jMali
JF-Expert Member
- Nov 9, 2010
- 8,412
- 5,013
Comments by Charles Kambanda
First, Theoneste Bagosora and Gen. Bizimungu who, as Kagame's propaganda goes, were " the chief architects" of the so-called Tutsi genocide, were acquitted on genocide and planing genocide charges. The international Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda records are available to prove this. If FDLR was being accused of " Tutsi genocide" because its founders were suspected of the " Tutsi genocide", then acquittal of FDLR founders on genocide and planning genocide charges should have vindicated FDLR.
Why has this not happened? The answer is that the so-called Tutsi genocide" is a myth Kagame and his American lobbyists are pushing down our throat for two major reasons: (a) to cover Kagame's own on-slaughter of the Hutu and some Tutsi which was the then rebels' strategy to terrorize Rwanda and create chaos which would lead them to power; Kagame's strategy worked to his satisfaction. I am not saying that the Hutu side did not butcher some Tutsi. I contest the victor's narrative that it's the Hutu side only that butchered people during the 1994 massacres in Rwanda. I have personal knowledge of what really happened during the massacres.
Likewise, there is enormous body of knowledge to prove that Kagame and his lobbyists' narrative is an international hoax. (b) Kagame's dictatorship is by design, not by default. The "genocide" crime is Kagame tool to silence and demonize any perceived or actual political and armed opposition Kagame is confronted with because of his insane brutality and dictatorship. Unfortunately, many western policy makers have bought in Kagame propaganda without critical thinking. Of course, Kagame pays the most extensive Washington DC and London lobbyists to sustain his propaganda.
Second, the International Criminal Court ( ICC) arrested and prosecuted all FDLR top political leaders. These FDLR political leaders were arrested because of Kagame's wide spread propaganda that FDLR committed atrocities in DRC. However, the ICC set free these FDLR political leaders because they had no case to answer. That was last year. Which atrocities did FDLR commit in DRC for which the ICC could not hold FDLR politica leaders accountable? Third, last year, the ICC examined the top FDLR military commander's alleged crimes.
The ICC trial court found that there was no prima facie case for the Court to issue arrest warrants for the FDLR top military commander. Under pressure from Kagame and his lobbyists, the ICC prosecutor appealed. The appeals court accepted to issue arrest warrants for FDLR top military commander. Questions: (a) if, as Kagame's propaganda goes, FDLR is such a criminal organization, why didn't prosecution have basic evidence to convince the ICC to issue arrest warrants for FDLR top military commander?
(b) if ICC prosecutor did not have a prima facie case to issue arrest warrants, where on earth will the ICC find evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to secure conviction?
(c) where is the evidence for the alleged FDLR crimes if the ICC failed to find prima facie case for FDLR's top military boss? It should be noted that there was so much lobbying for the ICC appeals court to issue arrest warrants for the top FDLR military commander. Kagame had refused to hand over his Tutsi commander who was accused of committing horrible crimes in DRC under Kagame's orders.
Kagame insisted that he would hand over Bosco Ntaganda, the terminator, only if the court issued arrest warrants for the Hutu rebel leader Gen. Mudacumura, the top FDLR military commander. FDLR top military commander's ICC arrest warrants, which Kagame and his lobbyists secured on appeal, are but a political compromise. Why did they have to lobby so much for the ICC to issue arrest warrants - moreover on appeal, if FDLR is rightly accused of those crimes? This defeats logic and common sense.
It's only suitable for Kagame's American lobbyists. I guess. All the original FDLR commanders abandoned FDLR and joined Kagame troops, allegedly bought off. None of those former top FDLR has ever been prosecuted for the genocide FDLR is accused of.
On the other hand, a Spanish and French courts have issued international arrest warrants for Kagame and his top Tutsi commanders for international crimes including genocide and terrorism. Those arrest warrants stand to date. There are innumerable international reports that have detailed Kagame's horrific crimes during the civil war he commanded from 1990 to 1994. Notable among these reports is the UNHCR sponsored investigations led by Gersony ( the famous Gersony report).
