America: From Superpower to Superfailure

Cops

Member
Jul 18, 2012
23
0
By Cops

Empires have come and gone over the course of human history. The cause and pattern of their fall have remained more or less the same and is presently typified by the United States of America: Wars outside their borders and poverty in the hinterland.


First, a brief outline of the American empire

America is (was) not an empire in the historical context of the term. It departed from classical empires in not occupying foreign lands. In fact it even let the countries it defeated to run their own administration but with vice-like grip on their economic and foreign policies and a limited but very powerful military footprint (in the form of military, naval and missile bases), making them subservient to American interests. Thus you have Germany and Japan with all the trappings of independent, democratic nations but in practice still under American grip (lately loosening) since WWII. South Korea and Philippines come close to this group, though not exactly in the same category.

Then there are countries - incidentally mostly the so-called “Muslim countries” -- like Turkey, Pakistan, Jordan and Egypt (too early to say if it will really cut its umbilical cord tied to America) that willingly accepted American obedience in return for financial and military aid.

Saudi Arabia and the little monarchies comprising the [Persian] Gulf Cooperation Council are a class apart. They stick to America for sustenance of their own rule but no practical return benefit of any sort to their people. Most part of the petrodollars earned from America in fact never reach these countries but remain very much there to nourish American banks and arms industries. This has been the story even long before the manufactured “Iran threat,” which means the “Iran threat” is nothing but a convenient ruse to keep their people silent.

The story of European part of the American empire was born in World War II, cemented through reconstruction aid under Marshal Plan. The threat of Soviet short range missiles and tanks marching once again westward further tied Western Europe to America. But it went beyond military union under NATO to be one with America in their world view, financial (banking) policies and social norms. America decided for Europe it politics and defense - as was best seen, for instance, during the years of discussions with the Soviet Union on short range missiles. The discussions were held by America, not the potentially threatened countries, i.e., Western Europeans; they were just passive audience waiting for the decisions reached.

Finally, Canada (a NATO member), Australia and New Zealand are simply holding apron strings of the empire to be worthy members of the Bush’s “international community.”

With the demise of the countervailing force - the Soviet Union - and helped by deep pockets, military might and global media reach, America, began redefining and molding political, economic and social terminology and rules for the world according to its own perceptions and use. American power got unleashed - domestically and internationally.

On the domestic front, the most visible part of the American power on display for, and of consequence to, its population and the world at large was the size and the global reach of its stock market and banks; the latter, in particular, tying, directly or indirectly, almost whole of the global economy to their network and in the processes enriching American economy.

On international front, it first checked its “superpower” status against Iraq (first war, 1990-91). Live telecast of bombers taking off the aircraft carriers in the India Ocean and the Persian Gulf, cruise missiles getting launched from thousands of miles, and tanks rolling through desert sands were enough to cow-down friend and foe. “Enemy” decimated (though not eliminated), world awed and none to challenge, America came out emboldened.

Superfailure on military front

Afghans, whose sacrifices against Soviet Union inadvertently achieved America such superlative prefixes as “the superpower”/ “the sole superpower”/ “the hyperpower,” came to be next the target using false flag 911 operation. With that was born the new enemy and mission, the “War on Terror,” which unfolded really as the “War on Muslims”. The power and reach of the American empire was uniquely at display when even countries of no-consequence -- like Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Slovenia -- and far off -- like New Zealand, Australia, Iceland and Finland -- willingly hitched American bandwagon against Al Qaeda and Taliban “threat.”

When terror and death was still on display for the world to watch in awe and submission over Afghanistan’s sky and barren mountains, the “superpower” decided for a grander and mightier show that necessitated a Bagdad revisit. It was a real revisit, indeed, of the proportions world had never seen or heard about - in terms of brazen and crooked lies in justification of the war, use of military might and, most importantly, despicable moral values displayed during the conduct of the war.

History is replete with cases where a powerful army was defeated by a weak one. However, what sets American defeats in Iraq and Afghanistan apart is that it wasn’t defeated by any regular army but a bunch of rag tags with no support, unlike earlier when a similar rag tag bunch, only far more in numbers, was supported - through arms, logistics and finance - by the very America and a host of its allies against Soviet Union. Soviet Union’s defeat wasn’t as spectacular or shameful because its military wasn’t as mighty and resources not as huge and sophisticated as the American, and it was fighting alone; in fact, cornered and ostracized by the world community at the behest of America. On the contrary and despite its far superior military and other resources, America didn’t fight alone. It got nearly whole of the world on its side, including NATO and many non-NATO armies. And equally importantly, its enemies were restrained from accessing military supplies: Iraqis fighting mainly with whatever they could loot from Saddam’s arsenal during American bombardment, Afghans have relied most on fertilizer!

