A reason why one visa for tourists is not an option for Tanzania

Tanzania derailing single tourist visa uptake - industry stakeholders

Serengeti.jpg

Tourists at a park in Tanzania. PHOTO | FILE | NATION MEDIA GROUP

IN SUMMARY
Background




    • The single tourist visa was launched on February 20.
    • MARKETING: Since then, the three partner states have been jointly marketing the region as a single destination at the international level.
    • OUTSOURCING: Countries also pledged to each task a private public relations firm to help in the marketing of the countries' tourism sites.
    • PROGRESS SO FAR: Only Rwanda has hired a private PR firm to handle its marketing. Uganda is in the process of hiring one and has already advertised the tenders. Kenya is yet to act.
    • COSTS: The single tourism visa costs $100 and grants tourists a 90-day validity period with no room for extension.
    • Tour firms recently proposed a review of the visa to allow 30 days of free movement for expatriates within the region.
The uptake of the single tourist visa launched jointly by Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda is being undermined by the failure by Tanzania to buy into the idea of marketing East Africa as one tourism destination.

According to tourism stakeholders, the number of tourists visiting the region as a circuit would rise if Tanzania, the lead destination in the region, joined in the initiative.

"Currently, Tanzania receives more tourists than Kenya and has more and better sites than any other partner state. Therefore, if the country were to join hands with the other member states, then we would likely to see more tourists coming into the region especially to the Mara then Serengeti National park," said Waturi Matu, the co-ordinator of the East African Tourism Platform.

She added: "Kenya is known for its Big Five Safaris while Tanzania is best known for its tree-climbing lions. A tourist would prefer travelling to these two destinations on a single tourist visa through Kenya for the safari then cross over to Tanzania to spot the tree climbing lions."

But Tanzania has categorically stated that until security concerns are addressed, it is not ready to be part of the single tourist visa. The country also wants the issue of how revenues will be split addressed and infrastructure put in place.

"Security in the region is not good. For example, Kenya is prone to Al Shabaab attacks; if a tourist gets a visa from Tanzania and has security problems in Kenya, who will be blamed?" Tanzania's EAC Deputy Minister Abdullah Juma said in an interview.

READ: Tough times ahead for EA tourism as insecurity scares visitors away

ALSO READ: Terrorist threat may weigh against Single Tourist Visa

A recent report shows that since the launch of the single tourist visa on February 20, only 1,560 have been sold. The number is projected to rise by nine per cent in 2015 if insecurity, and the issue of high cost of airfares and hotel ratings are addressed.

According to Ms Matu, the high cost of air travel across the region is hurting the growth of the tourism industry.

"Flying across the East African Community is too expensive compared with other regions across the continent and globally," said Ms Matu, adding that a tourist would rather pay $100 more to South Africa than fly to the three East African countries which will cost him/her almost three times the cost to South Africa.

Flight charges

Flying from one of the EAC countries to another costs between $220 and $350 minus taxes, for a return trip. Ms Matu blamed the high costs on the absence of uniform airspace policies and high airport parking fees.

EAC air transport is governed by the Bilateral Air Services Agreements (BASAs) negotiated between the different EAC countries.

The current BASAs, however, have restrictions on designated routes (route schedule), which in most cases include departure from one party's international (mainly capital city) airports to the other contracting party's international airport or capital city; cabotage rights (the transport of goods or passengers between two points in the same country by an aircraft registered in another country), which are not provided; designation of beneficiary airlines; conditions such as the requirement for substantial ownership and effective control of the designated airline being vested in the contracting party or its nationals.

This is the case in the BASA between Rwanda &[HASHTAG]#8211[/HASHTAG]; Kenya; and Rwanda &[HASHTAG]#8211[/HASHTAG]; Tanzania.

Limitations of capacity, particularly in frequencies, such as the case of Rwanda and Tanzania's bilateral agreement, is also a challenge. Any flights beyond the scheduled number are considered unscheduled and attract extra charges.

"The restrictions limit operations of foreign airlines and are, therefore, uncompetitive," noted Ms Matu.

Other factors constraining the EAC air transport industry include the uncompetitive domestic tax regime; fiscal policies such as airport taxes and VAT, high insurance premiums; management inefficiencies; limited subsidies and safety oversight.

The EAC is currently negotiating to liberalise its air space in order to boost competitiveness. It recently developed the EAC liberalisation of transport services regulations - which eliminate some of the restrictions imposed by BASAs.

For example, partner states can grant each other rights beyond the ones provided in the regulations at their own discretion. They can also liberalise air transport tariff without the relevant authorities in the EAC being required to approve them.



