A reason why one visa for tourists is not an option for Tanzania

A reason why one visa for tourists is not an option for Tanzania

DAR si LAMU

Mkuu Dar si Lamu,

Kuna kamdudu kabaya sana kamejificha hapo, mwenye macho haambiwi tazama; yaani tukishasema tu tumekubali hiyo one-visa-policy yao basi Tour Company zao zitaanza kuleta watalii toka airport yao (yaani pale wanapopatiwa hiyo one visa) hadi ndani ya mipaka yetu (yaani kwenye vivutio vyetu vya utalii) na kufanya industry yetu particularly our Tour companies kufa ama kurudi kule ilikokua miaka kadhaa iliyopita kabla ya kuwabania milango.

Kwa kifupi, hii yote ni janja yao ya kutaka ku-revive tourism industry yao ambayo imeathirika sana miaka ya hivi karibuni baada ya sisi kufumbua macho na kuwafungia mianya waliyokua wakitumia.

Let us put it this way, kama wao ndio wanapokea wageni wengi thru the so-called hub mbona ni sisi ndio tunafaidika kwa mapato makubwa zaidi yao?. Kumbuka hapo zamani tulikuwa hatupati hata nusu ya hicho walichokua wanatengeneza...

Word.:wave:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kuna kamdudu kabaya sana kamejificha hapo, mwenye macho haambiwi tazama; yaani tukishasema tu tumekubali hiyo one-visa-policy yao basi Tour Company zao zitaanza kuleta watalii toka airport yao (yaani pale wanapopatiwa hiyo one visa) hadi ndani ya mipaka yetu (yaani kwenye vivutio vyetu vya utalii) na kufanya industry yetu particularly our Tour companies kufa ama kurudi kule ilikokua miaka kadhaa iliyopita kabla ya kuwabania milango.
...sioni kamdudu hapo, ndugu. hivi, tunajua ni kiasi gani cha watalii kina cross border, with or without tour operators of the other side? and are faced with multiple visas, na labda hii inapunguza kiasi kidogo cha idadi yao ku cross.

...the point i see here, ni kwamba, operators wetu watapoteza kazi. je, sheria zinazohusu kazi hizo zikoje? je, operator isiyekuwa registered hapa anaweza fanya kazi?

...je, si kwamba, kama wateja wanashuka jkia, operator wa hapa ndio atawafata kwakuwa ni wake?

Kwa kifupi, hii yote ni janja yao ya kutaka ku-revive tourism industry yao ambayo imeathirika sana miaka ya hivi karibuni baada ya sisi kufumbua macho na kuwafungia mianya waliyokua wakitumia.
...point here being, wanataka kuchukua wateja wetu?

...je, watalii wanakuja Tanzania badala ya Kenya kwa ajili kuna multiple visa, au ni kwakuwa wanakuja Tanzania?

...mianya ipi? kwamba Mt. Kilimanjaro uko Kenya, na hivyo kutuletea wateja?

Let us put it this way, kama wao ndio wanapokea wageni wengi thru the so-called hub mbona ni sisi ndio tunafaidika kwa mapato makubwa zaidi yao?. Kumbuka hapo zamani tulikuwa hatupati hata nusu ya hicho walichokua wanatengeneza...
...a million dollar question. i'd argue to indulge yourself more in it.

...huduma zetu ni bora zaidi sasa, ndio maana wageni wengi na hivyo mapato. hata hivyo, tuna mengi ya kufanya kwenye hii area.

Word.:wave:
...Holla!
 
DAR si LAMU

Tafuta hizo figures za Visa kutoka kwenye balozi zetu nje na linganisha au foreign affairs utuwekee.

