Take a look on this

Si kila jambo ni la utani.
Uko siriazi na hizi picha za kilimwengu kuhusu undumilakuwili wa wanasiasa na "ujinga" wa wapiga kura wao? Sikujua kama uko siriazi namna hii. I am sorry. Wengine huwa tunakuja huku JF photos na MMU kupunguza stress tu na si vinginevyo. [emoji125][emoji125][emoji125]
 
MKUUU mbona apo kuna kitu rais tuuuu kama roho inakuuma mlaze chini kiongozi unamuwakirisha hapo kwenye hiyo picha kisha gombea wewe pia mbona utafika hapo
 
Wanasisa = Wachungaji wa makanisa ya kiroho.
Wapiga kura = Waumini wa makanisa ya kiroho.
 
[emoji35] [emoji35] [emoji35] [emoji35] [emoji35] [emoji35] [emoji35] [emoji35] [emoji35] [emoji35] [emoji35]
 
Impossible! Haiwezekani!

By the way, did Descartes say anything about the monopoly of power, manipulation of the masses and the nature of knowledge? May be the politicians are just misunderstood.


As per displayed pictures: If one minds the gap between a politician and a voter, it doesn't need a rocket science to know that the majority would choose being politicians over voters.

By the way, I am one of the voters sagging in that packed lorry, though.
 
The problem is that, based on the nature of their job as representatives of the masses a.k.a voters, not all of us (the masses) can be politicians. The argument that "the majority would choose being politicians over voters", while factual superficially, it's actually inherently contradictory and fallacious.

You ignored all my other questions. I assumed that by nicknaming yourself Descartes, you are also interested in his philosophy.
 


Right on.

I am for your argument. To begin with, the fallacy is displayed through the pictures in question.

If deduced as per mentioned premises one would obvious end up into a false conclusion, so to speak.

Otherwise, I remain as trustful as a diligent voter sagging in a packed lorry by the greedy politician.
 

Similar Discussions

Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…