Nairobi dry land depot not meant for Uganda

[Geza Ulole]

 

[mulisaaa]

This is the great opportunity for Tanzania

 

[mulisaaa]

Portbell ikimalizika soko la Uganda tunalichukua. Bandari ya Mombasa imejaa rushwa watu wanalalamika

 

[mulisaaa]

Kwa sasa Kampala tuna wawakilishi. Kwa sasa inabidi tuanze kutangaza matangazo kuwa tumewapunguzia distance yakuchukua mizigo

 

[Geza Ulole]

Kwa sasa Kampala tuna wawakilishi. Kwa sasa inabidi tuanze kutangaza matangazo kuwa tumewapunguzia distance yakuchukua mizigo

Kinachonishangaza ni kama mradi was SGR Kenya hauna good plans how the hell they built a container inland port without thinking of landlocked cargo?

 

[Kafrican]

Why do you guys have such weired interpretation of things, no wonder you alway end up hurting, confused, bitter when Kenya beats you hands down on something .

1) In the Video, The Ugandan guy says that Nairobi ICD can not possibly handle Ugandan+Nairobi+Rwandan cargo as tha would lead to conjestion once more.

2) The Kenyan guy says, the Nairobi ICD has capacity of over 450,000 TEU p.a and they have bought 3 plots of land for future expansion.

3) I say, The SGR mdiam term goals is to transport 1,200 TEU per day which translated to around 440,000 TEUs p.a, currently as we speak, Kenya SGR does approx 400TEUS per day and is expected to reac 600TEUS by june and continue like that....So the fact of the matter is as we speak, we are not there yet, we are operating below capacity...

4) When we get to Naivasha, Th 2nd dry port wll be built, Uganda,Rwanda,DRC cargo will stop using Nairobi ICD, they wil pick their cargo from Naivasha ICD which would be closer.

5) By th time the SGR reaches Kisumu, the Kisumu port will be built, This is the intended ICD that will handle EA goods as it is closer to that region. Nairobi ICD is just temporarybut when SGR gets finished, Nairobi IDC will only handle cargo destined for Nairobi

6) Mombasa port has a capacity of 1.5 million TEUs but handled 1.1 Million TEUs last year. On the other hand, Dar port handled 0.54 Million TEUs.... Therefore Kenya can handle bigger volume more efficiently than Tanzania.




SGR inafika Naivasha Mwakani, sleepers zimeshaunganiswa na reli zinangoja kulazwa juu ya matuta phase 2A

 

[Geza Ulole]

Kafrican don't shoot the messenger! Listen to the clip.

 

[thisdayes]

Why do you guys have such weired interpretation of things, no wonder you alway end up hurting, confused, bitter when Kenya beats you hands down on something .

1) In the Video, The Ugandan guy says that Nairobi ICD can not possibly handle Ugandan+Nairobi+Rwandan cargo as tha would lead to conjestion once more.

2) The Kenyan guy says, the Nairobi ICD has capacity of over 450,000 TEU p.a and they have bought 3 plots of land for future expansion.

3) I say, The SGR mdiam term goals is to transport 1,200 TEU per day which translated to around 440,000 TEUs p.a, currently as we speak, Kenya SGR does approx 400TEUS per day and is expected to reac 600TEUS by june and continue like that....So the fact of the matter is as we speak, we are not there yet, we are operating below capacity...

4) When we get to Naivasha, Th 2nd dry port wll be built, Uganda,Rwanda,DRC cargo will stop using Nairobi ICD, they wil pick their cargo from Naivasha ICD which would be closer.

5) By th time the SGR reaches Kisumu, the Kisumu port will be built, This is the intended ICD that will handle EA goods as it is closer to that region. Nairobi ICD is just temporarybut when SGR gets finished, Nairobi IDC will only handle cargo destined for Nairobi

6) Mombasa port has a capacity of 1.5 million TEUs but handled 1.1 Million TEUs last year. On the other hand, Dar port handled 0.54 Million TEUs.... Therefore Kenya can handle bigger volume more efficiently than Tanzania.