BTW Visa ni reciprocal Je, ni Watanzania kiasi gani wamekwenda kwenye hizo nchi na wangapi wamenyimwa VISA? Pili sio lazima upewe VISA kutembelea nchi flani, Je vigezo vya kutoa VISA vya Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda na Burundi ni sawa na vigezo vya Tanzania. Je, kama sio sawa ni kwa nini? Je, kwa nini Kenya wanapendelea tuwe na VISA ya pamoja? Je, cost benefit analysis ya kuwa na VISA moja nani alifanya? Je, tunaweza kuwekewa hapa hiyo analysis report na nchi ambayo walilipa gharama zake? Je, ni kwa nini ilifanyika?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wacha1
Naweza toa mfano mmoja under COMESA Ethiopians hawahitaji kupata visa kutembea Kenya wakati sisi kila siku tunawarudisha hawa viumbe kwao as illegal immigrants
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Naweza toa mfano mmoja under COMESA Ethiopians hawahitaji kupata visa kutembea Kenya wakati sisi kila siku tunawarudisha hawa viumbe kwao as illegal immigrants

Kwa hiyo sisi ndio good samaritans yaani watu waje tu waingie kama wanakwenda sokoni. Watanzania wanalipa kodi ili wajiwezeshe kuinua kiwango chao cha uchumi. Wahamiaji haramu wanalifilisi taifa. kama huna hata pesa za VISA kwa nini ukanyage Tanzania? Wabomgo kibao wanalipa VISA wala hawalalamiki nyie kutwa kucha mnawatetea wageni si muwalipia basi hizo pesa kama mna huruma sana.
 
Wazungu wakiamua one visa, one visa italetwa penda msipende. Nchi masikini kama Tanzania zina uhuru jina tuu.
 
Borderless Borders – REALLY ?

Posted by Prof. Dr. Wolfgang H. Thome in Uncategorized. Leave a Comment
DISAPPOINTMENT OVER COST OF VISA FOR EXPATRIATES LIVING IN EAST AFRICA
(Posted 30th June 2014)
image223image224image225

Reactions were swift to come in when news spread over the weekend that expatriates living in any of the three 'Coalition of the Willing' countries of Uganda, Rwanda and Kenya will still have to pay Visa fees in order to be able to visit any of the neighbouring countries, a disappointing state of affairs and thought unhelpful to keep a significant number of travelers within the region, as expats in large numbers visit countries which do not require Visa from them like the UAE, the Seychelles or South Africa.

While at a cost of 100 US Dollars per Visa is the period of validity now extended to 6 months, this does not matter much for those who only wish to spend their local leave for instance at the beaches of Mombasa and not travel several times to and from one of the neighbouring countries.

Tourism stakeholders for long argued that such Visa should be given for free for expatriates holding a work or residence permit but it is now clear that the issue of revenue trumped the need to truly make the region an open area for tourist exchanges.

While officials tried to spin a positive effect into this latest announcement were tourism operators and in particular travel agents less hopeful as they had expected that the need for costly Visa, setting a family of four back by 200 US Dollars under the old regime and 400 US Dollars under the new regime, would be shelved. 'The doubts you expressed here before were justified. If my clients now pay 100 Dollars each for a Visa, even if it is valid for half a year and they only need it once a year when they have their local leave, they will keep that money in their pockets and continue to fly to Dubai or to Jo'burg or to the Seychelles' said a travel agent in Kampala before adding 'If they really want more expats here to go to Mombasa, with all the hullaballoo going on there, they must give them a free entry because what we now read is a weak compromise which will serve little purpose. There will not be much uptake for that, perhaps business people regularly flying from Entebbe to Nairobi or Kigali but not for the target this was aimed for, families going for a beach holiday. They never listen!'.

Is change which brings no change really change one wonders? Back to the drawing board ladies and gentlemen, as duly registered expats after all pay taxes and deserve some better consideration. The spirit of an open, and as the promoters say Borderless Borders East Africa, here at least, is not very visible.

Borderless Borders – REALLY ? | Wolfgang H. Thome's Blog
 
Foreigners in possession of a valid work or residence permit in Kenya, Rwanda and Uganda will be given an East Africa Tourism visa valid for six months.

The decision was reached by the heads of tourism bodies in the three States and was announced on Sunday.

