Painful Interview Between Islamic Group Spokesperson and Australian Journalist

Painful Interview Between Islamic Group Spokesperson and Australian Journalist

kamandawasua

JF-Expert Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Posts
326
Reaction score
86
SYDNEY - What started as a courteous interview on ABC's Lateline last night, quickly unravelled into chaos.
Australian spokesperson for controversial Islamic group Hizb ut-Tahrir, Wassim Doureihi, was interviewed by Emma Alberici on the news program, which turned into a bickering match.

The interview focussed on Hizb ut-Tahrir's views on the Islamic State's tactics, which Doureihi downplayed in comparison to Western government tactics in the Middle East.

Alberici repeatedly called for Doureihi to state his group's views on the murderous campaign of ISIS, including his response to an Australian child holding up a severed head in Syria.

"Do you support the murderous campaign being waged by Islamic State fighters in Iraq?" she asked, before he attempted to deflect the question.

"I want to take a moment just to take a step back," he said. Alberici continued to push him back to the actual question, which he avoided answering directly. The fierce talking over, shut downs, question dodging and sneers continued almost the entirety of the 11-minute interview.

"The fact is the entire response isn't what Muslims are doing or may not be doing, but no one legitimately or sincerely is discussing what Western governments are doing in the Muslim world," Doureihi spluttered out as he was allowed a moment to speak.

"Groups like ISIS or Al Qaeda don't exist in a vacuum," he said. "They exist as a reaction to Western interference in the Islamic lands and they view themselves, rightfully or wrongfully, irrespective of my opinion or otherwise, as a resistance effort to what they regard as an unjust occupation."

Alberici interjected: "But what I'm asking you is the tactic that's being employed to push back. Do you support it?"

The back and forth continues: "Why will you not point blank condemn the actions of IS fighters?" she said. "The question itself is offensive," he said. "Answer it," she said, while interrupting. "I've answered the question quite - quite directly," he said, while still not answering the question.

The headache-inducing clash finally ended with more unanswered questions than answered, yet between the back and forth, Doureihi seemed to push his views through.

The interview followed a statement by Prime Minister Tony Abbott that he would like to see the group banned in Australia, as it has been in Germany, Russia and many countries in the Middle East.

"We are changing the law that will make it easier to ban organisations like Hizb ut-Tahrir," Abbott told the media.

"There is no doubt they are an organisation that campaigns against Australian values, that campaigns against Australian interests. They are a thoroughly objectionable organisation."




Source
Painful Interview Between Islamic Group Spokesperson and Australian Journalist


Watu kama hawa wanahitajika Tanzania.
Kwani we unasemaje?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the guy...handled the lady firmly. He managed to stop her pushing her agenda through
 
hao hizbu tahrir wapo pia zanzibar, na kauli mbiu yao ni hiyo hiyo ya ISIS ya kutaka ukhalifa!
 
I guess media headlines in Australia the next day declared this guy supports ISIS!
This is what the West is doing to their people. Employing one-track minded presenters to push a certain angle of the story forgetting the context.
Simply this intelligent guy rejected being boxed into a one-angle story those who created the ISIS n the first place, when it suited tem
 
Wassim Doureihi, said ISIS was reaction against US. How can that be..? US don't sponsors terrorists: Us sponsors Revolutionaries like the rest of countries do worldwide. We(Tanzanian) gave support to freedom fighters from various African nations, but not a terrorists and rapists who killed innocence, children, women, and civilians
ISIS is doing, what the scriptures are saying.that's is why this guy can't afford to deny it.

Emma Alberici has revealed an extraordinary understanding of these delusional beings.These extremists are trying to hid the true self including the hatred embedded in their faith for a long time I still can't differentiate what i see in Saudi Arabia and ISIS. They all banned churches. Can we say Saudi Arabia actions is to retaliate US interactions?
I still wondering why liberals are acting so blind to these undeniable truths of all time.?!

I always liked something I read in Bob Woodward;s book State of Denial where he claims the Saudi Ambassador told GW that the Saudi royals were concerned with how popular Saddam was with the Saudi people.
The royals wanted the US to do something about Saddam. Bush said he needed a reason to get involved that he could present to the American people. The Ambassador said the Saudis could help... Ever wonder about most of the 9/11 terrorists having Saudi passports ? And Bush's lack of shock anger in the pictures of him at the elementary school ? This story was lost as the Administration created the story of Saddam being a threat to the US because he weapons of Mass Destruction - that we never found
 
Wassim Doureihi, said ISIS was reaction against US. How can that be..? US don't sponsors terrorists: Us sponsors Revolutionaries like the rest of countries do worldwide. We(Tanzanian) gave support to freedom fighters from various African nations, but not a terrorists and rapists who killed innocence, children, women, and civilians
ISIS is doing, what the scriptures are saying.that's is why this guy can't afford to deny it.

Emma Alberici has revealed an extraordinary understanding of these delusional beings.These extremists are trying to hid the true self including the hatred embedded in their faith for a long time I still can't differentiate what i see in Saudi Arabia and ISIS. They all banned churches. Can we say Saudi Arabia actions is to retaliate US interactions?
I still wondering why liberals are acting so blind to these undeniable truths of all time.?!