This report concluded that the dead bodies which floated on L. Victoria in 1993/4 were actually Hutu victims of Kagame's brutal war and orders; Kagame and his rebels butchered and dumped innocent Hutu civilians in streams and Rivers in their rebel controlled territory. Kagame butchered some Tutsi under Kagame rebel controlled territory too.
That was the source of the infamous L. Victoria floating dead bodies in 1993/4. The UN Mapping report is categorical; Kagame butchered close to 6 million people in DRC. The report accuses Kagame and his assassins of war crimes, crimes against humanity and possibly genocide.
That's a UN report. In recent months, the United Nations Security Council adopted a UNSC group of experts report " as is" which accuses M23 - Kagame's suicidal " rebel" troops in DRC - of international crimes. Questions: ( a) where does Kagame get the moral authority to accuse FDLR of international crimes and genocide?
(b) if FDLR is disqualified for any peace talks because it is accused of genocide, how is Kagame and his Tutsi clique in power, who is accused of international crimes and genocide, qualify to be the president of Rwanda?
It should be remembered that the then ICTR prosecutor was ready to prosecute Kagame and his former rebel fighters for crimes under the ICTR jurisdiction. These crimes include genocide. When the then prosecutor, Carl DePonte, tried to secure arrest warrants for Kagame and his officials, Kagame ran to the US for protection.
The then US president, Bush, ordered the ICTR to desist from prosecuting Kagame and his men because Kagame is a US ally. The then ICTR decided to resign instead of betraying the Oath of Office she took. Carl DePonte has written innumerable books and articles where she states the relevant facts. Question: (a) are the Hutu being prosecuted at the ICTR simply because they are not US allies?
[/QUOTE]
cc: Uso wa nyoka nyumba kubwa Swat yaliyomoyamo eliakeem MTAZAMO jMali Niwemugizi Bulldog JustDoItNow Prof Wacha1 meningitis Kibona Ngongo JokaKuu
First, Theoneste Bagosora and Gen. Bizimungu who, as Kagame's propaganda goes, were " the chief architects" of the so-called Tutsi genocide, were acquitted on genocide and planing genocide charges. The international Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda records are available to prove this. If FDLR was being accused of " Tutsi genocide" because its founders were suspected of the " Tutsi genocide", then acquittal of FDLR founders on genocide and planning genocide charges should have vindicated FDLR.
Why has this not happened? The answer is that the so-called Tutsi genocide" is a myth Kagame and his American lobbyists are pushing down our throat for two major reasons: (a) to cover Kagame's own on-slaughter of the Hutu and some Tutsi which was the then rebels' strategy to terrorize Rwanda and create chaos which would lead them to power; Kagame's strategy worked to his satisfaction. I am not saying that the Hutu side did not butcher some Tutsi. I contest the victor's narrative that it's the Hutu side only that butchered people during the 1994 massacres in Rwanda. I have personal knowledge of what really happened during the massacres.
Likewise, there is enormous body of knowledge to prove that Kagame and his lobbyists' narrative is an international hoax. (b) Kagame's dictatorship is by design, not by default. The "genocide" crime is Kagame tool to silence and demonize any perceived or actual political and armed opposition Kagame is confronted with because of his insane brutality and dictatorship. Unfortunately, many western policy makers have bought in Kagame propaganda without critical thinking. Of course, Kagame pays the most extensive Washington DC and London lobbyists to sustain his propaganda.
Second, the International Criminal Court ( ICC) arrested and prosecuted all FDLR top political leaders. These FDLR political leaders were arrested because of Kagame's wide spread propaganda that FDLR committed atrocities in DRC. However, the ICC set free these FDLR political leaders because they had no case to answer. That was last year. Which atrocities did FDLR commit in DRC for which the ICC could not hold FDLR politica leaders accountable? Third, last year, the ICC examined the top FDLR military commander's alleged crimes.
