Ethiopia: the budding powerhouse in Africa

Ethiopia: the budding powerhouse in Africa

1) When Kenyan government built the Nairobi-Thika expressway, why the city planners didn't stick with single lane highway?

2.) When you have a infrastructure construction project are you looking for the present or the potential future?

3.) So any country in Africa (including east Africa) should not build a mega port just because Mombasa port exists?

4.) Do you hope to have Kagame and Museven in power forever? What if the future regimes decide to use the Bagamoyo mega port?

5.) Remember a thorough feasibility study was conducted by all key parties before embarking on this massive project

Thika road was already a four lane highway. Bagamoyo imo was a knee-jerk reaction to the lamu port project and was supposed to bring competitition to mombasa port. It however got the funding because the chinese need it more than the tanzanians
 
Thika road was already a four lane highway. Bagamoyo imo was a knee-jerk reaction to the lamu port project and was supposed to bring competitition to mombasa port. It however got the funding because the chinese need it more than the tanzanians
Let's be patient and see what's gonna happen after the completion of this Bagamoyo mega project, then we can be in a position to conclude whether it's a failure or a success. You don't have to be intimidated by this ambitious mega infrastructure project. Thanks
 
Let's be patient and see what's gonna happen after the completion of this Bagamoyo mega project, then we can be in a position to conclude whether it's a failure or a success. You don't have to be intimidated by this ambitious mega infrastructure project. Thanks

I never intimated the project would be a failure btw but looking at the target market and regional geo-politics suggests that it may not complement Dar much but i have a feeling that it will be very important to the Chinese.
 
1) When Kenyan government built the Nairobi-Thika expressway, why the city planners didn't stick with single lane highway?

2.) When you have a infrastructure construction project are you looking for the present or the potential future?

3.) So any country in Africa (including east Africa) should not build a mega port just because Mombasa port exists?

4.) Do you hope to have Kagame and Museven in power forever? What if the future regimes decide to use the Bagamoyo mega port?

5.) Remember a thorough feasibility study was conducted by all key parties before embarking on this massive project
The issue is not whether the Port in Bagamoyo is a mega port or not. East Africa could do with more than one mega port. So Bagamoyo is welcome as a mega Port. In fact Tanzania needs a mega port. That is not in dispute. What we are asking is a port that is 30 time larger than a mega port what do you call it? Who will it serve? Is the hinterland growing or is it the same?
As for the 3ks ditching infrastructure they have invested in, that is wishful thinking. Uganda, Rwanda will also invest in the railway line in their countries so that Movement from Mombasa is seamless. Once that is done, they are locked into the project for life. Don't expect them to shift.
 
1) When Kenyan government built the Nairobi-Thika expressway, why the city planners didn't stick with single lane highway?

2.) When you have a infrastructure construction project are you looking for the present or the potential future?

3.) So any country in Africa (including east Africa) should not build a mega port just because Mombasa port exists?

4.) Do you hope to have Kagame and Museven in power forever? What if the future regimes decide to use the Bagamoyo mega port?

5.) Remember a thorough feasibility study was conducted by all key parties before embarking on this massive project
I think the issues raised here are not the issues at hand. For one the trend in the shipping world is towards large vessels. This means that the ports have to expand to accommodate their custom. So the issue of whether or not to build a mega port is neither here nor there. In fact I have seen a long term plan by TPA and it envisages that all ports under its docket will be upgraded to that level. The question is how big is a megaport? Is there a danger of creating excess capacity? since all ports are likely to be mega ports, in future, do we need a super megaport?
As for use, a Port itself is not enough, it has to be backed by other transport infrastructure such as roads and Railways. Without these a port is likely to be a white elephant. So shouldn't Tanzania build a mega port and spare some of the money to build a high speed Railway line from Bagamoyo to Mwanza for instance?
 
