Something From Nothing



USIJE UKASEMA YESU NI MUNGU KWANI AMESEMA YEYE HAWEZI KUFANYA CHOCHOTE


The following verses explicitly state that no one has seen God.


According to John 5:37, Jesus said that no one had ever seen God at anytime or ever heard his voice. And yet people did see Jesus, which proves that Jesus cannot be God.



John 1:18: No man hath seen God at any time,

Exodus 33:20: And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live

So those verses make it crystal clear that no man has seen God at any time, and that no man can see his face, and if any do they shall then die.

However so, there are several verses in the Bible which show men have seen the FACE of God and have not died, either Christians accept those verses to be in contradiction with the verses I quoted, or they agree that when the Bible claims that someone has seen the face of God, or have seen God, it basically means they have seen the glory of God and the power of God, not them literally looking at God.



However so, if Jesus is indeed God, then one must ask how could people have seen him and live?

Or did Jesus come in a disguise?

Or a costume, which is the flesh?

The fact is Jesus cannot be God, for no man has seen God, and man cannot see the face of God, for if they did they would die.
 
Ishmael said:
Kijana unamatatizo kweli kweli.

DAWA YA KILA UGONJWA KUTOKANA NA BIBLIA NI:
Jina la Yesu. Soma Mark 16:17-18.​

Kwenye dini yako ya kuzaliwa, hakuna jibu kule.
Click to expand...


MAXI SHIMBA IN DISGUISE ELEWA JESUS IS NOT GOD ACCORDING TO YOUR OWN BIBLE


The following verses explicitly state that no one has seen God.


According to John 5:37, Jesus said that no one had ever seen God at anytime or ever heard his voice. And yet people did see Jesus, which proves that Jesus cannot be God.



John 1:18: No man hath seen God at any time,

Exodus 33:20: And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live

So those verses make it crystal clear that no man has seen God at any time, and that no man can see his face, and if any do they shall then die.

However so, there are several verses in the Bible which show men have seen the FACE of God and have not died, either Christians accept those verses to be in contradiction with the verses I quoted, or they agree that when the Bible claims that someone has seen the face of God, or have seen God, it basically means they have seen the glory of God and the power of God, not them literally looking at God.



However so, if Jesus is indeed God, then one must ask how could people have seen him and live?

Or did Jesus come in a disguise?

Or a costume, which is the flesh?

The fact is Jesus cannot be God, for no man has seen God, and man cannot see the face of God, for if they did they would die.
 
Gavana said:
MAXI SHIMBA IN DISGUISE ELEWA JESUS IS NOT GOD ACCORDING TO YOUR OWN BIBLE



The fact is Jesus cannot be God, for no man has seen God, and man cannot see the face of God, for if they did they would die.
Click to expand...
Wewe mtoto wa Madrassa, usifikiri kila mtu ni mjukuu wa Jibril.

Jifunze hapa:
John 5:19 Jesus gave them this answer: "Very truly I tell you, the Son can do nothing by Himself; He can do only what He sees His Father doing, because whatever the Father does the Son also does.

Sasa wapi Allah kaitwa Baba? Allah hana uwezo wa kuwa Baba because your fiendish deity is barren.
 


MAXI SHIMBA , MTOTO WA MAASKOFU , JIFUNZE WEWE HAPA


1. Did Jesus Christ have two fathers?

The Father is the Father of the Son (I John 1:3), yet the child born of Mary was conceived by the Holy Ghost (Matthew 1:18, 20; Luke 1:35).

Which one is the true father?

Some trinitarians say that the Holy Ghost was merely the Father's agent in conception - a process they compare to artificial insemination!


2. How many Spirits are there? God the Father is a Spirit (John 4:24), the Lord Jesus is a Spirit (II Corinthians 3:17), and the Holy Spirit is a Spirit by definition. Yet there is one Spirit (I Corinthians 12:13; Ephesians 4:4).

3. If Father and Son are co-equal persons, why did Jesus pray to the Father? (Matthew 11:25). Can God pray to God?


4. Similarly, how can the Son not know as much as the Father? (Matthew 24:36; Mark 13:32).


5. Similarly, how can the Son not have any power except what the Father gives Him? (John 5:19, 30; 6:38).


6. Similarly, what about other verses of Scripture indicating the inequality of the Son and the Father? (John 8:42; 14:28; I Corinthians 11:3).


7. Did "God the Son" die? The Bible says the Son died (Romans 5:10). If so, can God die? Can part of God die?

8. How can there be an eternal Son when the Bible speaks of the begotten Son, clearly indicating that the Son had a beginning? (John 3:16; Hebrews 1:5-6).


9. If the Son is eternal and existed at creation, who was His mother at that time? We know the Son was made of a woman (Galatians 4:4).

10. Did "God the Son" surrender His omnipresence while on earth? If so, how could he still be God?

11. If the Son is eternal and immutable (unchangeable), how can the reign of the Son have an ending? (I Corinthians 15:24-28).


