The International Criminal Court (ICC) is a criminal institution

Mathanzua

JF-Expert Member
Jan 4, 2017
15,858
20,710

March 22, 2023

The International Criminal Court in The Hague (ICC) has recently issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin.

He stands accused of being responsible for, among other things, that a few hundred children have been brought safely into Russia from wartime Ukraine. This war that has been started by Barack Obama and then continued by his Vice President Joe Biden, has of course meant disaster and death to thousands of children in Ukraine.

Many fled to countries, such as Poland and Germany, which themselves are co-responsible for the war, but many remained under a Zelenski regime that did not mind sacrificing both young and old on the altar of war. For him, there was no choice either, because the US had forbidden him to even mention the word peace.

The situation is all too reminiscent of the one before the Second World War when President Roosevelt forbade his allies to consider any peace initiative from Hitler.To him the war effort was not to be stopped.

Back in Ukraine where the US had prevented every peace effort, the war would continue, and young and old would continue to be killed along with soldiers, who did not understand what they were fighting for. In that situation, Putin decided to save a number of children to join Russia with two million Russian families who themselves fled the hell created by the fighting.

The Australian analyst Tony Kevin comments on the ICC’s decision as follows: “The ICC is a redundant international institution in decay, that has lost faith to the international community. The ICC has fallen victim to the West’s fanatical Russophobia.”

What does this say about the ICC’s status as a legal institution? They brand those who carry out rescue operations and praise the war entrepreneurs or in any case hide their atrocities.

Such a procedure is described as: “protecting a criminal” and is described as criminal. This is not unique to disguised propaganda agencies like the ICC.

The court also has a tradition of falsehood and lies. We can begin our retrospect in 1919 when the verdict on the atrocities of the First World War. In Versailles, the trial was to be held, but in fact, it became a drama-comedy in which the designated culprit:Germany, had already been convicted before the trial and forbidden to plead.
Dignitaries gathered in the Hall of Mirrors at the Palace of Versailles, France, for the signing of the Treaty of Versailles in June 28, 1919.

States which a few years ago worked hard to bring about a war of extermination against Germany:the Anglo-American states, were now sitting as prosecutors. What was arrived at and ratified after a few months, was not a treaty, but a dictate, imposed under strong threats with the intention of tearing Germany apart. The entire First World War, like the Versailles plot, was characterized by Germanophobia, and it was not Germany that wanted a war.

After the Second World War, a number of high-ranking German military and politicians were brought before a political court in Nuremberg. They had to answer for the war crimes committed during the war. Hitler was not included in the dock, because he had already ended his life. However, together with the US diplomat Joseph Kennedy, he had done his best to avoid a war. But Franklin Roosevelt’s powerful message at the outbreak of war had a stronger volume than Kennedy’s: “No peace initiatives on the German side must be considered.” And so the scenario from Versailles was repeated,those who caused the war were now prosecutors.

Those who should have been sitting there were of course, Franklin Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, and Dwight Eisenhower. Roosevelt because he purposefully, from the time he took office as president, worked to have Germany crushed. Churchill because he took a job as Roosevelt’s running boy with such zeal.

In 1939 he exclaimed that: “this war is England’s war and the aim is to completely crush Germany.”
All three of them with Eisenhower took it upon themselves with delight to completely crush and burn down the German city of Dresden, which stood outside the arena of the war, thereby killing about 150,000 civilians. Eisenhower also took it upon himself to, after the end of the war and completely against all laws, to liquidate approx; 9 million German citizens through the so-called Morgenthau plan. That mass liquidation was thus taking place at the same time as the trials in Nuremberg.

In 2013, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Barack Obama ordered his Vice President Joe Biden to carry out a coup d’état in Ukraine with the intention of overthrowing the country’s popularly elected president and installing a Nazi-style government. This happened in accordance with Bzrezinski’s dogma:

“if you are a jihadist or a Nazi, it doesn’t matter as long as you hate Russia.”
The jihadists had done their bit when the US used Afghanistan to bring down the Soviet Union, now it was the Nazis’ turn to crush Russia.

The US is using Ukraine as slaughterhouse for the Russian army. That Ukraine,a country with 60 million people would be destroyed by this was unimportant to the White House. Now it has been 13 years since Obama gave his order for destruction and now it is apparent that destruction is indeed going on.
 
I Just don' t see Barak Obama starting a War. It is however, Unfortunate that he was the President of the United States(Sic). Well, he started a War?

