britanicca
JF-Expert Member
- May 20, 2015
- 16,277
- 33,910
As I look at the ongoing crisis in Syria, I'm convinced that the only viable path forward is a three-state solution. This would allow the peaceful and productive communities of the Kurds and Druze to thrive in self-governed territories, while the Sunni and Shiite Islamist militias, who seem intent on perpetuating violence, continue their battles elsewhere. This approach, though unconventional, offers the best hope for stability and prosperity for all parties involved.
From an Israeli perspective, a divided Syria would transform an historic threat into an opportunity. An independent Kurdish state in northeastern Syria and a Druze enclave in Suwayda would create reliable partners in the region. The Kurds, who have proven themselves as effective fighters against ISIS and as champions of secular governance, are natural allies in the fight against extremism. They have no history of hostility toward Israel, and supporting their independence could foster a lasting alliance.
Similarly, a Druze state could offer stability along Israel’s northern border. The Druze, with their deeply rooted values of coexistence and loyalty, have already shown their commitment to peace and stability. Their independence would safeguard their community from the chaos surrounding them while strengthening ties with Israel’s own Druze population. This alignment of interests creates a buffer of stability in an otherwise turbulent region.
For the Kurds, a three-state solution is the realization of a long-standing dream. For decades, they have struggled for autonomy, enduring persecution and denial of their rights. This proposal would finally give them the chance to formalize their self-rule, building on the foundation they have already laid in northeastern Syria through the Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria (AANES).
With their proven governance capabilities and a strong sense of community, the Kurds are well-positioned to establish a thriving state. Their track record of protecting minority rights and fostering inclusivity could serve as a model for the region. While challenges remain - particularly in dealing with Turkish hostility and limited resources - I believe the international community would step in to support such a promising initiative.
The Druze community in Syria is small but resilient, concentrated primarily in the Suwayda region. A three-state solution offers them a lifeline, an opportunity to establish a self-governed enclave where they can protect their identity and values. This is especially critical in a conflict where both Sunni and Shiite militias pose existential threats to smaller, non-aligned groups like the Druze.
With self-rule, the Druze could govern themselves without fear of interference, creating a sanctuary of stability and peace in a region otherwise mired in chaos. Though their population and resources may be limited, alliances with neighboring entities, including Israel, could help them overcome these challenges and ensure their survival and prosperity.
This three-state solution may not solve all of Syria’s problems, but it offers a pragmatic way to minimize suffering and promote stability. Allowing the Kurds and Druze to govern themselves would remove two peaceful and constructive communities from the cycle of violence. It would also create new allies in the region, offering a counterweight to the destabilizing forces of Sunni and Shiite Islamist militias.
Of course, a three-state solution is not without its challenges, but it is the most realistic path forward for Syria. It gives the Kurds and Druze the freedom to prosper while isolating the extremist forces that continue to sow destruction. From an Israeli perspective, this approach aligns with strategic interests, fostering potential partnerships with reliable neighbors. For the Kurds and Druze, it represents a chance to build secure, self-governed futures.
Britanicca