Ben Carson: A prospect presidential candidate for US election 2016

[beefinjector]

Napenda republicans wachukue safari hii. Hawa mashoga watakoma ubushi.

Democrats pumbavu sana

Mkuu, gay rights ni State issue sio Federal issue. Hata Repulicans wakishinda hawana mandate ya kuzuia. Sana sana watabwabwaja tu kuwa ni kitu kibaya lakini hawawezi kufanya lolote.

 

[2013]

......if you have a crystal ball then Yes!, it is a probability, otherwise it's going to remain a P.R.E.D.I.C.T.I.O.N!
And if that's the case how come Clinton et al are not on the other team?!, what's so special in BO that you see, and you have 200% assurance that he's eventually, going to come out?!, or may be this's just a hate against freedom of Ideas?!!......

Bo(Barack Obama) +democratic are trying to uproot american values.
Like Gay lobbing, atheism, supporting radicals like muslim brotherhood, etc.
How can we expect to survive when we gave more rooms for fundamentalists to flourish in our neighborhood, and government, etc.
USA supports human Rights all over the world, USA has become a safe heaven for human progress and welfare but eventually it welcomes radicals who don't want human rights. What do you expect the future would be without all human rights? What the whole world would be if UN recognises Shariah law? Tolerance sucks

 

[kui]

Bo(Barack Obama) +democratic are trying to uproot american values.
Like Gay lobbing, atheism, supporting radicals like muslim brotherhood, etc.
How can we expect to survive when we gave more rooms for fundamentalists to flourish in our neighborhood, and government, etc.
USA supports human Rights all over the world, USA has become a safe heaven for human progress and welfare but eventually it welcomes radicals who don't want human rights. What do you expect the future would be without all human rights? What the whole world would be if UN recognises Shariah law? Tolerance sucks

"USA supports human rights all over the World", so don't you think it's a contradiction if they don't support "all humans", rights in their own country?!,
You placed Gay lobbing in the same group as muslim radicals, are you suggesting they should fight it the way they're fighting Terror?!

 

[Ishmael]

It didn't work with Herman Cain, what will be the difference this time?

If they want black people to vote for their candidate they have to run a democrat. It is not going to work for him.

 

[Ishmael]

You are absolutely right!

[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD]To be the nominee, he'll have to win in the south. Not gonna happen. A number of southerners told me they would have voted Dem in governor and presidential elections if only the candidates weren't black.


[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

 

[kui]

[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD]To be the nominee, he'll have to win in the south. Not gonna happen. A number of southerners told me they would have voted Dem in governor and presidential elections if only the candidates weren't black.

Imagine some people still have this mind set in this age and time! [/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

 

[Bavaria]

Kabaisa mkuu.tuko pamoja.

Republican ni watu wa vita, fujo. They don't give a ***. Ukileta ujinga wanakuanzishia. Inshort they are real. Democrats wanapenda sana kuwapa watu uhuru. Do what they feel. Wanataka hata ku-negotiate with terrorists "which isn't the US policy"

 

[2013]

"USA supports human rights all over the World", so don't you think it's a contradiction if they don't support "all humans", rights in their own country?!,

They do support all Human rights in their own country. The fact that there are people who abuse Human rights is obvious but that doesn't mean they don't support it, ..they actual do.. However there are things which should not be priority of Human rights: things like tolerance to radicals, Atheism, and Homosexuality. Because these things destroy American values and interfere with multitude of peoples'cultural and backgrounds all over the world.

]placed [/COLOR]Gay lobbing in the same group as muslim radicals, are you suggesting they should fight it the way they're fighting Terror?!

Definitely

 

[lutemi]

He cannot win although he has positive vision about America

 

[kui]

They do support all Human rights in their own country. The fact that there are people who abuse Human rights is obvious but that doesn't mean they don't support it, ..they actual do.. However there are things which should not be priority of Human rights: things like tolerance to radicals, Atheism, and Homosexuality. Because these things destroy American values and interfere with multitude of peoples'cultural and backgrounds all over the world.

