Lies that attract mind in conspiracy theory

Victor Mlaki

Victor Mlaki

JF-Expert Member
May 1, 2016
3,542
3,451
This theory assumes that "it is not God who created man but man created God ideally".
It ask questions like "who created God?"
...........................................
Tukiiangalia hii nadharia ni kama unataka kuipa akili kuliko akili uliyotumia kufanya akili kuwa akili.
..".Kwamba akili ndiyo inayomuumba Mungu kidhahania.."
Wakati mwingine jambo linaloonekana kuwa karibu sana na ukweli inaweza kuwa ni uongo mkubwa.
 
mlakimtoto said:
This theory assumes that "it is not God who created man but man created God ideally".
It ask questions like "who created God?"
...........................................
Tukiiangalia hii nadharia ni kama unataka kuipa akili kuliko akili uliyotumia kufanya akili kuwa akili.
..".Kwamba akili ndiyo inayomuumba Mungu kidhahania.."
Wakati mwingine jambo linaloonekana kuwa karibu sana na ukweli inaweza kuwa ni uongo mkubwa.
Click to expand...
Naona MALUWE LUWE TU hapo
 
mlakimtoto said:
This theory assumes that "it is not God who created man but man created God ideally".
It ask questions like "who created God?"
...........................................
Tukiiangalia hii nadharia ni kama unataka kuipa akili kuliko akili uliyotumia kufanya akili kuwa akili.
..".Kwamba akili ndiyo inayomuumba Mungu kidhahania.."
Wakati mwingine jambo linaloonekana kuwa karibu sana na ukweli inaweza kuwa ni uongo mkubwa.
Click to expand...
Yes, I do agree that god is a mindset-creation of man therefore god has nothing to do with a creation of man, untill up-to-date.
 
Manton said:
Yes, I do agree that god is a mindset-creation of man therefore god has nothing to do with a creation of man, untill up-to-date.
Click to expand...
Can you justify it without blurred answers?
So what is the source of sources including the source itself?
 
Manton said:
Yes, I do agree that god is a mindset-creation of man therefore god has nothing to do with a creation of man, untill up-to-date.
Click to expand...

Are you sure that Existence of God is man Mindset Creation?

The thing that man fail to prove its existence make you to conclude that thing does not exist?
 
daaa najionea ma-movie movie tuu, itakuwa sijasoma high level ili kuyaelewa hayo.
 
mlakimtoto said:
Let me read it
Click to expand...
Yeah do that!..
(a brief account)
"...people looked for ways to build new communities as they left their old ones behind or saw them disintegrating. Surrounded by strangers, living in splintered ethnic groups which periodically exploded in violence, they needed to find comfort and reassurance in a new community, a new set of shared beliefs and rituals that took account of the complexity of their new urban world....."

"...For the rulers, peace posed a different sort of problem: a problem of legitimacy. How could they secure loyalty to their rule now that they could no longer command it by military might?. Rulers required a different form of legitimation and a new way of binding together disparate peoples. Force, of course, was always available if persuasion did not work. But persuasion was cheaper and ultimately more efficient – willing subjects are far more faithful than coerced ones; and force was anyway not always successful.. Rulers needed religions to keep them on their thrones, just as religions needed rulers to help spread their message and protect their followers."

"...Cities killed off most of the old pagan gods. It is not for nothing that the early Christians called non-Christians 'pagani: the Latin paganus means ‘country-dweller’. The pagan gods offered insurance against disaster, as long as they received an appropriate bribe in the form of sacrifice. But they did not provide what the mystery cults such as Isis and certain other religions were beginning to offer: a way to live one’s earthly life, the promise of an afterlife and a personal relationship with god. Such comforts as these, which today are seen as defining elements of what constitutes a religion, were increasingly necessary in the alien world of the cities of the late first century BC.."
 
Wick said:
Yeah do that!..
(a brief account)
"...people looked for ways to build new communities as they left their old ones behind or saw them disintegrating. Surrounded by strangers, living in splintered ethnic groups which periodically exploded in violence, they needed to find comfort and reassurance in a new community, a new set of shared beliefs and rituals that took account of the complexity of their new urban world....."

"...For the rulers, peace posed a different sort of problem: a problem of legitimacy. How could they secure loyalty to their rule now that they could no longer command it by military might?. Rulers required a different form of legitimation and a new way of binding together disparate peoples. Force, of course, was always available if persuasion did not work. But persuasion was cheaper and ultimately more efficient – willing subjects are far more faithful than coerced ones; and force was anyway not always successful.. Rulers needed religions to keep them on their thrones, just as religions needed rulers to help spread their message and protect their followers."