I always liked something I read in Bob Woodward;s book State of Denial where he claims the Saudi Ambassador told GW that the Saudi royals were concerned with how popular Saddam was with the Saudi people.
The royals wanted the US to do something about Saddam. Bush said he needed a reason to get involved that he could present to the American people. The Ambassador said the Saudis could help... Ever wonder about most of the 9/11 terrorists having Saudi passports ? And Bush's lack of shock anger in the pictures of him at the elementary school ? This story was lost as the Administration created the story of Saddam being a threat to the US because he weapoxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


REPLY:
First, let me try to make sense of your comment which appears to come from a person who has not made up his mind, or, worse, suffering from some split-decision (not personality) syndrome. In the fist part you deny that USA could ever support terrorism. Yet in the second you confirm just that by USA being in cahoot with the Saudis. So, which is which?
Then you launch into something you have no knowledge about- associating 'faith' (Islam) with terrorism. This is a jaded topic and only the likes of you are still confused. One who considers Saudi Arabia to be the representative of all Muslims, must either have an agenda or their Medulla oblongata is dysfunctional. Why not Turkey, Malaysia, Indonesia or Iran? So let's leave this topic aside. It is only for the intellectuals.
USA only supporting only revolutionaries? Are you kidding? Like the Savimbis, the Smiths, the Bay of pigs....eh? on which planet you are, Jupiter?
Just this part of your views makes me uninterested to carry the debate any further, as your opinions mean less to me than a cold bucket of spit!
 
First, let me try to make sense of your comment which appears to come from a person who has not made up his mind, or, worse, suffering from some split-decision (not personality) syndrome. In the fist part you deny that USA could ever support terrorism. Yet in the second you confirm just that by USA being in cahoot with the Saudis. So, which is which?
Then you launch into something you have no knowledge about- associating 'faith' (Islam) with terrorism. This is a jaded topic and only the likes of you are still confused. One who considers Saudi Arabia to be the representative of all Muslims, must either have an agenda or their Medulla oblongata is dysfunctional. Why not Turkey, Malaysia, Indonesia or Iran? So let's leave this topic aside. It is only for the intellectuals.
USA only supporting only revolutionaries? Are you kidding? Like the Savimbis, the Smiths, the Bay of pigs....eh? on which planet you are, Jupiter?
Just this part of your views makes me uninterested to carry the debate any further, as your opinions mean less to me than a cold bucket of spit!
woh woh woh
I still don't get it, which side are you. We've plenty of Criticizers ..just show your direction? .

Saying that i'm associating terrorists with Islamic faith..Kiss my Ass... Not me but them->Caliph Al baghdad said that: ISIS associates themselves with Islamic Faith. They are called Islamic States of levante or ISlamic States(IS), they are following on what scriptures are saying.
Alshabab, Muslim brotherhood, Hamas, Hezzbollah. Alqaeda, Zarqawi network, Taliban, Bokoharam Nusra front, etc they all associate with Islamic faith. - When they killed Innocence in Shopping mall (Kenya), when they kidnapped women and banned education in Nigeria, When they mutilated women, raped women, slaughter non Muslims, When they attack World Trade Center(WTC) on Sept11, they all associated their actions with Islamic faith. There's no secret about it. They justified it all in Al Jazeera(Their lovely media), CCTV, and other international medias. Is like You don't care( Sijali !!)
on what they are saying everyday.. tell me Which ALLAH are they talking about?
The Caliph..Albaghad Used to say: We will raise a Flag of ALLAH in the White House".
. Fu.ck politics, reality matters
May be it is true that: i know less about the religion, but still we've Boko haram, Alshabaab, Why all are Muslims? Why all are killing people in the name of religion.?
Savimbi and others including IDD Amin DADA, did not associate their atrocities with the act of any religion.

The Thinking that:it is US who created ISIS is the dumbest idea of all time. I only believe that It is opportunity in Iraq that made ISIS to emerged, in other word it is a Gap left by US that allows this radical gang to benefit from it and emerged. ISIS is a religious detached group from Al qaeda. Like any other groups like Nusra front etc.


Why Saudi;
His bond to religion is original.Saudi original culture is completely inherited from religion. Most of all,
Saudi harbors the so called Holy places. it supposed to be an example- If they banned churches, i may say no doubt that is true example. Turkey and other countries have their culture before the religion. That is why in Afghanistan Muslims are allowed to play and dance in Music.
 
No wonder your name is Vasco da Gama! If you knew what Da Gama did to the Africans along the East African Coast from Sofala in Mozambique to Malindi in Kenya, you would not EVEN think of associating yourself with that monster. And he did what he did in the name of Christianity- he was sent down by the Church!
Anyway, I am so exhausted trying to educate people like you that Islam is different from Muslims. So is Christianity and all noble religions. People like you who just pick and choose to prove something are mentally sick. All these examples around you of good, pious, respectful and well behaving Muslims are not enough. You have to go all the way to Iraq to import the type that fits your idea of Islam- fine, go on. Let me ask you, though: have you or your sister been assaulted in any way by a Muslim neighbour? Has your uncle's head been chopped off by them? No? Then they are not Muslims!
You see how stupid you will end up by going down that way?
Saudi harbours the so-called Holy places- so what? The Vatican city harbours a holy place. The last time I read about it they killed a Pope there! Go educate yourself.
 
Back
Top Bottom