Israel ranked number one in most militarized country in the world.

Jasusi huo ni uongo IRON DOME imetengenezwa ISRAEL na kampuni iitwayo RAFAEL inadeal na missile defence system.

One missile inagharimu $40000-$50000
Hii inatumika kuintercept Missiles ambazo zinarushwa kuelekea population places.
Marekani yeye ametoa hela $200 mil baada ya hii system kuanzishwa.
Imeanza tumika kuanzia mwaka jana march

Technology ya Iron dome wamepewa na Marekani. That is the Gospel truth.
 
This is according to the report 'Global Militarization Index' issued on13/Nov/2012,by Bonn International Centre for Conversion. Iran which is in tug of war with Israel is far in number 34. Syria is number 4,Jordan 5. MY TAKE: Iran,palestina,Egypt nk wana ubavu wa kumpiga huyu mtu?.

Allah anatosha!!
 
Technology ya Iron dome wamepewa na Marekani. That is the Gospel truth.

Mtu mzima acha ubishi usio na tija wala evidence ni wazi kabisa kuwa iron dome origin yake ni israel na kampuni inayotengeneza ni RAFAEL ADVANCED DEFENSE SYSTEMS LTD. ila kwa sasa wamekubaliana na USA wanaipa funds hii project ili na wao wapate hii system! na hata ingekuwa imeoriginate USA bado israel ingekuwa inahusika maana viwanda vingi vya silaha vya USA vinamilikiwa na watu wenye asili ya kiyahudi! pata elimu na acha ubishi!
 
Mtu mzima acha ubishi usio na tija wala evidence ni wazi kabisa kuwa iron dome origin yake ni israel na kampuni inayotengeneza ni RAFAEL ADVANCED DEFENSE SYSTEMS LTD. ila kwa sasa wamekubaliana na USA wanaipa funds hii project ili na wao wapate hii system! na hata ingekuwa imeoriginate USA bado israel ingekuwa inahusika maana viwanda vingi vya silaha vya USA vinamilikiwa na watu wenye asili ya kiyahudi! pata elimu na acha ubishi!

Bora umenisaidia maana watanzania wengine wamegandishwa sana kila akiona kitu cha Israel eti kapewa na USA.
Umemsaidia na yeye pia
 
Unadangwanya kitoto kweli Mr Swati....That is media war...Even you with little knowledge of creating blogs,websites and the alike you can POST anything you like and those narrow minded will follow you same as you have followed that bla bla....How can u compare IRAN with Syria or Jordan? How can u bliv that ISRAEL is No 1 in terms of military strength globally? History shows that Israel iliivamia na kuviaribu vinu vya IRAK in 1981 na Pia iliivamia SYRIA na kuviharibu vinu vyake 2007....Lakini imeshindwa kabisa kuivamia IRAN na kuomba msaada wa kimataifa...Na ikumbukwe IRAN ni hatari kwa Israel kwani msimamo wao nadhani unaujua tafauti na ilvyokua Irak na Syria....So mtoa mada usiamini kila kitu unachokuta kwenye internet kwani kila mtu anaweza post SAME AS MAJIBU YA KWENYE WIKIPEDIA KILA MTU ANAWEKA YAKE SO WAVIVU WA KUFIKIRI WANADHANI WAMEPATIA

Ok kwa hiyo na wewe umeweka post kama mtu mwingine yeyote anavyoweza kuweka bila kujali ukweli wa uliyoyasema? Anyway, kuna nchi kama Egypt haiwezi kuthubutu kujaribu kuishambulia Israel hata kidogo. Kwa wanaojua historia wanajua ni kwanini Rais Nasser wa Egypt alikufa kwa pressure, ni kwanini Rada iliyowekwa bahari ya sham ili kuchunguza Israel inachofanya ilibebwa nzima nzima na waisrael na kwanini Waisrael walifanikiwa kuchukua mateka Uganda. Waisrael hata marekani yenyewe inawaogopa.

Kama unafikiri Iran ni superior kivita zaidi ya Israel basi washauri Iran waingilie kati ili makobora ya Israel yasiendelee kuwaumiza wapalestina, halafu utasikia mziki wake!!!!

