The truth behind Muammar Gaddafi death

[mangyi]

In 2009, Colonel Gaddafi, then President of the African Union, suggested to the States of the African continent to switch to a new currency, independent of the American dollar:

The objective of this new currency was to divert oil revenues towards state-controlled funds rather than American banks. In other words, to stop using the dollar for oil transactions. Countries such as Nigeria, Tunisia, Egypt and Angola were ready to change their currencies.
Fast forward to 2011, civil unrest and protest started for his step down, a coincidence? Well let’s see. In March 2011, the NATO-led coalition began a military intervention in Libya in the name of freedom.

Don’t forget that Free water, almost free gasoline, free health system and free education were commonplace for Libyans under Gaddafi’s dictatorship.The leader, who has been in power for 41 years, has managed to gain the support of all the major tribes and buy social peace

Libya itself was a stable country where the risk of being kidnapped or even murdered by an armed militia was non-existent.
With an excellent management of oil revenues, the Libyan state had managed to store hundreds of tons of gold and the same amount in silver.

All these resources were going to make Libya the most influential country in Africa, supplanting France for example.
Gaddafi wanted to avoid American influence in his oil transactions by using this gold.

However, after his death, information was discovered through Hillary Clinton’s electronic mailbox. One of the 3000 emails showed NATO’s willingness to overthrow Gaddafi’s government. NATO mainly wanted to neutralize the African gold currency

At the beginning of March, the Libyan army and the many militias loyal to the government had already crushed the rebellion, thanks to their numbers and equipment. However, with Western intervention, the dream of a unified monetary system based on gold died

The NATO overthrow was not for the protection of the people, but instead it was to thwart Gaddafi’s attempt to create a gold-backed African currency to compete with the Western central banking monopoly.

The emails indicate the French-led NATO military initiative in Libya was also driven by a desire to gain access to a greater share of Libyan oil production, and to undermine a long term plan by Gaddafi to supplant France as the dominant power in the Francophone Africa region.

The April 2011 email, sent to the Secretary of State Hillary by unofficial adviser and longtime Clinton confidante Sidney Blumenthal with the subject line “France’s client and Qaddafi’s gold,” reveals predatory Western intentions.

The email makes clear that intelligence sources indicate the impetus behind the French attack on Libya was a calculated move to consolidate greater power, using NATO as a tool for imperialist conquest, not a humanitarian intervention as the public was falsely led to believe.

The most air strikes ever launched in Africa by NATO was more than 10,000 on Libya in 2011 with over 500,000 Civilian Casualities. When Nato was questioned about civilian Casualities and the death of Gaddafi children, they insisted that it was collateral damage and normal in wars

No matter what happened in Libya, no organization, country had the right to invade another country. It goes against the United Nations treaty and principle of sovereignty hence can be used as a basis for another world war!

Mnamo mwaka wa 2009, Kanali Gaddafi, Rais wa Umoja wa Afrika wakati huo, alipendekeza kwa Mataifa ya bara la Afrika kubadili sarafu mpya, isiyotegemea dola ya Marekani:

Madhumuni ya sarafu hii mpya ilikuwa kuelekeza mapato ya mafuta kwa fedha zinazodhibitiwa na serikali badala ya benki za Amerika. Kwa maneno mengine, kuacha kutumia dola kwa shughuli za mafuta. Nchi kama vile Nigeria, Tunisia, Misri na Angola zilikuwa tayari kubadilisha sarafu zao.
Haraka kuelekea 2011, machafuko ya wenyewe kwa wenyewe na maandamano yalianza kwa ajili ya kuondoka kwake, kwa bahati mbaya? Sawa tuone. Mnamo Machi 2011, muungano unaoongozwa na NATO ulianza uingiliaji wa kijeshi nchini Libya kwa jina la uhuru.

Usisahau kwamba maji ya bure, karibu petroli ya bure, mfumo wa afya bure na elimu bila malipo vilikuwa vitu vya kawaida kwa Walibya chini ya udikteta wa Gaddafi.Kiongozi huyo ambaye amekuwa madarakani kwa miaka 41 amefanikiwa kuungwa mkono na makabila yote makubwa na nunua amani ya kijamii

Libya yenyewe ilikuwa nchi tulivu ambapo hatari ya kutekwa nyara au hata kuuawa na wanamgambo wenye silaha haikuwepo.
Kwa usimamizi bora wa mapato ya mafuta, serikali ya Libya ilikuwa imeweza kuhifadhi mamia ya tani za dhahabu na kiasi sawa katika fedha.

Rasilimali hizi zote zingeifanya Libya kuwa nchi yenye ushawishi mkubwa zaidi barani Afrika, ikichukua nafasi ya Ufaransa kwa mfano.
Gaddafi alitaka kuepuka ushawishi wa Marekani katika shughuli zake za mafuta kwa kutumia dhahabu hii.

