Lissu apoteza pingamizi dhidi ya hati ya mashtaka

Lissu apoteza pingamizi dhidi ya hati ya mashtaka

Manyanza

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Posts
22,319
Reaction score
58,706
Mahakama Kuu nchini Tanzania, imetupilia mbali pingamizi la Mwenyekiti wa Chadema, Tundu Lissu, lililokuwa likipinga uhalali wa hati ya mashtaka katika kesi yake ya uhaini, ikisema hati hiyo inakidhi matakwa yote ya kisheria.

Katika hoja zake za mwisho, Bw. Lissu aliiomba mahakama imuachie huru, akidai kuwa hati ya mashtaka haikuwa na maelezo ya kutosha kumwezesha kuandaa utetezi wa kina dhidi ya tuhuma zinazomkabili.

Miongoni mwa hoja alizozitoa, alipinga matumizi ya neno "umma" katika hati ya mashtaka, akisema sheria inayotumika katika shtaka hilo inazungumzia kushawishi mtu au kundi la watu, na si umma kwa ujumla.

Hata hivyo, Jaji Dunstan Ndunguru, anayeliongoza jopo la majaji watatu wanaosikiliza shauri hilo, alikubaliana na hoja za upande wa mashtaka kwamba neno "umma" linajumuisha watu binafsi pamoja na makundi ya watu, hivyo matumizi yake katika hati ya mashtaka hayakuwa na kasoro yoyote ya kisheria.

Mahakama ilisema hati ya mashtaka ina maelezo ya kutosha kumfahamisha mshtakiwa kuhusu tuhuma zinazomkabili na kumwezesha kuandaa utetezi wake ipasavyo.

"Kwa sababu hiyo, pingamizi hili halina mashiko na mahakama inalitupilia mbali," alisema Jaji Ndunguru wakati akisoma uamuzi huo.

Baada ya kutupilia mbali pingamizi hilo, mahakama iliendelea kuchambua vipengele vya kisheria vinavyounda kosa la uhaini, ili kubaini iwapo upande wa mashtaka umefanikiwa kuthibitisha masharti muhimu ya kosa analodaiwa kutenda Bw. Lissu.
 
Siku ya kusoma hukumu inamaanisha hiyo kesi imeshapita hatua hizo zote ulizozielezea hapo juu, labda hiyo ni taarifa ya siku nyingi. Unaisoma hii leo
 
Mahakama Kuu nchini Tanzania, imetupilia mbali pingamizi la Mwenyekiti wa Chadema, Tundu Lissu, lililokuwa likipinga uhalali wa hati ya mashtaka katika kesi yake ya uhaini, ikisema hati hiyo inakidhi matakwa yote ya kisheria.

Katika hoja zake za mwisho, Bw. Lissu aliiomba mahakama imuachie huru, akidai kuwa hati ya mashtaka haikuwa na maelezo ya kutosha kumwezesha kuandaa utetezi wa kina dhidi ya tuhuma zinazomkabili.

Miongoni mwa hoja alizozitoa, alipinga matumizi ya neno "umma" katika hati ya mashtaka, akisema sheria inayotumika katika shtaka hilo inazungumzia kushawishi mtu au kundi la watu, na si umma kwa ujumla.

Hata hivyo, Jaji Dunstan Ndunguru, anayeliongoza jopo la majaji watatu wanaosikiliza shauri hilo, alikubaliana na hoja za upande wa mashtaka kwamba neno "umma" linajumuisha watu binafsi pamoja na makundi ya watu, hivyo matumizi yake katika hati ya mashtaka hayakuwa na kasoro yoyote ya kisheria.

Mahakama ilisema hati ya mashtaka ina maelezo ya kutosha kumfahamisha mshtakiwa kuhusu tuhuma zinazomkabili na kumwezesha kuandaa utetezi wake ipasavyo.

"Kwa sababu hiyo, pingamizi hili halina mashiko na mahakama inalitupilia mbali," alisema Jaji Ndunguru wakati akisoma uamuzi huo.