Any doubt it isn’t Superfailure?

Superfailure on economic and domestic fronts

Recently we heard America deciding to give “behind the scene” support to NATO’s war on Libya and Syria. Also, we haven’t seen America rushing ground attack on Yemen or Somalia despite being engaged in both countries for a long time now through drone warfare.
Don’t make mistake of attributing this to American war wariness. Shooting and killing is what Americans in general and their rulers in particular love. Gun lobby is not for nothing the most influential lobby there.

It is only because superfailure on military fronts in far off lands seamlessly arched back home where American economy and financial sector failed in equally pitiful manner and measure, forcing America to limit its war efforts to cost effective Playstation drone bombings and supply of some rudimentary military hardware to its mercenaries.

Simultaneous with letting its military loose in “wars of choice,” America also let its money sharks (banksters) unbridled in the money pond. Neither came cheap. Both devoured the nation - and devoured it to its bare bones. One devoured economy and the other people. And together, ensuring the American prefix “superpower” is substituted with ‘superfailure;’ power and glory with decline and shame.

A nation of 15 trillion dollar economy running a national debt of 16.3 trillion dollars and a total debt close to 59 trillion dollars is no laughing matter. It reflects the callous leadership. More than that, it reflects depths of ignorance that ordinary Americans have fallen to, unaware where they have been led to in their merry-go-round credit card life.

On top of this mountain of debt is the failing economy with very little chance of recovery in many, many years to come - notwithstanding whatever contrary the political leadership or economists, Nobel Laureates or not, may say. Just keep watching frequent downward revisions to the predicted growth rates.

If the American national debt looks staggering, the number of its drug addicts, prisoners, homeless, unemployed, on food stamps (technical cover-up for the more degrading term ‘beggars’), divorces, shootings, or those committing suicides are no less staggering. They reflect a society torn apart at the seams. These are the type of social indices that would worry anthropologists about the Third World countries. Here we are talking of a nation that until only few years ago was the largest lender, the “Leader of the First World” still with 15 trillion dollar economy, the “sole superpower,” the “hyperpower!”

Blaming Europe or China will not help. What would help is to stop being led “like a stupid mule” and have a relook at its own policies.

Superfailure beyond borders
Wars haven’t accumulated debt alone for America. They also accumulated heaps of hate against America around the world, raging particularly in the Muslim world. Strange it may seems to most Americans that despite making tremendous contributions to the world in terms of science and technology and aid that have made significant differences to the life of ordinary people, yet their nation is presently one of the most hated nations on earth. However, strange it wouldn’t look if they give a thought to how much equally America extracted from the world through blood and fortune.

Look at the wars alone it has inflicted post-WWII on poorest of the poor countries, first in the name of fighting commies and lately terrorists. Destabilizing elected governments through covert operations is another American story of blood spilling, no less gruesome than the one openly enacted in Libya and another under way in Syria under the overt “regime change’ doctrine.

Also, American aid to any country has never come cheap. The least it would do is to force feed its financial, political, social and moral norms, sometimes under the garb of helping the spread of democracy and sometimes directly as aid strings.

War or aid, objective remains the same: Americanize the world - remove any other identity and homogenize wholly and thoroughly (like it did with Native Americans at gun point). Nothing short of arrogant definition of the media-prompted dream of the now suddenly forgotten “American Century.”

Suddenly, but not without reason. It is difficult even for the worst type of presstitute to be still writing about “American Century” and be convincing in the face of economic and social indices stats that presently characterize America. Recent resoundingly successful NAM meeting in Iran under the leadership of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and now overwhelming vote, including by some of the key US allies, in favor of Palestine are indicative enough about America’s decline and isolation in the world. Here more than who voted in favor of the Palestinians, what is significant is who stood with America other than Israel and Canada -- the Czech Republic, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau and Panama.

Where is Europe gone? Where are the coalition partners? Where is the “international community?”