Walakini, baada ya kifo chake, habari iligunduliwa kupitia sanduku la barua la kielektroniki la Hillary Clinton. Moja ya barua pepe 3000 zilionyesha nia ya NATO kupindua serikali ya Gaddafi. NATO hasa ilitaka kugeuza sarafu ya dhahabu ya Kiafrika

Mwanzoni mwa Machi, jeshi la Libya na wanamgambo wengi watiifu kwa serikali walikuwa tayari wamemaliza uasi, shukrani kwa idadi yao na vifaa. Walakini, kwa uingiliaji kati wa Magharibi, ndoto ya mfumo wa pesa uliounganishwa kulingana na dhahabu ilikufa

Kupinduliwa kwa NATO hakukuwa kwa ajili ya ulinzi wa watu, lakini badala yake kulikuwa ni kuzuia jaribio la Gaddafi la kuunda sarafu ya Afrika inayoungwa mkono na dhahabu ili kushindana na ukiritimba wa benki kuu ya Magharibi.

Barua pepe hizo zinaonyesha mpango wa kijeshi wa NATO unaoongozwa na Ufaransa nchini Libya pia ulichochewa na hamu ya kupata sehemu kubwa ya uzalishaji wa mafuta ya Libya, na kudhoofisha mpango wa muda mrefu wa Gaddafi wa kuchukua nafasi ya Ufaransa kama nguvu kuu katika Afrika ya Kifaransa. mkoa.

Barua pepe ya Aprili 2011, iliyotumwa kwa Waziri wa Mambo ya Nje Hillary na mshauri asiye rasmi na msiri wa muda mrefu wa Clinton Sidney Blumenthal ikiwa na mada "mteja wa Ufaransa na dhahabu ya Qaddafi," inaonyesha nia za Magharibi.

Barua pepe hiyo inaweka wazi kwamba vyanzo vya kijasusi vinaonyesha msukumo wa shambulio la Ufaransa dhidi ya Libya ilikuwa hatua iliyokadiriwa ya kujumuisha nguvu kubwa, kwa kutumia NATO kama chombo cha ushindi wa ubeberu, sio uingiliaji wa kibinadamu kama umma uliongozwa kwa uwongo kuamini.

Mashambulizi mengi zaidi ya anga kuwahi kuanzishwa barani Afrika na NATO ni zaidi ya 10,000 dhidi ya Libya mnamo 2011 na zaidi ya vifo vya Raia 500,000. Nato ilipohojiwa kuhusu mauaji ya raia na kifo cha watoto wa Gaddafi, walisisitiza kuwa ni uharibifu wa dhamana na wa kawaida katika vita.

Haijalishi kilichotokea Libya, hakuna shirika, nchi iliyokuwa na haki ya kuivamia nchi nyingine. Inaenda kinyume na mkataba wa Umoja wa Mataifa na kanuni ya uhuru hivyo inaweza kutumika kama msingi wa vita vingine vya dunia

 

[Jmalando]

Muamar was killed by Nato and not Libyans, to those Liberals who suddenly altered to become one of the most trained and expert militia unit in Military Combat, they were not even to communicate by arabic-they don't know, arabic was not their language, they were not Bedouins nor Berber. They were not Libyans, they were MAMLUKI not Mercenaries hired for a special mission to just wave the False flag of the whole Nato Ops in Tripolitania!!

And for what purpose!? What did NATO gained on that?!

 

[Yoda]

You are right 100%

I totally disagree with this African narrative regarding this you people think to have free food and free money is everything which is quite wrong let take an example here in East Africa community we don't go along to the point we close boarder among ourselves and you wanna tell me we're going to have one Africa bro you gota kidding Africa have a lot of problem to be solved before we rich that stage Gadafi was killed by his own greedy by his own people we can trace it back from Arab spring and a lot of factors in It I agree there were NATO intervention but it was not for the purpose you just did tried to speculate

 

[Jmalando]

A victim of western disinformation and propaganda. Who gave those nukes to Russia?!

Do you even know that Russia has some modern weapons that the US and it's cronies don't have at the moment?

Have you heard of sarmat missile?

Budda kasome buddapest memorandum au lisobon agreement plus denuclearization after the fall of USSR 1991 kaangalie nan alikua na siraha nying Kati ya ukraine na Russia na angalia nini kilitokea kwa silaha za ukraine!

Hio Sarmat ni ICBM tu mzee improvement ni uwezo wa kubeba nuclear heads but remember ICBM is unlike hypersonic can be intercepted and USA has that power to intercept it! But militarily Russia Yuko far inferior compare to USA ukiangalia aspect zote afu kwenye silaha Kila mtu anazake USA pia ana silaha ambazo Russia hana yan karbia Kila nchi iliyo endelea ina siraha ambazo mwingne hana ila siyo sababu ya kushinda vita angalia hapo fanya ulinganifu Kati ya USA na Russia afu niambie Russia anaweza nn

 

[Jmalando]

Huyu putin ni reli nyingine kamwe hawamuwezi na wanaelekea kuumia muda sio mrefu

Acha kujidanganya mzee Putin sahv ana behave kama watu walio panic hawaelew wanaongea nn