Is Logic Illogical?

[einstein newton]

The laws of Logic rest upon the substratum of three axioms

Law of Identity
Attests that,A is A and anything is itself

Particle is particle,and wave is wave

Law of excluded middle
An object is either A or non A,it cannot be A and non A simultaneously

Law of non contradiction
Nothing can be A and non A at the same time and under same conditions

All things have non contradictory nature

Aristotle held that,any attempt to disprove those axioms is doubly folly because axioms are self evident

Yeah,you cannot disprove your own existence,because you must exist in order to do so
[Stolen concept fallacy]

But are those axioms really true?

My view is that,those axioms are only true at largest scale nature

But at Plack's scale,they are thoroughly wrong,and therefore illogical

Forexample due to Quantum eccentricity,Electron can be both particle and waves synchronously

Schrodinger cat is both alive and dead at same time

Contrary to the laws of logic

So,is logic trivial and illogical?

 

[Sniper shooter]

asee akhaa

 

[Njaa]

The laws of Logic rest upon the substratum of three axioms

Law of Identity
Attests that,A is A and anything is itself

Particle is particle,and wave is wave

Law of excluded middle
An object is either A or non A,it cannot be A and non A simultaneously

Law of non contradiction
Nothing can be A and non A at the same time and under same conditions

All things have non contradictory nature

Aristotle held that,any attempt to disprove those axioms is doubly folly because axioms are self evident

Yeah,you cannot disprove your own existence,because you must exist in order to do so
[Stolen concept fallacy]

But are those axioms really true?

My view is that,those axioms are only true at largest scale nature

But at Plack's scale,they are thoroughly wrong,and therefore illogical

Forexample due to Quantum eccentricity,Electron can be both particle and waves synchronously

Schrodinger cat is both alive and dead at same time

Contrary to the laws of logic

So,is logic trivial and illogical?

Law number 2 (Law of excluded middle) and 3 (Law of non contradiction) are almost the same. I can prove my non existence during my existence. I mean I can prove that I was not existed before my birth, and i am sure I will not exist after my death.

Here is the formula:

 

[einstein newton]

Law number 2 (Law of excluded middle) and 3 (Law of non contradiction) are almost the same. I can prove my non existence during my existence. I mean I can prove that I was not existed before my birth, and i am sure I will not exist after my death.

Here is the formula:

The problem is,in order to prove your non existence,you must firstly presuppose your own existence

Forexample,if you claim that you didnot exist before your birth

Then the question will come,how did you know that?

You cannot know that you will cease to exist after your death because the very act of knowing assumes the consciousness and therefore your existence

In either way,a logical fallacy known as stolen concept is being commited

Anyway!,The key question of this thread is to know whether logic itself is illogical or not

If three underpinning laws of classical logic are invalid in quantum world,

Then logic is not only trivial,but illogical and non-universal