Rwanda’s Untold Story: Who Was Behind the Genocide?

Rwanda’s Untold Story: Who Was Behind the Genocide?

Hizi garbage zimesharudiwa million times na hakuna mtu mwenye akili anasikiliza huo upuuzi,Rwanda is moving ahead na hairudi nyuma...ila usisahau all genociders,interahamwe,FDLRs etc lazima justice iwafikie,for now endeleeni kujifurahisha na keyboards zenu huku mkiendelea kuokotwa one at a time...FYI pro NAZI still wanatoa documentary kama hizo to this day so hakuna jipya hapo and was expected hamuwezi kuishia bila useless noise.

Safi san mkuu. Hiyo ndiyo saini yenu watus. Lazima useme hayo maneno genociders,interahamwe,FDLRs..........Ahahahhaa
Bonge la chata. Nyie ni watu wa ajabu sana. kwanini msijifunze kutoka kwetu tunavyoishi makabila yote bila ubaguzi? Ni nani kawaloga?
 
Very soon RWANDA na wanyarwanda watapata Uhuru kotoka kwa huyu mkoloni PAKA, na kukomesha mauaji ya RAIA wetu kama prof Mwaikusa.

Siku hizi mtu akidondoka kwa kumeza viagra mnamsingizia rais wetu. Kazi ipo kweli kweli.
 
Ooh.... nimekuelewa..... sasa hiyo haiitwi uhuru.... bali mapinduzi kama vile ilivyokuwa kwa Zanzibar..... uhuru ulikuwa mwaka 1963 lakini mapinduzi yakawa 1964....

Na nyie watu wa Rwanda ni bora mkasema kilichotokea 1994 ilikuwa ni mapinduzi.... Na hivyo serikali yenu ikaitwa....SERIKALI YA MAPINDUZI YA RWANDA.... hapo mtakuwa hamjapindisha historia.... maana ninachoelewa uhuru unapatikana mara moja tu..... na pia ni uhuru toka kwa utawala kandamizi wa watu wa nje ya mipaka ya nchi (Ukoloni)...

South Africa?
 
washaanza

[h=2]Global researchers protest BBC Genocide revisionist film[/h]By: JAMES MUNYANEZA
1413276720researchers.jpg
CLOCKWISE: Renowned British researcher and author Prof. Linda Melvern; Canadian Senator Gen. (Rdt) Romeo Dallaire, the commander of the UN force in Rwanda during the Genocide; former Czech Representative on the UN Security Council, Amb. Karel Kovanda; and Boubacar Boris Diop of Sénégal, author of ‘Murambi, the Book of Bones, are among those who signed the letter. (Internet photos)