Tiba
 
This is according to the report 'Global Militarization Index' issued on13/Nov/2012,by Bonn International Centre for Conversion. Iran which is in tug of war with Israel is far in number 34. Syria is number 4,Jordan 5. MY TAKE: Iran,palestina,Egypt nk wana ubavu wa kumpiga huyu mtu?.
This is psychological war. How a weak country which is being seeking military assistance from other countries be called the country with best military. for example Israel is seeking assistance from US to strike Iran. Also Syria is Surviving due to support it is receiving from Iran. Israel has recently bought submarine from Germany.
 
hamas-rockets-2012-1.jpg



To begin to make sense of the escalating conflict in Gaza, we need to go back to the night of Oct. 23 in Khartoum. Around 11 p.m. that night, the Yarmouk weapons facility in the Sudanese capital was attacked, presumably by the Israeli air force. There were indications that Iran had been using this facility to stockpile and possibly assemble weapons, including anti-aircraft missiles, guided anti-tank missiles and long-range Fajr-5 rockets capable of reaching Tel Aviv and Jerusalem from Gaza.

One of the major drivers behind Israel's latest air and assassination campaign is its belief that Hamas has a large cache of long-range Fajr-3 and Fajr-5 rockets in its possession. Israel's primary intent in this military campaign is to deny Hamas the ability to use these rockets or keep them as a constant threat to Israel's population centers. This likely explains why in early October, when short-range rocket attacks from Gaza were still at a low level, Israeli officials began conditioning the public to the idea of an "inevitable" Israeli intervention in Gaza. Israel knew Hamas had these weapons in its possession and that it could require a war to eliminate the Fajr rocket threat. It began with the strike on the facility in Sudan, extended to the assassination of Hamas military commander Ahmad Jabari (the architect of the Fajr rocket program) and now has the potential to develop into an Israeli ground incursion in Gaza.

Analysis

Oct. 23 was not the first time Israel allegedly attacked weapons caches in Sudanese territory that were destined for Gaza. In January 2009, Israel allegedly carried out an airstrike against a weapons convoy northwest of Port Sudan heading to Gaza. The convoy included Fajr-3 rockets and was unusually large, with more than 20 trucks traveling north toward Gaza. The rushed shipment was allegedly arranged by Iran to reinforce Hamas during Operation Cast Lead. Iran was also exposed trying to smuggle weapons to Gaza through the Red Sea.

Though efforts were likely made to conceal the weapons cache at Yarmouk, it obviously did not escape Israeli detection. Hamas therefore took a major risk in smuggling the weapons to Gaza in the first place, perhaps thinking they could get away with it since they have been able to with less sophisticated weapons systems. Before Hamas responded to the Nov. 14 Jabari assassination, there were two major spates of rocket and mortar attacks over the past month. The first was Oct. 8-10 and the second was Oct. 22-24. When the decision was made to carry out these attacks, Hamas may not have known that Israel had detected the long-range Fajrs. Launching Grad and Qassam mortars may have been Hamas' attempt at misleading Israel into thinking that Hamas did not even have the Fajr rockets, because otherwise it would have used them. Hamas may have also erroneously assumed that launching mortars and short-range rockets, as it periodically does when the situation gets tense with Israel, would not lead to a major Israeli response.

By the time Israel attacked the Yarmouk facility, Hamas had to assume that Israel knew of the weapons transfer to Gaza. Hamas then quickly agreed to an Egyptian-mediated ceasefire Oct. 25. When attacks against Israel began picking up again around Nov. 10 -- including an anti-tank attack on an Israeli military jeep claimed by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and several dozen more rocket attacks claimed by Palestinian Islamic Jihad and smaller Salafist-jihadist groups -- Hamas appeared more cautious, calling the main Gaza militant groups together on Nov. 12 to seek out another truce. By then, it was too late. They had already inadvertently provided the Israelis with the justification they needed to get public relations cover for their campaign to destroy Hamas' long-range rocket program.

Related reports you can access with the subscription: Considering an Israeli Ground Assault in Gaza Attacks Continue Along With Efforts To Mediate A Test of Hamas' Authority in Gaza On Nov. 14, Jabari was assassinated, and Hamas had to work under the assumption that Israel would do whatever it took to launch a comprehensive military campaign to eliminate the Fajr threat. It is at this point that Hamas likely resigned to a "use it or lose it" strategy and launched Fajr rockets toward Tel Aviv, knowing that they would be targeted anyway and potentially using the threat as leverage in an eventual attempt at another truce with Israel. A strong Hamas response would also boost Hamas' credibility among Palestinians. Hamas essentially tried to make the most out of an already difficult situation and will now likely work through Egypt to try to reach a truce to avoid an Israeli ground campaign in Gaza that could further undermine its authority in the territory.