If, it's part of terror and there's a need to treat it accordingly, can you explain to me how Homosexuality TERRORIZE the security of the country?!,......and while on that, keep in mind this's the best definition of TERROR to me, "violent or destructive acts as (BOMBING)!, committed by a group in order to intimidated a population or government into granting their demands"

 

[JokaKuu]

..huyu hawezi kufika popote as a Republican.

 

[2013]

If, it's part of terror and there's a need to treat it accordingly, can you explain to me how Homosexuality TERRORIZE the security of the country?!,......and while on that, keep in mind this's the best definition of TERROR to me, "violent or destructive acts as (BOMBING)!, committed by a group in order to intimidated a population or government into granting their demands"

RED:Terrorism hijacked religion. The Ideology of HATE is what attracts people to terrorism.Think about how terrorists do their jobs.the first question comes into mind is.. How can a gay man becomes a strong soldier?.
Being strong and brave is not about weapons, technology, it is about heart. Gays have no balls.

I've watched many of them in Jerry springer tv show. They are so loose and weak. They are like girls... actually More than girls.

Lobbying homosexuality:this means you're likely to have gay soldiers in the future. How can a gay soldier stands man to man with a JIhadist.? The answer is quiet obvious. The security of the country would be in jeopardy with a gay soldier.They need to be discharged from military very soon.

But the state needs many strong soldiers. There' would be no guatantee to have strong soldiers in the corrupted society where gay lobbying is practiced.

Those terrorists with heavy beards will make gay soldiers look more girlish, by soften their hearts.
Gays have lost their manhood. And so they don't have balls to fight terrorism like real men do.

.In reality, gays shouldn't join the military to fight terrorism . not only that, Gays would be a bad idea for the military because man-on-man massages would distract soldiers and leave them vulnerable to terrorist attack. they did have people come along who they loved that was the same sex and would give them massages before they went into battle… And if you’re sitting around getting massages all day ready to go into a big, planned battle, then you’re not going to last very long. It is guerilla fighting .You are going to be ultimately vulnerable to terrorism.

Homosexuality is a threat to family care and fertility. I still believe children do best when raised by their own biological mother and father who are committed to one another in a life-long marriage. Children who are raised by homosexual parents or caregivers suffer disadvantages in comparison to children raised in other family structures--particularly children raised by a married mother and father.

With Democratic party: expert to see the first GAy president of United States of America. We normally used to pronounce FIRST LADY ,.. I guess we will have new term like the "FIRST GENTLEMEN".

 

[kui]

2013,.......I do respect your hard core, die hard, head over hills love of conservatism but I beg to differ.

I failed to understand your argument about gays in the military, who said you have to be straight to shoot straight?!

And also, when it comes to Gay parenting I don't think it's fair to make a conclusion that it's abnormal unless there's evidence for its abnormalities. What's the difference between single parenting and Gay parenting?, (I'd love to learn) if we DON'T, make a big deal out of single parenting why are we making a big deal out of Gay parenting?!, the notion that kids who grow up with Gay parents tend to be weak, hence a weak nation?!,.......is absurd!

 

[2013]

2013,.......I do respect your hard core, die hard, head over hills love of conservatism but I beg to differ.
I failed to understand your argument about gays in the military, who said you have to be straight to shoot straight?!
!

I consider Homosexuals to a category of disable people who failed to handle their sexual orientation and their mental situations. They aren't normal people.The fact that they talk, wear trousers and reason like others (heterosexuals) doesn't make them mentally stable. hermaphrodites and transexuals are also have disabilities. Like Michale jacksoon hate his own colour


1:Gays are weak mentally and physically
In the past US leaders didn't give a C.R.A.P about their soldiers' sexual preference . All they cared about was trained hard, worked hard, did what you were told, and stayed in-shape.
Gays may have been in the military since it's inception. Recognizing them creating another thing that could cause the biggest problem in Millitary operations. Gays would want to stay soft and tender for their spouses. Sexuality has something to do with tenderness and softness.
Putting them into special mission, thinking that they are hard and mental stable, while their butt has already soften their hearts are no different from those of women. Believe me, With tough operations they will think of sex to re leave their mental and physical pains. Sexual intercourse uses more energy and causes exhaustion with tough military exercise: the Gay soldiers would not be effective.


