Geza Ulole
Platinum Member
- Oct 31, 2009
- 75,809
- 107,245
[h=5]THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 2013[/h][h=1]EAC would be lightweight without Tanzania[/h]
15Comments
Print
[h=3]In Summary[/h]
East Africa Community
By Kwame Owino
More by this AuthorCitizens of the individual countries that make up the formal East African Community (EAC) are aware that relations between some member countries, political leaders and competing businesses within it are tense.
Upon noticing that once again, the leaders of Tanzania and Burundi were not in attendance during the commissioning of a new berth in Mombasa, many commentators wondered whether the region has finally decided that Tanzania was dispensable.
The recognition that port facilities serve multiple countries irrespective of the area of their location is laudable.
That notwithstanding, the nationalistic fervor that interpreted the absence of Tanzania as an in your face statement of irrelevance based on the closeness among of the leaders in attendance is wrong-headed. Plainly stated, Tanzania is indispensable to the EAC.
It is doubtful that any meaningful cooperation is possible between Kenya and the other states, to the exclusion of this founder member.
The conventional view that Tanzania is an impediment to fast tracking of integration through realization of the customs union and political federation are not justified. It is true that a number of critical decisions necessary for movement have not been concluded, but failure to make these are a reflection of the diplomatic deficiency of state partners than the intransigence of any one state.
The same concerns that arise within EAC regarding benefits of market access are often raised by trade diplomats at multilateral levels too. Why then would it be unreasonable for one member to deploy similar arguments at the EAC?
The EAC treaty bears explicit clauses about making the region peaceful and secure for citizens of all member states. And yet five years after the rise of security issue regarding an island on Lake Victoria, the twins of the EAC, Kenya and Uganda have not brought this to a conclusion.
That pace is not a reflection of true partnership yet and even if many observers are too polite to mention, it certainly does not escape the attention of a country concerned for its internal peace and not given to aggressive posture against neighbours.
That the EAC is Tanzanias natural home for integration is clear to its leadership and thats the reason that any patronizing postures are counter-productive. The claim that Tanzania sees its future in a southern African cluster would only be sensible if the EAC failed to achieve its objectives.
And because Tanzanias people have the sovereign right to choose its preferred regional grouping, the onus is upon those who wish for quicker integration to justify that pace. It cannot be that Tanzanias leadership is ignorant of its own interests. Just because the rest of the region waxes lyrical about EAC patriotism doesnt mean that Tanzanians are unaware of that.
Truth be stated, Tanzanias citizens find Kenyas intense politics interesting but are far more respectful of its businesses. For that reason, no leader in Tanzania would place the idea of concluding a political federation as a serious platform for action and retain much public support.
The lesson from this is that the EAC is probably much further away from the formation of a political federation than its most enthusiastic political leaders realize. On this issue, Tanzanias instincts on the reality of achievement are probably more accurate and honest.
The impasse that exists in moving the customs union forward is a real test of the diplomatic ability of the fast-movers. And for those who consider that the departure of Tanzania would clear the deck for deeper integration should understand that what would be left after this exit would be a very active but lightweight shell.
Tanzanias departure would state more about the EAC than it would about Tanzania itself and that message would be damning. The active membership must get Tanzania in and thereafter look northwards to getting in Ethiopia too.
EAC would be lightweight without Tanzania - dot9 - nation.co.ke
15Comments
[h=3]In Summary[/h]
- It is doubtful that any meaningful cooperation is possible between Kenya and the other states, to the exclusion of this founder member.
- Truth be stated, Tanzanias citizens find Kenyas intense politics interesting but are far more respectful of its businesses. For that reason, no leader in Tanzania would place the idea of concluding a political federation as a serious platform for action and retain much public support.
East Africa Community
More by this AuthorCitizens of the individual countries that make up the formal East African Community (EAC) are aware that relations between some member countries, political leaders and competing businesses within it are tense.
Upon noticing that once again, the leaders of Tanzania and Burundi were not in attendance during the commissioning of a new berth in Mombasa, many commentators wondered whether the region has finally decided that Tanzania was dispensable.
The recognition that port facilities serve multiple countries irrespective of the area of their location is laudable.
That notwithstanding, the nationalistic fervor that interpreted the absence of Tanzania as an in your face statement of irrelevance based on the closeness among of the leaders in attendance is wrong-headed. Plainly stated, Tanzania is indispensable to the EAC.
It is doubtful that any meaningful cooperation is possible between Kenya and the other states, to the exclusion of this founder member.
The conventional view that Tanzania is an impediment to fast tracking of integration through realization of the customs union and political federation are not justified. It is true that a number of critical decisions necessary for movement have not been concluded, but failure to make these are a reflection of the diplomatic deficiency of state partners than the intransigence of any one state.
The same concerns that arise within EAC regarding benefits of market access are often raised by trade diplomats at multilateral levels too. Why then would it be unreasonable for one member to deploy similar arguments at the EAC?
The EAC treaty bears explicit clauses about making the region peaceful and secure for citizens of all member states. And yet five years after the rise of security issue regarding an island on Lake Victoria, the twins of the EAC, Kenya and Uganda have not brought this to a conclusion.
That pace is not a reflection of true partnership yet and even if many observers are too polite to mention, it certainly does not escape the attention of a country concerned for its internal peace and not given to aggressive posture against neighbours.
That the EAC is Tanzanias natural home for integration is clear to its leadership and thats the reason that any patronizing postures are counter-productive. The claim that Tanzania sees its future in a southern African cluster would only be sensible if the EAC failed to achieve its objectives.
And because Tanzanias people have the sovereign right to choose its preferred regional grouping, the onus is upon those who wish for quicker integration to justify that pace. It cannot be that Tanzanias leadership is ignorant of its own interests. Just because the rest of the region waxes lyrical about EAC patriotism doesnt mean that Tanzanians are unaware of that.
Truth be stated, Tanzanias citizens find Kenyas intense politics interesting but are far more respectful of its businesses. For that reason, no leader in Tanzania would place the idea of concluding a political federation as a serious platform for action and retain much public support.
The lesson from this is that the EAC is probably much further away from the formation of a political federation than its most enthusiastic political leaders realize. On this issue, Tanzanias instincts on the reality of achievement are probably more accurate and honest.
The impasse that exists in moving the customs union forward is a real test of the diplomatic ability of the fast-movers. And for those who consider that the departure of Tanzania would clear the deck for deeper integration should understand that what would be left after this exit would be a very active but lightweight shell.
Tanzanias departure would state more about the EAC than it would about Tanzania itself and that message would be damning. The active membership must get Tanzania in and thereafter look northwards to getting in Ethiopia too.
EAC would be lightweight without Tanzania - dot9 - nation.co.ke