The East Africa Tourism visa, which came into force early this year, resulted from a joint initiative and decision made by the heads of state of the respective countries.

The cross-border visa between the three northern corridor states, which costs $100 (Ksh 8,755) and is valid for 90 days for a foreigner, will now cost the same and be extended for six months for foreign residents residing in any of the states, according to a statement.

Kenya Tourism Board (KTB) Managing Director Muriithi Ndegwa said the preferential treatment to foreigners in the member states would entice them to tour and extend their stay within the northern corridor states.

MULTI-COUNTRY PACKAGES

"These expatriates form (the) bulk of travellers in any destination and the six-month-long tourism visa will go a long way in tapping into this potential group," Mr Ndegwa is quoted as saying in the statement.

The Rwanda Development Board's head of department in charge of Tourism and Conservation, Ambassador Yamina Karitanyi, explained that any foreign holder of the East Africa Tourist visa will move freely to and from any of the countries of residence to visit without having to pay for an extra visa for a period of six months.

"Therefore, they have a longer period to visit any of the tourism products in any or all the states combined. This is also a good opportunity for our tour operators to offer experience packages and itineraries combining the three countries."

Uganda Tourism Board's Chief Executive Officer Stephen Asiimwe hailed the move as a great development for tourism in the region and regional cooperation.

PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT

"The preferential treatment initiative means increased business for hotels, airlines, travel operators, the service industry and jobs for our people. The residents also get to sample and have an experiential taste of the great variety of the wildlife, culture, history and heritage that the region has to offer," Mr Asiimwe said.

The introduction of the visa will enhance the tourist product offering in the three countries and as a result increase the number of tourists to the three countries that have a diversity of experiences to explore.

Between January and March this year, Rwanda received 305,752 visitors and earned $75.1 million compared with 291,418 visitors and revenues of $71.5 million in the same period last year, representing a 5 per cent increase.

The noticeable increase in the number of travellers from the region could partly be attributed to the visa initiative as well as better and diversified packages in all the three countries. Information about the visa can be accessed on Borderless Borders

Foreigners to get six-month East Africa tourism visa - Business - nation.co.ke

 
[h=1]Tourism earnings cross Sh3 trillion[/h]IN SUMMARY

  • The country earned $1.973 billion (about Sh3.255 trillion) during the year to June 2014, up from $1.757 billion (about Sh2.899 trillion) during the year to June 2013


Dar es Salaam. Earnings from tourism went up by 12.28 per cent during the year to June 2014 as the travel sector cements its position as the most important industry in Tanzania's economy.
The country earned $1.973 billion (about Sh3.255 trillion) during the year to June 2014, up from $1.757 billion (about Sh2.899 trillion) during the year to June 2013, according to latest Bank of Tanzania (BoT) figures.
The increase, according to the BoT was mainly driven by the increase in travel and transportation receipts.
Gold, which used to be Tanzania's Number One foreign exchange earner, brought in $1.658 billion (about Sh2.737 trillion) during the year ending June 2014, a 14.45 per cent drop from earnings worth $1.898 billion (about Sh3.13 trillion) registered during the year to June 2013.
The drop is mainly attributed to a fall in gold prices, a situation that also reduced the dominance of the precious metal to Tanzania's total non-traditional exports.
"Gold does still dominate non-traditional exports although at a smaller share of 41.0 per cent," reads a statement in the BoT's Monthly Economic Review for July 2014 which covers the year ending June 2014.
During the year ending June 2013, gold accounted for 49.0 per cent of total non-traditional exports from Tanzania.
In Asian markets yesterday, gold traded at $1,311.32 an ounce compared to $1,307.33 an ounce late Wednesday.
It is however hoped that tourism and gold will remain Tanzania's leading economic sectors until the country starts developing and tapping the benefits of recent natural gas finds.