A group of 28 eminent scholars, researchers, historians and journalists from around the world has demanded that the BBC apologises for broadcasting an hour-long documentary earlier this month which they say revises and distorts the reality about the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi.
In an October 12 letter to the Director-General of the BBC, Tony Hall, the researchers expressed “grave concern at the content of the documentary ‘Rwanda’s Untold Story’ (This World, BBC 2 Wednesday October 1).”
“We hope that the BBC management will quickly realise the gravity of the genocide denial in ‘Rwanda’s Untold Story’. We call upon the BBC to explain how the programme came to be made and the editorial decision-making which allowed it to be broadcast,” they said.
“In the course of any internal BBC enquiry we hope all relevant documents from the This World archive and from senior editors involved in approving the programme will be released for study,” they added.
The researchers, who have separately spent years investigating and writing about the events that rocked Rwanda two decades ago, said the documentary “tarnishes the BBC’s well-deserved reputation for objective and balanced journalism.”
“We urge the BBC to apologise for the offence this programme has caused for all victims and survivors of the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.”
The film, which carries interviews with a group of known opponents of President Paul Kagame’s government and justice fugitives, has provoked protests from Genocide survivors with both the umbrella organisation of survivors, Ibuka, and its member associations in the UK also delivering written protests as well as carrying out demonstrations at the BBC headquarters in London.
The researchers say there was nothing new about the allegations, accusing the BBC of recycling the same revisionist material that had for years been “distributed far and wide as part of an on-going ‘Hutu Power’ campaign of genocide denial.”
“At the heart of this campaign are convicted génocidaires, some of their defence lawyers from the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), and their supporters and collaborators.”
“We accept and support that it is legitimate to investigate, with due diligence and respect for factual evidence, any crimes committed by the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), and to reflect on the contemporary political situation in Rwanda,” the petitioners wrote.
“However, attempts to examine these issues should not distort the reality of the 1994 genocide. It is not legitimate to use current events to either negate or to diminish the genocide. Nor is it legitimate to promote genocide denial,” the scholars wrote.
The petitioners added: “Three of the untenable claims made in the programme are of the utmost concern: the first is a lie about the true nature of the Hutu Power militia.
“The second is an attempt to minimize the number of Tutsi murdered in the genocide, and the third is an effort to place the blame for shooting down President Habyarimana’s plane on April 6, 1994 on the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF)”.
“Third, the film argues that the shooting down of the plane on April 6, 1994 was perpetrated by the RPF. This same story was promoted by Hutu Power extremists within a few hours of the president’s assassination and promoted ever since by génocidaires and a few ICTR defence lawyers.”
In the documentary, the BBC questioned the orthodox standard narrative of the Genocide, with interviewees largely blaming the RPF and Kagame for the Genocide with some two controversial American researchers even revising the number of the Tutsi victims of the slaughter from an estimated one million people to 200,000.
“The programme attempts to minimise the number of Tutsi murdered, a typical tactic of genocide deniers. The false figures cited are provided by two US academics who worked for a team of lawyers defending the génocidaires at the ICTR.
“They even claim that in 1994 more Hutu than Tutsi were murdered – an absurd suggestion and contrary to all the widely available research reported by Amnesty International, UNICEF, the UN Human Rights Commission, Oxfam, Human Rights Watch, Africa Rights, a UN Security Council mandated Commission of Experts and evidence submitted to the ICTR and other European courts who have successfully put on trial several perpetrators,” the researchers wrote to the BBC.
On the fact the BBC made reference to biased research that attempt to blame the RPF for the downing of Habyarimana’s plane, an incident that is seen as the trigger of the killings, the experts said, “the film pays no heed to a detailed expert report published in January 2012 by a French magistrate Judge Marc Trévidic.
“This contains evidence from French experts, including crash investigators, who proved scientifically that the missiles that shot down the plane came from the confines of the government-run barracks in Kanombe on the airport’s perimeter – one of the most fortified places in the country, and where it would have been impossible for the RPF, armed with a missile, to penetrate.
******
FULL LETTER AND LIST OF THE PETITIONERS
Mr. Tony Hall, Director-General of the BBC, Broadcasting House, Portland Place,
London, W1A 1AA
October 12, 2014
Dear Sir,
We the undersigned, scholars, scientists, researchers, journalists and historians are writing to you today to express our grave concern at the content of the documentary Rwanda’s Untold Story (This World, BBC 2, Wednesday, October 1), specifically its coverage of the 1994 genocide of the Tutsi.
We accept and support that it is legitimate to investigate, with due diligence and respect for factual evidence, any crimes committed by the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), and to reflect on the contemporary political situation in Rwanda. However, attempts to examine these issues should not distort the reality of the 1994 genocide. It is not legitimate to use current events to either negate or to diminish the genocide. Nor is it legitimate to promote genocide denial.
The parts of the film which concern the 1994 genocide, far from providing viewers with an ‘Untold Story’ as the title promises, are old claims. For years similar material using similar language has been distributed far and wide as part of an on-going ‘Hutu Power’ campaign of genocide denial. At the heart of this campaign are convicted génocidaires, some of their defence lawyers from the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), and their supporters and collaborators. These deniers continually question the status of the genocide and try to prove – like the programme – that what it calls the ‘official narrative’ of the 1994 genocide is wrong. The BBC programme Rwanda’s Untold Story recycles their arguments and provides them with another platform to create doubt and confusion about what really happened.
Three of the untenable claims made in the programme are of the utmost concern: the first is a lie about the true nature of the Hutu Power militia. The second is an attempt to minimize the number of Tutsi murdered in the genocide, and the third is an effort to place the blame for shooting down President Habyarimana’s plane on April 6, 1994 on the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF).
First, the programme allows a witness to claim that ‘only ten percent of the Interahamwe (militia) were killers’. In fact, the majority of Hutu Power militia forces – estimated to have been 30,000 strong – were trained specifically to kill Tutsi at speed, and indoctrinated in a racist ideology, part of genocide planning. There is eyewitness testimony by several militia leaders who cooperated with the ICTR.
Second, the programme attempts to minimise the number of Tutsi murdered, a typical tactic of genocide deniers. The false figures cited are provided by two US academics who worked for a team of lawyers defending the génocidaires at the ICTR. They even claim that in 1994 more Hutu than Tutsi were murdered – an absurd suggestion and contrary to all the widely available research reported by Amnesty International, UNICEF, the UN Human Rights Commission, Oxfam, Human Rights Watch, Africa Rights, a UN Security Council mandated Commission of Experts and evidence submitted to the ICTR and other European courts who have successfully put on trial several perpetrators.
Third, the film argues that the shooting down of the plane on April 6, 1994 was perpetrated by the RPF. This same story was promoted by Hutu Power extremists within a few hours of the president’s assassination and promoted ever since by génocidaires and a few ICTR defence lawyers.
The film pays no heed to a detailed expert report published in January 2012 by a French magistrate Judge Marc Trévidic. This contains evidence from French experts, including crash investigators, who proved scientifically that the missiles that shot down the plane came from the confines of the government-run barracks in Kanombe on the airport’s perimeter – one of the most fortified places in the country, and where it would have been impossible for the RPF, armed with a missile, to penetrate.
Within hours of the president’s assassination, in this carefully planned genocide, roadblocks went up all over Kigali and the Presidential Guard started to target every member of Rwanda’s political opposition.
These momentous events are barely mentioned. The members of the Hutu and Tutsi pro-democracy movements were hunted down and killed, including Rwanda’s Prime Minister, Agathe Uwilingiyimana, and ten UN peacekeepers from Belgium who were protecting her. These opposition politicians separately threatened the Habyarimana regime for advocating power-sharing and paid for their courage with their lives. Ignored in this film are the Hutu Power attempts to divide the internal political opposition along ethnic lines. Political violence in the film is seen only in the context of a ‘civil war’ between the RPF and the Habyarimana government, a smoke screen, used then and now, to hide the systematic killing of Tutsi carried out by the Hutu Power Interim Government and its militia.
The film-maker, Jane Corbin, who presented the programme, even tries to raise doubts about whether or not the RPF stopped the genocide. The authority on this subject is Lt.-General Roméo Dallaire, the Force commander of the UN Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR), and present in Rwanda throughout the genocide. Dallaire is categorical. ‘The genocide was stopped because the RPF won and stopped it’, he says. Corbin ignores the testimonies of direct witnesses to what happened in 1994: Dallaire and his volunteer UN peacekeepers, Philippe Gaillard and the medics at the International Committee of the Red Cross, and Dr. James Orbinski of Médecins Sans Frontières. Years of research and writing by academics and other experts along with hours of films by journalists who work for the BBC – all of this eyewitness testimony is dismissed as if fraudulent.
In broadcasting this documentary the BBC has been recklessly irresponsible. The programme has fuelled genocide denial. It has further emboldened the génocidaires, all their supporters and those who collaborate with them. It has provided them the legitimacy of the BBC. Denial of genocide causes the gravest offence to survivors. For them, the genocide is not a distant event from 20 years ago but a reality with which they live every day.
The denial of genocide is now widely recognised as the final stage of the crime. One of the world’s preeminent genocide scholars, the US Professor Greg H. Stanton, describes ten stages in genocide: classification of the population; symbolization of those classifications; discrimination against a targeted group; dehumanisation of the pariah group; organisation of the killers; polarisation of the population; preparation by the killers; persecution of the victims; extermination of the victims; and denial that the killing was genocide.
Denial, the final stage, ensures the crime continues. It incites new killing. It denies the dignity of the deceased and mocks those who survived. Denial of genocide is taken so seriously that in some European countries it is criminalized. In 2008 the Council of the European Union called upon states to criminalize genocide denial.
The 1994 genocide of the Tutsi should be treated by all concerned with the utmost intellectual honesty and rigour. We would be willing – indeed see it as our duty – to meet with journalists and to debate in a follow up programme the serious inaccuracies in Rwanda’s Untold Story.
We hope that the BBC management will quickly realise the gravity of the genocide denial in Rwanda’s Untold Story. We call upon the BBC to explain how the programme came to be made and the editorial decision-making which allowed it to be broadcast. In the course of any internal BBC enquiry we hope all relevant documents from the This World archive and from senior editors involved in approving the programme will be released for study.
Rwanda’s Untold Story tarnishes the BBC’s well-deserved reputation for objective and balanced journalism. We urge the BBC to apologise for the offence this programme has caused for all victims and survivors of the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.
--------------------
Signed
Professor Linda Melvern, Author, A People Betrayed: The Role of the West in Rwanda’s Genocide; Conspiracy to Murder