The ICC trial court found that there was no prima facie case for the Court to issue arrest warrants for the FDLR top military commander. Under pressure from Kagame and his lobbyists, the ICC prosecutor appealed. The appeals court accepted to issue arrest warrants for FDLR top military commander. Questions: (a) if, as Kagame's propaganda goes, FDLR is such a criminal organization, why didn't prosecution have basic evidence to convince the ICC to issue arrest warrants for FDLR top military commander?
(b) if ICC prosecutor did not have a prima facie case to issue arrest warrants, where on earth will the ICC find evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to secure conviction?
(c) where is the evidence for the alleged FDLR crimes if the ICC failed to find prima facie case for FDLR's top military boss? It should be noted that there was so much lobbying for the ICC appeals court to issue arrest warrants for the top FDLR military commander. Kagame had refused to hand over his Tutsi commander who was accused of committing horrible crimes in DRC under Kagame's orders.
Kagame insisted that he would hand over Bosco Ntaganda, the terminator, only if the court issued arrest warrants for the Hutu rebel leader Gen. Mudacumura, the top FDLR military commander. FDLR top military commander's ICC arrest warrants, which Kagame and his lobbyists secured on appeal, are but a political compromise. Why did they have to lobby so much for the ICC to issue arrest warrants - moreover on appeal, if FDLR is rightly accused of those crimes? This defeats logic and common sense.
It's only suitable for Kagame's American lobbyists. I guess. All the original FDLR commanders abandoned FDLR and joined Kagame troops, allegedly bought off. None of those former top FDLR has ever been prosecuted for the genocide FDLR is accused of.
On the other hand, a Spanish and French courts have issued international arrest warrants for Kagame and his top Tutsi commanders for international crimes including genocide and terrorism. Those arrest warrants stand to date. There are innumerable international reports that have detailed Kagame's horrific crimes during the civil war he commanded from 1990 to 1994. Notable among these reports is the UNHCR sponsored investigations led by Gersony ( the famous Gersony report).
This report concluded that the dead bodies which floated on L. Victoria in 1993/4 were actually Hutu victims of Kagame's brutal war and orders; Kagame and his rebels butchered and dumped innocent Hutu civilians in streams and Rivers in their rebel controlled territory. Kagame butchered some Tutsi under Kagame rebel controlled territory too.
That was the source of the infamous L. Victoria floating dead bodies in 1993/4. The UN Mapping report is categorical; Kagame butchered close to 6 million people in DRC. The report accuses Kagame and his assassins of war crimes, crimes against humanity and possibly genocide.
That's a UN report. In recent months, the United Nations Security Council adopted a UNSC group of experts report " as is" which accuses M23 - Kagame's suicidal " rebel" troops in DRC - of international crimes. Questions: ( a) where does Kagame get the moral authority to accuse FDLR of international crimes and genocide?
(b) if FDLR is disqualified for any peace talks because it is accused of genocide, how is Kagame and his Tutsi clique in power, who is accused of international crimes and genocide, qualify to be the president of Rwanda?
It should be remembered that the then ICTR prosecutor was ready to prosecute Kagame and his former rebel fighters for crimes under the ICTR jurisdiction. These crimes include genocide. When the then prosecutor, Carl DePonte, tried to secure arrest warrants for Kagame and his officials, Kagame ran to the US for protection.
The then US president, Bush, ordered the ICTR to desist from prosecuting Kagame and his men because Kagame is a US ally. The then ICTR decided to resign instead of betraying the Oath of Office she took. Carl DePonte has written innumerable books and articles where she states the relevant facts. Question: (a) are the Hutu being prosecuted at the ICTR simply because they are not US allies?
[/QUOTE]
cc: Uso wa nyoka nyumba kubwa Swat yaliyomoyamo eliakeem MTAZAMO jMali Niwemugizi Bulldog JustDoItNow Prof Wacha1 meningitis Kibona Ngongo JokaKuu