Back to The Citizen: Tourism earnings cross Sh3 trillion
Tourism earnings cross Sh3 trillion - Business - thecitizen.co.tz


 
Travel Sunday, October 05, 2014
[h=1]Tourism earns Tanzania $1.8b[/h]DAR ES SALAAM, Tanzania – Tanzania earned $1.8 billion from tourism in 2013, which is a first in the history of tourism in Tanzania.
The Minister for Natural Resources and Tourism, Lazaro Nyalandu, was speaking in Dar es Salaam last week on the sidelines of the just ended international tourism fair.

Tanzania Tourism Board (TTB) has set up the new International Tourism Fair dubbed as Swahili International Tourism Expo (S!TE) so as to open up international tourism markets to local tourism agencies.

Nyalandu said this is the good step for the country's tourism sector, taking into consideration amid the current economic uncertainty, "tourism is one of the few economic sectors in Tanzania growing strongly, while driving economic progress in our country."

According to Nyalandu, between 2002 and 2013, Tanzania registered a growth of over 50% in international tourist arrivals.

He said in 2013, Tanzania received 1,135,884 tourists, who earned the country $1.81 billion.

Tanzania is blessed with unique natural and cultural attractions but minister Nyalandu said: "We cannot rely merely on the abundant tourist attractions.

"It is important that we work harder than ever to capitalize on the ‘top of mind' awareness that our previous efforts have generated for the country. As a nation, we need to make concerted efforts on strategies to promote our attractions."

In February 2013, TTB entered into partnership with Pure Grit Project and Exhibition Management LTD to establish an International Tourism Fair in Tanzania, known as Swahili International Tourism Expo (S!TE), with effective from October, 2014.

Pure Grit Project and Exhibition Management LTD is the company that manages the INDABA Tourism Fair, one of the largest tourism marketing events on the African calendar and one of the top three ‘must visit' events of its kind on the global calendar.

The TTB Acting Managing Director, Devota Mdachi said that the effort to establish S!TE in addition to promoting Tanzania as a preferred tourist destination is intended to link the Small and Medium Tourism Enterprises (SME's) with the international Tourism market.

"It is a fact that many Tanzanian tourism agencies are small-scale enterprises, which have limited capital and ability to access to international tourism markets," Mdachi said.

She said S!TE and in particular the hosted buyer programme will help address this challenge.

Mdachi, urged all tourism enterprises to seize the opportunity which will enable them link their tourism businesses with regional and international tourism markets.

S!TE, Tanzania's first ever International Tourism Expo, will be held annually in October at the Mlimani City Convention Centre in Dar-es-Salaam and focuses on inbound and outbound travel to Africa and takes the format of a travel and trade exhibition with a conference element focusing on topical tourism, sustainability, conservation and other market related issues.

Dar es Salaam has been strategically selected as a place for staging the fair because of its geographical location, adequate air access; the existing ‘state of the art' and readily available infrastructure and amenities suitable for establishing an international tourism fair.


By Leonard Magomba, Sunday, October 05th, 2014
http://busiweek.com/index1.php?Ctp=2&pI=1951&pLv=3&srI=57&spI=23&cI=19
lawmaina78, waltham, hbuyosh
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Geza Ulole

Losing a war on poaching in Tanzania

2014-06-02 07:30


3a19b63c3fbc4a5995858ab85c3b9037.jpg
An elephant in the Mikumi National Park, which borders the Selous Game Reserve, in Tanzania. (Daniel Hayduk, AFP)
Multimedia · User Galleries · News in Pictures Send us your pictures · Send us your stories


  • The Past and Present of Poachers and Poaching - A Collection of Classic Articles on the History,... Now R555.00




Dar es Salaam - Apollo Kwilabya has loved the outdoors ever since he was a young boy, hunting small animals with his father in Tanzania's southern highlands.

It is also the reason why he signed up as a ranger at Selous Game Reserve, where although he earned a modest $200 a month, he could spend most of his time on patrol in one of the largest wildlife reserves in the world.

But his dream job quickly turned into a nightmare: Kwilabya said he was rarely paid on time, and around him his fellow rangers were killed off one-by-one.