Senator Roméo Dallaire, Force Commander, UNAMIR

Professor Gregory H. Stanton, President, Genocide Watch

Mehdi Ba, Journalist and Author

Bishop Ken Barham, Dr. Margaret Brearley Independent Scholar

Dr. Gerald Caplan, Author, The Preventable Genocide

Professor Frank Chalk, Professor of History/Director, Montreal Institute for Genocide and Human Rights Studies, Concordia University, Co-author, ‘Mobilizing the Will to Intervene: Leadership to Prevent Mass Atrocities’ (McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2010)

Dr.Phil Clark, Reader in Comparative and International Politics, SOAS, University of London

Boubacar Boris Diop, Sénégal. Author, Murambi, the book of bones

Jean-François Dupaquier, Author and Expert

Hélène Dumas, Diplômée de l’IEP d’Aix-en-Provence (2003), Docteur en histoire de l’EHESS (2013)

Professor Margee Ensign, President, American University of Nigeria

Tim Gallimore, Independent genocide researcher

Peter Greaves, Former UNICEF staff member

Fred Grünfeld, Emeritus professor in International Relations, Human Rights and the Causes of Gross Human Rights Violations, Universities of Maastricht and Utrecht, Netherlands. Author, The Failure to Prevent Genocide in Rwanda: The Role of Bystanders, 2007

Dr. Helen Hintjens, Assistant Professor in Development and Social Justice, International Institute of Social Studies (ISS) The Hague

Dr. Georgina Holmes, Lecturer International Relations,
University of Portsmouth/Royal Holloway, University of London

Richard Johnson, Author, The Travesty of Human Rights Watch on Rwanda

Eric Joyce MP, Ambassador Karel Kovanda (ret), Czech Representative on the UN Security Council, 1994-95

Françoise Lemagnen, Chief Executive, Survivors Fund (SURF)

Ambassador Stephen Lewis, Former Canadian Ambassador to the UN.

