Da Dona
JF-Expert Member
- Dec 16, 2025
- 827
- 527
Free speech activists have expressed concern over the proposed Protection of Sovereignty Bill, warning that it contains vague provisions that could be used to restrict freedom of expression in Uganda.
📸: VOX
The activists argue that key provisions in the Bill, particularly those related to “economic sabotage,” are broadly defined and could be misused by the State to target critics.
The Bill, currently before Parliament, is presented by government as a measure aimed at protecting Uganda’s sovereignty, curbing foreign influence, securing national interests, and regulating foreign funding for civil society and individuals.
Activists say Section 13 of the Bill is especially worrying. It proposes that a person may be accused of economic sabotage if they publish information or take part in activities that are considered to weaken or damage the country’s economic system or stability.
They argue that such wording is too broad and could make it difficult to distinguish between legitimate criticism and criminal activity, creating room for abuse.
The Bill also proposes heavy penalties, including fines running into billions of shillings and possible long prison sentences for those found guilty of economic sabotage.
Legal experts and rights advocates quoted in the discussion say such provisions could discourage public debate, journalism, academic work, and activism, as individuals may fear punishment for expressing critical views.
Source: Daily Monitor UG
📸: VOX
The activists argue that key provisions in the Bill, particularly those related to “economic sabotage,” are broadly defined and could be misused by the State to target critics.
The Bill, currently before Parliament, is presented by government as a measure aimed at protecting Uganda’s sovereignty, curbing foreign influence, securing national interests, and regulating foreign funding for civil society and individuals.
Activists say Section 13 of the Bill is especially worrying. It proposes that a person may be accused of economic sabotage if they publish information or take part in activities that are considered to weaken or damage the country’s economic system or stability.
They argue that such wording is too broad and could make it difficult to distinguish between legitimate criticism and criminal activity, creating room for abuse.
The Bill also proposes heavy penalties, including fines running into billions of shillings and possible long prison sentences for those found guilty of economic sabotage.
Legal experts and rights advocates quoted in the discussion say such provisions could discourage public debate, journalism, academic work, and activism, as individuals may fear punishment for expressing critical views.
Source: Daily Monitor UG
