African Satellite World and Sat Gear

African Satellite World and Sat Gear

freq said:
To nab magufuli stuff easily go to 75e Ku.
Click to expand...

I was receiving its C band TP that hosts the Somalia channels as a parasite on a 6 footer, can I as well receive those Magufulis as parasite with a normal LNB?
 
6502cb18193db7ba7bbe1e7af59338e0.jpg


Can these be found locally jameni

Must we import everything.

Any leads will be appreciated.
 
Munyaga said:
What about when using an Inverto Ultra single?
Click to expand...

Ooohh. Sorry. So you were talking about 75e ku? Thought you were talking about 64e cband.

For magufulis on 75e ku I think you can get them as a parasite on a 6ft using inverto single assuming 68.5 is your prime.​
 
freq said:
Ooohh. Sorry. So you were talking about 75e ku? Thought you were talking about 64e cband.

For magufulis on 75e ku I think you can get them as a parasite on a 6ft using inverto single assuming 68.5 is your prime.​
Click to expand...

Yes, you're right. Since I have the required hardware, when I get an opportunity I will try it out. Thanks.
 
freq said:
Ooohh. Sorry. So you were talking about 75e ku? Thought you were talking about 64e cband.

For magufulis on 75e ku I think you can get them as a parasite on a 6ft using inverto single assuming 68.5 is your prime.​
Click to expand...
In terms of percentages; If one gets 60% quality on transponder using an es21, what percentage would one typically expect with a es21 gold, an esck 31 and/or a pauxis?
 
Now on :Tistv EFL football Live fox sports Leeds vs Derby.has anyone solved the fox sport 1 puzzle?someone said it is biss.
 
Cheupec said:
In terms of percentages; If one gets 60% quality on transponder using an es21, what percentage would one typically expect with a es21 gold, an esck 31 and/or a pauxis?
Click to expand...
Havent come accross the said esck 31 but Comparatively, Pauxis and es21 gold plus performs at about 150% to 170% of the average ordinary lnb with no Wimax filter such as Eurostar Escd21​
 
Been using 1.8m PF dishes and 120cm offset dish for quite a long time now, and I usually get 1.8m PF outperform the 120cm on Ku side, (for the Cband its obvious PF btn those two given the difference in 60 cm)

Now i want to go up a little to 2.4m so im stuck in middle because I'm planning to get a 2.4m dish next week, and I had a talk with some one about it before! However, before I commit my cash, someone with both prime focus and offset 2.4m, or ever used previously both of them, what's your verdict on the two, which one will bless me more(for both Ku side and Cband)

I'm interested on the experience side, not theories!
To start with I know guys like VICWA, GIDEN(I responded back to you via pm, but its OK if you respond here),
FREQ, etc.




Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
 
Let Love Reign said:
Been using 1.8m PF dishes and 120cm offset dish for quite a long time now, and I usually get 1.8m PF outperform the 120cm on Ku side, (for the Cband its obvious PF btn those two given the difference in 60 cm)

Now i want to go up a little to 2.4m so im stuck in middle because I'm planning to get a 2.4m dish next week, and I had a talk with some one about it before! However, before I commit my cash, someone with both prime focus and offset 2.4m, or ever used previously both of them, what's your verdict on the two, which one will bless me more(for both Ku side and Cband)

I'm interested on the experience side, not theories!
To start with I know guys like VICWA, GIDEN(I responded back to you via pm, but its OK if you respond here),
FREQ, etc.




Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
Click to expand...

A 2.4 offset will outperform a 2.4 PF on both C and KU

I have a 2.4 PF but i cant nab some birds that are nabbed by a Offset.


(Ps.A Newbie opinion)
 
I have been using my starsat 2000hd extreme software version 245 without any problem for a while now ... but two days ago i experienced some problems ... when my starsat connects to internet via wifi or ethernet the device becomes unreponsive but when i instal software version 241 everything if ok

is this general !
 
Aaaaarrghhh said:
I have been using my starsat 2000hd extreme software version 245 without any problem for a while now ... but two days ago i experienced some problems ... when my starsat connects to internet via wifi or ethernet the device becomes unreponsive but when i instal software version 241 everything if ok

is this general !
Click to expand...


i have done a Factory Reset And Inserted the WIFI USB In Front Port Of Starsat 2000 Extreme and everything seems to be working
 
Let Love Reign said:
"A 2.4 offset will outperform a 2.4 PF on both C and KU"

This is what i want to confirm! (Its alright my brother, I don't discriminate, as long as you have proved practically)





Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
Click to expand...
Very few people own 2.4m offset because of its bulkiness and unavailability in the market. I can only recall Vicwa as one of the active available
owners.

What we know about 2.4m offset is mostly theory...​
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar Discussions

Our Community

Coming Soon

Regional Communities

Coming Soon
Back
Top Bottom
Menu
Forums
New posts
Log in
Register