W. Alan McClue, Visiting Fellow, Bournemouth University/Cranfield University

Roland Moerland, Ph.D. Researcher and Lecturer in Supranational and Organizational Criminology, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology Maastricht University, The Netherlands

George Monbiot, Author and Journalist

Jacques Morel, Author, La France au coeur du génocide des Tutsi (2010)

Barbara Mulvaney, International Law Consultant; Former Senior Trial Attorney - Bagosora et al., United Nations International Tribunal for Rwanda

Dr. Jude Murison, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh

Peter Raymont, President, White Pine Pictures, Toronto, Canada

Professor Josias Semujanga, Professeur titulaire, Département des littératures de langue française, Université de Montréal, Quebec

Jonathan Salt, Managing Director of Ojemba Education

Keith Somerville, Senior Research fellow, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London; Lecturer in Communications and Humanitarianism, Centre for Journalism, University of Kent

Patrick de Saint-Exupéry, Author and journalist

Dr James M. Smith, CBE CEO, Aegis Trust

Rafiki Ubaldo, Journalist

Andrew Wallis, Author, Silent Accomplice: The untold Story of the Role of France in the Rwandan Genocide, I.B.Tauris, 2014

Lillian Wong, O.B.E., British Chargé d’Affaires in Rwanda 1994-1995






http://www.newtimes.co.rw/section/article/2014-10-14/181938/
 
washaanza

Global researchers protest BBC Genocide revisionist film

By: JAMES MUNYANEZA
1413276720researchers.jpg
CLOCKWISE: Renowned British researcher and author Prof. Linda Melvern; Canadian Senator Gen. (Rdt) Romeo Dallaire, the commander of the UN force in Rwanda during the Genocide; former Czech Representative on the UN Security Council, Amb. Karel Kovanda; and Boubacar Boris Diop of Sénégal, author of ‘Murambi, the Book of Bones, are among those who signed the letter. (Internet photos)


