This is interesting, it has reminded me the old days of my school. the answer is 3263442. I will explain later if needed how I got that.
The answer is the password to open the spreadsheet that is attached below. If you figure it out, open the spreadsheet, type your name
in, save it and resend it to your friends.
This is interesting, it has reminded me the old days of my school. the answer is 3263442. I will explain later if needed how I got that.
This is interesting, it has reminded me the old days of my school. the answer is 3263442. I will explain later if needed how I got that.
Very simple mathematics. Weka nyingine
I solved this in like 2 minutes
You multiply n by n +1,
unaanza na 1
Then 1 x (1 + 1) = 2
Then 2 x (2 + 1) = 6
Then 6 x (6 +1) = 42
Then 42 x (42 +1) = 1806
Then 1806 x ( 1806 + 1) = 3263442
The nth term of the sequence can best be described by nth -1 term x (nth + 1) because of the changing nature of the multiplier, a better formula to determine the nth term escapes me.The multiplier m can be described by m = n + 1
Bring something a bit more challenging and interesting,like some modern day version of Poincare's conjecture.
If we talk of maths problem, let it be really maths!! This is too simple to be dealt with!
Imekuwa simple baada ya jibu kutolewa, jaribu hiyo nyingine!
...The second one, while not exactly Poincare's conjecture, is a bit more interesting.
Lete jibu kwanza ndo upate mamlaka ya kusema "it is not exactly Poincare's conjecture"! Sasa hivi hujui!
"A bit more interesting" ndo nini, inakusumbua, sio?
Na ukisha solve, andika the n-th term of the sequence. Ndio hapo kweli utahalalisha utashi wa kusema "hesabu hizi rahisi... sio Poncare's conjecture!"
Hizi ni sequence and series,mambo ya form two, uninteresting.
Hizi sio sequence and series. Sequence and series zina definition ya n-th term!
Hizi hazina, jibu linapatikana kwa guess or google!
Sequence and series sio hesabu za form two, sequence and series ni hesabu zinazoanza kutambulishwa form II.
Katika Sayansi na Hesabu vitu "interesting" ni vile ambavyo havina solutions bado. Bado kuna watu wanaandika unsolved problems in sequence and series kwenye PhD papers. Anaeheshimu au kuelewa mizizi ya Science na Hesabu hawezi kusema "hiki kitu ni uninteresting... hesabu za form II... not exactly Poncare's conjecture"!
"Hesabu za form II" wakati kuna mysteries bado hazina majibu? Basi wewe tusovie hii ngoma tukachukue Nobel Prize: Find three consecutive squares belonging in a Square-Partial Digital Subsequence (SPDS) of the form n squared, (n +1)squared, and (n + 2)squared!
Mdomo jumba la maneno.
Hizi ni sequence and series, labda ujifunze zaidi sequence and series ni nini.Ona link hiyo hapo chini. Eti google na guess, una entertain guesswork ulimwengu huu?
Rudi shule,
Umepewa namna ya kupata nth term kwa kutumia n-1th term, kwa definition yako hata Fibonacci sequence, one of the most famous sequences, si sequence, una expose uelewa wako mdogo wa hesabu.
Ona hapa
http://fym.la.asu.edu/~tturner/MAT_117_online/SequenceAndSeries/Sequences.htm
Mimi nishasolve problems mbili, wew unachangia nini zaidi ya copy paste za Smarandache Squares?
Hiyo linki uliyo gugu ni wapi ilipopingana na definition yangu ya sequence and series?
Hizi hesabu hapo juu mmesolve kwa kujaribu jaribu namba na, au, ku gugu, hawezi ku predict n-term! Umesema kuna formula ya ( n -1)th term kwenye hesabu ya pili hapo juu, iweke basi!
Fibonacci Sequence inakubaliana na definition yangu maana ina formula: F-nth = F(n-1)th + F(n - 2)th.
Na kama umezi master Smarandache Squares (labda ulifundishwa Form II), na sequence and series ni hesabu rahisi, solve basi three consecutive numbers belonging in a Square-Digital Sub-Sequence!
Unadai ume solve hesabu 2, hesabu zenyewe si umesema ni cha mtoto? Mimi nilijaribu kumwambia mchangiaji mwingine aliyejifanya kukandya kama wewe, nikamwambia atupe basi n-th term, katokomea, nilijaribu kuleta ka challenge kidogo. Matokea yake mnawaka, sasa kwa nini mlijifanya kukandia "hesabu za form II"?
Debe tupu haliishi kuvuma.
While I am not interested in form two maths, I didn't say I was embodying the reincarnation of Carl Freidrich Gauss either.