12. If in answer to questions 3 through 11 we say only the human Son of God was limited in knowledge, was limited in power, and died, then how can we speak of "God the Son"? Are there two Sons?


13. Whom do we worship and to whom do we pray? Jesus said to worship the Father (John 4:21-24), yet Stephen prayed to Jesus (Acts 7:59-60).


14. Can there be more than three persons in the Godhead?

Certainly the Old Testament does not teach three but emphasizes oneness.

If the New Testament adds to the Old Testament message and teaches three persons, then what is to prevent subsequent revelations of additional persons?

If we apply trinitarian logic to interpret some verses of Scripture, we could teach a fourth person (Isaiah 48:16; Colossians 1:3; 2:2; I Thessalonians 3:11; James 1:27).
Likewise, we could interpret some verses of Scripture to mean six more persons (Revelation 3:1; 5:6).


15. Are there three Spirits in a Christian's heart? Father, Jesus, and the Spirit all dwell within a Christian (John 14:17, 23; Romans 8:9; Ephesians 3:14-17). Yet there is one Spirit (I Corinthians 12:13; Ephesians 4:4).


16. There is only one throne in heaven (Revelation 4:2). Who sits upon it? We know Jesus does (Revelation 1:8,18, 4:8). Where do the Father and the Holy Spirit sit?


17. If Jesus is on the throne, how can He sit on the right hand of God? (Mark 16:19). Does He sit or stand on the right hand of God? (Acts 7:55). Or is He in the Father's bosom? (John 1:18).


18. Is Jesus in the Godhead or is the Godhead in Jesus? Colossians 2:9 says the latter.


19. Given Matthew 28:19, why did the apostles consistently baptize both Jews and Gentiles using the name of Jesus, even to the extent of rebaptism? (Acts 2:38; 8:16; 10:48; 19:5; 22:16; I Corinthians 1:13).

20. Who raised Jesus from the dead? Did the Father (Ephesians 1:20), or Jesus (John 2:19-21), or the Spirit? (Romans 8:11).


21. If Son and Holy Ghost are co-equal persons in the Godhead, why is blasphemy of the Holy Ghost unforgivable but blasphemy of the Son is not? (Luke 12:10).


22. If the Holy Ghost is a co-equal member of the trinity, why does the Bible always speak of Him being sent from the Father or from Jesus? (John 14:26; 15:26).


23. Does the Father know something that the Holy Spirit does not know? If so, how can they be co-equal? Only the Father knows the day and hour of the Second Coming of Christ (Mark 13:32).


24. Did the trinity make the Old and New covenants? We know the LORD (Jehovah) did (Jeremiah 31:31-34; Hebrews 8:7-13). If Jehovah is a trinity then Father, Son, and Spirit all had to die to make the new covenant effective (Hebrews 9:16-17).


25. If the Spirit proceeds from the Father, is the Spirit also a son of the Father? If not, why not?


26. If the Spirit proceeds from the Son, is the Spirit the grandson of the Father? If not, why not?
 
Gavana said:
MAXI SHIMBA , MTOTO WA MAASKOFU , JIFUNZE WEWE HAPA


1. Did Jesus Christ have two fathers?

26. If the Spirit proceeds from the Son, is the Spirit the grandson of the Father? If not, why not?
Click to expand...
Jesus is Allah according to the Koran
​

One of the names of God in Islam is AL-HAQ. Which means in Arabic ‘The Truth.' Did Jesus say in the Holy Bible, "I am the Truth?' Yes. He said on John 14;9," I am the way and the truth and the life. No-one comes to the Father except through Me." The most important for Christians now that Jesus said, "He is the Truth." Always remember this truth.

Can any Muslim deny that is God's (Allah) another name is "The Truth" (AL-HAQ)? No. No one can deny this fact. Because this Truth in Islam is ‘Allah'. AL is Arabic word and its English meaning is ‘you talking about whom.' HAQ means Truth which in English we say ‘I am the Truth'. In Arabic I am the ‘AL-HAQ'. Can any Muslim deny that?
 
Gavana said:
MAXI SHIMBA , MTOTO WA MAASKOFU , JIFUNZE WEWE HAPA





26. If the Spirit proceeds from the Son, is the Spirit the grandson of the Father? If not, why not?
Click to expand...
Jesus is Allah according to the Koran
​


Another name for God of Islam is AL-BAETH. The Resurrection. Did Jesus say in the Gospel, "I am the Resurrection?" Yes. In the Gospel of John 11;25-26 Jesus says, "I am the Resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me will live, even though he dies; and who-ever lives and believes in Me will never die." When Muslims God ‘Allah' is called ‘AL-BEATH' which means resurrection, then it is clearly proven to all of us that Jesus Himself is Allah as Jesus says, "I am the Resurrection." In Arabic " I am the ‘AL-BEATH.' There are not a single Muslim in this Earth can deny that. If any Muslim denies this truth then he/she denies/reject ‘Allah' as well because they deny the 99 names of Allah.
 