"...Cities killed off most of the old pagan gods. It is not for nothing that the early Christians called non-Christians 'pagani: the Latin paganus means ‘country-dweller’. The pagan gods offered insurance against disaster, as long as they received an appropriate bribe in the form of sacrifice. But they did not provide what the mystery cults such as Isis and certain other religions were beginning to offer: a way to live one’s earthly life, the promise of an afterlife and a personal relationship with god. Such comforts as these, which today are seen as defining elements of what constitutes a religion, were increasingly necessary in the alien world of the cities of the late first century BC.."
Click to expand...
Thank you friend! I also noted something glittering as gold but I am sure it can't be so.
 
Bajeti ya kunguru said:
Yaani watu wanakubali pikipiki chombo kidogo tu kuwa kimeundwa na binadamu ila ulimwengu wote huu na vyote vilivyomo hakuna aliyeviumba. Nawasikitikia tu.

MAGUFULI4LIFE.
Click to expand...
Umeeleweka vizuri sana Kaka ila umehitimisha vibaya .Nina ukakika huu uzi siyo wa kisiasa na humlengi na hauna itikadi yoyote ile ni kutaka zaidi ya kubaini nadharia na kuzihusisha na uelewa.
Na ikiwezekana kuzipinga "falsification"
 
Yule mzee mnywa viroba Charles Darwin na mindevu yake kama mchicha wa nyongeza katuharibia sana vijana wetu na theory yake ya kikuda(origin of species)
 
mlakimtoto said:
Umeeleweka vizuri sana Kaka ila umehitimisha vibaya .Nina ukakika huu uzi siyo wa kisiasa na humlengi na hauna itikadi yoyote ile ni kutaka zaidi ya kubaini nadharia na kuzihusisha na uelewa.
Na ikiwezekana kuzipinga "falsification"
Click to expand...
Unajua kila nikilala nikiamka ni MAGUFULI ndio maana kila nalotenda huwa najikuta naombea.


MAGUFULI4LIFE.
 
mlakimtoto said:
This theory assumes that "it is not God who created man but man created God ideally".
It ask questions like "who created God?"
...........................................
Tukiiangalia hii nadharia ni kama unataka kuipa akili kuliko akili uliyotumia kufanya akili kuwa akili.
..".Kwamba akili ndiyo inayomuumba Mungu kidhahania.."
Wakati mwingine jambo linaloonekana kuwa karibu sana na ukweli inaweza kuwa ni uongo mkubwa.
Click to expand...
Thibitisha Mungu yupo kweli na si wazo la watu tu.
 
Wick said:
Yeah do that!..
(a brief account)
"...people looked for ways to build new communities as they left their old ones behind or saw them disintegrating. Surrounded by strangers, living in splintered ethnic groups which periodically exploded in violence, they needed to find comfort and reassurance in a new community, a new set of shared beliefs and rituals that took account of the complexity of their new urban world....."

"...For the rulers, peace posed a different sort of problem: a problem of legitimacy. How could they secure loyalty to their rule now that they could no longer command it by military might?. Rulers required a different form of legitimation and a new way of binding together disparate peoples. Force, of course, was always available if persuasion did not work. But persuasion was cheaper and ultimately more efficient – willing subjects are far more faithful than coerced ones; and force was anyway not always successful.. Rulers needed religions to keep them on their thrones, just as religions needed rulers to help spread their message and protect their followers."

"...Cities killed off most of the old pagan gods. It is not for nothing that the early Christians called non-Christians 'pagani: the Latin paganus means ‘country-dweller’. The pagan gods offered insurance against disaster, as long as they received an appropriate bribe in the form of sacrifice. But they did not provide what the mystery cults such as Isis and certain other religions were beginning to offer: a way to live one’s earthly life, the promise of an afterlife and a personal relationship with god. Such comforts as these, which today are seen as defining elements of what constitutes a religion, were increasingly necessary in the alien world of the cities of the late first century BC.."
Click to expand...

All these nightmare ideas always came from narrow minded peoples. It's hard to believe a creature who never know and had not even idea what will happen on him within a coming second. Can create GOD on his mind. May be a one who having that said idea he didn't have a knowledge of what is GOD. for that reason he can talk as his narrow mind piloted him and think that the great thinkers can believe his rubbish idea.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar Discussions

Back
Top Bottom
Forums
New posts
Post thread
Back