Tanzania derailing single tourist visa uptake - industry stakeholders - Business - www.theeastafrican.co.ke

MY TAKE

First Tanzania has her own big five and does not need to be complemented by Kenya's big five or whats ever tourism product Kenya offers.Its lame and stupid to brand Kenya to be big five favourite over Tanzania.

If Kenya and Rwanda are real serious about one visa tourism for EA market then they should allow Fastjet Tanzania operate unrestricted on routes to Nairobi and Mombasa and on those routes granted a 5th freedom right by Uganda.

Otherwise there is no point to harmonize visa while KQ's and Rwandair's monopolies are unfairly ripping off tourists at bloated airfares! Kenyans should stop pretending to be not aware of their scheming and crying foul attitude, the regional market is for all to benefit including budget airlines operating in member states as far as fair competition principles are considered.

BTW Tanzania stated clearly her having no interest with this one visa thing i wonder where is all this noisy coming from while the initiative was launched at pomp and fanfare in the name of isolating Tanzania.
lawmaina78 bagamoyo waltham, Dhuks, Askari Kanzu JokaKuu
 
why tag me in your whinnings? when was kenyan tourism dependent on your insecurities?
 
[h=1]Tanzania tourism up as gold income falls[/h]
gold.jpg


Workers at a gold mine in Tanzania. PHOTO|FILE
IN SUMMARY

  • The value of gold exports reached above $2.08 billion in the year ending October 2012, but the shipment decelerated to $1.75 billion in 2013 and stood at $1.35 billion in the year to October 2014, according to Bank of Tanzania (BoT).



Dar es Salaam.
Gold, which was once Tanzania’s largest foreign exchange earner, sustained a fall in the value of income from its exports as the mineral faces trouble in the world market.


The value of gold exports reached above $2.08 billion in the year ending October 2012, but the shipment decelerated to $1.75 billion in 2013 and stood at $1.35 billion in the year to October 2014, according to Bank of Tanzania (BoT).


The figure puts the mineral in the second largest foreign exchange recipient after travel (tourism) which has been increasing in the last few years.


Travel recorded $1.96 billion in the year to October 2014 up from $1.79 billion in the same period in 2013 and $1.62 billion in 2012, BoT’s November Monthly Economic Review shows.


“Gold which has been dominant in the non-traditional export recorded a decline following a decrease in both volume and price,” says the statement. The yellow metal has been trading below the 2013’s close of above $1,200 per ounce in the world market and the trend has affected its income in Tanzania.


The total value of Tanzania’s exports of goods and services was $8.6 billion, being 3.3 per cent higher compared with the amount that was recorded in the corresponding period in 2013. The development was attributed to good performance in exports of manufactured goods, fish and fish products as well as increase in travel and transport receipts, BoT says. Export of manufactured goods increased by 35.5 per cent to $1.37 billion with a notable increase recorded in edible oil, textile apparels, plastic goods, fertilizers and paper products. During the period, the value of traditional exports was $768.2 million compared with $841.7 million recorded in the year ending October 2013.




Back to The Citizen: Tanzania tourism up as gold income falls

http://www.thecitizen.co.tz/Busines...82/-/view/printVersion/-/8q0ms9z/-/index.html


 
I have to admit i have been a vocal critic on this one visa thing but right now my objection is fast diminishing seeing fastjet (and probably other airlines in Tanzania) is given same frequencies to Kenyan airports (esp. JKIA and MIA) as KQ's to Tanzania aside ecological impacts on Tanzanian parks are looked at (the Bolongoja gate issue) ! The field is now now on a right track to be leveled and this should be a way forward for sustainable economic block for EA! Now Fastjet should aim to access to Addis Ababa, then Juba then Lagos then Kigali, Abuja and Accra and make Dar another important hub in the region


MY TAKE
A merry Xmas to my brothers and Sisters up North! This is the way forward as far as a win-win situation is concerned for a suistainable EAC! Much more i congratulate the govt of Magufuli for standing up hard on KCAA's objection to allow Fastjet's access on Kenyan space from Tanzania. This single decision will allow free movement like no other thing and business, tourism and leisure will flourish immensely!


nomasana
, MK254, sam999, NairobiWalker, hbuyosh, msemakweli, simplemind, Kimweri, Bulldog, MK254, Kafrican, bagamoyo,Ngongo, AbTitchaz, mtanganyika mpya, JokaKuu, Ngongo, Askari Kanzu, Dhuks, Yule-Msee, waltham, Mzee Mwanakijiji,Mwananchi
 
