!! Aibuuuu

 

[Kisai]

Hizi sheria zenu huwa za kijinga sana, yaani kesi inachukua miaka kadhaa, ndiyo hukumu inatolewa. Hili tatizo.

 

[rikiboy]

Duuh bhasi majanga mkuu...!! Kweli tembea uone

Mkuu nilikuwa najiulizaga sana kuwa kuna watu uwa wanafungwa hapa Tanzania kwa kukiri uongo tena muda mwingine kwa hiari tu maana mara kibao nimeona kesi nyingi huko marekani watu wana brag mauaji ambayo hawakuyafanya sasa sijajua uwa tatizo ni nini. Ila uwa wanawakamata na bado wanakiri kufanya mauaji ila baadae wanakuja kuachiwa baada ya upelelezi kuonyesha mashaka katika wanachodai mfano, ushahidi wanaotoa kutofautiana na phyisical evidence, mfano mtu anasema ameua wakati inagundulika siku ya mauaji hakuwepo, au anasema alimchoma kisu wakati ripoti ya daktari inaonyesha silaha iliyotumika ni bisibisi.

 

[uhurubado]

Mzigo unalalia kwa Jamuhuri kuthibisha kwa ushahidi usiotia shaka .Watu humu wanaogea kwa kutumia hisia tu utadhan mahakama ni kibanda umiza.

Na hao majaji waliotoa hukumu iliyokatiwa rufaa nao hawakulitambuwa hilo kama siye tusojuwa sheria?

 

[Nanye Go]

Angekua mamako kauwawa na MTU na akakiri na akaachiwa usingeropoka kamaunavyoropoka kmmk

Pole na kumradhi sikujua ni mama yako kauwawa.

 

[Innocent Kirumbuyo]

Anaweza kukiri kwasababu ya shinikizo fulani au uoga kukiri tu siyo sababu ya kumfanya kuwa ndiye ameuwa kwaiyo na ambao awajakiri wachiwe huru kwasababu awajakiri sheria haziko hivyo zipo kwa haki zinatazama ni mazingira gani mtumiwa alikiri kosa

Muuwaji anakiri alafu Hakimu anasema hakuna ushahidi wa kutoshaa...!! Aibuuuu