SINGAPORE: Serikali yaondoa mfumo wa madaraja(Division) katika mitihani, yasema elimu sio mashindano

[Kurzweil]

Waziri wa Elimu Ong Ye Kung amesema kuwa kuanzia mwakani hakuta kuwa na ripoti za kuwapanga wanafunzi kulingana na viwango vya ufaulu

Wazazi watapokea taarifa za watoto wao kupitia vikao vya uongozi wa shule na wazazi. Aidha, mitihani kwa wanafunzi wa chekechea na darasa la kwanza imeondolewa

Waziri Kung amesema kuwa hatua hii imechukuliwa ili kuwapa wanafunzi fursa ya kuzingatia masomo yao na sio kushindana na wengine

Waziri huyo ameongeza kuwa hatua hii imelenga kuwajengea utaratibu wa kujifunza zaidi na sio kutafuta matokeo ya juu katika mitihani

======

Whether a child finishes first or last will no longer be indicated in primary and secondary school report books from next year in Singapore, – a move which Education Minister Ong Ye Kung hopes will show students that “learning is not a competition”.

Report books will not just stop showing a student’s position in relation to class or cohort. The information to be dropped includes:

• Class and level mean​
• Minimum and maximum marks​
• Underlining and/or colouring of failing marks​
• Pass/fail for end-of-year result​
• Mean subject grades​
• Overall total marks​
• L1R5 (English plus five relevant subjects), L1R4 , EMB3 (English, maths, best three subjects) and EMB1 for lower secondary levels​

The Ministry of Education (MOE) said on Friday (Sept 28) that the change is to allow each student to focus on his or her learning progress and discourage them from being overly concerned about comparisons.

From next year all examinations for Primary 1 and 2 pupils will also be removed, and whatever forms of assessment they have will not count towards an overall grade.

The MOE said that teachers will continue to gather information about pupils’ learning through discussions, homework and quizzes. Schools will use other ways like “qualitative descriptors”, in place of marks and grades, to evaluate pupils’ progress at these two levels.

For older students in primary schools and secondary schools, marks for each subject will be rounded off and presented as a whole number, without decimal points – to reduce the focus on academic scores. Parents will continue to receive information about their child’s progress in school during parent-teacher meetings.

In an address to some 1,700 school leaders earlier this week, Mr Ong said: “I know that ‘coming in first or second’, in class or level, has traditionally been a proud recognition of a student’s achievement. But removing these indicators is for a good reason, so that the child understands from young that learning is not a competition, but a self-discipline they need to master for life.

“Notwithstanding, the report book should still contain some form of yardstick and information to allow students to judge their relative performance, and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses.”
–
Source: StraitTimes

 

[NaughtyGuy]

Learning sio mashindano

 

[swissme]

Ukitaka kuteketeza Nchi usitumie siraha wewe Benda vunja Elimu utaona mainjinia mjengo yanaanguka madokter Watauga watu na Jiwe atatawala milele


Swissme

 

[mulwanaka]

Waziri wa Elimu Ong Ye Kung amesema kuwa kuanzia mwakani hakuta kuwa na ripoti za kuwapanga wanafunzi kulingana na viwango vya ufaulu

Wazazi watapokea taarifa za watoto wao kupitia vikao vya uongozi wa shule na wazazi. Aidha, mitihani kwa wanafunzi wa chekechea na darasa la kwanza imeondolewa

Waziri Kung amesema kuwa hatua hii imechukuliwa ili kuwapa wanafunzi fursa ya kuzingatia masomo yao na sio kushindana na wengine

Waziri huyo ameongeza kuwa hatua hii imelenga kuwajengea utaratibu wa kujifunza zaidi na sio kutafuta matokeo ya juu katika mitihani

======

Whether a child finishes first or last will no longer be indicated in primary and secondary school report books from next year in Singapore, – a move which Education Minister Ong Ye Kung hopes will show students that “learning is not a competition”.

Report books will not just stop showing a student’s position in relation to class or cohort. The information to be dropped includes:

• Class and level mean​
• Minimum and maximum marks​
• Underlining and/or colouring of failing marks​
• Pass/fail for end-of-year result​
• Mean subject grades​
• Overall total marks​
• L1R5 (English plus five relevant subjects), L1R4 , EMB3 (English, maths, best three subjects) and EMB1 for lower secondary levels​

The Ministry of Education (MOE) said on Friday (Sept 28) that the change is to allow each student to focus on his or her learning progress and discourage them from being overly concerned about comparisons.

