Is this chess or checkers?

[Keynez]

In chess, you never expose your King to an attack. Matter of fact, the King is never used in the battle until the very last stages of the game when almost all the pieces are eliminated.

Moral of the story is, when you see a player moving his King all over the place recklessly, there are two things. Either, you are dealing with an amateur or there is a high degree of recklessness.

 

[Chamoto]

In chess, you never expose your King to an attack. Matter of fact, the King is never used in the battle until the very last stages of the game when almost all the pieces are eliminated.

Moral of the story is, when you see a player moving his King all over the place recklessly, there are two things. Either, you are dealing with an amateur or there is a high degree of recklessness.

Beautiful analogy, it shows how deep of a thinker you are but explaining a little bit about checkers on your first paragraph as you did with chess, would kill it.

 

[FaizaFoxy]

In chess, you never expose your King to an attack. Matter of fact, the King is never used in the battle until the very last stages of the game when almost all the pieces are eliminated.

Moral of the story is, when you see a player moving his King all over the place recklessly, there are two things. Either, you are dealing with an amateur or there is a high degree of recklessness.

The Queen in chess is guarded not the king.