SGR inafika Naivasha Mwakani, sleepers zimeshaunganiswa na reli zinangoja kulazwa juu ya matuta phase 2A

This is stereo type!! Wakenya mnanibambaga sana, you guys are in for a shock kama kwenye bomba la mafuta

 

[Zuwenna]

Kwa sasa Kampala tuna wawakilishi. Kwa sasa inabidi tuanze kutangaza matangazo kuwa tumewapunguzia distance yakuchukua mizigo

Kabisa

 

[Tony254]

Why do you guys have such weired interpretation of things, no wonder you alway end up hurting, confused, bitter when Kenya beats you hands down on something .

1) In the Video, The Ugandan guy says that Nairobi ICD can not possibly handle Ugandan+Nairobi+Rwandan cargo as tha would lead to conjestion once more.

2) The Kenyan guy says, the Nairobi ICD has capacity of over 450,000 TEU p.a and they have bought 3 plots of land for future expansion.

3) I say, The SGR mdiam term goals is to transport 1,200 TEU per day which translated to around 440,000 TEUs p.a, currently as we speak, Kenya SGR does approx 400TEUS per day and is expected to reac 600TEUS by june and continue like that....So the fact of the matter is as we speak, we are not there yet, we are operating below capacity...

4) When we get to Naivasha, Th 2nd dry port wll be built, Uganda,Rwanda,DRC cargo will stop using Nairobi ICD, they wil pick their cargo from Naivasha ICD which would be closer.

5) By th time the SGR reaches Kisumu, the Kisumu port will be built, This is the intended ICD that will handle EA goods as it is closer to that region. Nairobi ICD is just temporarybut when SGR gets finished, Nairobi IDC will only handle cargo destined for Nairobi

6) Mombasa port has a capacity of 1.5 million TEUs but handled 1.1 Million TEUs last year. On the other hand, Dar port handled 0.54 Million TEUs.... Therefore Kenya can handle bigger volume more efficiently than Tanzania.




SGR inafika Naivasha Mwakani, sleepers zimeshaunganiswa na reli zinangoja kulazwa juu ya matuta phase 2A

Bro tumwagie picha za phase 2A kama unazo?

 

[ichoboy01]

Why do you guys have such weired interpretation of things, no wonder you alway end up hurting, confused, bitter when Kenya beats you hands down on something .

1) In the Video, The Ugandan guy says that Nairobi ICD can not possibly handle Ugandan+Nairobi+Rwandan cargo as tha would lead to conjestion once more.

2) The Kenyan guy says, the Nairobi ICD has capacity of over 450,000 TEU p.a and they have bought 3 plots of land for future expansion.

3) I say, The SGR mdiam term goals is to transport 1,200 TEU per day which translated to around 440,000 TEUs p.a, currently as we speak, Kenya SGR does approx 400TEUS per day and is expected to reac 600TEUS by june and continue like that....So the fact of the matter is as we speak, we are not there yet, we are operating below capacity...

4) When we get to Naivasha, Th 2nd dry port wll be built, Uganda,Rwanda,DRC cargo will stop using Nairobi ICD, they wil pick their cargo from Naivasha ICD which would be closer.

5) By th time the SGR reaches Kisumu, the Kisumu port will be built, This is the intended ICD that will handle EA goods as it is closer to that region. Nairobi ICD is just temporarybut when SGR gets finished, Nairobi IDC will only handle cargo destined for Nairobi

6) Mombasa port has a capacity of 1.5 million TEUs but handled 1.1 Million TEUs last year. On the other hand, Dar port handled 0.54 Million TEUs.... Therefore Kenya can handle bigger volume more efficiently than Tanzania.




SGR inafika Naivasha Mwakani, sleepers zimeshaunganiswa na reli zinangoja kulazwa juu ya matuta phase 2A

always nonsense nilidhani hujui maana10lanes pekee kumbe hata huku uko empty head

 

[ichoboy01]

Bro tumwagie picha za phase 2A kama unazo?