I think the issues raised here are not the issues at hand. For one the trend in the shipping world is towards large vessels. This means that the ports have to expand to accommodate their custom. So the issue of whether or not to build a mega port is neither here nor there. In fact I have seen a long term plan by TPA and it envisages that all ports under its docket will be upgraded to that level. The question is how big is a megaport? Is there a danger of creating excess capacity? since all ports are likely to be mega ports, in future, do we need a super megaport?
As for use, a Port itself is not enough, it has to be backed by other transport infrastructure such as roads and Railways. Without these a port is likely to be a white elephant. So shouldn't Tanzania build a mega port and spare some of the money to build a high speed Railway line from Bagamoyo to Mwanza for instance?
That US$ 11 billion caters for railway interconnection between Bagamoyo and Tazara while on central line, plan are underway on Dar-Isaka overhaul. Meanwhile Rwandan and Burundian Government have confirmed to still be in the project that AfDB is read to fund.
 
I never intimated the project would be a failure btw but looking at the target market and regional geo-politics suggests that it may not complement Dar much but i have a feeling that it will be very important to the Chinese.
so you mean Chinese won't be paying tax for their exports via Bagamoyo? :baby: Talking of regional politics diplomacy is making a way with your embroiled saga on Mombasa-Nairobi Railway! I hear Kagame is not fazed with the procurement process on that SGR and he is having a quiet diplomacy with Tanzanian officials as the photo here under testify our senior minister from President office is having a teh-teh with Rwandn Foreign minister

unnamed+(12).jpg
 
Ethiopia was for many years known only because of its airline, the Ethiopian. But noiw the country is emerging from war and communist rule with stunning results. Apart from robust growth rates, the country is emerging as a potential powerhouse in Africa.
East Africa Economic Report: Ethiopia: The budding energy power house in Africa
Tanzania power sources are immense too! From Geothermal to gas to Hydropower to coal to wind to solar to Uranium! Actually more than Ethiopia since we have massive hydrocarbons, coal and nuclear deposits confirmed already put aside geothermal though under researched but volcanic activities, hot fountains and geysers are all over across the two branches of the Great East African rift valley both found in Tanzania (Kenya has only one). I always tell you when you write something try to put fanaticism aside and let your wisdom guide you after carrying out enough research. If you did so you would have not dared to compare Ethiopian project with the Inga dam project that has phases together with a capacity to produce over 10,000 MW. I am sorry but you sound shallow in knowledge and biased always!
 
Tanzania power sources are immense too! From Geothermal to gas to Hydropower to coal to wind to solar to Uranium! Actually more than Ethiopia since we have massive hydrocarbons, coal and nuclear deposits confirmed already put aside geothermal though under researched but volcanic activities, hot fountains and geysers are all over across the two branches of the Great East African rift valley both found in Tanzania (Kenya has only one). I always tell you when you write something try to put fanaticism aside and let your wisdom guide you after carrying out enough research. If you did so you would have not dared to compare Ethiopian project with the Inga dam project that has phases together with a capacity to produce over 10,000 MW. I am sorry but you sound shallow in knowledge and biased always!

Deal with your low self esteem and inferiority complex dude. When someone writes an article about some country that's doing well doesn't mean you reply with long paragraphs on how your country is doing better.
 
Deal with your low self esteem and inferiority complex dude. When someone writes an article about some country that's doing well doesn't mean you reply with long paragraphs on how your country is doing better.
JF is a respected platform and we do fact check! We don't condone fallacy just cause someone can write as Kenyans are fond of! No hydropower project is bigger in potentials than Inga dam in Congo Basin, AND that's a fact. And no country in the region has more uranium, geothermal, coal, and hydrocarbon (gas) (Mozambique excluded here) potentials in the region than Tanzania! That's another fact whether a Kenyan like it or NOT! Whether a Kenyan is not aware or pretend to be not aware. The only thing i suggest, we should be guided by core values of JF and should not be a mouthpiece of propaganda! Thank you

BTW The grand Inga project all the 6 phases can produce over 40,000 MW; currently Inga III is underway and will produce 4300 MW!
 