Gavana said:
MAXI SHIMBA , MTOTO WA MAASKOFU , JIFUNZE WEWE HAPA



26. If the Spirit proceeds from the Son, is the Spirit the grandson of the Father? If not, why not?
Click to expand...

Jesus is Allah according to the Koran
​


The God of Islam has two other names. "AL-AWAL" and "AL-AKHER." In English we say, "I am the Alfa-I am the Omega." (I am the First and I am the Last.) Isaiah 41;4 says, "I, the Lord-with the first of them and with the last-I am He." Also the book of Revelation 22;13 says, "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End." Jesus is the AL-AWAL and Jesus is the AL-AKHER. Muslims there are no any option or excuse to refuse this truth. You have to accept Jesus as your "Allah."
 

MAXI SHIMBA UNAJIPONGEZA MWENYEWE UKITUMIA ID YA SCHINDLER ??? WAZIMU KITU KIBAYA AU NDIYO MAFUNDISHA YA YESU WAKO HUYO ???

WACHA SHIRK YA KUJIDANGANYA NAFSI YAKO , HIYO AYA YAKO KWENYE QURAN HAIJAMTAJA YESU HAPO ,

WALA HIYO AYA YAKO YA BIBLIA REVELATION 22:13 HAISEMI MANENO HAYO KAYASEMA YESU

BY THE WAY, USIMSAHAU HUYU KIUMBE WA TAPELI PAULO


Now personally I want to draw the attention of the Christians in another passage of the Bible, in the book of Hebrews we read:


1. For this Melchisedec, king of Salem, priest of the most high God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings, and blessed him;


2. To whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all; first being by interpretation King of righteousness, and after that also King of Salem, which is, King of peace;



3. Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually. ( Hebrews 7:13)




Notice this Priest Melchisedec "has neither beginning of days, nor end of life", in other words very logically we can say that this statement is much more superior than the statement supposed uttered by Jesus (that he is Alpha and the Omega).

Because alpha and Omega has a beginning and end but this Priest Melchisedec has no beginning and no end, therefore why MAXI SHIMBA don't consider this Priest as God Almighty?

Because his superiority from Jesus is not only for his eternal existence but also because he does not have a mother,

Jesus had a mother, and he does not have a descent, Jesus had descents (two genealogies according to the gospels).

So when Christians try to prove the divinity of Jesus by the statement "Iam Alpha and Omega" I advise them to better look the statement of Melchisedec which is much more superior than Jesus.

However, Christians do not support that Melchisedec is God.



 

Jesus is Allah according to the Koran​
One of the names of the God of Islam 'Allah' is the kings of King. In Arabic ‘AL-MALEK.' The book of Revelation says on chapter 17 verse 14, "They will make war against the Lamb, but the Lamb will overcome them because He is Lord of lords and King of kings-and with Him will be His called, chosen and faithful followers."
 
Gavana said:
However, Christians do not support that Melchisedec is God.
Click to expand...
Jesus is Allah according to the Koran​


One of the names of the God of Islam ‘Allah' is the Guide-"AL-HADI." Which's English meaning is The Door/Gate. Did Jesus say that He is the Gate? Yes. In the Gospel of John 10;9 tells us Jesus said, " I am the gate; whoever enters through Me will be saved. He will come in and go out, and find pasture."
 
Jesus is Allah according to the Koran​


One of the names of the God of Islam ‘Allah' is The Light which in Arabic is "Al-NUR." Did Jesus say that He is the Light or He is the AL-NUR? Yes. In the Gospel of John 8;12 says, " I am the Light of the world. He who follows Me shall not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life." All these verses are clearly proves that Jesus is Allah according to the Koran and no Muslims can deny this truth. (For readers references please check the Gospel of John. 10;9/15;1/6;35 and 10;11).
 

MAXI SHIMBA UGONJWA UMEKUZIDI ,

UNAHITAJI MSUMALI WA MOTO HUU HAPA, LABDA UTAKUTIBU


Christians usually give verses from the Bible where Jesus says, "I am the resurrection and the life", "I am the way, the truth, the life", "I am the bread of life", etc. to prove that Jesus claimed to be God. All of these arguments have been proven false to show that Jesus claimed divinity.

As for these claims that Jesus made, we have to remember that Jesus used to talk figuratively. But then when he talked plainly with his disciples he made it clear that he was sent FROM God and that he did not say that he WAS God.


​
John 16:25-33


​
[SUP]25[/SUP]"Though I have been speaking figuratively (paroimia), a time is coming when I will no longer use this kind of language but will tell you plainly about my Father.

[SUP]26[/SUP]In that day you will ask in my name. I am not saying that I will ask the Father on your behalf. [SUP]27[/SUP]No, the Father himself loves you because you have loved me and have believed that I came from God.

[SUP]28[/SUP]I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father."

[SUP]
29[/SUP]Then Jesus' disciples said, "Now you are speaking clearly and without figures of speech.

[SUP]30[/SUP]Now we can see that you know all things and that you do not even need to have anyone ask you questions. This makes us believe that you came from God."


[SUP]31[/SUP]"You believe at last!" Jesus answered.

