Rais Donald Trump asitisha ajira zote za umma kwenye serikali kuu isipokuwa jeshi

Troll JF

JF-Expert Member
Feb 6, 2015
7,804
12,233
Tazama mjadala wa habari hii ukisomwa kwenye JamiiLeo

=====

Muda mfupi uliopita Rais Donald Trump wa Marekani amesimamisha ajira zote kwa muda (hiring freeze) isipokuwa za kijeshi tu kwenye serikali kuu. Pia amevunja mkataba wa Mexico city policy, uliokua unaruhusu serikali ya Marekani kutoa fedha kwa mashirika yake mbalimbali ulimwenguni yanayojishughulisha na masuala ya uzazi wa mpango.

Mkataba wa Mexico city uliruhusu utoaji mimba ikiwa mimba hiyo itaonekana kuhatarisha afya ya mama, kama moja ya njia za uzazi wa mpango. Vilevile ameiondoa nchi yake kwenye mkataba wa kibiashara na nchi za Pacific (TPP) na kuwarudisha nyumbani mabalozi wake wote waliopo kwenye mashirika na jumuiya mbalimbali za kimataifa (e.g UN, EU, ASAN, etc). Wakati akivunja mkataba wake wa kibiashara na nchi za Pacific amesema alikua akisubiria kwa muda mrefu nafasi hiyo.

============

Trump Orders Broad Hiring Freeze for Federal Government

Trump.jpg

WASHINGTON — President Trump on Monday ordered an across-the-board employment freeze for the federal government, halting hiring for all new and existing positions except those in national security, public safety and the military.

In the two-page order, Mr. Trump said the directive was a stopgap way to control the growth of government until his budget director recommends a long-term plan to significantly reduce the federal work force through attrition.

“In carrying out this memorandum, I ask that you seek efficient use of existing personnel and funds to improve public services and the delivery of these services,” Mr. Trump wrote in the memorandum, one of his first acts as president. “Accordingly, this memorandum does not prohibit making reallocations to meet the highest priority needs and to ensure that essential services are not interrupted and national security is not affected.”

The largest public employees union blasted the president’s action, saying it will force federal agencies to rely on more expensive contractors to deliver the services that Americans have come to expect from the government.

“This hiring freeze will mean longer lines at Social Security offices, fewer workplace safety inspections, less oversight of environmental polluters and greater risk to our nation’s food supply and clean water systems,” said J. David Cox Sr., the president of the group, the American Federation of Government Employees.

Mr. Trump’s memorandum addressed that point directly by saying that “contracting outside the government to circumvent the intent of this memorandum shall not be permitted.”

Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, said on Monday that the president’s decision to freeze hiring was the result of a desire to show greater care for taxpayers’ money.

“What the president’s showing through the hiring freeze, first and foremost today, is that we’ve got to respect the American taxpayer,” he told reporters in his first briefing at the White House.

What you need to know to start your day, delivered to your inbox Monday through Friday.
Receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times's products and services.

“Some people are working two, three jobs just to get by. And to see money get wasted in Washington on a job that is duplicative is insulting to the hard work that they do to pay their taxes,” Mr. Spicer said.

The decision to freeze hiring has precedents in American presidential history.

In 1981, Ronald Reagan issued a similar hiring freeze within minutes of finishing his inaugural address, making good on a promise that he had made throughout his campaign against President Jimmy Carter.

Mr. Reagan’s freeze went further than Mr. Carter’s decision to allow only one federal employee to be hired for every two that departed government service. In February of that year, a federal judge ruled against a challenge to the freeze, saying that it was neither unconstitutional nor illegal.

“This begins the process of restoring our economic strength and returning the nation to prosperity,” Mr. Reagan wrote in his 1981 memorandum putting the freeze in place.

In his own campaign, Mr. Trump had pledged to “drain the swamp” in Washington, and he had repeatedly said that there was plenty of “waste, fraud and abuse” to be found in government agencies.

That campaign message put government workers and unions on notice that a freeze was possible. On Monday, Mr. Trump’s action confirmed that he intends to put pressure on agencies to justify their work forces.

The action applies only to the civilian work force in the executive branch; the Office of Personnel Management reported in 2014 that there were about 1.36 million civilian employees.

