Would Putin dare to drop a nuke on Ukraine?

Ikitotanzila

JF-Expert Member
Sep 22, 2020
1,409
2,263
Vladimir Putin would find it difficult to justify such an action against a brother country. This is how he describes Ukraine.

Putin is already having trouble justifying this war to his people, which is why he has locked up the media to prevent the term war from being used. The message from the Kremlin remains: "We are conducting a special operation in the Donbas".

If Putin were to drop a nuclear bomb on Ukraine, the effects would be such that he too would probably be hit while in Moscow.

The nuclear weapon will therefore not be used, and it should be seen more as a deterrent weapon. This is how Putin has used it in recent days to rekindle this fear in the Western world.

But I don't think he will go that far. He would have too much to lose as well.
 
Mwanzo nilikuwa nikiamini mtu akijenga hoja kwa lugha ya kiingereza hiyo hoja inakuwa na mantiki na nondo za hatari.
Kwanza jiulize. Russia walitengeneza silaha za nyuklia kwa ajili ya kufanyia nini. Bila shaka ni kujilinda, si ndio? So, ikitokea ulazima wa kuitumia, itatumika tu. Sio kwa hao ndugu zake tu, hata kwa hao Nato na US ikibidi. Yale sio mapambo.
 
Putin can't launch nuclear against Ukraine but he could launch against West.
Lets be quickly reminded that since the
1970s, both the West and Russia have thousands of nuclear
tipped missiles already programmed to hit targets in all
major
cities on each other's soil. With just the press of a button,
those missiles will fly out and head for their targets.
But there are difficulties. Both sides have watchmen that are
not sleeping. Every inch of Russian territory is under a 24/7
scan for missile launch by the West, using flare and heat
detection satellites. Russia has the same system.
The moment a rocket motor ignites (most missiles are
powered by rocket motors. Cruise missiles use air-breathing
jet engines - pretty much the same used by aeroplanes, but
they could be ramjets or jets with afterburners. Cruise
missiles are usually called precision guided weapons), they
know in the West. These missile scouts will start to track
the
missile or missiles and note their number, velocity and
heading. They have about 10 minutes to confirm and
reconfirm that missiles are being launched against the West or Ukraine.
In this case they will mostly be ICBMs (Intercontinental
Ballistic Missiles).
 
Vladimir Putin would find it difficult to justify such an action against a brother country. This is how he describes Ukraine.

Putin is already having trouble justifying this war to his people, which is why he has locked up the media to prevent the term war from being used. The message from the Kremlin remains: "We are conducting a special operation in the Donbas".

If Putin were to drop a nuclear bomb on Ukraine, the effects would be such that he too would probably be hit while in Moscow.

The nuclear weapon will therefore not be used, and it should be seen more as a deterrent weapon. This is how Putin has used it in recent days to rekindle this fear in the Western world.

But I don't think he will go that far. He would have too much to lose a
Mh!
 
..Ukrainians have to blame themselves for giving up their nuclear arsenal and handing it over Russia when the Soviet Union collapsed.
 
Enzi zile Trump alimwambia mzee wa Kiduku kwamba asicheze na Nuklia kwani button ya Nuklia za US ni kubwa na powerful kuliko yao. Walinywea

Putin hawezi kuanzisha huu upuuzi maana anajua mtiti wake hautamuacha salama
B4B217ED-07FE-4A30-BD77-B5859EBF0A86.jpeg
 
It's not the issue of daring!! It's the issue of moral values! It's only the immoral USA which can dare to drop a nuke bomb to another country! USA remains to be the only country in history which has managed to be immoral enough to resort to the nuclear bomb! I don't think Putin can do so!!
 
It's not the issue of daring!! It's the issue of moral values! It's only the immoral USA which can dare to drop a nuke bomb to another country! USA remains to be the only country in history which has managed to be immoral enough to resort to the nuclear bomb! I don't think Putin can do so!!
Now what is the use of his nuclear bomb? Did he manufacture it for funny or rather showoff ?
 