[SUP]32[/SUP]"But a time is coming, and has come, when you will be scattered, each to his own home. You will leave me all alone. Yet I am not alone, for my Father is with me.


[SUP]33[/SUP]"I have told you these things, so that in me you may have peace. In this world you will have trouble. But take heart! I have overcome the world."

​

The word paroimia could mean...
​

1) a saying out of the usual course or deviating from the usual manner of speaking


a) a current or trite saying, a proverb


2) any dark saying which shadows forth some didactic truth


a) esp. a symbolic or figurative saying


b) speech or discourse in which a thing is illustrated by the use of similes and comparisons


c) an allegory


1) extended and elaborate metaphor


Source: http://www.blueletterbible.org/tmp_dir/words/3/1146511128-5176.html


Christians usually argue that Jesus used to talk in parables and therefore his disciples might not have understood him clear enough.

However, in the passage I just cited we see that Jesus was talking plainly and not figuratively.

Now if Jesus was talking plainly then why didn't the disciples just go and say that they knew Jesus was God and not just sent by God?
 

MAXI SHIMBA UNATAKA DAWA NYENGINE HII


Once again we have a classic example of the evolution in the Gospels.

Note how John now goes to call Jesus the light of the world, yet in the earlier Gospels we see that Jesus was simply specifically sent to the children of Israel:


Mat 15:24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

Jesus even tells his disciples to go the children of Israel:



Matthew

Chapter 10

KJV

[SUP]
1 And when he had called unto him his twelve disciples, he gave them power against unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to heal all manner of sickness and all manner of disease.

[SUP]2 [/SUP]Now the names of the twelve apostles are these; The first, Simon, who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother; James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother;

[SUP]3 [/SUP]Philip, and Bartholomew; Thomas, and Matthew the publican; James the son of Alphaeus, and Lebbaeus, whose surname was Thaddaeus;

[SUP]4 [/SUP]Simon the Canaanite, and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him.

[SUP]
5 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:

[SUP]6 [/SUP]But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.



Note Jesus even tells his disciples to not go to the Gentiles! So this is an obvious modification in the Gospel by John, he wants to make it seem that Jesus was sent for everyone when he clearly wasn't, nor did he tell his disciples to go to the gentiles.

[/SUP][/SUP]
 
​
Hujui usemalo. Jesus said those words approximately 700 prior to the birth of Muhammad and his deity. Now, who do you think I will follow?

Get out of the diabolical box of copying Jesus and pasting to the fiendish Jibrilicaco book.
 
KORAN INAKIRI KUWA UISLAMU NI DINI YA WAARABU PEKEE​
Katika hii mada ninawaletea ushaidi kuwa Uislam ni dini ya Waarabu peke yao.
Waislamu bila kuchoka wamekuwa wakidai kuwa Uislamu utatawala dunia nzima. Katika kufanya hivyo, wao watakuwa wamekwenda kinyume na maneno ya Allaha kama yarivyo teremshwa kwenye Qur'an. Kwa hiyo, ni haki kwa kusema wao ni Makafiri.


Quran 10: 47. Na kila umma una Mtume. Alipo wajia Mtume wao walihukumiwa baina yao kwa uadilifu, wala hawakudhulumiwa
.
Angalia hii aya pia
Quran 14: 4. Na hatukumtuma Mtume ila kwa ulimi wa kaumu yake ili apate kuwabainishia. Basi Allah humuacha akapotea amtakaye, na akamwongoa amtakaye. Naye ni Mtukufu Mwenye nguvu na Mwenye hikima.
Kama aya hizi ni kweli, basi Uislamu si kwa mashirika/mataifa/ummah yasiyo ya Waarabu. Quran inasema kwamba kila watu wamepokea ujumbe wao kutoka kwa Mungu katika lugha yao wenyewe ili waweze kuelewa na Qur'ani akaishuka kwa Waarabu ili Waarabu waweze kulewa nini Allah anasema.
Dhana hii ya Allah kushusha Kitabu kwa kila lugha ni muhimu sana kwasababu imejirudia mara nyingi na ndio msingi wa hili somo.


Quran 16: 36. Na kwa hakika kwa kila umma tuliutumia Mtume kwamba: Muabuduni Mwenyezi Mungu, na muepukeni Shetani. Basi kati yao wapo alio waongoa MwenyeziMungu. Na kati yao wapo ambao ulio wathibitikia upotovu. Basi tembeeni katika ardhi, muangalie ulikuwaje mwisho wa wanao kanusha.


Quran 5: 48. Na tumekuteremshia wewe, kwa haki, Kitabu hichi kinacho sadikisha yaliyo kuwa kabla yake katika Vitabu na kuyalinda. Basi hukumu baina yao kwa aliyo yateremsha Mwenyezi Mungu, wala usifuate matamanio yao ukaacha Haki iliyo kujia. Kila mmoja katika nyinyi tumemwekea sharia yake na njia yake. Na lau kuwa Mwenyezi Mungu angeli taka ange kufanyeni nyote umma mmoja, lakini ni kukujaribuni kwa aliyo kupeni. Basi shindaneni kwa mambo ya kheri. Kwa Mwenyezi Mungu ndio marejeo yenu nyote, na atakuja kuwaambieni yale mliyo kuwa mkikhitalifiana.


