Where is Nyaningabu?
U wanna bet?
50 us dollar
Phwee!. Now you are talking!.I'm not a betting man and no betting man bet on Holyfield to whoop Tyson's ass either.
So just continue to get an orgasm on fake opinion polls.
The only poll that counts is on Nov. 6.
Phwee!. Now you are talking!.
METHODOLOGY
The survey was produced for Esquire/Yahoo! News by Langer Research Associates, with sampling, data collection and tabulation by Interviewing Service of America of Van Nuys, CA
I'm a realist.
I'm not gonna gloat or get depressed based on some opinion poll that I'm not even sure whether it actually happened or not.
Think about it, what proof is there to show they actually interviewed people?
Have you ever been polled by anybody? I haven't.
So, so much for these opinion polls. To me they aren't worth a hill of beans.
Taasisi zinzo deal na polls
kama Gallup kwa mfano ni taasisi trustworthy
ziko kwenye hii kitu for years
na kila election zina aaminika sababu result ikitoka hazitofautiani sana
zina credibility
A story concerning the possible abuse of power by the White House or Obama campaign that was initially dismissed by liberal blogs appears to be proving otherwise. According to internal e-mails, obtained by the Daily Caller'sMatt Boyle, sent between senior Gallup Organization executives, senior Obama campaign adviser David Axelrod attempted to intimidate the well known polling firm, when numbers for President Obama were not particularly ideal.
When news broke that the Justice Department was filing a lawsuit against Gallup for overcharging their clients, there was suspicion that either the White House or the Obama campaign may have applied pressure to Gallup because of President Obama's less than great polling numbers from the organization.
According to the Daily Caller: (bolding is mine)
In April, Axelrod tweeted that a poll showing Mitt Romney with a 48-43 percent lead over Obama was "saddled with some methodological problems," directing his Twitter followers to read a National Journal story criticizing Gallup polls showing a Romney lead.
In that National Journal piece, Ron Brownstein wrote that the polls showing Romney leading the president had "a sample that looks much more like the electorate in 2010 than the voting population that is likely to turn out in 2012."
Internally, Gallup officials discussed via email how to respond Axelrod's accusations. One suggested that it "seems like a pretty good time for a blog response," and named a potential writer.
In response to that suggestion, another senior Gallup official wrote - in an email chain titled "Axelrod vs. Gallup" - that the White House "has asked" a senior Gallup staffer "to come over and explain our methodology too."
That Gallup official, the email continued, "has a plan that includes blogging and telling WH [the White House] he would love to have them come over here etc. This could be a very good moment for us to [show] our super rigorous methods compared to weak samples etc. …"
The writer named several news organizations with their own polling methodologies, all of which resulted in numbers more favorable to President Obama at the time.
In response to that email, a third senior Gallup official said he thought Axelrod's pressure "sounds a little like a Godfather situation."
"Imagine Axel[rod] with Brando's voice: '[Name redacted], I'd like you to come over and explain your methodology…You got a nice poll there….would be a shame if anything happened to it…'"
In a second email chain titled "slanderous link about Gallup methodology," another senior Gallup official noted that a Washington Examiner story on Axelrod's anti-Gallup tweet was "on [the] Drudge [Report] right now," before writing that the episode was "o politically motivated, it's laughable."
"As they say in b-ball: he's trying to work the refs," that official wrote to other senior Gallup staffers. "What a joke. Axel's had a bad week. He got in the middle of the Ann Romney thing. Then said the country is going in the wrong direction. (Oops!) Now he's swinging at us…."
I spoke with former White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, now an Obama campaign sr. adviser, about whether the campaign interacted with the Gallup Organization regarding the polling company's methodology.
"I was the press secretary for two years. I know it was really smart not to get involved in discussing things around the justice department that I have no knowledge about," said Gibbs. "I have no knowledge of any discussions of anybody on the campaign side with Gallup," he went on to say later.
Kuna mengi sana yanakupita wewe. Hebu soma hii....
Kweli. Nakumbuka kwenye mkesha wa uchaguzi mwaka ule Fox News walitoa survey yao inayoonyesha McCain yuko mbele kwa pts 6 wakati Gallup, Real Clear, etc. wakionyesha yuko nyuma kwa mbali. Organizations zinafuata methodologies tofauti tofauti (na ku'question' integrity ya methodology siyo kitu kigeni). Kwa uhakika zaidi ni vema kufuatilia polls ya organizations kadhaa au ''polls of polls'' .
Hapana. Kwa uhakika zaidi ni vema kusubiri polls za Nov. 6 ambazo ndizo za ukweli.
Jasusi Jasusi mkuu... usiukatae ukweli..Mimi na wewe tunaelewa Obama kama binadamu yeyote ana mapungufu lakini naamini yeye ni bora kuliko Mitt... Mitt most of the time hajui hata upepo wake unaelekea wapi? Anajaribu kuiga mambo mengi ambayo Obama Administration inafanya. Mimi nipo 110% sure Obama atashinda hata iweje.. Wamarekani sio wajinga... Uchumi sio kila kitu kwa America kuna mambo mengi yapo ambayo ukiangalia kwa undani Obama Administration wamejitahidi.. OBAMA ANAPIGA VITA MAPEBARI NUKTA.I'm not a betting man and no betting man bet on Holyfield to whoop Tyson's ass either.
So just continue to get an orgasm based on fake opinion polls.
The only poll that counts is on Nov. 6.
Samahani, hapa najiuliza bila kupata jibu. Not that I'm trying to be controversial, lahasha. Hivi, uchaguzi wa Marekani sisi watanzania unatuhusu nini? Haya mambo waachiwe wenyewe wapiga kura wa Marekani, wao ndiyo wanajuwa nani anawafaa. Sie twasubiri kifo cha CCM kunako 2015, Amen!