JF is a respected platform and we do fact check! We don't condone fallacy just cause someone can write as Kenyans are fond of! No hydropower project is bigger in potentials than Inga dam in Congo Basin, AND that's the fact. And no country apart in the region has more uranium, geothermal, coal and hydrocarbon (gas) (Mozambique excluded) potentials in the region than Tanzania! That's another fact whether a Kenyan like it or NOT! Whether a Kenyan is not aware or pretend to be not aware. The only thing is we should be guided by core values of JF and should not be a mouthpiece of propaganda! Thank you

BTW The grand Inga project all the 6 phases can produce over 40,000 MW; currently Inga III is underway and will produce 4300 MW!

And that's how your inferiority complex comes in......nobody said Ethiopia has a project bigger than Inga dam but you find a way to bring it in. The article does not concern Tanzania or Kenya in any way but you find a way to bring in Tanzania and do your usual hydrocarbon comparisons........ that's so immature and a proof of inferiority complex.
 
And that's how your inferiority complex comes in......nobody said Ethiopia has a project bigger than Inga dam but you find a way to bring it in. The article does not concern Tanzania or Kenya in any way but you find a way to bring in Tanzania and do your usual hydrocarbon comparisons........ that's so immature and a proof of inferiority complex.
Pls "Hide your stupidity", basically i am smarter than you on everything and more specifically on area on my specialization i.e. energy

May be he should tell us from where did he come with that 45,000 MW figure for Ethiopia?

Evidences:

"The 45,000MW hydro capacity is higher than D.R Congo's Grand Inga Dam whose capacity is 40,000MW."

"However, Ethiopia is way above D.R Congo in terms of potential
to produce power. Figure this 45,000MW of hydro power generation is perhaps the highest capacity in the world. Add to that an estimated 13000MW of wind power and 5000MW of geothermal power, not to count solar energy
. We are talking about MW of power 63000MW of power concentrated in a single hand."




 
Deal with your low self esteem and inferiority complex dude. When someone writes an article about some country that's doing well doesn't mean you reply with long paragraphs on how your country is doing better.

When Tanzanians say something good about their country.. Kenyans will jump and start to bark "low self esteem" "inferiority complex"..

i call this... wivu wa kike...
 
When Tanzanians say something good about their country.. Kenyans will jump and start to bark "low self esteem" "inferiority complex"..

i call this... wivu wa kike...

When anything is said about any country, Tanzanians jump in and do comparisons with Tanzania...... that's not saying anything good about your country, that's embarrassing your country by showcasing low self esteem.
 
pls "hide your stupidity", basically i am smarter than you on everything and more specifically on area on my specialization i.e. Energy

may be he should tell us from where did he come with that 45,000 mw figure for ethiopia?

Evidences:

"the 45,000mw hydro capacity is higher than d.r congo's grand inga dam whose capacity is 40,000mw."

"however, ethiopia is way above d.r congo in terms of potential
to produce power. Figure this 45,000mw of hydro power generation is perhaps the highest capacity in the world. Add to that an estimated 13000mw of wind power and 5000mw of geothermal power, not to count solar energy
. We are talking about mw of power 63000mw of power concentrated in a single hand."




gosh.this big mouth is everywhere doing is usual verbal diarrhea i am this best, i am that best with is broken english.the crappy fellow is master of none but a juakali material masquerading as a kenya expert with is inferiority complex disorder.jeez is loud mouth shut for a minute.he knows everything on earth except abt his poor tz backyard.lazy bum
 
Uchumi wa Kenya si mara mbili ya wa Tanzania! pls stop distortion otherwise i will ask moderators to act on u as JF forum rules are concerned

Kenya's GDP $37.34 billion (2012)

Tanzania's GDP $ 28.25 billion (2012)

$ 28.25 billion*2= $ 56.50 billion

56.50 billion-$37.34 billion= $ 19.16 billion short of ur fantasies and at Kenya economy that struggles to grow at 4% u can tell ur knuckled head where will Kenya be when compared with Tanzania's economy that grows 7%> constantly in next 5 years
[h=2]UNAPENDA SANA VISTORY VYA PENI NANE.YOUR UTOPIA TZ.GET A LIFE LAZY BUM
Kenya biashara:figures dont lie[/h]
[TABLE="class: cms_table_tborder, align: center"]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_alt1"]Kenyans’ investments in Tanzania have hit the Sh160.7 billion mark. A meeting between Prime Minister Raila Odinga and his Tanzanian counterpart Mizengo Peter Pinda was on Wednesday told that the investments by Kenyans had helped to create jobs in the neighbouring country.