Quran 36: 5. Uteremsho wa Mwenye nguvu, Mwenye kurehemu. 6. Ili uwaonye watu ambao baba zao hawakuonywa , basi wao wamekuwa wenye kughafilika.
Hizi aya zimekamilka na kueleza kiuwazi kuhusu kuja kwake kwa Waarabu pekee. Allah katika Koran anasema kwamba kila watu wamekuwa na Mtume wao wenyewe ambao aliwaonya katika lugha zao wenyewe, na kwamba amemtuma Muhammad kwa wale ambao bado hawajaanza mwongozo wowote, na ambao baba zao hawakuonywa, yaani Waarabu. Kwa njia hii watakuwa hawana udhuru wowote na hawezi kusema, lakini hatukuwai kupokea ujumbe wowote.


Endelea kusoma Koran hapa chini:
Quran 6: 156. Msije mkasema: Hakika mataifa mawili kabla yetu yameteremshiwa Kitabu; na sisi tulikuwa hatuna khabari ya waliyo kuwa wakiyasoma.
157. Au mkasema: Lau kuwa tumeteremshiwa sisi Kitabu tungeli kuwa waongofu zaidi kuliko wao. Basi imekufikieni bayana kutoka kwa Mola wenu Mlezi, na uwongofu, na rehema. Basi nani aliye dhaalimu mkubwa zaidi kuliko yule anaye kanusha Ishara za Mwenyezi Mungu, na akajitenga nazo? Tutawalipa wanao jitenga na Ishara zetu adhabu kali kabisa kwa sababu ya kujitenga kwao.


Quran ni wazi ilitumwa kwa Waarabu. Wale ambao si Waarabu hawawezi kuielewa Koran, hayo ni maneno ya Allah. Waislamu wanasisitiza kuwa hakuna tafsiri ya Qur'ani inaweza kuwa sahihi. Hivyo, haiwezi kamwe kuwa wazi kwa mashirika yasiyo ya Waarabu na haikutumwa kwa mashirika/ummah yasiyo ya Waarabu.
Uthibitisho mwingine kuwa Qur'ani ilitumwa tu kwa ajili ya Waarabu ni katika mistari ifuatayo hapo chini:
Quran 26: 198. Na lau kuwa tungeli iteremsha juu ya mmoja wa wasio kuwa Waarabu, 199. Na akawasomea, wasingeli kuwa wenye kuamini.


Kama ambavyo Waarabu wana haki ya kuto amini kitabu chechote kile kilichotumwa kwa lugha ambayo si yakwao, ikimaanisha Kiarabu, vivyo hivyo, mashirika yasiyo ya Waarabu nao wana haki ya kuto iamini Koran, kitabu kilichoandikwa kwa lugha ya Kiarabu. Ndio kwasababu Koran inasema Allah atatuma mjumbe kwa kila lugha ili wao wenyewe kwa wenyewe waweze kuelewa.
Kuhakikisha hakuta kuwa na kutokuelewana, Allah anashusha hii aya 05:19 Quran: Enyi Watu wa Kitabu! Bila ya shaka amekujilieni Mtume wetu akikubainishieni katika wakati usio kuwa na Mitume, msije mkasema: Hakufika kwetu mbashiri wala mwonyaji. Basi amekujieni mbashiri na mwonyaji. Na Mwenyezi Mungu anao uweza wa kila kitu.


Kwa mujibu wa Qur'an watu wote wamepokea ufunuo. Aya ya hapo juu inasema Qur'ani ni kwa wale ambao kamwe hawakupokea ufunuo, iliwasije kusema, `kuwa sisi hatuja wai kutumiwa mbashiri na hakuna mjuonyaji aliye tumwa kwetu'.


Jambo hili ni wazi, lakini Allah anataka liwe wazi hata na kwa asiye na ufahamu wowote ule aelewe kuwa Koran ilitumwa kwa Waarabu pekee kwa kuzitaja sehemu halisi za kijiografia ambazo Muhammad alitumwa kama Mtume wa Allah.


Quran 6:92. Na hiki ni Kitabu tulicho kiteremsha, kilicho barikiwa, chenye kuhakikisha yaliyo tangulia, na ili uuwonye Mama wa Miji na walio pembezoni mwake. Na wenye kuamini Akhera wanakiamini hichi, nao wanazihifadhi Sala zao.
Leo, tumejifunza kuwa, Koran ilitumwa kwa Waarabu pekee na si kwa Mataifa yote. Sasa, nina uhakika baadhi ya Waislamu wanaweza kuleta aya nyingine zinazosema kwamba Uislamu ni kwa wanadamu wote. Kama Waislam watafanya hivyo, basi waelekuwa kwa kufanya hivyo ni kuthibitisha kwamba aya hapo juu ni za uongo.


