Sijakuelewa mkuuSent using Jamii Forums mobile app
The case cited hereto (decided by Lord Atkin) does not applied here. Since the clamant did not drink even a tiny puff of a drink!. The main qns here are;Soma hii case
Donoghue vs stevenson (1932)
soma facts na ruling yake. Baada ya hapo utajua la kufanya.
Naona soon utakuwa tajiri hata zile noah zetu usipopata huna cha kupoteza.
Utalipwa pesa zaidi ya zile za makinikia.
Nb leta mrejesho.
my dia, i do believe that u know this case.The case cited hereto (decided by Lord Atkin) does not applied here. Since the clamant did not drink even a tiny puff of a drink!. The main qns here are;
1. Is the claimant a neighbour of a company??
2. did the claimant suffered/sustained any injury or damages??.
Here the company many be liable on other circumstances rather than this one u argues!.