One was killed by a propeller when a hippo overturned a patrol boat, another was bitten by a green mamba, a third was out fishing when he was grabbed by a huge crocodile, and another was trampled by an elephant, while the fifth fell to the deadliest enemy: the poacher.

"I thank God that I'm alive", said Kwilabya, who quit his job after three years and moved to Dar es Salaam to become a tour guide.

"That day we were chasing the poachers, and they would just shoot and run, shoot and run. Everyone was shooting. It's like a war."

This particular poacher was hunting elephant for ivory and, like most, was from one of the small, poor communities that border the park. But Kwilabya said the poachers are clearly well-equipped and funded, brandishing brand-new automatic rifles that put the rangers' firepower to shame.

Boots on the ground

If it is a war, the conservationists are losing. A third of all illegal ivory seized in Asia comes from Tanzania, and the safari tourism destination has lost over half of its elephants in the last five years, according to the Tanzanian Elephant Protection Society (TEPS).

There are 60 000 left but, if poaching continues unabated, Tanzania may see all of its elephants eradicated by the year 2020, TEPS warned during an anti-poaching summit in Dar es Salaam earlier this month.

The problem is particularly pronounced in the Selous Game Reserve, which was made a Unesco World Heritage Site in 1982 when more than 100 000 elephants roamed the area. By 1989 the elephant population had plunged to 30 000.

Benson Kibonde has spent over 30 years protecting the park, and was Selous' Chief Warden from 1992 to 2008. During his tenure, the elephant population more than doubled, climbing back up to 70 000, thanks also in part to an international ban on the sale of ivory.

But something went seriously wrong after Kibonde left Selous to become an instructor at Pasiansi Wildlife Training Institute. Pay checks went unpaid for months at a time, infrastructure fell into disrepair and morale dropped, according to Kwilabya and other rangers. The elephant population also plummeted to just 13 000 animals.

Kibonde was called out of retirement, and has been back in charge of Selous since 2012.

"Based on the poachers we've been arresting recently, I can assure you that they are as local as I used to know in the past,", he said in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania's commercial capital. "So it's still traditional. And I think we can stop them using traditional means."

The technique that Kibonde employed since the 1990s, and the one he plans to continue now, simply involves ensuring that rangers are everywhere. He does this by giving the scouts a map, GPS, rifle, backpack and a small tent, and sending them off on random patrols.

"They visited parts of the reserve that no one had ever gone to before. That's when we realised that we still had rhinos, because they bumped even into rhinos", he said.

"We need to commit boots on the ground, that's the only thing that will save the elephants."

Cutting out corruption

Selous currently has about 285 rangers, but the effective number in the bush at any given time may not be any more than 150, all covering 55 000km2 of wilderness, an area well over twice the size of neighbouring Rwanda.

To add to these numbers, the Tanzanian government recently announced plans to train 1,000 new park rangers and buy four helicopters, with much of the money coming from the Howard Buffet Foundation.

Aside from aid money, which has been rolling in since news of the devastation in Selous became widespread, more money will be raised for the park by making the Tanzania Wildlife Authority (Tawa), the department that oversees game reserves like Selous, independent of government.

Currently, Selous only keeps 50% of the revenue it generates from tourism with the rest going to the government. When Tawa is up and running, which should happen by January 2015, the reserve will reinvest 100% of its revenues into conservation.

The independent authority will also cut down on red tape and having to deal with government bureaucracy, which conservation groups have accused of corruption either by taking bribes or being involved with poaching themselves.

Along with his role as chief warden, Kibonde is also the chairman of the task force overseeing the establishment of Tawa.

"The worst case scenario is the status quo, so it can only be better", he said.

"I'm not so worried. With the 13 000 elephants that we have in Selous, if we commit our hearts and minds seriously, which I'm trying to get in the thinking of the scouts, we will be fine."
- AFP
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tanzania to join single tourist visa pact

Minister attributes delay to issues related to lack of identity cards by Tanzanians
PIX.jpg

Tanzanian Natural Resources and Tourism minister Lazaro Nyalandu. PHOTO | FILE | NATION MEDIA GROUP

LONDON


Tanzania will soon join Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda in implementing the single entry tourist visa as part of efforts to boost tourism in the region.


