My Hypothesis on CHADEMA/Zitto’s Shadow Budget Blunder

English Learner others, be informed that if it turns out to be as you are saying, the finance minister, he will along with all professionals including TRA commissioners, entires staff in the ministry from PS, deputy PSs, commissioners even the parliamentry select comittee responsible. So don't expect for something like this to happen. Lets not be destructed by such a minor error in our cause to a Tanzania we want
 
Kosa ni kosa liwe la ccm ama chadema. Chadema haina budi kuomba msamaha kwa hili.
Apology ilitolewa na jedwali la source of funds likawekwa........

mnataka apite nyumbani kwenu kuwaomba radhi?
 
For undineable truism i'm negating with u're all hypotheses; neither any trick nor deliberate purpose done by ZZK during Shadow Budget preparations, it might be errered b'coz of technicalities in the process, mind you that CDM thy're just using very meager resources (human, money&time) to cub the situation, people w'll be stupid if will relay on this very minor mistake and leave big issues like embersoment and misuse of Public fund and they like..
 
The thread you are referring in JF is packed here https://www.jamiiforums.com/jukwaa-la-siasa/273409-zitto-2012-13-budget-participation.html

Personally I gave the below following reason to defend my rejection to that call:




NOW let me ask you ALL who responded; Do you think your opinion was considered?
 

Your hypothesis is null and void because it is pointing to a speculation not a premise. Go back to class and try to review concepts of hypothesis.
 
However, after a thorough assessment it has come to our knowledge that it has less impact on M4C process.
 
Sina ushahidi lakini urafiki wa uliowazi hadharani katiy ya Zitto na Kikwete unaniaminisha kuwa zitto anatumiwa na ccm. Nukta!!
 

dont limit y're brain brother! even yesterday during the session Halima Mdee in respect to the source of funds elaborated well that is ok in particular page there is only total amount without showing how amount of Income/ Revenue and Expenditures will be but all of these was analysed in specific schedule attached purposely.

for clarafication go and pass through in Hansard dated 21/6/2012 for MPs report.
 
....Msitake kueneza propaganda za Zitto the great kwa kutumia Marks za shule kama Mwigule Nchemba..

I have learn from the best parents and teachers to speak the truth and only the truth with supporting evidence(s). Refer to https://www.jamiiforums.com/jukwaa-...ojiano-ya-mwigulu-na-zitto-leo-asubuhi-2.html


What is the difference between the two (Zitto and Nchemba) and who is a liar between me and you?


Aliyesahau kuliingiza jedwali hilo ni Zitto na sio Chadema........na lilikuwepo in the first place

Ooooh! Kumbe....
 
Thank you, I'll go but I won't choose you to be my Teacher if that is how quickly you jump into the conclusion.

Your hypothesis is null and void because it is pointing to a speculation not a premise. Go back to class and try to review concepts of hypothesis.
 

Excellent position to stand. Keep it up lady.
 
there is where the main question lies! where will you get the income to cover such expenditure? Budget should clearly shows both sides REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE! You cant say collectively say for example that we will collect lets say 10 trilions and spend 10 trilions, that is not correct you must show all sources of 10 trillions and all places where you are going to use the funds, that is budget!! we should agree there was mistake in preparation of that doccument either delibarately or otherwise!!
 
I don think if zitto has something to do with that budget mistakes rather than typing error.

But what i cant understand how comes nape congratulate cdm? We all know Nape is not real,there must be something wrong some where.

But we should watch Nape moves we will find something and i know the trueth will be revealed soon because zitto can hide nothing to us.

I hope we suspect him for nothing because people wont forgive him if he has something to do with budget mistakes.
 
================

In trying to find-out what reason(s) could have caused such a blunder to be done and pass unnoticed along all Party’s (CDM) levels only to be realized in the public, I’ve came-out with the following hypothesis................................
In English, you cannot say I've came-out................. instead use the words "I've come-out", it is a principle of the language itself, not the way you like.