Ama Quran ni pakiti ya uongo na utata au ni tu kwa Waarabu wa Makkah na jirani yake kama alivyo sema Allah ambaye ni mungu wa Waislamu.
Katika huduma yake,
 

Hebu tuiache Biblia itueleze:

Yesu akaondoka huko, akaenda kando pande za Tiro na Sidoni. Na tazama, mwanamke Mkananayo wa mipaka ile akatokea, akampazia sauti akisema, Unirehemu, Bwana, Mwana wa Daudi; binti yangu amepagawa sana na pepo. Wala yeye hakumjibu neno. Nao wanafunzi wake wakamwendea, wakamwomba, wakisema, Mwache aende zake; kwa maana anapiga kelele nyuma yetu. Akajibu, akisema, Sikutumwa ila kwa kondoo waliopotea wa nyumba ya Israeli. Naye akaja akamsujudia, akisema, Bwana, unisaidie. akajibu, akasema, Si vema kukitwaa chakula cha watoto na kuwatupia mbwa. Akasema, Ndiyo, Bwana, lakini hata mbwa hula makombo yaangukayo mezani za bwana zao. Ndipo Yesu akajibu, akamwambia, Mama, imani yako ni kubwa; na iwe kwako kama utakavyo. Akapona binti yake tangu saa ile.
Mathayo 15.21-28​
Kwa maneno yasiotatanisha Yesu Kristo anasema kuwa yeye hakutumwa ila kwa "kondoo waliopotea wa nyumba ya Israeli."

Hakuwajia Waarabu, wala Wazungu, wala Wahindi, wala Waafrika, wala Machina. Kama hayo hayakutosha kuonyesha kuwa yeye hakuwajia wasio Mayahudi anazidi kufahamisha kwa mfano wa kumkata mtu kiu:

Si vema kukitwaa chakula cha watoto na kuwatupia mbwa."

Ikiwa ipo shaka yo yote katika akili ya mtu kuwa maana ya maneno hayo ni kuwa Yesu anasema kuwa hakutumwa kwa kabila nyengine zo zote ila Waisiraili tu na atazame mwenye shaka tafsiri kubwa kabisa ya Wakristo inayoeleza maana wazi maneno ya Biblia, The Interpreter's Bible, sahifa 441 jalada VII ambamo imeandikwa hivi:

"Yaonekana wazi kuwa Yesu hakika aliamini kuwa ujumbe wake kwanza na khasa ni kwa watu wake mwenyewe." Ndio maana alisema:


Msiwape mbwa kilicho kitakatifu, wala msitupe lulu zenu mbele ya nguruwe, wasije wakazikanyaga chini ya miguu yao, wakageuka na kuwararua.
Mathayo 7.6​
Mbwa na nguruwe ni watu wa mataifa yasiyokuwa wana wa Israili. Ukristo haufai kufundishwa watu wo wote isipokuwa Mayahudi. Hayo ndiyo mawazo ya Yesu, au ya hao walioandika Injili na wakatia maneno hayo kinywani mwa Yesu.

Kama asemavyo Isaac Asimov katika kitabu chake Guide to the Bible (Uwongozi kwa Biblia):


"Suala liliopo ni nani hao mbwa na nguruwe wnaokusudiwa katika mstari huu? Yaweza kuwa maana ya mstari huu ni kuwa haifai kufunza ukweli wa dini kwa wale wasiotubu katika kejeli zao, au wale waliozama katika madhambi, lakini hayo hayaelekei kabisa. Basi mtu amfundishe nani? Wale waliokwisha amini?

Yesu mwenyewe anakanya hayo, kwani aliposhutumiwa kuwa anachanganyika na wenye dhambi ananukuliwa kusema:

Wenye afya hawahitaji tabibu, bali walio hawawezi.
Mathayo 9.12
​
"Upande mwengine, huku kutaja mbwa na nguruwe huweza kuwa ni maneno aliyoyachagua Mathayo kulipa nguvu wazo lake kuwa isifanywe juhudi kubwa kueneza mafunzo ya Yesu miongoni mwa Mataifa mengine.

Labda ni nadhari ya Mathayo kuwa ipo khatari kubwa ya hayo Mataifa kuudhika na juhudi za kutaka kuwatanasarisha na kwa hivyo wakawatesa Wakristo; itakuwa ndio 'watageuka na kuwararua'.Na hayo kwa hakika waliwahi kuyafanya. Yaweza kuwa aliona kuwa yale Mataifa yaliyoukubali Ukristo bila ya kuijua Sharia ya Musa yangeweza kuyavuruga mafunzo ya Yesu: 'na kuyakanyaga chini ya miguu yao.'"

Na juu ya kauli ya Yesu :

"Si vema kukitwaa chakula cha watoto na kuwatupia mbwa,"

Asimov anasema:



"Hapa Mathayo kwa uwazi anatuletea Yesu ambaye kazi yake ni ndani ya mipaka ya uwananchi wa Kiyahudi tu."