And to strengthen the economic ties, the two leaders encouraged wananchi (citizens) from both countries to increase trade and investment opportunities.

More exports
Mr Odinga said exports from Kenya to Tanzania between 2007 and 2008 increased by 27 per cent while those from Tanzania to Kenya registered a 17 per cent growth. He encouraged Tanzanian investors and businesspeople to explore the Kenyan market as a way of closing the trade imbalance which is in favour of Kenya.

Mr Pinda said Tanzania encouraged the development of regional economic blocs, notably the East African Community, because it placed the region in a better position in global economic affairs.

However, he said 67 districts in Tanzania were experiencing severe drought and feared that this could have a negative effect on country’s economy which has been growing by five per cent.

Mr Odinga noted that considerable progress had been made in negotiations on the common market protocol to be signed at the East African Community summit in November where issues of land, usage of national identity cards and permanent residency had been addressed.

Mr Odinga praised presidents Mwai Kibaki and Jakaya Kikwete for their directive to revive the joint Permanent Commission of Cooperation, noting that the first session would take place in Arusha between September 5 and 6.

“The forum will enable a review of the status of our bilateral cooperation, seek ways of solving any challenges that may stand in the way, resolve the outstanding issues that have been identified and agree on the new areas for increased cooperation,” he added.

Mr Odinga briefed the Tanzanian Premier on the state of Kenya’s economy, noting that due to the post-election violence and other external factors, a GDP growth rate of 1.7 per cent was recorded in the country last year as opposed to 7.1 per cent in 2007.

He hastened to add that this year’s growth was projected at three per cent. Premier Pinda echoed the sentiments, saying a stronger economy in the East African region would attract international investments and mitigate the effects of drought, poverty and unemployment.
previous.gif


__________________
isupporthekenyancountygovernme nts™


​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_alt2"]Kenya's Dominance in the East African Community




rsz_uganda_president_yoweri_museveni.jpg
Kenya is positioning itself to become the dominant power in the emerging East African Community, which includes Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda and Burundi in addition to Kenya itself. On Nov. 30, the heads of state of the five member countries signed a monetary union protocol, the third of four steps that could lead to a politically unified East African Federation. As a regional export and financial hub, Kenya has been fundamental to this process. However, Nairobi wants to reinforce its position as a gateway into East Africa and wield greater political power within the community -- and ultimately, the federation.
For the East African Community, a common currency makes sense, especially for Uganda and Kenya. Both countries are net importers, but there is an imbalance between them. Kenya is the dominant regional exporter, while Uganda is the dominant regional importer. This means that relative to one another, the Kenyan shilling consistently strengthens against the Ugandan shilling, making Kenyan goods more expensive in Uganda.

In addition, Uganda and its southern neighbor Tanzania are emerging as potentially large oil and natural gas producers, putting their currencies at risk of the "Dutch disease" phenomenon, in which rapid foreign investment causes a dramatic appreciation of a country's currency. This would undermine both countries' status as PC-16 states and potential beneficiaries of investment in low-end manufacturing. The adoption of a common currency would help mitigate these risks. Of course, as seen in the eurozone, a single currency makes it difficult for individual countries to deal with their own problems, since monetary policy will become the responsibility of the East African Central Bank.

The East African monetary union will be slow to develop. Implementation will take place over the next 10 years as its member states harmonize their financial systems and institute the necessary reforms to support a common currency. This will not be an easy process; the five countries have dramatically different fiscal and pecuniary policies. For instance, the monetary union protocol ratified Nov. 30 requires that signatories maintain a 25 percent tax-to-gross domestic product ratio, but Uganda's and Rwanda's ratios are only half that. Because many businesses and commercial dealings in these areas are informal, the two countries will need to implement institutional reforms in order to collect more taxes. Kenya's Status in the Community
The heart of the East African Community is the dynamic relationship between Uganda and Kenya. The cores of the two countries are adjacent to one another: Kenya's nucleus lies in its western highlands, while Uganda's is on the northern shores of Lake Victoria. This means that the two nations are inherently linked and form a somewhat unified economy. While some commercial sectors overlap, the two countries complement each other. Uganda's traditional economy is agricultural, while Kenya strives to be the region's industrial and manufacturing hub. The East African Community's other members are only an extension of this relationship. The most visible sign of this exclusive connection has been further infrastructure development that primarily connects Uganda to Kenya.