 
Zitto and all Chadema's MPs are mortals and not angels. By this I mean that there is a possibility of making mistakes. It is only God who is perfect in every area of His being. I think we should understand rather than blaming them mercilessly. I believe that they have learned from this blunder as we know that sometimes we learn through the mistakes we do. If they fail to learn from that, then that will mean that they are unfit for the leadership of our nation. Please, let us give them a second chance. CCM was so tough on that blunder, however, we know that political parts like to capitalize on the mistakes of other parts, so it was expected of CCM to do that and that is how politic is. Personally, I believe that CCM is one of the major factors that has contributed to the backwardness of our nation. I would be so glad to see them becoming an opposition part. Peopleeeeeeeeeeeeeeees Poweeeeeeeeeeer.
 
Katika hali kama hii, ambayo Jedwali moja limesahaulika kuwekwa kwenye hotuba iliyosomwa, lakini lilikuwepo in the first place sio jambo la ajabu hata kidogo...........

Bigirita
Your statement above confirms my hypothesis straight away. Had Zitto read the printed copy, missing or stepping a Table could not be taken as a big deal. But lucky the dot.com MP used a soft touch iPad. Which means if the soft copy (which is the original doc.) had no Tables, then the sources of income were not identified. And if the Tables were there but not read then Zitto stepped or removed them deliberately. The later statement has also been said by you. That confirms my hypothesis is valid. Agree?

BigiritaAliyesahau kuliingiza jedwali hilo ni Zitto na sio Chadema........na lilikuwepo in the first place.

Bigirita
So why did Zitto do that? Is removing something from its appropriate position not a deliberate act?

Bigirita you suite best to stand on the prosecutor side of this hypothesis than being a defender. Your witness would have made a fair verdict to come out so easily and quickly.
 
Isn't this exactly what English Learner implies?

  • That the likes of Zomba would immediately not only come out and point the obvious but go ahead and make such ridiculous conclusions as,
    if big mistakes are noticed by a layman (me) and none of your "economists" gives a shit
  • That the likes of Nape Nnauye, the noisy CCM vuvuzela, would come out and congratulate Zitto for showing maturity by admitting the short-coming in his presentation?
  • That the pathetic no-gooders like Ngeleja would acquire some breathing space and gleefully liken the presentation to a wedding budget proposal?
  • That the likes of CCM lawmakers would take the opportunity to divert peoples attention from discussing the budget tabled by the government and instead focus on Zitto's budget?
  • That the gullible Tanzanian public would be swayed by such incoherent assertions as;
    Who in his right senses would give chadema a go ahead to lead us?

Well English Learner, preplanned? Based on the way things stand, I am almost but not entirely convinced by your hypothesis though, for sure, the omission gave some loud mouths an opportunity to strike back however feebly. The Zombas will clutch at anything to save themselves and to them the mistake has been like a straw, a lifesaver...this should never be allowed to happen and it's a pity it did. My conclusion is that it needs to be looked into very seriously indeed!
 

I have offered an almost similar advise (free of charge) a bit before you, follow the link: https://www.jamiiforums.com/jukwaa-la-siasa/282200-ushauri-kwa-wana-chadema.html#post4104305
 
Reactions: UTC
What is shadow budget anyway? what is the relevance of preparing a "shadow budget"? what if all the numbers in the shadow budget are wrong and its propositions flawed? what does that mean in the grand scheme of things a.k.a the national budget? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

Of course, if CDM was the party in power, its budget preparation should have been better prepared and obviously it would have taken a group of professionals to prepare it. To me the biggest error in this whole saga is the assumption that the opposition's budget is somewhat relevant to the national budget. IT IS NOT. For me the opportunity should have been used to dissect meticulously and precisely the national budget. The opportunity should have been used to show how the failed policies of the ruling party have brought our nation to this brink of catastrophe. I hope next year CDM will stop doing this "shadow budget' thing! Its a waste of time and resources.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…