Federal judge blocks new travel ban; Trump calls it 'judicial overreach'

BAK

JF-Expert Member
Feb 11, 2007
124,790
288,124
A federal judge in Hawaii blocked President Donald Trump's new travel ban on Wednesday afternoon, hours before the ban was set to go into effect.

In a 43-page ruling, US District Court Judge Derrick Watson concluded in no uncertain terms that the new executive order failed to pass legal muster at this stage and the state had established "a strong likelihood of success" on their claims of religious discrimination.

170129023207-travel-ban-7-muslim-nick-paton-walsh-lklv-00002701-exlarge-169.jpg

Trump decried the ruling during a rally Wednesday night in Nashville, introducing his statement as "the bad, the sad news."

"The order he blocked was a watered-down version of the first one," Trump said, as the crowd booed the news.

"This is, in the opinion of many, an unprecedented judicial overreach," he added, before pledging to take the issue to the Supreme Court if necessary.

========

A Federal judge in Hawaii has blocked President Donald Trump's new travel ban, hours before it was due to begin at midnight on Thursday.

US District Judge Derrick Watson cited "questionable evidence" in the government's argument that the ban was a matter of national security.
President Trump described the ruling as "unprecedented judicial overreach".

The order would have placed a 90-day ban on people from six mainly Muslim nations and a 120-day ban on refugees.

Mr Trump insists the move is to stop terrorists from entering the US but critics say it is discriminatory.

An earlier version of the order, issued in late January, sparked confusion and protests, and was blocked by a judge in Seattle.

Speaking at a rally in Nashville, Tennessee on Wednesday evening, Mr Trump said the ruling in Hawaii made the US "look weak". He said he would take the case "as far as it needs to go" including to the Supreme Court, adding: "We're going to win."

Hawaii is one of several US states trying to stop the ban.

Lawyers had argued that the ban would violate the US constitution by discriminating against people on the grounds of their national origin.

The state also said the ban would harm tourism and the ability to recruit foreign students and workers.

Under the revised order, citizens of six countries on the original 27 January order - Iran, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen - would once more be subject to a 90-day travel ban.

Iraq was removed from the list because its government boosted visa screening and data sharing, White House officials said.

The revised order also lifts an indefinite ban on all Syrian refugees and says Green Card holders (legal permanent residents of the US) from the named countries will not be affected.

But more than half a dozen US states have joined lawsuits in an attempt to block it.

In his presidential campaign, Mr Trump vowed "a total and complete shutdown" of Muslim immigration to the US, and to implement a process of "extreme vetting" in order to prevent violent extremists from entering the US.


Source: BBC
 
Ndipo unapogundua kuwa Trump ni mbumbumbu sana pale aliposema kuwa "The order he blocked was a watered-down version of the first one;" yaani anamlaumu jaji kwa uamuzi wa kuipiga stop amri hiyo huku akisema kuwa amri hiyo ilikuwa ni sawa na ya kwanza ila imelainishwa kidogo (watered-down version). Kulainisha kosa hakumaanishi kuwa siyo kosa tena; ni ama fanya kosa au usifanye kosa kabisa. Iwapo atakata rufaa, maneno haya haya yatamrudia tena. Trump alimdharau sana Obama lakini nadhani sasa hivi anajutia sana kujiingiza katika jukumu kubwa ambalo liko juu sana ya uwezo wake wakati mwenzake Obama alilimudu sana jukumu hilo licha ya vipignamizi alivyokumbana navyo kutokea Senate na Congress. Huyu Trump sasa hivi hana upinzani wowote lakini ndtyo hivyo, anayumba yumba; je akipata upinzani kama aliokumbana nao Obama kweli atasavaivu?
 
Hiyo ndo check and balance...
Sidhani kama Trump atafanikiwa kupitisha hiyo amri yake,maana mahakama imekaa mkao wa kuiblock kwa kila hali,

majaji wa huko hawana njaa njaa na kujikomba komba
 
Majaji wote wa mahakama za "wilaya" "mikoa", rufaa na wale wa mahakama kuu Marekani hawafukuzwi kazi na mtu yoyote kirahisi, kwa hiyo hawamuogopi mtu yeyote hata kama ni raisi. Kufukuzwa kwao kunahitaji zaidi ya nusu ya wabunge wa Congress, na zaidi ya asilimia 60 ya wabunge Senate.

Ndipo unashangaa kuona kuwa jaji mmoja wa kisiwa kidogo sana cha Hawaii anazuia amri ya rais wa Marekani yote isitekelezwe.
 
Back
Top Bottom