A group of 28 eminent scholars, researchers, historians and journalists from around the world has demanded that the BBC apologises for broadcasting an hour-long documentary earlier this month which they say revises and distorts the reality about the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi.
In an October 12 letter to the Director-General of the BBC, Tony Hall, the researchers expressed "grave concern at the content of the documentary ‘Rwanda's Untold Story' (This World, BBC 2 Wednesday October 1)."
"We hope that the BBC management will quickly realise the gravity of the genocide denial in ‘Rwanda's Untold Story'. We call upon the BBC to explain how the programme came to be made and the editorial decision-making which allowed it to be broadcast," they said.
"In the course of any internal BBC enquiry we hope all relevant documents from the This World archive and from senior editors involved in approving the programme will be released for study," they added.
The researchers, who have separately spent years investigating and writing about the events that rocked Rwanda two decades ago, said the documentary "tarnishes the BBC's well-deserved reputation for objective and balanced journalism."
"We urge the BBC to apologise for the offence this programme has caused for all victims and survivors of the 1994 genocide in Rwanda."
The film, which carries interviews with a group of known opponents of President Paul Kagame's government and justice fugitives, has provoked protests from Genocide survivors with both the umbrella organisation of survivors, Ibuka, and its member associations in the UK also delivering written protests as well as carrying out demonstrations at the BBC headquarters in London.
The researchers say there was nothing new about the allegations, accusing the BBC of recycling the same revisionist material that had for years been "distributed far and wide as part of an on-going ‘Hutu Power' campaign of genocide denial."
"At the heart of this campaign are convicted génocidaires, some of their defence lawyers from the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), and their supporters and collaborators."
"We accept and support that it is legitimate to investigate, with due diligence and respect for factual evidence, any crimes committed by the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), and to reflect on the contemporary political situation in Rwanda," the petitioners wrote.
"However, attempts to examine these issues should not distort the reality of the 1994 genocide. It is not legitimate to use current events to either negate or to diminish the genocide. Nor is it legitimate to promote genocide denial," the scholars wrote.
The petitioners added: "Three of the untenable claims made in the programme are of the utmost concern: the first is a lie about the true nature of the Hutu Power militia.
"The second is an attempt to minimize the number of Tutsi murdered in the genocide, and the third is an effort to place the blame for shooting down President Habyarimana's plane on April 6, 1994 on the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF)".
"Third, the film argues that the shooting down of the plane on April 6, 1994 was perpetrated by the RPF. This same story was promoted by Hutu Power extremists within a few hours of the president's assassination and promoted ever since by génocidaires and a few ICTR defence lawyers."
In the documentary, the BBC questioned the orthodox standard narrative of the Genocide, with interviewees largely blaming the RPF and Kagame for the Genocide with some two controversial American researchers even revising the number of the Tutsi victims of the slaughter from an estimated one million people to 200,000.
"The programme attempts to minimise the number of Tutsi murdered, a typical tactic of genocide deniers. The false figures cited are provided by two US academics who worked for a team of lawyers defending the génocidaires at the ICTR.
"They even claim that in 1994 more Hutu than Tutsi were murdered – an absurd suggestion and contrary to all the widely available research reported by Amnesty International, UNICEF, the UN Human Rights Commission, Oxfam, Human Rights Watch, Africa Rights, a UN Security Council mandated Commission of Experts and evidence submitted to the ICTR and other European courts who have successfully put on trial several perpetrators," the researchers wrote to the BBC.
On the fact the BBC made reference to biased research that attempt to blame the RPF for the downing of Habyarimana's plane, an incident that is seen as the trigger of the killings, the experts said, "the film pays no heed to a detailed expert report published in January 2012 by a French magistrate Judge Marc Trévidic.
"This contains evidence from French experts, including crash investigators, who proved scientifically that the missiles that shot down the plane came from the confines of the government-run barracks in Kanombe on the airport's perimeter – one of the most fortified places in the country, and where it would have been impossible for the RPF, armed with a missile, to penetrate.
******
FULL LETTER AND LIST OF THE PETITIONERS
Mr. Tony Hall, Director-General of the BBC, Broadcasting House, Portland Place,
London, W1A 1AA
October 12, 2014
Dear Sir,
We the undersigned, scholars, scientists, researchers, journalists and historians are writing to you today to express our grave concern at the content of the documentary Rwanda's Untold Story (This World, BBC 2, Wednesday, October 1), specifically its coverage of the 1994 genocide of the Tutsi.
We accept and support that it is legitimate to investigate, with due diligence and respect for factual evidence, any crimes committed by the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), and to reflect on the contemporary political situation in Rwanda. However, attempts to examine these issues should not distort the reality of the 1994 genocide. It is not legitimate to use current events to either negate or to diminish the genocide. Nor is it legitimate to promote genocide denial.
The parts of the film which concern the 1994 genocide, far from providing viewers with an ‘Untold Story' as the title promises, are old claims. For years similar material using similar language has been distributed far and wide as part of an on-going ‘Hutu Power' campaign of genocide denial. At the heart of this campaign are convicted génocidaires, some of their defence lawyers from the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), and their supporters and collaborators. These deniers continually question the status of the genocide and try to prove – like the programme – that what it calls the ‘official narrative' of the 1994 genocide is wrong. The BBC programme Rwanda's Untold Story recycles their arguments and provides them with another platform to create doubt and confusion about what really happened.
Three of the untenable claims made in the programme are of the utmost concern: the first is a lie about the true nature of the Hutu Power militia. The second is an attempt to minimize the number of Tutsi murdered in the genocide, and the third is an effort to place the blame for shooting down President Habyarimana's plane on April 6, 1994 on the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF).
First, the programme allows a witness to claim that ‘only ten percent of the Interahamwe (militia) were killers'. In fact, the majority of Hutu Power militia forces – estimated to have been 30,000 strong – were trained specifically to kill Tutsi at speed, and indoctrinated in a racist ideology, part of genocide planning. There is eyewitness testimony by several militia leaders who cooperated with the ICTR.
Second, the programme attempts to minimise the number of Tutsi murdered, a typical tactic of genocide deniers. The false figures cited are provided by two US academics who worked for a team of lawyers defending the génocidaires at the ICTR. They even claim that in 1994 more Hutu than Tutsi were murdered – an absurd suggestion and contrary to all the widely available research reported by Amnesty International, UNICEF, the UN Human Rights Commission, Oxfam, Human Rights Watch, Africa Rights, a UN Security Council mandated Commission of Experts and evidence submitted to the ICTR and other European courts who have successfully put on trial several perpetrators.
Third, the film argues that the shooting down of the plane on April 6, 1994 was perpetrated by the RPF. This same story was promoted by Hutu Power extremists within a few hours of the president's assassination and promoted ever since by génocidaires and a few ICTR defence lawyers.
The film pays no heed to a detailed expert report published in January 2012 by a French magistrate Judge Marc Trévidic. This contains evidence from French experts, including crash investigators, who proved scientifically that the missiles that shot down the plane came from the confines of the government-run barracks in Kanombe on the airport's perimeter – one of the most fortified places in the country, and where it would have been impossible for the RPF, armed with a missile, to penetrate.
Within hours of the president's assassination, in this carefully planned genocide, roadblocks went up all over Kigali and the Presidential Guard started to target every member of Rwanda's political opposition.
These momentous events are barely mentioned. The members of the Hutu and Tutsi pro-democracy movements were hunted down and killed, including Rwanda's Prime Minister, Agathe Uwilingiyimana, and ten UN peacekeepers from Belgium who were protecting her. These opposition politicians separately threatened the Habyarimana regime for advocating power-sharing and paid for their courage with their lives. Ignored in this film are the Hutu Power attempts to divide the internal political opposition along ethnic lines. Political violence in the film is seen only in the context of a ‘civil war' between the RPF and the Habyarimana government, a smoke screen, used then and now, to hide the systematic killing of Tutsi carried out by the Hutu Power Interim Government and its militia.
The film-maker, Jane Corbin, who presented the programme, even tries to raise doubts about whether or not the RPF stopped the genocide. The authority on this subject is Lt.-General Roméo Dallaire, the Force commander of the UN Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR), and present in Rwanda throughout the genocide. Dallaire is categorical. ‘The genocide was stopped because the RPF won and stopped it', he says. Corbin ignores the testimonies of direct witnesses to what happened in 1994: Dallaire and his volunteer UN peacekeepers, Philippe Gaillard and the medics at the International Committee of the Red Cross, and Dr. James Orbinski of Médecins Sans FrontieÌ€res. Years of research and writing by academics and other experts along with hours of films by journalists who work for the BBC – all of this eyewitness testimony is dismissed as if fraudulent.
In broadcasting this documentary the BBC has been recklessly irresponsible. The programme has fuelled genocide denial. It has further emboldened the génocidaires, all their supporters and those who collaborate with them. It has provided them the legitimacy of the BBC. Denial of genocide causes the gravest offence to survivors. For them, the genocide is not a distant event from 20 years ago but a reality with which they live every day.
The denial of genocide is now widely recognised as the final stage of the crime. One of the world's preeminent genocide scholars, the US Professor Greg H. Stanton, describes ten stages in genocide: classification of the population; symbolization of those classifications; discrimination against a targeted group; dehumanisation of the pariah group; organisation of the killers; polarisation of the population; preparation by the killers; persecution of the victims; extermination of the victims; and denial that the killing was genocide.
Denial, the final stage, ensures the crime continues. It incites new killing. It denies the dignity of the deceased and mocks those who survived. Denial of genocide is taken so seriously that in some European countries it is criminalized. In 2008 the Council of the European Union called upon states to criminalize genocide denial.
The 1994 genocide of the Tutsi should be treated by all concerned with the utmost intellectual honesty and rigour. We would be willing – indeed see it as our duty – to meet with journalists and to debate in a follow up programme the serious inaccuracies in Rwanda's Untold Story.
We hope that the BBC management will quickly realise the gravity of the genocide denial in Rwanda's Untold Story. We call upon the BBC to explain how the programme came to be made and the editorial decision-making which allowed it to be broadcast. In the course of any internal BBC enquiry we hope all relevant documents from the This World archive and from senior editors involved in approving the programme will be released for study.
Rwanda's Untold Story tarnishes the BBC's well-deserved reputation for objective and balanced journalism. We urge the BBC to apologise for the offence this programme has caused for all victims and survivors of the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.
--------------------
Signed
Professor Linda Melvern, Author, A People Betrayed: The Role of the West in Rwanda's Genocide; Conspiracy to Murder