From next year all examinations for Primary 1 and 2 pupils will also be removed, and whatever forms of assessment they have will not count towards an overall grade.

The MOE said that teachers will continue to gather information about pupils’ learning through discussions, homework and quizzes. Schools will use other ways like “qualitative descriptors”, in place of marks and grades, to evaluate pupils’ progress at these two levels.

For older students in primary schools and secondary schools, marks for each subject will be rounded off and presented as a whole number, without decimal points – to reduce the focus on academic scores. Parents will continue to receive information about their child’s progress in school during parent-teacher meetings.

In an address to some 1,700 school leaders earlier this week, Mr Ong said: “I know that ‘coming in first or second’, in class or level, has traditionally been a proud recognition of a student’s achievement. But removing these indicators is for a good reason, so that the child understands from young that learning is not a competition, but a self-discipline they need to master for life.

“Notwithstanding, the report book should still contain some form of yardstick and information to allow students to judge their relative performance, and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses.”
–
Source: StraitTimes

Nimeipenda hiyo system.....mashidano katika elimu ndo yanao sababisha wizi wa mitihani na kufanya elimu iwe Biashara badala ya kua huduma mhimu.....tena hata wale wenye div1 au 2. Sione tofouti na wengine katika utendaji kazi

 

[titimunda]

yaleyale ya kuvalishana yunifomu darasani na bwenini eti ili tufanane wote.Mwanaadamu kiasili ni mshindani,tokea akiwa mbegu ya uzazi,kushindana kwenye maendeleo sio jambo baya,wasiopenda ushindani ni wale wenye roho dhaifu.

 

[pye Chang shen]

Yaani hapo ndio wamebugi kabisa
Bila Shaka huyo waziri naye ni kimeo
Bila kushindana mutaendeleaje?

 

[Diwani]

Yaani hapo ndio wamebugi kabisa
Bila Shaka huyo waziri naye ni kimeo
Bila kushindana mutaendeleaje?

Kama ni mpenzi wa falsafa, utakuwa unaufahamu msemo huu

"Usishindane na mtu yeyote, shindana na wewe mwenyewe"

Elimu ni falsafa.

 

[pye Chang shen]

Kama ni mpenzi wa falsafa, utakuwa unaufahamu msemo huu

"Usishindane na mtu yeyote, shindana na wewe mwenyewe"

Elimu ni falsafa.

Mi si mpenzi Wa falsafa

 

[Diwani]

Mi si mpenzi Wa falsafa

Ok, basi naomba nikufunze, Elimu ni falsafa, na falsafa haiimizi katika ushindani kati ya watu, bali mtu mwenyewe

 

[Black Sniper]

Niliona kwenye world economy forum
Hawa jamaa wako vizuri na wanatumia waalimu wao kufundisha mpaka kila mwanafunzi aelewe somo ndio ana endelea
Hapo ni kuelewa somo tu
Pia wanafunzi wataendelea kusoma science na hesabu mpaka wanamaliza elimu yao yote

Hii system naona ni nzuri kwa wao

 

[hearly]

Aisee

 

[Yodoki II]

Learning sio mashindano

Mashindano ni catalyst

 

[Yodoki II]

Mitihani kusudio lake si kumshindanisha mwanafunzi bali njia ya kujitathimini kwake na mwl wake pamoja na mamlaka kupata mrejesho na kufanya tathimini pia

 

[Yodoki II]

Ok, basi naomba nikufunze, Elimu ni falsafa, na falsafa haiimizi katika ushindani kati ya watu, bali mtu mwenyewe

Unamfahamu Plato na falsafa zake juu ya elimu?

 

[Diwani]

Unamfahamu Plato na falsafa zake juu ya elimu?

Ndio

 

[Diwani]

Unamfahamu Plato na falsafa zake juu ya elimu?

Falsafa yake ililenga 'ushindani" Kama matokeo ya elimu, na sio "Propeller" ya maendeleo ya elimu.

 

[Mazindu Msambule]

Yaani hapo ndio wamebugi kabisa
Bila Shaka huyo waziri naye ni kimeo
Bila kushindana mutaendeleaje?