Tanzanian Natural Resources and Tourism minister Lazaro Nyalandu attributed his country's delay in agreeing to the visa pact to issues related to lack of identity cards by Tanzanian citizens.


He denied accusations that Tanzania was a stumbling block to the single entry tourist visa launched last year.


"Tanzania was unable to implement the single tourist visa since our citizens didn't have IDs, whereas Kenyans have for a long time been having the IDs," he said.


"We are almost concluding the issuance of IDs to all Tanzanians and we will soon join other East African member states in implementing the single tourist visa initiative," he added.


On the other hand, Mr Nyalandu said Tanzania had joined forces with Kenya on the war against poaching within the Serengeti-Mara eco-system to contain the killing of elephants by poachers.


He noted that the joint anti-poaching efforts between the two countries had helped protect elephants population in the Serengeti national park in Tanzania and the Maasai Mara game reserve in Kenya.


"We are happy to report that the number of elephants within the Serengeti-Mara eco-system has increased from 3,000 in 2006 to 7,000 this year due to anti-poaching efforts," he said.


ELIMINATE POACHING

He revealed that poaching of elephants in Tanzania had dropped by 75 per cent, adding that plans were underway to eliminate the menace.

Mr Nyalandu said Tanzania will from Friday to Sunday host an Eastern Africa summit to discuss strategies to contain ivory trade in the region.


The countries expected at the summit include Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda, Burundi, Uganda, South Sudan, Zambia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Mozambique, Zambia and Malawi.


"The aim of the summit is for the member states to sign a memorandum of understanding on the sharing of intelligence and joint patrols to stem elephant poaching across the region," he explained.


Earlier, Kenya's Tourism Cabinet Secretary Phyllis Kandie said Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda had successfully implemented the single tourist visa.


She said since it was launched last year, international holidaymakers have been able to visit the three countries after paying the $120 visa fee.


International tourists apply for the single tourist visa online in all international airports in Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda.


"We are now celebrating one-year anniversary since our three countries agreed to roll out the single tourist visa initiative," she said.


"We are appealing to our neighbouring Tanzania to join us so that we can achieve the resolution of marketing East Africa as a single destination in effort to boost our tourism sector," she added.

Tanzania to join single tourist visa pact - Business - nation.co.ke


MY TAKE
Nyalandu stop being stupid we don't need single tourism visa with Kenya! They shouldn't pin you down like that let them go ahead and see who makes more money at the end! Look you can't have one visa for for tourists with a country that frustrate free movement due to their protectionism attitude! Fastjet can not operate in Kenya from Tanzania cause KCAA wants to protect KQ and yet they want one visa for tourists knowing they will only be in a position to ferry those tourists since they have access to every corner of the EA member states! Wake up Mr Nyalandu.
 
Geza Ulole

i erlier posted single tourist visa should come after we have revive east africa airline!!! i am sure nyalandu was just buying time for sure he know we will loose, he was just trying to be funny i guess but we wont implement that by any means.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Geza Ulole

We will arm-twist our way, bila hodi, kwa mateke.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To any economist will agree with me that the much talked about one border one visa for tourists plying to EA can not be in the best interest to the growth of Tanzania's tourism out of a vivid factual that it will deprive Tanzania of revenues it gets from visa fees. But more than that there are other facts that are equally strong to not speak them out and one can get some understandings on them after looking at the following not so spoken factors:

First, the difference between tourism and conservation policies among member states! Tanzania advocates for "fewer but highly paying tourists" that have minimal ecological impacts to Tanzania's pristine ecosystems found in her parks.

Its upon these values most of the daily conservation efforts for Parks within Tanzania are supervised using the Environmental Management Plans that clearly state the ecological directives that the GOT has partial managed to follow but striving hard to adhere to.

