GIDEN
JF-Expert Member
- Apr 19, 2015
- 1,474
- 704
I have posted here severally the multiplier or ratio of pf to offset is 1.5:1 ie if a pf is 3m then an equivalent offset will beYou guys remember, a month ago, I was here requesting a piece of advice when I wanted to go 2.4!
That is after doing a three months google research! and never came to a conclusion! Among the guys I usually salute are the so called US Satellite guys, as these guys have scientific equipments enough to check and balance but they also never came to consensus!
But one thing they both agreed!
That PF of 2.4 will never outperform offset of the same size in KUband.
And Offset dish of that same size will never outperform PF dish in CBand.
This also was indicated by if I'm correct GIDEN, and/or VICWA.
That being said
The other guys! Not sure if Asian forum or what, they had somewhat the above stand
although they said An offset could as well do both, KUand Cband better than PF could do both ku and Cband given precision is taken to point I.e equivalent CBAND LNB GAIN for Offset, should be the same with that Ku lnb gain for Cband, given that other factors too are the same.
2.4 Prime focus what will be its equivalence in Offset dish for Ku purposes?
Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
3.0/1.5 = 2m offset.
This is for Ku band.
Sent using Satellite dishes, Lnbs,Decoders and other sat gear
GIDEN