Utamlaumu huyo waziri bure tu, ninacho amini, waziri hawezi kufanya mabadiriko makubwa namna hiyo pekee yake, hiyo ujue imejadiriwa kwenye vikao husika na waziri kama muhusika wa hiyo sector ndio analazimika kutangaza but nina amini, suala hilo lina Baraka ya rais wa nchi, waziri mkuu (kama wanae) na the cabinet wanajua na kupanga hivyo!

 

[Yodoki II]

Falsafa yake ililenga 'ushindani" Kama matokeo ya elimu, na sio "Propeller" ya maendeleo ya elimu.

Mkuu, mtihani una malengo mengi lakini kubwa ni EVALUATION & SELECTION. Mambo ya nani kawa wa kwanza au wa mwisho yanaweza yasiwe na maana ila ku-cluster wanafunzi kulingana na ufaulu kuna matumizi yake.

 

[Diwani]

Mkuu, mtihani una malengo mengi lakini kubwa ni EVALUATION & SELECTION. Mambo ya nani kawa wa kwanza au wa mwisho yanaweza yasiwe na maana ila ku-cluster wanafunzi kulingana na ufaulu kuna matumizi yake.

Ni kweli, hili lipo ndani ya tathmini ya kiwango, kwa sababu kufaulu na kufeli (kulingana na daraja) kunachangiwa na vitu vingi, na si kwmba evaluation ikiwa viable na kiwango kilichowekwa na mamlakha basi hiyo product ndio bora

Elimu hubadilika kulingana na maisha, mazingira na wakati.
curriculum design inalinganisha mahitaji ya jamii, jamii sasa inapita competence na sio performance (division) huenda hii ndio ikawa sabbu ya wao kubadili

 

[Al Watani]

Waziri wa Elimu Ong Ye Kung amesema kuwa kuanzia mwakani hakuta kuwa na ripoti za kuwapanga wanafunzi kulingana na viwango vya ufaulu

Wazazi watapokea taarifa za watoto wao kupitia vikao vya uongozi wa shule na wazazi. Aidha, mitihani kwa wanafunzi wa chekechea na darasa la kwanza imeondolewa

Waziri Kung amesema kuwa hatua hii imechukuliwa ili kuwapa wanafunzi fursa ya kuzingatia masomo yao na sio kushindana na wengine

Waziri huyo ameongeza kuwa hatua hii imelenga kuwajengea utaratibu wa kujifunza zaidi na sio kutafuta matokeo ya juu katika mitihani

======

Whether a child finishes first or last will no longer be indicated in primary and secondary school report books from next year in Singapore, – a move which Education Minister Ong Ye Kung hopes will show students that “learning is not a competition”.

Report books will not just stop showing a student’s position in relation to class or cohort. The information to be dropped includes:

• Class and level mean​
• Minimum and maximum marks​
• Underlining and/or colouring of failing marks​
• Pass/fail for end-of-year result​
• Mean subject grades​
• Overall total marks​
• L1R5 (English plus five relevant subjects), L1R4 , EMB3 (English, maths, best three subjects) and EMB1 for lower secondary levels​

The Ministry of Education (MOE) said on Friday (Sept 28) that the change is to allow each student to focus on his or her learning progress and discourage them from being overly concerned about comparisons.

From next year all examinations for Primary 1 and 2 pupils will also be removed, and whatever forms of assessment they have will not count towards an overall grade.

The MOE said that teachers will continue to gather information about pupils’ learning through discussions, homework and quizzes. Schools will use other ways like “qualitative descriptors”, in place of marks and grades, to evaluate pupils’ progress at these two levels.

For older students in primary schools and secondary schools, marks for each subject will be rounded off and presented as a whole number, without decimal points – to reduce the focus on academic scores. Parents will continue to receive information about their child’s progress in school during parent-teacher meetings.

In an address to some 1,700 school leaders earlier this week, Mr Ong said: “I know that ‘coming in first or second’, in class or level, has traditionally been a proud recognition of a student’s achievement. But removing these indicators is for a good reason, so that the child understands from young that learning is not a competition, but a self-discipline they need to master for life.

“Notwithstanding, the report book should still contain some form of yardstick and information to allow students to judge their relative performance, and evaluate their strengths and weaknesses.”
–
Source: StraitTimes

Sitashangaa mpuuzi mmoja akituletea na sisi mfumo huu ilimradi kafanya mabadiliko bila hata research