It is not just America itself but even the multilateral institutions it created and controls, like World Bank and IMF, are no more in favor -- the loud message the proposed creation of alternative financial institutions by BRICS conveys. Moreover, America is already out of South America, and Europe is avoiding it- so distinctly seen in how Euro Zone countries, led by Germany and France, have kept America (and its European poodle, Britain) at bay while trying to resolve their economic problems. (Mark this: It is matter of time before Germany would lead continental Europe on way to economic integration with Moscow.) Also, Africa is quietly falling into China’s lap.

America is left with Israel and arrogance

“Pacific pivot” and -- its less talked about and low key pincer -- Africom are the last ditch efforts of the superfailed nation to be relevant in the face of its decline and rise of China. An effort already declared futile by the present state and future prospects of the American economy.

Source web portal : presstv.com


 
Over 30 million americans who are well able to work they depends on government stamps,,also now over 80% of the new jobs announced since the global turmour on 2008 are low paying job,like cleaning,serving at macdonalds,retailers like walmarts etc,,am feelin sorry now for the people who are living in usa.
 
Source >>Press TV? What good/plausible and unbiased review do you expect to read or hear from press tv about USA or Western powers in particular?

Why can't press tv do a meditation as to why the Jewish state of Israel has been defeating its neighbors all along in all wars?

Israel has won every single war for decades. Islamic states have lost over and over and over. Muslims (Arab nations as well) lost even with superiority. Actually Israel won the six day war (for example) having obsolete tanks collected from the yards of WWII against more than 500 modern tanks at that time . five hundred!! against nearly zero.

Before you tout any analysis like this from press tv...read and feed your brain on many issues, contemporary and erstwhile and you will have informed opinion and good judgement on the subject matter.
 
Kila chenye mwanzo lazima kiwe na mwisho. Zilikuwapo dola kama Roma, Mughal, Safavid, Ottoman, Misri ya mafirauni, Ugiriki, Babylon, Uingereza, Uchina tena kabla ya zote. Zote zilikuja zikapita nini Marekani?
 
Ah!! USA will fall 1 day! Their Era is coming to an end! Mark my words, the power will shift to East soon!
 
America has failed because it is no longer a homogeneous White country it was 50 or 100 years ago. When non-White mass immigration to America started in the 1960s, that's when things started to go downhill. Now many big states in terms of population such as California, New York, Texas do not have White majority. You may ask how do demographics changes cause a country to fail? It's simple. Whites have a higher average intelligence (IQ > 100 points). This makes Whites a highly productive, innovative population. But non-Whites immigrants (except Asians) tend to have lower average intelligence and not as productive or innovative. Therefore for example, if Africans become the majority in America, then expect the American economy to look like African economies. Simply because Africans are not as productive or innovative as White Americans due to differences in intelligence. It's not that hard to comprehend.
 
Kila chenye mwanzo lazima kiwe na mwisho. Zilikuwapo dola kama Roma, Mughal, Safavid, Ottoman, Misri ya mafirauni, Ugiriki, Babylon, Uingereza, Uchina tena kabla ya zote. Zote zilikuja zikapita nini Marekani?

Wishfully thinking.
For your information America will not fall in your life time. Get used to it and stop whining.
 
Wishfully thinking.
For your information America will not fall in your life time. Get used to it and stop whining.
I can gamble in USA over any other nation on earth.
1. All the Chinese wanatorokea US. Hata wanaoiba fedha zao wanazi-invest in the US
2. Most European wana-emmigrate to the US
3. Hata waarabu wanaoi-hate US kila kukicha wanahamia huku na billions zao ziko in the US stocks/banks
USA will rule the world. Hamtopenda but that is the reality
 
My kid October, there is nowhere I have indicated that I crave or long to see America fall in my time. Nonetheless you accidentally supported me saying that it will fall, the fact is that it will fall just like those powerful empires I have mentioned. So there is no dispute as to when it will crumble. The thing is it will cascade just like others. And this is the true nature of things whether you love or hate it.
 
Kila chenye mwanzo lazima kiwe na mwisho. Zilikuwapo dola kama Roma, Mughal, Safavid, Ottoman, Misri ya mafirauni, Ugiriki, Babylon, Uingereza, Uchina tena kabla ya zote. Zote zilikuja zikapita nini Marekani?

