Citizen Journalism vs. Professional Journalism , Who is winning?
Citizen journalism; the process of members within the public playing an independent role in collecting, reporting and distributing, current and breaking news events, has recently become very popular(i). New media technology such as social networking eg: Twitter, Facebook and Blogger, have given everyday citizens the ability to transmit information globally; a power which was once only reserved for large media corporations (ii).
Is citizen journalism a reliable source of news? Will citizen journalism replace professional journalism? Do these two forms of journalism have the potential to
co-exist? If so, is it necessary and can a balance be found?
One of the primary aims of journalism is to be objective and present an unbiased, factual account of news events. A strict code of ethics is adhered to by all professional journalists when doing so to maintain and preserve public trust, confidence and reliability (iii). To ensure this the process of ‘gate keeping’ is upheld within mainstream media (iv). This relies on all experienced and trained journalists and editors to filter any nonfactual information from news reports before publication or broadcasting (v). Citizen journalists are untrained in such journalistic methods and are therefore at risk of using unreliable sources and publishing incorrect or in-factual news.
Citizen journalism is also often viewed as ‘by the people, for the people.’ This is because many find citizen journalists ‘relatable and honest.’ Popularity within this opinion has spread as citizen journalist’s gain more public attention, trust and confidence.
This poses a very controversial question; with the popularity of citizen journalism growing, will it replace professional journalism and large media corporations?
Source:
Citizen Journalism vs. Professional Journalism