The New Libya...

Angalia video kuanzia dakika 10:26. Ni Libya story.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Reality About Libya
 
Last edited by a moderator:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Torture in Libya: The ugly reality of imperialist “liberation”

1 February 2012

Multiple reports of widespread torture in the detention centers run by the new imperialist-backed Libyan regime and NATO’s “rebels” give the lie to all those who justified last year’s war in the name of human rights and “liberation.”

It is just over 100 days since the lynch-mob murder of Libya’s former ruler Muammar Gaddafi, a grisly act that marked the culmination of the eight-month US-NATO war. At the time, President Barack Obama took to the White House Rose Garden to hail the assassination as the advent of “a new and democratic Libya.”

The evidence and testimony provided by aid groups and human rights organizations over the past week paint a very different picture. A criminal imperialist war that ended with a brutal murder has, unsurprisingly, yielded a regime of terror, torture and repression.

According to a report released by Amnesty International (AI), “torture is being carried out by officially recognized military and security entities as well as by a multitude of armed militias operating outside of any legal framework.”

The organization reported numerous cases of detainees having been tortured to death. It also reported meeting with others who bore “visible marks indicating torture in recent days and weeks.” AI continued: “Their injuries included open wounds on the head, limbs, back and other parts of the body.”

Prisoners are “suspended in contorted positions, beaten for hours with whips, cables, plastic hoses, metal chains and bars and wooden sticks, and given electric shocks with live wires and Taser-like electro-shock weapons,” according to the Amnesty report. A spokesperson for the organization described the failure of the US- and NATO-backed National Transitional Council (NTC) to conduct any investigation, much less take any action against the torture, as “horrifying.”

Amnesty’s findings were corroborated by UN human rights chief Navi Pillay, who told the Security Council recently that torture is widespread. “There’s torture, extrajudicial executions, rape of both men and women,” she said.

Pillay expressed special concern for the fate of sub-Saharan African immigrants and black Libyans, who have been rounded up by militias as suspected Gaddafi supporters solely because of the color of their skin.

The medical aid group Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders—MSF) has pulled its volunteers out of detention centers in the Libyan city of Misrata because they were asked to treat torture victims solely for the purpose of making them fit to endure yet another interrogation session. “Our role is to provide medical care to war casualties and sick detainees, not to repeatedly treat the same patients between torture sessions,” said the group’s general director, Christopher Stokes. He added that MSF repeatedly raised the issue with Libyan authorities, but no action was taken.

The brutality and torture meted out by the “rebels” who were brought to power by NATO bombings and special forces “advisers” provoked an uprising last month in the town of Bani Walid, where citizens took up arms to free prisoners and drive out the militia stationed there by the NTC.

All of these developments have been studiously ignored by the coterie of “left” organizations and liberal academics and journalists who played such a critical role in promoting and justifying the US-NATO war for regime-change in Libya.

Less than a year ago, they warned of a supposedly imminent massacre in Benghazi, decried the repression of the Gaddafi regime, and invoked the doctrine of “responsibility to protect” civilians as grounds for a military intervention by the imperialist powers in the former colonial country.

Academic scoundrels like Juan Cole of the University of Michigan, who traded on his inflated reputation as a critic of the Iraq war to sell the war in Libya, as well as pseudo-left groups ranging from the New Anti-Capitalist Party in France to the Left Party in Germany and the International Socialist Organization in the US all provided a critical service to imperialism, supporting the pro-imperialist “rebel” leaders and helping to dress up a naked intervention for oil and geo-strategic interests as a crusade to protect civilians and promote democracy and human rights.

That these pseudo-lefts and liberals can now turn a blind eye toward—and provide a cover for—torture in Libya has an unmistakable significance. This socio-political layer has moved decisively into the camp of imperialism.

Their politics reflect the interests of better-off sections of the middle class. Under conditions of unprecedented social polarization, which has been intensified by the global capitalist crisis, they are coalescing around their respective ruling elites and are prepared to defend whatever methods are required to defend their rule. Libya stands as a warning. If this layer and these organizations countenance repression and torture to uphold the interests of imperialism abroad, they will not shrink from backing similar methods in confronting the working class at home.