90km only munajenga kwa 3yrs serious au mumeanza kushtuka kama mradi umegeuka kua white elephant

 

[Tony254]

Kabisa

Ooh munataka kutumaliza zuwenna?

 

[Tony254]

90km only munajenga kwa 3yrs serious au mumeanza kushtuka kama mradi umegeuka kua white elephant

120 km plus internal container depot (icd)

 

[Mkikuyu- Akili timamu]

120 km plus internal container depot (icd)

*inland container depot

 

[Mkikuyu- Akili timamu]

The Cheapest SGR will win the business for Uganda. Highly unlikely for an expensive diesel powered, high maintenance railway with huge dollar loans repayment to beat an inexpensive faster electric train with very low maitenace costs and zero loans

 

[nyangau mkenya]

Why do you guys have such weired interpretation of things, no wonder you alway end up hurting, confused, bitter when Kenya beats you hands down on something .

1) In the Video, The Ugandan guy says that Nairobi ICD can not possibly handle Ugandan+Nairobi+Rwandan cargo as tha would lead to conjestion once more.

2) The Kenyan guy says, the Nairobi ICD has capacity of over 450,000 TEU p.a and they have bought 3 plots of land for future expansion.

3) I say, The SGR mdiam term goals is to transport 1,200 TEU per day which translated to around 440,000 TEUs p.a, currently as we speak, Kenya SGR does approx 400TEUS per day and is expected to reac 600TEUS by june and continue like that....So the fact of the matter is as we speak, we are not there yet, we are operating below capacity...

4) When we get to Naivasha, Th 2nd dry port wll be built, Uganda,Rwanda,DRC cargo will stop using Nairobi ICD, they wil pick their cargo from Naivasha ICD which would be closer.

5) By th time the SGR reaches Kisumu, the Kisumu port will be built, This is the intended ICD that will handle EA goods as it is closer to that region. Nairobi ICD is just temporarybut when SGR gets finished, Nairobi IDC will only handle cargo destined for Nairobi

6) Mombasa port has a capacity of 1.5 million TEUs but handled 1.1 Million TEUs last year. On the other hand, Dar port handled 0.54 Million TEUs.... Therefore Kenya can handle bigger volume more efficiently than Tanzania.




SGR inafika Naivasha Mwakani, sleepers zimeshaunganiswa na reli zinangoja kulazwa juu ya matuta phase 2A

my fren when you see threads like these dont even bother,
Hii ni zile zao za tuta-fanya hii ,tuta-etc, air and paper projects
Its true nairobi icd was never meant for uganda, it was built for service to nairobi and sorrounding areas, just like naivasha icd is built for naivasha, kericho icd for kericho ,ikisumu icd for kisumu, malaba icd for malaba.. etc

Uganda ,rwanda, south sudan will get their own container depots when the rail gets there
Simple as that

 

[Kafrican]

always nonsense nilidhani hujui maana10lanes pekee kumbe hata huku uko empty head

Wewe hata hujui kukumbuka kuosha mikono baada ya kujitamba, futa keyboard na jik kwanza alafu uandike comment yako tena

 

[ichoboy01]

Wewe hata hujui kukumbuka kuosha mikono baada ya kujitamba, futa keyboard na jik kwanza alafu uandike comment yako tena

barabara ya 8lanes unaita 10lanes heheh yani umeniskitisha sana alaf huku bado unaandika upuuzi tena kuhusu SGR

 

[ichoboy01]

my fren when you see threads like these dont even bother,
Hii ni zile zao za tuta-fanya hii ,tuta-etc, air and paper projects
Its true nairobi icd was never meant for uganda, it was built for service to nairobi and sorrounding areas, just like naivasha icd is built for naivasha, kericho icd for kericho ,ikisumu icd for kisumu, malaba icd for malaba.. etc

Uganda ,rwanda, south sudan will get their own container depots when the rail gets there
Simple as that

rwanda?? forget about rwanda burundi and congo nyinyi mlilieni museven otherwise tumeshaanza kuwajengea 9km rail portbell to kampala ili mizigo ipitie bandari ya mwanza na itakua cheap kuliko usafiri wa aina yoyote

eat that