In Tehran, Iranian officials are likely quite content with these developments. Iran needed a distraction from the conflict in Syria. It now has that, at least temporarily. Iran also needed to revise its relationship with Hamas and demonstrate that it retains leverage through militant groups in the Palestinian territories as part of its deterrence strategy against a potential strike on its nuclear program. Hamas decided in the past year that it was better off aligning itself with its ascendant parent organization, the Muslim Brotherhood, than remaining tethered to an ideological rival like Iran that was being put on the defensive in the region. Iran could still capture Hamas' attention through weapons sales, however, and may have even expected that Israel would detect the Fajr shipments.

The result is an Israeli military campaign in Gaza that places Hamas' credibility in question and could create more space for a group like the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, which has close ties to Iran. The conflict will also likely create tension in Hamas' relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Jordan and Syria, since the Brotherhood, particularly in Egypt, is not prepared or willing to confront Israel beyond rhetoric and does not want to face the public backlash for not doing enough to defend the Palestinians from Israel Defense Forces. All in all, this may turn out to be a relatively low-cost, high payoff maneuver by Iran.

Source
http://beforeitsnews.com/2012/2012/11/irans-agenda-in-the-gaza-offensive-2439792.html
 
Unadangwanya kitoto kweli Mr Swati....That is media war...Even you with little knowledge of creating blogs,websites and the alike you can POST anything you like and those narrow minded will follow you same as you have followed that bla bla....How can u compare IRAN with Syria or Jordan? How can u bliv that ISRAEL is No 1 in terms of military strength globally? History shows that Israel iliivamia na kuviaribu vinu vya IRAK in 1981 na Pia iliivamia SYRIA na kuviharibu vinu vyake 2007....Lakini imeshindwa kabisa kuivamia IRAN na kuomba msaada wa kimataifa...Na ikumbukwe IRAN ni hatari kwa Israel kwani msimamo wao nadhani unaujua tafauti na ilvyokua Irak na Syria....So mtoa mada usiamini kila kitu unachokuta kwenye internet kwani kila mtu anaweza post SAME AS MAJIBU YA KWENYE WIKIPEDIA KILA MTU ANAWEKA YAKE SO WAVIVU WA KUFIKIRI WANADHANI WAMEPATIA

Naona kama vile wewe ndiyo umekuja kiuepesi zaidi kuweza kuaminika
 
Mtu mzima acha ubishi usio na tija wala evidence ni wazi kabisa kuwa iron dome origin yake ni israel na kampuni inayotengeneza ni RAFAEL ADVANCED DEFENSE SYSTEMS LTD. ila kwa sasa wamekubaliana na USA wanaipa funds hii project ili na wao wapate hii system! na hata ingekuwa imeoriginate USA bado israel ingekuwa inahusika maana viwanda vingi vya silaha vya USA vinamilikiwa na watu wenye asili ya kiyahudi! pata elimu na acha ubishi!
Chuma,
Sijabisha kuwa Rafael Advanced Systems LTD ndio wanaotengeneza hiyo iron dome lakini teknology hiyo wamepewa na Marekani. That is all I am saying. Israel copied the technology from the United States as they copied the nuclear technology. What is so hard to understand? Actually yesterday on one of the talk shows on TV someone said among the things that the US has given Israel is the technology to deal with the threat of rockets fired from an enemy country, including Iran. Mbishi ni wewe!
 
Unadangwanya kitoto kweli Mr Swati....That is media war...Even you with little knowledge of creating blogs,websites and the alike you can POST anything you like and those narrow minded will follow you same as you have followed that bla bla....How can u compare IRAN with Syria or Jordan? How can u bliv that ISRAEL is No 1 in terms of military strength globally? History shows that Israel iliivamia na kuviaribu vinu vya IRAK in 1981 na Pia iliivamia SYRIA na kuviharibu vinu vyake 2007....Lakini imeshindwa kabisa kuivamia IRAN na kuomba msaada wa kimataifa...Na ikumbukwe IRAN ni hatari kwa Israel kwani msimamo wao nadhani unaujua tafauti na ilvyokua Irak na Syria....So mtoa mada usiamini kila kitu unachokuta kwenye internet kwani kila mtu anaweza post SAME AS MAJIBU YA KWENYE WIKIPEDIA KILA MTU ANAWEKA YAKE SO WAVIVU WA KUFIKIRI WANADHANI WAMEPATIA