Uganda is Kenya's largest export partner, receiving more goods and commodities from its neighbor than to the rest of the bloc combined. By comparison, Tanzania's total exports to Uganda were a mere $103 million in 2012, or less than 2 percent of Kenya's equivalent exports for the same period. The relationship between Uganda and Kenya will only deepen as transportation costs dwindle as a result of improving intermodal infrastructure. This improved connectivity, along with Uganda's emergence as a likely focal point for oil and as a potential exporter of petroleum products, will see Uganda's exports to Kenya increase substantially.

As well as increasing opportunities for trade, improved fiscal integration will enhance Nairobi's status as a financial nexus and gateway to the East African Community. Compared to its regional neighbors, Kenya has by far the most developed financial and banking system. Indeed, the private Kenya Commercial Bank is one of Africa's leading investment institutions and a significant financier to Tanzania and Rwanda. Kenya's banks are also expanding their physical presence in neighboring countries, and international banks use Nairobi as a base from which they provide services to the East African region. The Nairobi Securities Exchange is easily the largest exchange in the region, ensuring that as the rest of the East African Community members develop their financial systems, Kenya will continue to hold a key position among them. Geopolitical Rivals: Tanzania and Kenya
Kenya's emergence as the most powerful exporter in the region, with an expansive transportation network that provides vital supply chains into the Great Lakes region of Africa, has not gone unnoticed. Coupled with Nairobi's primacy as the hub of the regional financial industry, this has made Tanzania, Kenya's natural rival in the East African Community, uneasy. Tanzania harbors the same aspirations as Kenya but does not have the geographic advantage or developed financial system to truly compete. Its business orientation has also differed from Kenya's, which was a waypoint for regional trade routes dating back to colonial times. By comparison, Tanzania is traditionally more oriented toward internal activities, with poorer infrastructure linkages and a limited strategic emphasis on liberal economic development.

Furthermore, the geographic realities of economic expansion have polarized regional investment, which necessarily focuses on the area either north or south of Lake Victoria. Activity north of the lake feeds into the Kenyan economy, while activity to the south benefits Tanzania. This polarization has caused friction as the northern countries in the East African Community (Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda) have at times cooperated in order to advance projects without the involvement of Tanzania.

While this selective affiliation has created an image of fragmentation within the East African Community, the separate pursuits of the northern and southern countries are simply a territorial fact. The results of any geographic or economic quarrels have been limited to what is best described as a diplomatic entente. Tanzania has not at any point objected to or refused to advance toward the common goals of the East African Community. Likewise, Kenya has made no attempt to exclude its southern confederate. Despite the two countries' differences, Tanzania recognizes the value of greater social, political and economic integration, so while it might bluster, it will not obstruct progress because it still stands to make significant gains. Courtesy : Stratfor (www.stratfor.com) [/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

​
 
Pls "Hide your stupidity", basically i am smarter than you on everything and more specifically on area on my specialization i.e. energy

May be he should tell us from where did he come with that 45,000 MW figure for Ethiopia?

Evidences:

"The 45,000MW hydro capacity is higher than D.R Congo’s Grand Inga Dam whose capacity is 40,000MW."

"However, Ethiopia is way above D.R Congo in terms of potential
to produce power. Figure this 45,000MW of hydro power generation is perhaps the highest capacity in the world. Add to that an estimated 13000MW of wind power and 5000MW of geothermal power, not to count solar energy
. We are talking about MW of power 63000MW of power concentrated in a single hand."