Bill Van Auken. Source: www.wsws.org (world socialist web site)
 
MMarekani nia ilikua ni mafuta hamna lolote,marais wa Africa wajifunze,tunarudi kwenye ukoloni,wataingia nnchi zote kwa gia hizo hizo
 
MMarekani nia ilikua ni mafuta hamna lolote,marais wa Africa wajifunze,tunarudi kwenye ukoloni,wataingia nnchi zote kwa gia hizo hizo

Kwa maelezo zaidi juu ya nia ya marekani soma makala hapo chini....Ila kwa ufupi kwa mujibu wa makala hiyo chini, ni kuwa uchumi wa Marekani kiini chake cha uimara kimo katika matumizi ya pesa yake ya dola katika masoko ya fedha duniani na hasa matumizi yake katika ununuzi wa mafuta ulimwenguni.

OPEC inalazimika kutumia pesa ya dola katika kuuza mafuta yake. vichapo vyote vilivyo shinikizwa na marekani kwa nchi za iraki, Libya na sasa irani vimelenga kuzilazimisha nchi hizo kuacha mpago wao wa kutaka kutumia fedha mbadala katika biahashara ya mafuta. sababu za kuwa inchi hizo zina mipango ya nyuklia ni pretex tu ya kuzihujumu nchi hizo kivita.



Petrodollar pumping US policy on Iran, backfire looms

Published:01 February, 2012, 20:18

As tensions between the US and Iran heat up, author Michael T. Winter believes the main reason behind America's harsh stance is Tehran's move to seek an alternative to the dollar as an oil currency.

Economic sanctions, spearheaded by the US and, less willingly, the EU could have a disastrous effect on both of their respective economies. If Iran cannot sell their oil to Europe, there are plenty of customers waiting in the wings, and if they come bearing not petrodollars, but gold and sovereign currencies, then all the better for Iran.

These sanctions, if enforced, will in effect place a serious dent in the power of the petrodollar.
Any rhetoric regarding Iran's nuclear program and the insistence on crippling it is nothing more than a US attempt to force regime change for one more receptive to maintaining the hegemony of the petrodollar.The world now knows the truth about the US and how they conduct their affairs.

US hostilities toward Iran have nothing to do with nuclear weapons development. If that were the case, then North Korea and Pakistan would be facing similar sanctions and threats, but they aren't. The difference of course is in what lies beneath the ground – oil. Iran has it and the other guys don't
.At the heart of the issue is not Iran's dubious attempt to build nuclear weapons, or even oil, but how that oil is paid for. In 1973, Richard Nixon promised King Faisal of Saudi Arabia that the US would protect Saudi Arabian oilfields from any and all interested parties seeking to forcefully wrest them from the House of Saud. It's important to remember that in 1973, Saudi Arabia didn't have a fraction of the military and ground forces it possesses today (almost exclusively US manufactured weapons) and the USSR was very much a threat.In return Saudi Arabia, and by extension OPEC, agreed to sell their oil in US dollars only. As if that weren't sweet enough, as part of the deal, they were required to invest their profits in US treasuries, bonds and bills.

The real zinger is that all countries purchasing oil from OPEC had to do so in US dollars, or ‘petrodollars'. This strengthened the US dollar, resulting in a steady US economic growth cycle throughout the 80's and 90's. Countries purchasing OPEC oil started buying US treasury bills, bonds and securities to ensure they could continue purchasing OPEC oil. This worked fine for the US until 2001
.

No plan, however well formulated, functions smoothly indefinitely.............................>>>Petrodollar pumping US policy on Iran, backfire looms — RT
 
Kuna mtu anaekumbuka zile frozen assets za Libya zilikuwa na thamani ya billioni ngapi?

Billioni 160 au 200. Hizi zimeishia wapi?

Libya's government will post a budget deficit of $10 billion this year as it struggles to pay public workers' salaries and meet energy costs, the head of the country's National Transitional Council (NTC) said in remarks published on Thursday.

Mustafa Abdel Jalil told French daily newspaper Le Figaro the country had still only recovered a fraction of the $100 billion in assets frozen overseas during the country's bitter civil war.

Zaidi hapa Libya sees $10 bln budget deficit in 2012- paper | News by Country | Reuters
 
 
Last edited by a moderator:

wameyataka mkuu.
Kipindi kile tulisema tukaonekana vichaa, wanam-miss Kanali eh?
Halafu unakuta miafrika bado inamshobokea Jaluo...
Dah?
 
wameyataka mkuu.
Kipindi kile tulisema tukaonekana vichaa, wanam-miss Kanali eh?
Halafu unakuta miafrika bado inamshobokea Jaluo...
Dah?