Contrarily neither Masai Mara nor Amboseli is having an EMP to know a thing about conservation undertakings there! As for Kenya, mass tourism is their priority. It is within these principles that the Tanzania Tourism Board does not see a reason for a neighbor country to be fighting for tourists to pay less for the services of an ecosystem that they have paid no penny to preserve but looking for a chance to benefit on them.


Moreover, out of the same principles TTB imposed a charge on each vehicle plying to its parks from abroad as a way to discourage traffic and minimize the stamping effect emanating from many tour vehicles that go to the parks. I advice the charge to extend to domestic tour vehicles though price should be compatible to set balance between job creation and environment conservation.

It has to be understood it is within this same principle the Bolongoja gate was closed and it is out of this same principle Tanzania gave in to the global external pressure to not construct the highway across the Serengeti. So when Balala makes noises he should make sure that he maintains his loud voice but at least within the universal acceptable moral standards! Things like pushing for the Bolongoja gate opening and one visa to increase traffic within the Serengeti are naive and contradicting to the same principles his oneself, his country's media and Environmental NGOs were fighting for to save the Serengeti.


Secondly, if the one visa thing is to be implemented then to device a formula and modalities under which the distribution and transfer of revenues will be carried out, is a hard thing to come with. And for Tanzania that depends on foreign support on its budget to the tune of 33% will be not doing any favor to its attempt to free her economy from donors' dependence if it is to scrap the visa fee.

Whereas for Kenya their reason for pushing for one visa thing emanates mainly from them being best positioned to rip big if their demands are to be accommodated, this is partly due to the fact that Kenya is aware that is having a more advanced interconnection from the overseas markets with a carrier that is seeking to use the other member states' market to benefit via a surge of passengers posed to use their airline if the one visa thing come to mature.

Interestingly being blind on the fundamentals of economic principles that they can still attract more tourists destined to other member states by being competitive enough against other international flights established in the region. For instance by lowering the price for flight ticket they charge when one boards KQ flight, if at all the country is that sympathetic to the so claimed unnecessarily overcharged tourists plying to the region.


I serious doubt if that can be possible since we read and hear cheap and negative accusations against Tanzania and it's God given resources more often than an offer of genuine generosity e.g. allowing other member states' Governments inject capital and be stakeholders in that KQ to make it a truly East African carrier just like the former disbanded East African Airways, in exchange of free access to the market while squarely competing with huge airlines from outside the region
(some heavily supported by oil money) plying the EA routes.

I know this is a bitter pill to swallow to our neighbors but could have meant your seriousness to the region prospects and not opportunism.

At the moment, KQ has one of the highest price rates for any trip plying within or out of Kenya be it to regional, continental or overseas that could have easily been offset if the airline would have a regional ownership since a sense of ownership would have triggered an influx of East African passengers and as a result significantly raised the revenues to surpass running costs and accelerate growth.

If that can't go well with Kenyans then instead of holding Tanzania at ransom to remove visa fees, they should try business common senses and at least meet the charges of that US$50+
visa fee by lowering their ticket costs and attract the traffic to Nairobi. BTW Nairobi still ferries tourists to other destination within the region anyway, so i simply don't see why all the noises!?

With the amount of negativity displayed in their assumed "big brother" media status be it on their recklessness (on part of the GOK) to control the hunger situation, the blame fell on the part of GOT on their failure
to have excess maize to offer Kenyans though both countries faced serious drought and there is no official bilateral pact that exists to give assurance of maize supply to them to cast such unfounded accusations.

The accusations also extend to the part of Tanzania's customs on a supposed retaliation of overcharging by our neighbors on those many non-tariffs barriers at our borders that end up into full blown rows. All these keep me wondering if at all Kenya will be ready to play a goodwill role and step in the shoes of a true regional powerhouse and bail out Tanzania if a Greece' situation is to happen within the block or they gonna disband the boat and leave it behind sinking just like the way history tells us.


Thirdly, Tanzania is endowed with all the sort of tourism products that belong to the other EA members states with an exception of Mountain gorillas tourism that Rwanda and Uganda offer (though Jane Goodall's Chimpanzees can substitute them) as a diversity but the other members lack what Tanzania offers.