Senator Roméo Dallaire, Force Commander, UNAMIR

Professor Gregory H. Stanton, President, Genocide Watch

Mehdi Ba, Journalist and Author

Bishop Ken Barham, Dr. Margaret Brearley Independent Scholar

Dr. Gerald Caplan, Author, The Preventable Genocide

Professor Frank Chalk, Professor of History/Director, Montreal Institute for Genocide and Human Rights Studies, Concordia University, Co-author, ‘Mobilizing the Will to Intervene: Leadership to Prevent Mass Atrocities' (McGill-Queen's University Press, 2010)

Dr.Phil Clark, Reader in Comparative and International Politics, SOAS, University of London

Boubacar Boris Diop, Sénégal. Author, Murambi, the book of bones

Jean-François Dupaquier, Author and Expert

Hélène Dumas, Diplômée de l'IEP d'Aix-en-Provence (2003), Docteur en histoire de l'EHESS (2013)

Professor Margee Ensign, President, American University of Nigeria

Tim Gallimore, Independent genocide researcher

Peter Greaves, Former UNICEF staff member

Fred Grünfeld, Emeritus professor in International Relations, Human Rights and the Causes of Gross Human Rights Violations, Universities of Maastricht and Utrecht, Netherlands. Author, The Failure to Prevent Genocide in Rwanda: The Role of Bystanders, 2007

Dr. Helen Hintjens, Assistant Professor in Development and Social Justice, International Institute of Social Studies (ISS) The Hague

Dr. Georgina Holmes, Lecturer International Relations,
University of Portsmouth/Royal Holloway, University of London

Richard Johnson, Author, The Travesty of Human Rights Watch on Rwanda

Eric Joyce MP, Ambassador Karel Kovanda (ret), Czech Representative on the UN Security Council, 1994-95

Françoise Lemagnen, Chief Executive, Survivors Fund (SURF)

Ambassador Stephen Lewis, Former Canadian Ambassador to the UN.