Vladimir Putin would find it difficult to justify such an action against a brother country. This is how he describes Ukraine.

Putin is already having trouble justifying this war to his people, which is why he has locked up the media to prevent the term war from being used. The message from the Kremlin remains: "We are conducting a special operation in the Donbas".

If Putin were to drop a nuclear bomb on Ukraine, the effects would be such that he too would probably be hit while in Moscow.

The nuclear weapon will therefore not be used, and it should be seen more as a deterrent weapon. This is how Putin has used it in recent days to rekindle this fear in the Western world.

But I don't think he will go that far. He would have too much to lose as well.
Not all 'nukes' are created the same.

'Tactical nukes' cannot be ruled out when the going gets tough!
 
Vladimir Putin would find it difficult to justify such an action against a brother country. This is how he describes Ukraine.

Putin is already having trouble justifying this war to his people, which is why he has locked up the media to prevent the term war from being used. The message from the Kremlin remains: "We are conducting a special operation in the Donbas".

If Putin were to drop a nuclear bomb on Ukraine, the effects would be such that he too would probably be hit while in Moscow.

The nuclear weapon will therefore not be used, and it should be seen more as a deterrent weapon. This is how Putin has used it in recent days to rekindle this fear in the Western world.

But I don't think he will go that far. He would have too much to lose as well.
Instead of concentrating to the ongoing Conflict between Russia and Ukraine you better use your energy to advice your President on how He / She can tackle the 'Four Historical Problems' of Ignorance, Poverty, Diseases and Corruption.
 
..Ukrainians have to blame themselves for giving up their nuclear arsenal and handing it over Russia when the Soviet Union collapsed.
This needs some explaining. What happened? Were they forced by a treaty to give up their nukes?
 
This needs some explaining. What happened? Were they forced by a treaty to give up their nukes?

..it was during the nuclear arms control negotiations that went on right after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

..Ukraine was persuaded to denuclearize in exchange for security guantee by the Russians and US.
 
Mwanzo nilikuwa nikiamini mtu akijenga hoja kwa lugha ya kiingereza hiyo hoja inakuwa na mantiki na nondo za hatari.
Kwanza jiulize. Russia walitengeneza silaha za nyuklia kwa ajili ya kufanyia nini. Bila shaka ni kujilinda, si ndio? So, ikitokea ulazima wa kuitumia, itatumika tu. Sio kwa hao ndugu zake tu, hata kwa hao Nato na US ikibidi. Yale sio mapambo.
Na yeye ndio utakuwa mwisho wake, na inawezekana ndio ikawa mwanzo wa vita kuu ya dunia ambayo itamaliza kabisa na kuifanya hii dunia isikalike tena kwa mwanadamu
 
Na yeye ndio utakuwa mwisho wake, na inawezekana ndio ikawa mwanzo wa vita kuu ya dunia ambayo itamaliza kabisa na kuifanya hii dunia isikalike tena kwa mwanadamu
Wanadamu wataendelea kuwepo bro. Kama wamechoka kiluishi wauane wao kwa wao
 
Wanadamu wataendelea kuwepo bro. Kama wamechoka kiluishi wauane wao kwa wao
Inawezekana tukaendelea kuwepo lakini kumbuka kuna viumbe vilikuwepo kabla yetu na vikawa wiped na natural disaster na havipo tena mfano dinosaurs, binadamu we are not special ni viumbe tuu kama viumbe wengine kwa hiyo nuclear inaweza ikasafisha human race without a trace
 
Instead of concentrating to the ongoing Conflict between Russia and Ukraine you better use your energy to advice your President on how He / She can tackle the 'Four Historical Problems' of Ignorance, Poverty, Diseases and Corruption.
Don't hit around the bush, be direct to whom you refer. For sure you are talking of Her Excellency.
 
2 Reactions
Reply
Back
Top Bottom