Tanzania v Zimbabwe: Mwinyi Kazimoto Serves A Timely Reminder

Tanzania v Zimbabwe: Mwinyi Kazimoto Serves A Timely Reminder

Lonestriker

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2010
Posts
640
Reaction score
241
Taifa Stars coach, Kim Poulsen had the good fortune of drawing the experience and expertise of his five foreign based players, Kazimoto, Ulimwengu, Samatta, Kapombeand Mapunda in the Tuesday draw with Zimbabwe’s Warrior.Ulimwengu and Samatta have become the bedrock of Stars’s attacking department, their place in the team unquestionable. Kapombe had been out for a long time due to injury since his move to France fourth division club, AS Cannes. Nothing much was expected of him due to his layoff.


And so the focus was on the other two foreign based players, MwinyiKazimoto and Ivo Mapunda. Both were not newcomers. The veteran goalkeeper, Mapunda was making a return after a four year absence. Kazimoto recent performance in the national colours before his Qatar move had been a see-saw affair. Good in one match then bad in the following match. Inconsistence had slowly crept into his form.


He had a bad day in his last match against Uganda Cranes. He was completely below par in a disorganized midfield that uncharacteristically surrendered possession to the Ugandans. It was no surprise Stars lost 1-0 at home. That was the last to be seen of him in Taifa Stars’ jersey till Tuesday’s clash. In between he managed to complete a difficulty transfer to Qatar-based second division club, Al-Markhiya.


His transfer was not only shrouded in mysteries, it was a heavy gamble on his part. The Qatar second division league consists of just six teams. The quality and competitive nature of the league cast doubt on whether the diminutive midfielder had taken a career step forward or backward. (Read Tanzanian Soccer: Mwinyi Kazimoto na Ubora Wa Ligi ya Timu Sita Huko Qatar and Tanzanian Soccer: Kazimoto Transfer Fee; Another back-door Deal?


Reports from Qatar indicate he has integrated well into the team. He has played all his club’s league matches, a sign the coach has faith in his ability and performance. As widely expected, Poulsen granted him a starting place. Kazimoto did not need time to register his metamorphosis in the eyes of the sparse crowd that had attended the match. He appeared fit and rejuvenated. While he had been more defensive in the past, on Tuesday he was more attack minded. He mostly played well-measured forward passes that set chances for Ulimwengu and Samatta who were attacking from the flanks.


Devoid of the service of Athumani Idd who was once again benched Stars’ penetration largely depended on Kazimoto. He was the only Stars’ player who could switch play from one flank to another with long range passes as the rest struggled with short square passes that failed to threaten Zimbabwe.


His set piece deliveries were a joy to watch. His absolute precision lifted fans off their seats on more than one occasion. Stars’ best scoring chances coincided with his presence in the field. Perhaps Stars would have walked away with a victory had it not been for our strikers who chose to once again advertise their profligacy.


His substitution seven minutes after the breather gave the Zimbabwe warrior opportunity to dominate proceedings in the second half. His fifty two minutes cameo was enough to serve a reminder that our football needs more foreign based players. Kazimoto’s confidence, calmness and composure while it endorsed long time view that the nation has talented football it highlighted the fact that our players need abroad exposure.


Though he was not severely tested, Mapunda also served another reminder that we need more of our players to get out of their comfort zone. There was little to be seen of his customary awkwardness in dealing with crosses. He spilled balls on not more than three occasions. He did not charge out of his goal area, a part of his weakness that had reduced him to a comic figure.


However little abroad chances are coming their way, our players should be more aggressive in seeking these opportunities. The local league is a comfort zone. It does not push players to their limit. Playing for Simba, Yanga and Azamin league players rarely have to be at their best to emerge victorious. Kazimoto and to an extent,Mapunda have served us another timely reminder.
Source Tanzanian Soccer: Taifa Stars v Zimbabwe:In-Form Kazimoto Serves A Reminder
 
A right observation on one part, but either a premature or a wrong conclusion on the other.
 
Would be interesting to get opinion on Kapombe's performance (regardless of his lay off) for those of us who didnt see the game. You are taking the easy route out mate. Kapombe played 90 minutes compared to Kazimoto's 52 and you write a whole piece on Kazimoto alone, yet conclude on importance of foreign exposure whilst Ivo Mapunda doesnt seem like he has impressed?
 
Would be interesting to get opinion on Kapombe's performance (regardless of his lay off) for those of us who didnt see the game. You are taking the easy route out mate. Kapombe played 90 minutes compared to Kazimoto's 52 and you write a whole piece on Kazimoto alone, yet conclude on importance of foreign exposure whilst Ivo Mapunda doesnt seem like he has impressed?
the tittle is in favour of Kazimoto, you can enshrines Kapombe as well with your observation
 
the tittle is in favour of Kazimoto, you can enshrines Kapombe as well with your observation
"for those of us who didnt see, watch the game rather".....dont conclude from the title alone, that is not his message, read the entire article. The message is importance of foreign exposure. I am asking for his opinion. He does not cover Samatta and Ulimwengu because we know the score with them. And the question is 52 vs 90 minutes....why? And I believe he played right back this time?
 
"for those of us who didnt see, watch the game rather".....dont conclude from the title alone, that is not his message, read the entire article. The message is importance of foreign exposure. I am asking for his opinion. He does not cover Samatta and Ulimwengu because we know the score with them. And the question is 52 vs 90 minutes....why? And I believe he played right back this time?
dfk-agent,
Sijafanikiwa kuangalia mechi but nafikiri ukiwa kama wakala wa Kapombe ungetafuta watu walioko huku ambao wangekuwa wanafatilia perfomance ya Kapombe akiwa huku.Sisi wengine ni ngumu sana kufatilia perfomance ya mchezaji mmojammoja
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lonestriker has clearly indicated that the title is for Kazimoto. No mistake on this!
If you compare the performance of Kazimoto few days before joining Qatar based club it is evident that there is a lot of improvements. Many people were waiting to see him proving if Qatar has helped him to regain his lost form or otherwise.
And yes indeed, it has helped but as someone noted above it is too early to have judge. But again, it is just an observation.