Another garbage from ant EAC,eti TZ will lose some revenue from visa fees? very funny unavyokuja na hiyo conclusion huku hata numbers zenyewe huna,why pay the goverment 500$ just to cross the border? i think it does make sense kuwaachia for cheaper or free then waje spend hiyo 500$ to our busineses/people kuliko kulipa serikali zinakoishia kwa mafisadi,mnafikiri hao tourist wakiingia TZ watakula/kulala/kusafiri vipi? hizo ni legit businesses za wananchi and money will be made..kwanza visa fee ni expense ndogo sana kwa budget za tourist wengi wanaokuja EA tatizo ni ule usumbufu ndio maana wanaoelewa wanataka iondolewe,kwanza ingesaidia hata marketing expense zingepungua maana will sell EA as one.

sioni sababu ya wewe kupinga tozo hiyo kama wakenya wanatangaza mlima kilimanjaro uko kwao na pia zanzibar iko kwao acha walete watalii na sisi wakitaka kuingia mlima kilimanjaro walipe hiyo tozo ili wajue walidanganywa kilimanjaro ipo ke so ikiwa free huoni utawapa chance kenya kujitangazia vitu vyetu vingi kua ni vyao amka kiakili wewe hapa haibiwi mtuu
unaleta weak point kua tuwaruhusu waingie na hiyo pesa wajee kununua vitu kwa watanzania kuliko kulipa kodi kwa kigezo kua kuna watu wanakula hizo kodi ebuu kua na akili ya kujiongeza basi barabara itajengwa na nn hawawez kutumia facilities zetu bure aise barabaraa tujenge sisi wao waje kupiga pesa kupitia barabara zetu hebu jiulize vizuri ndo ulete mawazo mgando yako.....
 
TBT
I am happy to have written this in 2012 n today Tanzania is reaping from doing marketing of her natural attraction alone in. For those of u that were scared of our resistance to the idea please give us feedback.

CC:
nomasana, sam999, NairobiWalker, hbuyosh, msemakweli, simplemind, Kimweri, Bulldog, MK254, Kafrican, Ngongo, Ab_Titchaz, mtanganyika mpya, JokaKuu, Ngongo, Askari Kanzu, Dhuks, Yule-Msee, waltham, Mzee, mombasite gabriel, Juakali1980, Boda254, mwaswast, MwendaOmo, Iconoclastes, oneflash, Kambalanick, 1 Africa, saadeque, burukenge, nyangau mkenya, Teen-Upperhill Nairobi, kadoda11 , YoungD, COLLOH-MZII RELOADE, REDEEMER, Nairoberry
 
This post still holds water.
Mkuu wazungu wanatuchezea sana aisee. Hii Covid-19 lazima iwafumbue watu macho, wanaokufa kwa wingi ni wazungu kwa sababu tu ya ujinga wao wa kutokupiga nyungu na kutokuamini dawa zetu za kiasili. Dawa asilia ni mwarobaini wa kutosha na zinatibu magonjwa mengi bila madhara. Mababu zetu waliishi kwa miaka na miaka bila kuwa na madhara yoyote kwa afya zao. Leo hii dawa nyingi za wazungu zina side effects. Usikose malimao na ndimu zina kinga kubwa sana kwenye miili yetu.
 
Mkuu wazungu wanatuchezea sana aisee. Hii Covid-19 lazima iwafumbue watu macho, wanaokufa kwa wingi ni wazungu kwa sababu tu ya ujinga wao wa kutokupiga nyungu na kutokuamini dawa zetu za kiasili. Dawa asilia ni mwarobaini wa kutosha na zinatibu magonjwa mengi bila madhara. Mababu zetu waliishi kwa miaka na miaka bila kuwa na madhara yoyote kwa afya zao. Leo hii dawa nyingi za wazungu zina side effects. Usikose malimao na ndimu zina kinga kubwa sana kwenye miili yetu.

Nakubaliana na wewe kabisa. Dawa za kizungu zimeanza karne chache tu zilizopita. Ila nyungu na madawa mengine yapo miaka nenda miaka rudi. Sema tatizo la Afrika ni documentation of everything. Hatuna proper manuscripts for our beliefs, traditions, norms, laws, science, dance, architecture to name a few. This why we don't have a base to do our things. The result of it, every one is coming to tell us what to do from our beliefs, traditions and everything I mentioned above. Unlike our counter parts, like Chinese, Indians etc they have their own stuff. Even if someone is bringing to them what to do, they in the position to take something which do not go contrary to their fundamental beliefs of their society. Turudi kwenye asili yetu na tukitaka kuboresha ili iwe na usasa, tusitupe misingi yetu.
 
Back
Top Bottom