Economically, one visa idea won't benefit Tanzania on return under this modality as most of these tourism initiatives come in packages where countries with more unique breath-taking diverse products sells most to technically render the one visa idea a flaw.

If we are to go for one visa thing then let it be with a market that is not "a rival sort of" but a complementary to ours e.g. SA that doesn't have "Mt Kilimanjaro or Zanzibar Island" and they have "superior city tourism in addition to casino and gambling spots and leisure parks", an advantage to us to rip since the products complement to each other and the same is to them also; a win-win situation.

Or with
Morocco or Egypt since they don't have wildlife in Savannah (the big five) and we don't have sandy deserts and pyramids (plus camels, oasis). Unfortunately with Kenya there is nothing to exchange with them but competing for the same tourists since Kenya is a substitute market to Tanzania.

Both Kenya and Tanzania have wildlife (the big five) in Savannah and therefore posed to compete for time and resources from those wildlife loving tourists that wish to spend in respective parks though as for Kenya an added advantage to its touristic package offer as has no exotic islands (
a plus to them, considering the existing little and less appealing Lamu Island is about to be destroyed to pave a way for LAPSSET project).

Since Kenya has an efficient air carrier to fly all the tourists to- and fro- the region, that upper-hand on lucrative travelling industry poses a danger of crippling chances of ours (Tanzanian) to grow under the one visa deal. This alert is not to be mistaken with Protectionism since even in the EU, market fair competition bodies' intervention is permitted on this sort of incidences.

For instance EU's Fair competition body had to overrule a VW merger with Volvo since would have wiped off smaller Automobile companies like Opel a potential retrenchment scenario. For the EA one visa for tourists a more advantage to Kenya (since we are a complimentary market to them) though disadvantage to us in term of lost revenues when we remove the visa fees; a win-loss situation.

Above all that Tanzania has not fully exploited its touristic potentials and it will be a gross mistake to accept that one visa thing since we will never know our true potentials as a stand alone market esp. in those unexploited places like Mahale and Gombe Island Park in lake Tanganyika, Selous reserve in the South. Apart from the parks in the mainland, pristine Marine Parks and diving spots in places like Mafia Island are lying idle not fully discovered.


Moreover by refusing the one visa thing for tourists coming to Tanzania will put the country in a best position to repel all sort of economically harmful free-rider and deceitful gimmicks that are to emanate out of opportunistic marketing capitalization tricks from the block members as to deliberately fend off any knowledge transfer as where the resources are located and to whom are belonged, a catastrophic contentious scenario as recognition is concerned.

Marketing stunts like "Zanzibar is in Kenya" or "Come to Kenya to climb Mt Kilimanjaro" will be more common scenes and at the end of the day having detrimental effects on the country hosting those resources as far as royalties and the misuse of those resources by the neighbor that her aim is to unfairly exploit them.


Last but not least, i am more than impressed for the creativity TATO came with on the online booking concept. Since upon launching that online tour booking portal revenues will surge to the Tanzania coffers and eat significant the money others get for tourists that come to our land as there will be no need of doing booking via tour agents. i for one, foresee Arusha's economy boom with that portal since it will force that $250 per booking to be injected directed to our economy via other means be it on souvenirs or nyama choma or beer drinking.


Long live the tangible East Africa Integration process....


CC: Dhuks mwitaz livefire Nairoberry Smatta Koborer CattleRustler Ab-Titchaz Askari Kanzu lawmaina78 mwathai Koba

Hey look here friend, nobody is forcing this thing down your throats. You are free to make your own decisions. It is upto your government.
 
Hey look here friend, nobody is forcing this thing down your throats. You are free to make your own decisions. It is upto your government.
let your stupid media understand that!
 
Those are politics tu, there is an election in Tanzania next year. Tanzania will do what it wants and not to be told by any Nyang'aus.
 
Back
Top Bottom