Ndg unafikir jaluo ana sya katika hili............yeye mwenyewe ni mtazamaji tu............zile familia 9 ama ile asilimia moja watu wa US waliyokuwa wakiipigia kelele ndiyo inayocheza mchezo wote na kupanga ushindi! Jaluo ni kibendera tu
 
Ndg unafikir jaluo ana sya katika hili............yeye mwenyewe ni mtazamaji tu............zile familia 9 ama ile asilimia moja watu wa US waliyokuwa wakiipigia kelele ndiyo inayocheza mchezo wote na kupanga ushindi! Jaluo ni kibendera tu

dah?
Sasa mbona kwenye uvamizi wa Irak hakukuwa na hizi habari za familia 9 wala 1% ya Wamarekani.
Wote kwa umoja wetu tulimuelekezea lawama Bush na chama kubwa, The Republican.
Sasa kwanini uvamizi wa Libya, mweusi mwenzetu anakwepeshwa lawama kimakusudi, kwani katika miaka 8 ambayo Bill Clinton alikaa ikulu hizo familia 9 hazikutamani Afghan na Iraq zivamiwe? Lakini Bill akatolerate mpaka akamaliza kipindi chake salama bila mawaa, mashambulio ya Agosti 7 yalitokea wakati Bill akiwa White House, remember?
Kilikuwa ni kisingizio tosha cha kuvamia Afghan kwa kisingizio cha kusaka Al-Qaeda, lakini Bill akawa mvumilivu despite pressure ya kutoka Senate na Jumba la Wawakilishi.
Kwenye suala la Libya, hatuwezi kumkwepeshea Owbamer lawama mkuu. Unakumbuka ile speech yake wakati mapambano yamekolea?
He unveiled his true spirit over his mamaland, asitafutwe mchawi kwenye hili.
Mchawi ni Jaluo, kuendelea kumuunga mkono kwa jambo lolote ni kudhihirisha unafiki wetu dhidi ya Walibya, ambao ni ndugu zetu!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nadhani Niger wameamua kutoshirikiana na hao NTC, na ndiyo maana Saad ana confindence, hao NTC hawana muda.Kama hawakai vyema na majirani waafrika wenzao, basi lets wait and see how they're going to achieve peace.
 
Angalia hii kuanzia dakika ya 14:40 ....... Na aliye mweledi wa hii lugha atuhabarishe na sisi. Huyu dada anachokisema nini?.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
watamkumbuka Gaddafi mara 200, bora nusu shari kuliko shari zima. pole yao.
 
Rival Libyan militias fight gunbattle in capital



By Oliver Holmes
TRIPOLI | Wed Feb 1, 2012 3:15pm EST

Reuters) - Rival militias fought a two-hour gunbattle over a luxury beach house being used as a barracks in the Libyan capital Wednesday, underscoring how volatile the country is following the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi.


A Reuters reporter heard exchanges of both heavy and light weapons coming from the Tripoli district of El-Saadi beach, a stretch of Mediterranean coast overlooked by office skyscrapers and the Marriott Hotel.

Militias have carved up Tripoli and the rest of Libya into competing fiefdoms, each holding out for the share of power they say they are owed.

A witness, who had been relaxing on the beach with his family, told a local television channel fighters armed with anti-aircraft guns screeched along the coastal highway and stormed a walled residence.

"It was chaos, the fighters suddenly arrived in cars and started shooting at the house. Families fled from the beach," Abdul Musharim told the Libyan news channel 'Libya'.

A militia from Misrata, that arrived in Tripoli during the civil war last year, had been using the house as a barracks. It used to be owned by Gaddafi's son Saadi, a businessman and former professional footballer who is in Niger after escaping across the border when National Transitional Council (NTC) forces captured Tripoli in August.
A member of the NTC's High Security Committee said the fighting was between militiamen from Misrata and units from Zintan. Both groups fought to oust Gaddafi.

"We are not sure what the fighting was about but government forces have surrounded the area and it is calm now," the official said on condition of anonymity.

Black smoke rose from the beach house Wednesday and armed men who said they were working for the Interior Ministry circled the building and warned journalists their cameras would be smashed if they did not leave the area.

The NTC is struggling to impose its authority on the country and form a functioning national police force and army.
"There is nothing going on here, it is safe" an irate man told Reuters as gunfire erupted behind him.

In the chaos, men could be seen running along the beach carrying crates of ammunition taken from the house.
Several militias from outside the capital have set up bases in Tripoli. They clash intermittently often because of disputes over who controls which neighborhoods of the city.

The violence Wednesday was the first time in weeks that a major gunbattle had broken out in the center of the capital.
(Additional reporting by Ali Shuabi and Taha Zargoun; Editing by Janet Lawrence)
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…