Again it is a perogative of the West and East propaganda to blame whomever they see fitting every once and a while embellish those whom are at war as Rightly and justified.

Obama was not right. Putin and Biden got into a mix because of Obama. Aisee.

Hii Taarifa haijakaa sawa.
 
By the looks of it you are pro-west, so it is not at all surprising that you find this report out of context. It is funny however, especially when one takes into consideration the obvious evil nature of the West especially America. To a rational person however this report represents the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
 
Hao jamaa ni washenzi wanaenda kwa matakwa ya western countries.
Ni kweli kabisa mkuu.Nilichojaribu kufanya ni kwenda mbali zaidi,kuonyesha kwamba they are infact criminal.To me Russia wamefanya the right thing,nao kutoa an arrest warrant for Khan.Mkuu ni wazi kwamba Zelensky ndiye aliyetakiwa kupelekwa the Hague,sio Putin.
 
By the looks of it you are pro-west,so it is not at all surprising that you find this report out of context.
In some fashion I chose not to be on either side of the War. Sio vita yangu. Najua unaweza sema kwamba sisi waafrika tuna athirika, lakini hata nikichagua upande wowote ule....madhara ni yale yale, yaani haijalishi
It is funny however,especially when one takes into consideration the obvious evil nature of the West especially America.
That, in it self is apparent. But the whole Idea of Imperialism on both sides can be traced back decades, if not millenial and that is where my argument lies. Kuna mjamaa anaitwa George Kennan who concepted the expression "Containment" . The Contaient policy that started in the late 1940's, which sought to stop the Russian military capability and its, economic power and legitimacy...Kwa nini wasiseme alieanzisha haya alikuwa ni George Kennan au kuwa ni muendelezo wa sera alizo asisi yeye? why not Reagan na "Tear this wall" au Gorbachev? Obama Started the War!?? I doubt it. Its a blame game.
To a rational person however this report represents the whole truth,and nothing but the truth.
Najua fika sio weye uliosema hayo. Najua fika kuna mkono wa 'propaganda ya urusi' na ndio sababu kwa maoni yangu mwandishi anatafuta hila, wanajenga hila kwa Mwafrika Ila to a rational person in my view would say, mwandishi wa hiyo article alilenga kutafuta ushawishi wa Mwafrika ambaye kwa mda mrefu amekuwa akiita mahakama hiyo- lets say kihuni kuchagua upande wa Urusi kwa kuwa subjective.

Tatizo, ameanza na kichapo. hatahivyo umejiuliza....

Jihadism imeingia vipi hapo kama sio mtazamo wake umekuwa wa conspiracies kuwa Obama ni Muislam?
 
In some fashion I chose not to be on either side of the War. Sio vita yangu. Najua unaweza sema kwamba sisi waafrika tuna athirika, lakini hata nikichagua upande wowote ule....madhara ni yale yale, yaani haijalishi

That, in it self is apparent. But the whole Idea of Imperialism on both sides can be traced back decades, if not millenial and that is where my argument lies. Kuna mjamaa anaitwa George Kennan who concepted the expression "Containment" . The Contaient policy that started in the late 1940's, which sought to stop the Russian military capability and its, economic power and legitimacy...Kwa nini wasiseme alieanzisha haya alikuwa ni George Kennan au kuwa ni muendelezo wa sera alizo asisi yeye? why not Reagan na "Tear this wall" au Gorbachev? Obama Started the War!?? I doubt it. Its a blame game.

Najua fika sio weye uliosema hayo. Najua fika kuna mkono wa 'propaganda ya urusi' na ndio sababu kwa maoni yangu mwandishi anatafuta hila, wanajenga hila kwa Mwafrika Ila to a rational person in my view would say, mwandishi wa hiyo article alilenga kutafuta ushawishi wa Mwafrika ambaye kwa mda mrefu amekuwa akiita mahakama hiyo- lets say kihuni kuchagua upande wa Urusi kwa kuwa subjective.

Tatizo, ameanza na kichapo. hatahivyo umejiuliza....

Jihadism imeingia vipi hapo kama sio mtazamo wake umekuwa wa conspiracies kuwa Obama ni Muislam?
Obama sio Muislam mkuu,kabambikiziwa tu for an agenda,laiti ungejua.Nikipata muda next time we will discuss the issue, remind me.Anza na link ifuatayo👇

 
Back
Top Bottom