Well I've read several ridiculous posts by you on this forum but today you just hit a new rock bottom lol! Ati you Geza being smart? Lol, give me a cup of coffee......You're the most dumb and useless person I've ever met online!
 
gosh.this big mouth is everywhere doing is usual verbal diarrhea i am this best, i am that best with is broken english.the crappy fellow is master of none but a juakali material masquerading as a kenya expert with is inferiority complex disorder.jeez is loud mouth shut for a minute.he knows everything on earth except abt his poor tz backyard.lazy bum
is should be his
a should be an
abt should be about
 
UNAPENDA SANA VISTORY VYA PENI NANE.YOUR UTOPIA TZ.GET A LIFE LAZY BUM
Kenya biashara:figures dont lie

[TABLE="class: cms_table_tborder, align: center"]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_alt1"]Kenyans' investments in Tanzania have hit the Sh160.7 billion mark. A meeting between Prime Minister Raila Odinga and his Tanzanian counterpart Mizengo Peter Pinda was on Wednesday told that the investments by Kenyans had helped to create jobs in the neighbouring country.

And to strengthen the economic ties, the two leaders encouraged wananchi (citizens) from both countries to increase trade and investment opportunities.

More exports
Mr Odinga said exports from Kenya to Tanzania between 2007 and 2008 increased by 27 per cent while those from Tanzania to Kenya registered a 17 per cent growth. He encouraged Tanzanian investors and businesspeople to explore the Kenyan market as a way of closing the trade imbalance which is in favour of Kenya.

Mr Pinda said Tanzania encouraged the development of regional economic blocs, notably the East African Community, because it placed the region in a better position in global economic affairs.

However, he said 67 districts in Tanzania were experiencing severe drought and feared that this could have a negative effect on country's economy which has been growing by five per cent.

Mr Odinga noted that considerable progress had been made in negotiations on the common market protocol to be signed at the East African Community summit in November where issues of land, usage of national identity cards and permanent residency had been addressed.

Mr Odinga praised presidents Mwai Kibaki and Jakaya Kikwete for their directive to revive the joint Permanent Commission of Cooperation, noting that the first session would take place in Arusha between September 5 and 6.

"The forum will enable a review of the status of our bilateral cooperation, seek ways of solving any challenges that may stand in the way, resolve the outstanding issues that have been identified and agree on the new areas for increased cooperation," he added.

Mr Odinga briefed the Tanzanian Premier on the state of Kenya's economy, noting that due to the post-election violence and other external factors, a GDP growth rate of 1.7 per cent was recorded in the country last year as opposed to 7.1 per cent in 2007.

He hastened to add that this year's growth was projected at three per cent. Premier Pinda echoed the sentiments, saying a stronger economy in the East African region would attract international investments and mitigate the effects of drought, poverty and unemployment.
previous.gif


__________________
isupporthekenyancountygovernme nts™


​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: cms_table_alt2"]Kenya's Dominance in the East African Community




rsz_uganda_president_yoweri_museveni.jpg
Kenya is positioning itself to become the dominant power in the emerging East African Community, which includes Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda and Burundi in addition to Kenya itself. On Nov. 30, the heads of state of the five member countries signed a monetary union protocol, the third of four steps that could lead to a politically unified East African Federation. As a regional export and financial hub, Kenya has been fundamental to this process. However, Nairobi wants to reinforce its position as a gateway into East Africa and wield greater political power within the community -- and ultimately, the federation.
For the East African Community, a common currency makes sense, especially for Uganda and Kenya. Both countries are net importers, but there is an imbalance between them. Kenya is the dominant regional exporter, while Uganda is the dominant regional importer. This means that relative to one another, the Kenyan shilling consistently strengthens against the Ugandan shilling, making Kenyan goods more expensive in Uganda.

In addition, Uganda and its southern neighbor Tanzania are emerging as potentially large oil and natural gas producers, putting their currencies at risk of the "Dutch disease" phenomenon, in which rapid foreign investment causes a dramatic appreciation of a country's currency. This would undermine both countries' status as PC-16 states and potential beneficiaries of investment in low-end manufacturing. The adoption of a common currency would help mitigate these risks. Of course, as seen in the eurozone, a single currency makes it difficult for individual countries to deal with their own problems, since monetary policy will become the responsibility of the East African Central Bank.