In addition to military members, Mr. Trump’s action does not affect positions that require presidential appointment or members of the noncareer Senior Executive Service, who are generally political appointees in the agencies. That will allow Mr. Trump to continue his political appointments during the next several months.

The action also allows agency heads to seek exemptions for positions that are necessary for national security or public safety, the memorandum says.

SOURCE: New York Times
 
Hii ya uzaz wa mpango nzuri sana, maana mizungu haitaki tuzaliane inataka kutufanya kama nchi za kaskazin mwa Africa, blacks wote waliondolewa
 
Hivi mzee unajua kingereza kweli? Una uhakika na hilo unalolisema LA kusimamisha ajira zote za umma? Unajua ajira na sheria zake? Au unataka kutoa sifa za kijinga kwa mtukufu malaika? Acha kudanganya watu kwa kuweka uwongo na ukweli.
Mikataba sawa lkn si ajira
 
Wale watz ambao America ndio role model yao, mnabidi mfurahi kuwa rais wenu sasa ndiye amekuwa role model wa America, the great nation. Wenye vijiba vya roho na JPM lazima wakae na kwa jinsi ilivyo hata humu JF wanaonekana wamechooka, bwana wa kumkimbilia hayupo tena. Teh teh teh teh kwakwakwakwakwa!
 
Pure Magufuli
Hatamaliza muda wake, akivunja katiba tu kama hapa on the same day wanam-impeach! Time is coming soon. Marekani hufasnyi ujinga wakakuvumilia. Soma hapa
Why doesn't the President just pass everything as an executive order?

On the heels of his Sandy Hook gun control executive orders, what is there to stop the President just passing everything he wants to as an executive order? Do they hold less power than laws passed by Congress, or does he have a fixed number he can enact? Surely this would be easier than trying to pass every piece of legislation through a divided Congress.

Ross Cohen, B.A. in History and Political Science

Written Jan 18, 2013 · Upvoted by Carter Moore, worked at U.S. Federal Government

Executive Orders are not laws. The President can't just make something illegal, except where Congress has provided that framework through the legislative process. The power of the executive branch is vested in the President, so he can direct the employees and departments of that branch to do anything, so long as it's within the law.

For example, with immigration, Congress has yet to pass The DREAM Act. The President wants it passed but can't just declare it law. What he can do, is use his influence as the head of the executive branch to direct that, people that would fall under the act's provisions be given the lowest priority in deportation and other enforcement actions. It's like prosecutorial discretion. Resources are limited and choices must be made.

The President wanted to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. He was planning to just transfer the prisoners to one or more supermax federal prisons housing other criminals and captured terrorists. Previously, this would seem like something that was up to the Executive Branch - laws don't usually spell out specifically where prisoners must be kept. However, Congress didn't like that idea and passed a law that included provisions that essentially outlawed any GITMO detainees from being transferred into the states (among other new restrictions about what can be done with them). Consequently, something that was previously within the President's power to do was now explicitly blocked by law, which is why GITMO remains open.

Coming back to the gun control issue, if you look at the actual executive orders he signed, they were pretty small ball -- very little that should be controversial. There were more than 20 of them and they covered a wide range of areas, but they weren't anything radical or even anything that changed the law, because you can't change the law with an Executive Order, unless the law happens to be written in a way that allows discretion.

Here's an example of one of the orders:
"Direct the Attorney General to review categories of individuals prohibited from having a gun to make sure dangerous people are not slipping through the cracks." All he's doing is telling someone that works for him to look into something, something that was already under his general purview as the chief law enforcement officer.

If the President could do everything as an Executive Order, he would be a dictator. Contrary to some of the hyperbolic rhetoric on the right, he is not doing anything unprecedented with these orders. If he could do the bigger stuff via orders, he would, but existing laws will need to be changed and Congress will therefore have to be on board.

While Executive Orders have the full force of the law, the President may not create new laws using an EO. In 1952, the Supreme Court, in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, ruled that Presidential EO's may not "make law".

This puts significant limits on what can be done using an Executive Order.

Generally speaking, an EO can clarify the enforcement of an existing law, prioritize the execution of the law, or otherwise direct the activities of executive branch agencies. If Congress disagrees with an EO, they can simply pass legislation to make the directives in the EO illegal. Alternatively, states or private citizens may challenge the EO in federal court.
 
Back
Top Bottom