W. Alan McClue, Visiting Fellow, Bournemouth University/Cranfield University

Roland Moerland, Ph.D. Researcher and Lecturer in Supranational and Organizational Criminology, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology Maastricht University, The Netherlands

George Monbiot, Author and Journalist

Jacques Morel, Author, La France au coeur du génocide des Tutsi (2010)

Barbara Mulvaney, International Law Consultant; Former Senior Trial Attorney - Bagosora et al., United Nations International Tribunal for Rwanda

Dr. Jude Murison, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh

Peter Raymont, President, White Pine Pictures, Toronto, Canada

Professor Josias Semujanga, Professeur titulaire, Département des littératures de langue française, Université de Montréal, Quebec

Jonathan Salt, Managing Director of Ojemba Education

Keith Somerville, Senior Research fellow, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London; Lecturer in Communications and Humanitarianism, Centre for Journalism, University of Kent

Patrick de Saint-Exupéry, Author and journalist

Dr James M. Smith, CBE CEO, Aegis Trust

Rafiki Ubaldo, Journalist

Andrew Wallis, Author, Silent Accomplice: The untold Story of the Role of France in the Rwandan Genocide, I.B.Tauris, 2014

Lillian Wong, O.B.E., British Chargé d'Affaires in Rwanda 1994-1995






http://www.newtimes.co.rw/section/article/2014-10-14/181938/

Just look at the profile of the signatories. Just goes to show that when you are on the right side of history, nothing else matters. Usishangae ukisikia jMali anasema hawa nao wanalipwa na serikali ya rwanda.

cc Talkandtalk, Commanche, Koba, MUKAMASIMBA, Bongolander,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just look at the profile of the signatories. Just goes to show that when you are on the right side of history, nothing else matters. Usishangae ukisikia jMali anasema hawa nao wanalipwa na serikali ya rwanda.

cc Talkandtalk, Commanche, Koba, MUKAMASIMBA, Bongolander,

1.kati ya hao wangapi wamepoteza familia zao kwenye genocide?
2. kati ya hao wangapi wanaishi ukimbizini including nchi wanazotoka hao wanafiki kama canada, uk etc, na je NCHI hizo zimewapaje ukimbizi wanyarwanda ikiwa kagame ni mtu mzuri?
3. kati ya hao wangapi ni wanyarwanda?
4. andrew wallis ni MSHAURI WA SERIKALI, mr smith ana run kigali memorial...i'm sure mtu akikaa chini kuigoogle hiyo list lazima wote wana maslahi....halafu, wao waandike barua kama entity gani? hiyo atakuwa kaandika Mwenda halafu kawapitishia wapige saini...
 
1.kati ya hao wangapi wamepoteza familia zao kwenye genocide?
2. kati ya hao wangapi wanaishi ukimbizini including nchi wanazotoka hao wanafiki kama canada, uk etc, na je NCHI hizo zimewapaje ukimbizi wanyarwanda ikiwa kagame ni mtu mzuri?
3. kati ya hao wangapi ni wanyarwanda?
4. andrew wallis ni MSHAURI WA SERIKALI, mr smith ana run kigali memorial...i'm sure mtu akikaa chini kuigoogle hiyo list lazima wote wana maslahi....halafu, wao waandike barua kama entity gani? hiyo atakuwa kaandika Mwenda halafu kawapitishia wapige saini...

useless noise,mtasafishwa tuu kama NAZI walivyofanywa.
 
cc Talkandtalk, Commanche, Koba, MUKAMASIMBA, Bongolander, murutongore

watu walishajibu:
[h=3]Misleading petition from Kagame's consultants, research, journalists, workers and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide:[/h]
Misleading petition from Kagame's consultants, research, journalists, workers and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide:


Kagame is well known to be using bribes to attract support from white people from USA and Britain.


A group of international consultants who have been working for Kagame for the last 20 years have now criticised the BBC programme in relation to Rwandan genocide. The letter was prepared by Kagame and circulated by the Rwandan Embassy in the UK for signature by these consultants.


Among people who have signed the petition below include representatives of NGOs who have using genocide cards to get British money to fund their NGOs. Andrew Walllis was paid £150,000 by Kagame to create his Open Democracy website and write the book "Silent Accomplice: The untold Story of the Role of France in the Rwandan Genocide, I.B.Tauris, 2014". Even Romeo Dallaire who failed to prevent the genocide because of his lack of neutrality during the conflict in his role as representative of UN mission to Rwanda has signed the petition. Romeo Dallaire supported Kagame's war in order to remove the former regime of Habyarimana.