Tukiendelea na isemavyo Biblia juu ya ujumbe wa Yesu tunapata ushahidi zaidi kutokana na Injili ya Mathayo:

Hao Thenashara Yesu aliwatuma, akawaagiza, akisema, Katika njia ya Mataifa msiende, wala katika mji wo wote wa Wasamaria msiingie. Afadhali shikeni njia kuwaendea kondoo waliopotea wa nyumba ya Israeli.
Mathayo 10.5-6​
Hao Thenashara ni wanafunzi wake kumi na mbili aliowateua mwenyewe Yesu kutangaza mafunzo yake.

Hapo anawapa amri zilizo wazi kuwa wasiwaendee watu wa Mataifa, yaani wasiokuwa Waisraili. Hao wanafunzi kumi na mbili ndio wanaoitwa katika Biblia "mitume" kwa kuwa walitumwa na Yesu. Na wao kama yeye mwenyewe hawakutumwa ila kwa "kondoo waliopotea wa Israel" kwani "si vema kukitwaa chakula cha watoto na kuwatupia mbwa."

Kwa nini Yesu alisema maneno kama haya ya kukataa na kukataza kuwafunza dini ila Waisraili tu?

Kwa nini alitumia mifano mibaya kama hivyo "mbwa" na "nguruwe" kwa kuwakusudia hao watu wengine wasio Mayahudi, yaani ndio mimi na wewe mwenzangu?

Wataalamu wa Kikristo na wasio Wakristo wamestaajabishwa na maneno hayo. Ni maneno machache katika aliyoyasema Yesu ambayo yamewatatiza wasomaji Wakristo kuliko maneno haya.

Wapo wanaoona kuwa Yesu alitumia matusi yale kuwaita wote wasio Mayahudi kufuata mwenendo wa Kiyahudi, yaani ndio hivyo Mayahudi wawaonavyo binaadamu wote wasio kuwa wao. Na wapo wasemao kuwa Yesu akipenda kufunza kwa mifano, na hivyo anafananisha kama kwamba yeye anaamini hiyo imani mbovu ya Kiyahudi ya kudharau watu wasiokuwa kabila yao. Na wapo wengine kama Asimov ambao wanaona maneno yale ni ya Mathayo, na yeye Mathayo (au ye yote yule aliyeandika Injili hiyo) kamuambatisha nayo Yesu maneno hayo, kwa kuwa yeye mwandishi alikuwa Mkristo wa kabila la Kiyahudi na anacho kiburi cha Kiyahudi.

Ama kusema kuwa hakutumwa ila kwa kondoo waliopotea wa Israeli inaonekana kama kilivyosema kitabu cha The Interpreter's Bible kuwa Yesu hakika kwanza aliamini kuwa alitumwa kwa Waisraili tu.

Ni jambo la kustaajabisha kuwa Mungu au Mwana wa Mungu aje duniani atumwe na kwanza asiujue utumwa wake ila aamini tu kuwa katumwa kwa watu wake wa Kiyahudi basi. Na kama yeye ni Mungu au Mwana wa Mungu, katumwa na nani?

Kama katumwa na Mungu, basi yeye si Mungu.

Si hilo tu, bali hata akiwa ni Nabii na Mtume wa Mungu tunamtaraji aujue tangu mwanzo huo ujumbe wake aliokuja nao, asiwe kutapatapa, kupapasa, na kuhangaika katika jambo la msingi.

Hapana haja ya kuyatafutia tafsiri hii na maana hii, hayo maneno yaliyo wazi ya Yesu Kristo. Yesu hakika hakutumwa ila kwa kondoo waliopotea wa nyumba ya Israeli. Yesu hakika kawakataza "mitume" wake wasende kuwahubiria mataifa mengine.

Yesu ni kweli kaonya kuwa kuwafundisha mafunzo yake hayo mataifa mengine ni sawa sawa na kuwapa mbwa kilicho kitakatifu, na kuwatupia lulu nguruwe.

Kwa nini ikawa hivi?

Ikiwa Yesu kweli katumwa na Mungu, kwa nini ujumbe wake uwekewe mipaka kwa jamaa zake tu wa Kiisraili, na yeye asikiuke mipaka ile?

Naam, zipo sababu zenye nguvu kwa hayo.

Kwa hakika hayo hayakuwa mageni, wala Yesu hakuwa Mtume wa mwanzo kutumwa hivyo na Mwenyezi Mungu.

Mitume wote waliokwisha kuja kabla yake walikuwa ni Mitume wa vikundi vyao tu, na zama zao tu, na walikuja na mafunzo yao maalumu machache.

Musa alikuwa hivyo, na Yesu hali kadhaalika.

Hali yake hali ya wenziwe, ila yeye alikuwa ndiye Mtume wa mwisho katika Mitume waliotumwa kwa kabila maalumu.

Kwa nini Mwenyezi Mungu akafanya hivyo?

Kwa nini Yesu alikatazwa, mathalan, asiwahubirie yeye wala wafwasi wake, Waafrika, au Wazungu, au Wahindi, au Machina, au Waarabu?

Amekatazwa kwa sababu kabila zote hizo zilikuwa hata hazijachukua khatua ya mwanzo ya kuamini Mungu Mmoja.