As for Kapombe, his performance has been ever consistent and there was no point to prove in this match, but rather it would have been the question of how a better player he has been now compared to how he was before going to France. And in my opinion, he played well (not better than before), and again as Lonestriker noted he has just come out from injury so no big developments were noted or even expected
 
Would be interesting to get opinion on Kapombe's performance (regardless of his lay off) for those of us who didnt see the game. You are taking the easy route out mate. Kapombe played 90 minutes compared to Kazimoto's 52 and you write a whole piece on Kazimoto alone, yet conclude on importance of foreign exposure whilst Ivo Mapunda doesnt seem like he has impressed?
Admittedly, I debated a lot about Kapombe, there was a subtle change to his game compared to when he was around here. Not that he had a poor tactical discipline before his move, but watching him against Zimbabwe I noticed he wasn't trying to be everywhere on the flanks like the other full-back, Erasto Nyoni. I think he was trying to strike a balance between overlapping and defending, perhaps developing a tactical awareness of his position.
In the first half Zimbabwe offered little threats but you could still see Kapombe not pushing deep into their zone like he did against Ivory Coast where time and time again his pace and energy came to his rescue when the Ivorian counter-attacked thru' the flanks.
Perhaps he could do better with his cross deliveries playing as a full-back.
The bad thing, once again Poulsen used him on both sides, he played as a left full-back and right full-back in each half of the match. Taifa Stars has problems in the full-back positions a challenge that means Kapombe might keep being shuffled in those positions.
 
Would be interesting to get opinion on Kapombe's performance (regardless of his lay off) for those of us who didnt see the game. You are taking the easy route out mate. Kapombe played 90 minutes compared to Kazimoto's 52 and you write a whole piece on Kazimoto alone, yet conclude on importance of foreign exposure whilst Ivo Mapunda doesnt seem like he has impressed?

I noticed a subtle change in Kapombe style. His positioning sense seems to have changed. He was not trying to be everywhere on the flank as in the past. While Zimbabwe did not seem to be a threat he still kind of limited his overlapping compared to the time before his move. I felt like he was trying to strike a balance between his offensive instincts and defensive duties. Perhaps a tactical discipline; though he was not bad on that area even while around here.
For instance, against Ivory Coast pace and energy came to his rescue time and time again when the Ivorian counter-attacked thru' the flanks while he had ventured forward. Perhaps the opponents did not offer much but I don't recall him relying on pace to cover back his position.
A lot of fans and Journos have come to expect him to be constantly overlapping so some might have seen his performance as not that much impressive compared to his previous ones. Personally, I noticed the tactical awareness to his defensive and offensive approach and was impressed.
Last but least, I believe there is room for improvement on his cross deliveries. At times he went for the ' whom it may concern crosses' that were easily dealt by the Zimbabwe defenders.
 
A right observation on one part, but either a premature or a wrong conclusion on the other.
Premature or wrong conclusion on what basis? You have left your comment hanging...it is too loose, a mere blanket statement, why don't you try to be specific by pointing out specific context here.
 
Premature or wrong conclusion on what basis? You have left your comment hanging...it is too loose, a mere blanket statement, why don't you try to be specific by pointing out specific context here.
Sorry for that. I simply meant that one performance is not enough to warrant a lasting conclusion.
 
dfk-agent,
Sijafanikiwa kuangalia mechi but nafikiri ukiwa kama wakala wa Kapombe ungetafuta watu walioko huku ambao wangekuwa wanafatilia perfomance ya Kapombe akiwa huku.Sisi wengine ni ngumu sana kufatilia perfomance ya mchezaji mmojammoja

Naelewa, ninawasiliana pia na technical bench timu ya Stars so ninapata feedback. Swali nimemwuliza Lonestriker ambaye huandika makala, amenielewa na amejibu.
 
I noticed a subtle change in Kapombe style. His positioning sense seems to have changed. He was not trying to be everywhere on the flank as in the past. While Zimbabwe did not seem to be a threat he still kind of limited his overlapping compared to the time before his move. I felt like he was trying to strike a balance between his offensive instincts and defensive duties. Perhaps a tactical discipline; though he was not bad on that area even while around here.
For instance, against Ivory Coast pace and energy came to his rescue time and time again when the Ivorian counter-attacked thru' the flanks while he had ventured forward. Perhaps the opponents did not offer much but I don't recall him relying on pace to cover back his position.
A lot of fans and Journos have come to expect him to be constantly overlapping so some might have seen his performance as not that much impressive compared to his previous ones. Personally, I noticed the tactical awareness to his defensive and offensive approach and was impressed.
Last but least, I believe there is room for improvement on his cross deliveries. At times he went for the ' whom it may concern crosses' that were easily dealt by the Zimbabwe defenders.

Aha, there you go. Positioning sense....muhimu sana. Asante kwa feedback.
I tell you what, when he started playing after injury, he was complaining that he overlaps alot (impressive when he does it) but they dont seem to pass the ball to him. He kinda felt it was personal, but I advised him to try and read the game better and see how the others are moving and so that he doesnt waste his energy. One may be a talented skillful player but if you have no tactical nor positioning awareness then you become average and nobody will pay millions to teach you at 21.
In regards to his crosses, you are spot on. It is a common problem for most African players....they do the hard work, overlapping, going past someone and the end results is a poor cross. The hardest job is going past someone.....giving a pinpoint cross should be the easiest job.
 
Back
Top Bottom