The East African monetary union will be slow to develop. Implementation will take place over the next 10 years as its member states harmonize their financial systems and institute the necessary reforms to support a common currency. This will not be an easy process; the five countries have dramatically different fiscal and pecuniary policies. For instance, the monetary union protocol ratified Nov. 30 requires that signatories maintain a 25 percent tax-to-gross domestic product ratio, but Uganda's and Rwanda's ratios are only half that. Because many businesses and commercial dealings in these areas are informal, the two countries will need to implement institutional reforms in order to collect more taxes. Kenya's Status in the Community
The heart of the East African Community is the dynamic relationship between Uganda and Kenya. The cores of the two countries are adjacent to one another: Kenya's nucleus lies in its western highlands, while Uganda's is on the northern shores of Lake Victoria. This means that the two nations are inherently linked and form a somewhat unified economy. While some commercial sectors overlap, the two countries complement each other. Uganda's traditional economy is agricultural, while Kenya strives to be the region's industrial and manufacturing hub. The East African Community's other members are only an extension of this relationship. The most visible sign of this exclusive connection has been further infrastructure development that primarily connects Uganda to Kenya.

Uganda is Kenya's largest export partner, receiving more goods and commodities from its neighbor than to the rest of the bloc combined. By comparison, Tanzania's total exports to Uganda were a mere $103 million in 2012, or less than 2 percent of Kenya's equivalent exports for the same period. The relationship between Uganda and Kenya will only deepen as transportation costs dwindle as a result of improving intermodal infrastructure. This improved connectivity, along with Uganda's emergence as a likely focal point for oil and as a potential exporter of petroleum products, will see Uganda's exports to Kenya increase substantially.

As well as increasing opportunities for trade, improved fiscal integration will enhance Nairobi's status as a financial nexus and gateway to the East African Community. Compared to its regional neighbors, Kenya has by far the most developed financial and banking system. Indeed, the private Kenya Commercial Bank is one of Africa's leading investment institutions and a significant financier to Tanzania and Rwanda. Kenya's banks are also expanding their physical presence in neighboring countries, and international banks use Nairobi as a base from which they provide services to the East African region. The Nairobi Securities Exchange is easily the largest exchange in the region, ensuring that as the rest of the East African Community members develop their financial systems, Kenya will continue to hold a key position among them. Geopolitical Rivals: Tanzania and Kenya
Kenya's emergence as the most powerful exporter in the region, with an expansive transportation network that provides vital supply chains into the Great Lakes region of Africa, has not gone unnoticed. Coupled with Nairobi's primacy as the hub of the regional financial industry, this has made Tanzania, Kenya's natural rival in the East African Community, uneasy. Tanzania harbors the same aspirations as Kenya but does not have the geographic advantage or developed financial system to truly compete. Its business orientation has also differed from Kenya's, which was a waypoint for regional trade routes dating back to colonial times. By comparison, Tanzania is traditionally more oriented toward internal activities, with poorer infrastructure linkages and a limited strategic emphasis on liberal economic development.

Furthermore, the geographic realities of economic expansion have polarized regional investment, which necessarily focuses on the area either north or south of Lake Victoria. Activity north of the lake feeds into the Kenyan economy, while activity to the south benefits Tanzania. This polarization has caused friction as the northern countries in the East African Community (Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda) have at times cooperated in order to advance projects without the involvement of Tanzania.

While this selective affiliation has created an image of fragmentation within the East African Community, the separate pursuits of the northern and southern countries are simply a territorial fact. The results of any geographic or economic quarrels have been limited to what is best described as a diplomatic entente. Tanzania has not at any point objected to or refused to advance toward the common goals of the East African Community. Likewise, Kenya has made no attempt to exclude its southern confederate. Despite the two countries' differences, Tanzania recognizes the value of greater social, political and economic integration, so while it might bluster, it will not obstruct progress because it still stands to make significant gains. Courtesy : Stratfor (www.stratfor.com)[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

​
can you break down that Kenyan investment in Tanzania with names of the companies and how much they did put in! Thank you
 
Back
Top Bottom