Sasa wewe inakuuma nini achazipite
Kwani zisipopita au zikipita wewe zinakusaidia nini? Unamaliza mb zako kisa wazungu sorry mate na jpili njema.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
 
United States will not fall and if that happens the entire world will go down as well.
It's true that the American economy is not doing good but this ain't mean that the United States is down-falling.
America has a strong economic potential in such a way that it is easy for them to recover.
Most people think that China will take over and become a world super power. However, this is totally false concept and i bet, therefore the concept of " a super-power nation" in just 10 years to come will be "out-dated" and not used anymore.

What i see instead is this, there will be a concept of " world super power states" like that of European Union or NAFTA.

The American's are no fools, they do calculate every major decision that impacts their progress. Look, once you talk about world issues you obviously talk about Globalization and its impacts. The issues like what to produce and to whom is solely determined by demand and supply. The United States is the "biggest market in the world" therefore Chinese economic expansion means that, the United States has something to benefit due to the fact that many of their multi-national companies operate there.

I see the Chinese economic development as "miscalculated one" because, the advancement of economy in anyway will result to more "middle income families" if this is fact therefore, there will be a sway of "more freedom". The Chinese government will need to spend most of her resources to policing its people as a means to retain its power. This is because it's easier and cheap to run a democratic government than a Communist one.

Chinese communist government will therefore face a lot of oppositions from its people. Given this situation, the the position of China as "world super power" is highly theoretical.

What about Culture? Will Chinese influence the world through their cultural values? The answer is No...... I see no reasons for Chinese to influence the world through their culture. The Chinese are not spreading their culture and if that would come to happen, maybe in 100 to come.
 
We ni kiumbe wa ajabu kama kweli umekwenda shule. Hapa swali si kuumwa wala kupata nafuu bali ukweli. Kama wote tungekuwa na hisia na mawazo mgando kama wewe basi JF isingekuwapo. Tuna akili ili zitumike kujadili mada mbali mbali. Kama ulijua huna unachojua hukuwa na haja ya kuchangia zaidi ya kujifungia chumbani hata chooni na ujinga wako.
 
I can gamble in USA over any other nation on earth.
1. All the Chinese wanatorokea US. Hata wanaoiba fedha zao wanazi-invest in the US
2. Most European wana-emmigrate to the US
3. Hata waarabu wanaoi-hate US kila kukicha wanahamia huku na billions zao ziko in the US stocks/banks
USA will rule the world. Hamtopenda but that is the reality

wakati wamarekani wenyewe wanalalamika viwanda vyao vinakua outsourced to china,au mataifa kama vietnam ambako production cost iko low.NA inasababisha wamerekani wengi kutopata ajira.47 millioni ya wamerikani wanaishi kwa foodstump.
Idadi hiyo zaidi ya raia wote wa Tanzania.
Wao wenyewe wamerikani wanakuabali kwambo uchumi wao unaanguka.
NOTHING LAST FOREVER.
 
wakati wamarekani wenyewe wanalalamika viwanda vyao vinakua outsourced to china,au mataifa kama vietnam ambako production cost iko low.NA inasababisha wamerekani wengi kutopata ajira.47 millioni ya wamerikani wanaishi kwa foodstump.
Idadi hiyo zaidi ya raia wote wa Tanzania.
Wao wenyewe wamerikani wanakuabali kwambo uchumi wao unaanguka.
NOTHING LAST FOREVER.

The reality is that China has real competitive advantages, mainly a large, low-wage, quality workforce. Companies from the U.S. and elsewhere have moved production to China to capitalize on that workforce.
There's a reason that goods are cheaper in China--it's because the migrant workers that are making those things live in tiny filthy dorms, eat almost nothing but boiled cabbage and rice porridge, and work 14 hours a day for less money in a month than Americans expect to get in a single day of hard work. If that's the standard of living you're willing to reduce the American workforce to, that's when you'll start to bring those jobs back to America.

But then who will buy what they make? Canadians, Asians, and Europeans I guess? Really Africans and Tanzanians will rejoice to buy low quality cheap items.
 
