Colonial-era treaties on River Nile

Johnny Sack

JF-Expert Member
Jan 21, 2017
8,725
18,620
Colonial-era treaties
In 1929, Egypt and Britain signed the Nile Waters Agreement. Britain signed as a representative of Uganda, Kenya, Tanganyika (now Tanzania) and Sudan.

The document recognised Egypt’s right to the waters of the Nile as well as the right to veto any irrigation projects that would affect its share of the river's water. In 1959, Egypt and Sudan signed another accord that supplemented the previous agreement.

It gave Egypt the right to an annual share of 55.5 billion cubic metres (66%) and Sudan 18.5bn cubic metres (22%). Ethiopia was not consulted. The remaining 12 percent of the river's 84 billion cubic metre annual water supply is lost to evaporation.

Britain benefitted from the agreement as it was, at the time, taking advantage of Egypt's water-intensive crops, including cotton. In 1999, 10 Nile Basin countries formed the Nile Basin Initiative, namely Burundi, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, South Sudan, Sudan, Tanzania and Uganda.

This intergovernmental partnership aimed to develop cooperation, share socioeconomic benefits, and promote regional peace and security.

Slow and steady
Scientists believe the Nile to be between 20 and 30 million years old. In its current form, it is considered the oldest and longest river on the planet.

It contains more than 100 islands, Egypt being home to 22 of them. The construction of dams on the Nile, including the Renaissance Dam, is expected to severely impact the biodiversity of these islands and the people who rely on them.

Although the river is long, compared to other major rivers it is considered very slow. It is estimated to take up to three months for water to flow from Lake Victoria in the south to the Mediterranean Sea in the north.

The infographic below compares the flow rates of the Nile with the Amazon and the Mississippi.
 
That ancient treaty was between the British and the Egyptians and we have nothing to do with it.

We cannot sacrifice our much needed development today to safeguard the parochial interests of the Arabs. That's impossible and completely out of question.
 
1 Reactions
Reply
Back
Top Bottom