2:It is difficult to control sex activities among gays soldiers in relating to non gay soldiers in Millitary activities
Gays don't have limit on who(Gender), where and when to have sex. They may sex all time without getting noticed. Particularly with sex toys anything is possible. The fact that their ass.es can be penetrated give them more rooms to make love.
Gay behaviours spread like viruses. It affects the entire army. Even non gays soldiers would fall into the same trap of wanting to F.U.C.K. gays. Jealous and conflicts may arise among soldiers that may cause mistrust among soldiers and even killings on each other. Their unity would be dismantled. Unity is the key element of strong army.

Additionally , It comes a time when you select an infantry to conduct special mission, thinking that they are going to discipline themselves. But when they are together they started to get attracted to each other, and start to have group sex. It is clear that sex weakening men strength severely. You may loose the war because the soldiers lack discipline.
Everyone knows that: If You have two soldiers of opposite sex, and let them stayed overnight they may have sexually attracting to each other and start have sex.What would happen if you have more Gays in the army ALONE? won't they attracting each other and commit a group sex!? Probably they would...
The risk of clandestine affairs can be avoided when the soldiers are not gays. So You can guarantee that there's no sexual act that have been done by soldiers.

And also, when it comes to Gay parenting I don't think it's fair to make a conclusion that it's abnormal unless there's evidence for its abnormalities. What's the difference between single parenting and Gay parenting?, (I'd love to learn) if we DON'T, make a big deal out of single parenting why are we making a big deal out of Gay parenting?!, the notion that kids who grow up with Gay parents tend to be weak, hence a weak nation?!,.......is absurd

The ideal family structure for children is a two-parent, mother-father family.
It must be noted that Homosexuality may have severe negative impact to father more often than mother. Fathers reduce behavioral problems in boys and psychological problems in girls, enhance cognitive development, and decrease delinquency. Fathers, are critical to the healthy development of children.


Only mother-father families afford children the opportunity to develop relationships with a parent of the same, as well as the opposite sex. Relationships with both sexes early in life make it easier and more comfortable for a child to relate to both sexes later in life. Overall, having a relationship with both a male and female parent increases the likelihood that a child will have successful social and romantic relationships during his or her life.


SAME SEX MARRIAGE
Children are at increased risk for a variety of negative outcomes: homosexually parented children are more likely to experiment sexually, experience sexual confusion, and engage in homosexual and bisexual behavior themselves. And for those children who later engage in non-heterosexual behavior. they are more likely to suffer from psychiatric disorders, abuse alcohol and drugs, attempt suicide, experience domestic violence and sexual assault, and are at increased risk for chronic diseases, AIDS, and shortened life spans.

1: Gay parents can transmit the behavior to their child.
It shouldn't be surprising that to find children reared by homosexuals are more likely to engage in homosexual behavior themselves since extensive worldwide research reveals homosexuality is primarily environmentally induced

2: causing Emergence of NoN traditional marriage:
Same-sex marriage no doubt will increase sexual confusion and sexual experimentation by young people
there's also probability that, if society permits same-sex marriage, it also will have to allow other types of non-traditional marriage. The legal logic is simple: If prohibiting same-sex marriage is discriminatory, then disallowing polygamous marriage, polyamorous marriage, or any other marital grouping also will be deemed discriminatory. In fact, such legal maneuverings have already begun. The emotional and psychological ramifications of these assorted arrangements on the developing psyches and sexuality of children would be disastrous.