Uganda wins $435 oil case against Heritage | JamiiForums | The Home of Great Thinkers

Dismiss Notice
You are browsing this site as a guest. It takes 2 minutes to CREATE AN ACCOUNT and less than 1 minute to LOGIN

Uganda wins $435 oil case against Heritage

Discussion in 'International Forum' started by ByaseL, Nov 24, 2011.

  1. B

    ByaseL JF-Expert Member

    Nov 24, 2011
    Joined: Nov 22, 2007
    Messages: 2,223
    Likes Received: 22
    Trophy Points: 135
    By Ibrahim Kasita
    Uganda Wednesday won the first round of the $435m oil tax a decision that reaffirms its ability to control and manage the nascent oil and gas industry.

    The Tax Appeals Tribunal after a three hour session upheld that the transaction was taxable and the amount ($434.9m) assessed by URA remains the same.

    “This is a landmark victory not only for URA but for Uganda as a whole because, being the first of such transactions in Uganda, we have now set the standard that this and such future transactions are taxable in Uganda,” Paul Kyeyune Manager Public and Corporate Affairs Division stated in a press statement

    The tax dispute started when Heritage Oil and Gas Ltd announced its intention to transfer its Ugandan petroleum assets to Italian giant ENI in December, 2010.

    But Tullow Oil Uganda, which had 50% stakes in the assets, exercised its first right of option under the same terms. But Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) demanded 30% of the $1.5m deal in capital tax gain tax before the transaction was approved.

    Heritage was against paying the tax “based on comprehensive advice from leading tax experts in Uganda, United Kingdom and North America” that the transaction was not taxable in Uganda.

    The firm demanded to settle the tax dispute via the International Court of Arbitration in London.
    But went ahead and deposited only $121m on the treasury. The balance of $283.5m was deposited in an escrow account held by Standard Chartered Bank in United Kingdom (UK). The money will be released after the case has been resolved.

    But Uganda insisted that the tax case should be held in Uganda and in accordance and rushed to the Tax Appeals Tribunal.

    Heritage in December last year rushed to the High Court to stop the case. But the High Court upheld that the tax dispute be heard in Uganda.

    Different stakeholders yesterday expressed delight at the ruling. “We are very much happy about the ruling. The ruling will have a very bid impact on all other cases to follow. This is a good pointer,” Irene Muloni, the energy minister, commented yesterday.

    And Peter Nyombi, the Attorney General, said that the victory was “very important because the money will remain in Uganda for development purposes.
  2. B

    ByaseL JF-Expert Member

    Nov 24, 2011
    Joined: Nov 22, 2007
    Messages: 2,223
    Likes Received: 22
    Trophy Points: 135
    Waganda wamethubutu na wameweza sisi tunashindwa nini kama si maslahi binafsi?

    MAMMAMIA JF-Expert Member

    Nov 24, 2011
    Joined: Feb 26, 2008
    Messages: 3,822
    Likes Received: 24
    Trophy Points: 0
    Kwa sababu viongozi Uganda katika hili (sijui mengine) wamejali TAIFA KWANZA wakati viongozi wa Tanzania huwa wanajali TUMBO KWANZA.
    Yeyote hawezi kuamnini kuwa mapato ya Tanzania katika madini ni 3%, eti kwa kisingizio cha kuwa madini yanachimbwa na kusafirishwa kama "raw material". Kwa nini basi tungang'anie yachimbwe ikiwa hatuna uwezo wa kuyasafisha wenyewe? Inashangaza pia kuona utalii unaiingizia Tz mapato zaidi kuliko madini.
    Nchi hii............we wacha tu!