It is even strange to see that the content of the letter is referring to the investigations by Judge Marc Trévidic to support the consultants' arguments while the dictator and war criminal Kagame, Andrew Wallis and Linda Melvern have been documenting and accusing France of their involvement in the Rwandan genocide. It is well known that any different view to Kagame's version of the history of Rwandan genocide is considered by the war criminal and dictator Kagame as genocide revisionism. BBC was right to ignore these investigations because they are not credible and have not yet provided any answer to who shot the plane that was carrying two Presidents and their crew and entourage. The French approach to this matter has been repentance rather than finding the truth. In addition to this, the preliminary outcome of French investigations do not conclude that the plane was not shot by Kagame. So, it was not necessary for BBC to refer to them while investigations have not yet been completed.


The content of the consultants' letter written to BBC is not credible because these consultants have been working for Kagame for many years, paid to write books about him and his war, to represent him abroad and in various international conferences, They received financial support from Kagame to attend various conferences related to genocide. These consultants have not provided contradictory facts about the fake numbers of Tutsi killed as the result of the genocide. They have never condemned the massacres, war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by Kagame in Rwanda and in DR Congo.


In this petition, no credible answer was provided by the consultants about the issues raised by BBC.


Will we have people to defend and support Kagame's version of the history of Rwandan genocide even after his death. Let's wait and see !

source:UKAFRICA POST : Your Right to Know: Misleading petition from Kagame's consultants, research, journalists, workers and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
cc Talkandtalk, Commanche, Koba, MUKAMASIMBA, Bongolander, murutongore

watu walishajibu:
Misleading petition from Kagame's consultants, research, journalists, workers and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide:


Misleading petition from Kagame's consultants, research, journalists, workers and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide:


Kagame is well known to be using bribes to attract support from white people from USA and Britain.


A group of international consultants who have been working for Kagame for the last 20 years have now criticised the BBC programme in relation to Rwandan genocide. The letter was prepared by Kagame and circulated by the Rwandan Embassy in the UK for signature by these consultants.


Among people who have signed the petition below include representatives of NGOs who have using genocide cards to get British money to fund their NGOs. Andrew Walllis was paid £150,000 by Kagame to create his Open Democracy website and write the book "Silent Accomplice: The untold Story of the Role of France in the Rwandan Genocide, I.B.Tauris, 2014". Even Romeo Dallaire who failed to prevent the genocide because of his lack of neutrality during the conflict in his role as representative of UN mission to Rwanda has signed the petition. Romeo Dallaire supported Kagame's war in order to remove the former regime of Habyarimana.


It is even strange to see that the content of the letter is referring to the investigations by Judge Marc Trévidic to support the consultants' arguments while the dictator and war criminal Kagame, Andrew Wallis and Linda Melvern have been documenting and accusing France of their involvement in the Rwandan genocide. It is well known that any different view to Kagame's version of the history of Rwandan genocide is considered by the war criminal and dictator Kagame as genocide revisionism. BBC was right to ignore these investigations because they are not credible and have not yet provided any answer to who shot the plane that was carrying two Presidents and their crew and entourage. The French approach to this matter has been repentance rather than finding the truth. In addition to this, the preliminary outcome of French investigations do not conclude that the plane was not shot by Kagame. So, it was not necessary for BBC to refer to them while investigations have not yet been completed.


The content of the consultants' letter written to BBC is not credible because these consultants have been working for Kagame for many years, paid to write books about him and his war, to represent him abroad and in various international conferences, They received financial support from Kagame to attend various conferences related to genocide. These consultants have not provided contradictory facts about the fake numbers of Tutsi killed as the result of the genocide. They have never condemned the massacres, war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by Kagame in Rwanda and in DR Congo.


In this petition, no credible answer was provided by the consultants about the issues raised by BBC.


Will we have people to defend and support Kagame's version of the history of Rwandan genocide even after his death. Let's wait and see !

source:UKAFRICA POST : Your Right to Know: Misleading petition from Kagame's consultants, research, journalists, workers and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide:
Umesahau Blair,Clinton,Ban Kimoi etc nao walipewa ngapi na Kagame?
 
1.kati ya hao wangapi wamepoteza familia zao kwenye genocide?
2. kati ya hao wangapi wanaishi ukimbizini including nchi wanazotoka hao wanafiki kama canada, uk etc, na je NCHI hizo zimewapaje ukimbizi wanyarwanda ikiwa kagame ni mtu mzuri?
3. kati ya hao wangapi ni wanyarwanda?
4. andrew wallis ni MSHAURI WA SERIKALI, mr smith ana run kigali memorial...i'm sure mtu akikaa chini kuigoogle hiyo list lazima wote wana maslahi....halafu, wao waandike barua kama entity gani? hiyo atakuwa kaandika Mwenda halafu kawapitishia wapige saini...

hahahahahahahahahahaha!
 
Back
Top Bottom