America has failed because it is no longer a homogeneous White country it was 50 or 100 years ago. When non-White mass immigration to America started in the 1960s, that's when things started to go downhill. Now many big states in terms of population such as California, New York, Texas do not have White majority. You may ask how do demographics changes cause a country to fail? It's simple. Whites have a higher average intelligence (IQ > 100 points). This makes Whites a highly productive, innovative population. But non-Whites immigrants (except Asians) tend to have lower average intelligence and not as productive or innovative. Therefore for example, if Africans become the majority in America, then expect the American economy to look like African economies. Simply because Africans are not as productive or innovative as White Americans due to differences in intelligence. It's not that hard to comprehend.[/QUOTE
****!! Analysis, US economic criss has nothing to with race or innovation, all caused by American greed and unjust wars in Afaghanstan and Iraq. You should remember that US was built on blood of African and not yellow people "boble clat" and Africans have lived in US through the history new Arrivals are asian mostly from Indian and Parkstan their to blame for US misfortune. To me your a racist you should be put in prison
 
The US ni super power mpaka simba wa ukoo wa JUDAH atakaporudi, hizi zingine ni porojo wakuu.
 
Kama nilivyoelezea katika threag nyingine last week................

Based on extensive research that I have done, concerning future global super powers, ushahidi unaonyesha kuwa China will never rule the world, nor will it become the world super power. That will never happen in the next 100 years. Kwa mujibu wa kitabu kiitwacho The Next 100 Years by Michael Friedman, China will never rule the world due to the following key factors -:

  • China haina millitary bases nchi za nje. Hakuna nchi yoyote itakayoweza kutawala dunia bila kuwa na military bases nchi za nje. Marekani na mataifa mengine machache sana yana military bases kwenye nchi nyingine duniani na hivyo kujihakikishia usalama na uwezo mkubwa wa kujilinda, kujihami na kupigana. Bila kuwa na uwezo huo hakuna nchi yoyote itakayoweza kutawala dunia. Ili kutawala dunia ni lazima nchi iwe na vitu viwili vya msingi- nguvu za kijeshi na nguvu za kiuchumi. Mambo hayo lazima yawepo yote mawili na yaende sambamba kama hands and gloves.

  • China ni nchi masikini sana in interior China. China ni nchi tajiri kwenye majimbo machache sana likiwemo Beijing, Shanghai na Guangzho. Other than those few states the rest of China is extremely poor, dry and weak. Ukifanya average kimsingi China bado ni taifa masikini.

  • Utajiri wa China ni artificial. Utajiri wa China umetokana na wizi wa utaalamu na technologia. Karibu kila Kila kitu wanachojivunia wachina wameiga au kuiba (ujuzi, utaalamu na technologia) kutoka mataifa ya magharibi. Uchumi unaotegemea wizi wa utalaamu na technologia sio utajiri wenye nguvu nawa kudumu. Wachina hawafanyi researchs and innovation. Huwa wanasubiri kuiba tu.
Kuna sababu nyingine nyingi, ila based on those few, it suffice to conclude that China will never rule the world in the next 100 years.

 
Tuwe serious jamani, history is there totell us everything! Hebu tutizame enzi za ukoloni, britain walikua wanatawala kabisa (sio kuwa na base tu) mataifa ya africa? Germany na france wametawala pangapi? What happend at the end? Sasa USA ata kama ana base katika kila nchi,
 
****!! Analysis, US economic criss has nothing to with race or innovation, all caused by American greed and unjust wars in Afaghanstan and Iraq.

America has fought wars before such as World War 1 and 2, Vietnam, Korea, cold war, etc. How come those wars didn't cause economic crisis? In fact after World War 2 American economy took off. That was on top of America spending billions of dollars in the "Marshall Plan" to rebuild Europe and Japan after they were destroyed in the World War 2.

You should remember that US was built on blood of African and not yellow people "boble clat" and Africans have lived in US through the history new Arrivals are asian mostly from Indian and Parkstan their to blame for US misfortune. To me your a racist you should be put in prison

OK. In one minute you are saying US economic crisis has nothing to do with race or innovation then in another minute you are blaming Asians. Which is which? In any case I disagree with you about Asians. If you look at US census data you will see that Asians are doing very well economically in America which means they are not a burden to the system. Asians contribute greatly to American economy just look at Silicon Valley for example. This can't be said about other non-White populations in America.
 
15% of population on food stamps, less than 10% unemployment rates, what is wrong with the jobs?.
Anyway I dont consider US as already fallen superpower, you never know...... they are recovering
 
Back
Top Bottom