Ni kweli tunatakiwa tusiamini kila kitu tukionacho kwenye web. Lakini kama habari ina data na imefanyiwa research inatupasa tuiamini mpaka hapo wewe utakapoleta habari yako ambayo itatakiwa iwe well researched.Hiyo report si ya wikipedia na si yangu,ni ya well reputed organization,na kwa taarifa tu inafadhiliwa na serikali ya Ujerumani. Unge google hiyo report uisome na uone hao jamaa wamezi rank nchi kutokana na vigezo gani ingekusaidia kukupa mwanga zaidi. Usipokuwa na well researched data,unaweza kuwa biased na uka rank nchi kutokana na mapenzi yako tu kama ulivyoonyesha kwa Iran!
 
This is according to the report 'Global Militarization Index' issued on13/Nov/2012,by Bonn International Centre for Conversion. Iran which is in tug of war with Israel is far in number 34. Syria is number 4,Jordan 5. MY TAKE: Iran,palestina,Egypt nk wana ubavu wa kumpiga huyu mtu?.

Six Day War - (In Hebrew - Mil'hement sheshet Hayamim). A war between Israel and Egypt, Jordan and Syria that began on June 5, 1967 and ended on June 10 1967. In the war, Israel occupied the Sinai Peninsula, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.
iflag2.gif
Six_day_war_into_the_sea.gif


Six Day War - 6 Day war - Definition, History
 
Namna hii ya maongezi nilikuwa nayo wakati nipo std 5. Manake hapo kwenye RED sijui una hakika gani kwamba wanayo nia ila hawana uwezo. Kwani Israel ina ugomvi na Iran?

Maswali yako yanapinga hoja za mwenzio as if wewe ndio umekuwa entitled kuleta majibu ya ukweli. Haya na mimi nakuuliza UNAWEZAJE KUAMINI ISRAEL HAIWEZI KUIVAMIA IRAN?

Punguza jazba, si wewe wala si yeye mwenye majibu ya uhakika. Na wewe pia umesikia ushabiki sehemu ndio umeuleta hapa kwa povu jingi kama mama chiku na sabuni yake ya family

Sidhan km nimejibu kwa jazba km maandishi yako yalivyosomeka kijikejike tu matusi yanatoka wapi? Point yangu ni kwamba sikubaliani na mtoa mada kua Israel ni NO 1 dunian kijeshi na nikatoa mfano mdogo tu jinsi ilivyovivamia vinu vya IRAK na SYRIA ilikua ni kimya kimya wala bila kupiga kelele same as juzi tu walipokiharibu kiwanda cha SUDAN na bado kuna consiparcy and subotage wanazozifanya ISRAEL pale wanapoona usalama wao utakua hatarini lakini kwa case ya IRAN kwa shindwa kuivamia akiomba msaada wa US na NATO tofauti na tunavyoijua Israel....So kijana acha mapenzi ya kishoga come up with constructive thinking ili sio jukwaa la mipasho
 
iron dome system is real efficient na imewaokoa sana kwenye hii crisis na Gaza, la sivyo nao Israel wangekiona cha moto
 
Bwana October ! umeshawahi kupata masaibu mf kuvamiwa na majambazi ,kuibiwa nk. hawa hamas unaowasema wanaichokoza Israel ni miongoni mwa watoto ambao wazazi wao wameuawa na majeshi ya Israel, wadogo zaowamekanyagwa na vifaru vya Israel ,nyumba zao zimevunjwa kuna raha gani ya kuishi katika Dunia hiyo ? Mbona kuna watu hapa Tanzania wanaona bora kufa kuliko kubaki katika hali ya umasikini walionao ndio maana hawaogopi hata risasi za polisi.

Dunia inahitaji kufakari upya kwamba huwezi kuwatawala watu kwa nguvu, kila kitu kina mwanzo na mwisho waisrael na wafuasi wao kama wewe, mnapaswa kutambua kuwa haki ina nguvu zaidi kulikoo nyukilia na vifaru.

Viva Falestine,makaburu walikuwa hivyo pia walishindwa na Mandela pamoja na kuwa walikuwa wnaungwa mkono na wamarekani na Waingereza.
 
Back
Top Bottom