Kabila hizo na mataifa hayo yalikuwa makafiri ama wa kuabudu masanamu, au kuabudu mapango au miti au viumbe vyengine au kuabudu wanaadamu wenzao.

Na ujumbe wake Yesu ni kutengeneza mwenendo, tabia ya watu ambao tangu hapo wanayo imani ya Mungu mmoja.

Yeye hakuwa na uwezo wala muda wa kujenga tangu chini.

Yeye kazaliwa katika umma wenye kuamini Mungu Mmoja, umma wenye sharia ya Mwenyezi Mungu.

Kazi yake kwa muda mchache alioishi na kuhubiri ni kiasi ya kuwapiga msasa tu Mayahudi ambao walikwisha tahiriwa, wanajua cha halali na haramu, na muhimu kabisa wanamjua Mwenyezi Mungu Mmoja, asiyezaa wala kuzaliwa.

Ila yao Mayahudi ni kutokuwa na huruma, na kuifanya dini sharia tu isiyo na roho na imani. Mayahudi waliishika sharia ya Musa kwa dhaahiri yake, lakini waliutupilia mbali uchamngu wa Ibrahimu, wakashika ya kuonekana na watu, na wakatupa ya ndani anayoyaona Mwenyezi Mungu na dhamiri zao.

Walipoacha "mitume" wa Yesu amri hiyo ya Mungu ya kutowendea makafiri wasiomjua Mungu wala msingi wa sharia, ndipo mafunzo ya Yesu yalipochafuka.

 Kwani hao makafiri walipoingia katika Ukristo walijigeuza jina tu, lakini waliingiza karibu yao yote ya kikafiri katika dini ya Yesu, ikaitwa Ukristo, na hali sio Ukristo kabisa aliyoufundisha Yesu. Mahekalu yao ya kipagani yakageuzwa makanisa, na mizimu na mapango yao yakawa ndio monastari za Kikristo.

Lau kuwa Wana wa Israili wangeli mwitikia Yesu, basi Ukristo usingelichafuka kama ulivyo chafuka.

Upton Sinclair akiandika juu ya wakati ilipoingia Dola ya Kirumi katika Ukristo na ikaufanya ndio dini rasmi ya taifa, amesema kwa masikitiko: "Ulikuwa ni ushindi kwa Kanisa, na kwa mwenyewe mwenye kuanzisha (yaani Yesu) ni kushindwa kwa muda. Maana yake ni kuwa maadui zake wamelichukua jina lake, mafunzo yake, na nguvu zake."

Yesu alionya, lakini Paulo hakusikia:


"Katika njia ya Mataifa msiende, wala katika mji wo wote wa Wasamaria msiingie. Sikutumwa ila kwa kondoo waliopotea wa nyumba ya Israeli. Si vema kukitwaa chakula cha watoto na kuwatupia mbwa. Msiwape mbwa kilicho kitakatifu, wala msitupe lulu zenu mbele ya nguruwe, wasije wakazikanyaga chini ya miguu yao, wakageuka na wakawararua."

Katika Injili ya Yohana ananukuliwa Yesu kusema:
Mimi nawaombea hao; siuombei ulimwengu; bali hao ulionipa.
Yohana 17.9​
Tukiyachungua vilivyo maneno ya Yesu kama yalivyosimuliwa na Mathayo na Marko ya kuwa yeye alitumwa kwa kondoo waliopotea wa nyumba ya Israili, na maamrisho yake yalio wazi kuwapa "mitume" wake wasende kwenye mataifa mengine isipokuwa Mayahudi tu, na kuwa yeye na wanafunzi wake kumi na mbili watakaa katika viti vyao vya utukufu wakizihukumu kabila kumi na mbili za Israili katika ulimwengu mpya wa mbinguni, hatuwezi ila kuhukumu kuwa hao watu anaowaombea Yesu ni hao hao waliokwisha tajwa kabla, yaani wana wa Israili, sio ulimwengu, sio mimi na wewe.

Mimi na wewe si Wana wa Israili.

Mimi na wewe ni mataifa mengine.

Mimi na wewe na ulimwengu, usiokuwa wa Kiyahudi, Yesu kesha sema hatuombei, ikiwa tutakubali maneno yaliyoandikwa katika Injili zote.
 

I always say once you accept islam,your thinking/reasoning capacity decreases at an increasing rate,why? The answer is,islam discourage reasoning.

It does not take a genius to realize kwamba ukilinganisha maandiko ya Paulo na Allah,Paulo aliandika vitu vya msingi na maana kuliko Allah. Ukichukua maandiko ya Paulo as a human na Allah as a god, Paulo alikua na akili kuliko huyo mungu.

Btw,Allah says we have to believe whatsoever the fool believes.
 

Dini yoyote ni ulaghai wabkizamani unaopitwa na wakati.""We are on our way tobmake the earth a better place to live'"

We have killed many of your gods and we still kill them and sure we gonna kill all of your gods
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar Discussions

Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…