Baada ya kutupilia mbali pingamizi hilo, mahakama iliendelea kuchambua vipengele vya kisheria vinavyounda kosa la uhaini, ili kubaini iwapo upande wa mashtaka umefanikiwa kuthibitisha masharti muhimu ya kosa analodaiwa kutenda Bw. Lissu.
ok.🐒
 
ZANA [TOOLS] JINSI YA KUFUATILIA KESI HII BILA USHABIKI BALI KWA AKILI TUNDUIZI
MFANO NI HUU WATU WA VYOMBO WAKIPELEKEWA MOTO MAHAKAMANI

View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NccKrdx5VR8

During an intense cross-examination, defence lawyer Shadrack Wambui cast serious doubt on the credibility and competence of cyber-forensic analyst Juma Mwajirani, whose report forms part of the evidence against political commentator Nuru Okanga.Wambui began by asking Mwajirani to state the specific charges Okanga faced. The analyst initially relied on a DCI request letter that cited publication of false information and cyber harassment, but later retracted his answer, admitting he did not actually know the charges.

Lawyer Shadrack Wambui Dismantles Cyber forensic Analyst in Nuru Okanga’s Case


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fGvmL6yviqA

key facts, including whether he knew that Rigathi Gachagua is a former District Officer and former Deputy President details he conceded he did not know. When questioned about his understanding of “inflammatory” content, Mwajirani added that he does not know how to use a gun and that “not everyone shot with a gun dies,” a statement that raised concerns over the basis of his analysis.

On the technical front, the analyst confirmed that TikTok and YouTube accounts can be created without Gmail, acknowledged that the videos in question were posted by Diff Media and Riba News, yet admitted he did not access or identify the owners of those accounts. Of the 22 comments under the videos, he included only three in his report prompting Wambui to question whether the investigation was selectively conducted.

Wambui also highlighted a glaring discrepancy: the DCI request letter used by Mwajirani was dated 2023, even though the case pertains to 2024. The defence argued that such inconsistencies reflect a poorly handled and unreliable investigation.

26 November 2025
Lawyer Abner Mango Discredits Cyber Analyst Over Flawed Report in Nuru Okanga’s Case

View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=F4HV4Bo0L6w
Defence lawyer Abner Mango, together with other lawyers representing Nuru Okanga, challenged the credibility of analyst Juma Mwajirani’s report, arguing it was incomplete and selectively focused on Riba News while ignoring Diff Media, despite both being linked to the disputed video.

Mango questioned why Mwajirani did not investigate who owns the accounts or whether Okanga had any connection to them.

The defence also raised concerns about the handling of Okanga’s seized phone. Mwajirani admitted he never examined the device, checked for malware, or verified whether other users could access it gaps the defence argued undermine the integrity and reliability of his analysis.


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CJNiDPTw66E

cyber forensic expert’s report in the case against political commentator Nuru Okanga was severely weakened today after a blistering cross-examination by defence lawyer Hon. Babu Owino.Cyber and digital forensic analyst Juma Mwajirani came under intense scrutiny as Babu methodically poked holes in both his qualifications and his conclusions. The defence questioned the credibility of Mwajirani’s certification, pointing out that the institution he cited does not issue forensic analyst credentials.Babu further discredited the report by highlighting glaring inconsistencies—among them, the use of a 2023 reference letter to support an investigation conducted in 2024

02 July 2026

Deal Ruthlessly With DCI.Orengo Tough Question to Ruto DCI Officer In Court While Representing Bob

View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZH5rUg3NSGs

Source : Court Helicopter

Cheki na kusikiliza hukumu za nchi ya commonwealth zilivyoshiba umakini, tofauti na hapa kwetu


BAADA YA MAPOLISI KUHENYESHWA , HAKIMU MKAZI ATOA HUKUMU

20 January 2026
Court To Rule On Whether Nuru Okanga Has A Case To Answer In Cyber Crime Case


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qHh_3w_c1BU
 
Back
Top Bottom