You have dictatorship & authoritative thoughts which are philosophies of a past era of Africa. So think people should enter the fed even if it means been beaten? Your example ya states makes no sense at this time because that happened more than 100 years ago. How does politics of 150 years ago of America apply to East Africa now? Na for your information America fought to gain land by force not to form a federation. The only time they fought for a federation was during the time of Abraham Lincolm when the sourthen states wanted to split from the northen states so thatnis like Northen Kenya fighting to keep sourthen kenya not to force another country into a federation.
Another thing. A federation is not like a passing of a bill. have you ever heard of the word REFERENDUM? It is used to see the views of the people in issues such as this but obviously you would not know this because you don't even no your history thus your example of the US fighting to form a federation. Kasome your history then come back.
.....Not next year,not over 5 yrs...EAST AFRICAN FEDERATION NOW!
That shows that I was right to say you did not know what you were talking about before because this is all you could reply. You could not reply to your "hata kwa viboko" statement neither did you defend when I questions your example about the states "fighting to form a federation". You did not even explain how an event in the US which happened over a century ago applies to East Africa now. Dude the states was already a country then, there does not exist a federation between the EAC members yet. Hautoi hoja yoyote all you are doing is giving short asnswers which prove me right. You are not very bright because you give examples you are not sure of. You are not making any sense right now but then again i'm not shocked. Coming from a person who does not even have his historical facts right it is to be expected. I even dared you to go end check your historical facts then come back but yoy came back with nothing.
...you're just a moron and quit assuming anything about me.
Those things are done in coorporation as many projects are done. You think people who are not a federation don't build roads to link each others countries. For your information many countries do things in cooperation with each other without having a federation? Take a look at the EU. They do many projects in conjunction with each other umesikia Ulaya imekuwa au ina plan ya kuwa nchi moja? Your examples don't prove your point simply because cooperation among countries in different projects is not new but does not make them "one" country. You can continue to call me a moran but you are the one who plainly has no idea what the terms "international relations" and "internation cooperations" or "international trade" mean. Countries can do a lot of things together to link themselves together ot loosen up some regulations for the benefit of the partyies involved but it does not mean they are a federation. Whose the moron you say? I think you have lived in a village all your life because it seems its the first time you ever hearn nations working together WITHOUT being one country because the key word is"nations". Have any other point bring it on & we will continue.
....Please tell me why you are against federation and how it affects your life. Seriously!
Nyamaza wewe Mluguru...ebo!! Mbona una maneno mengi hivyo....
....Please tell me why you are against federation and how it affects your life. Seriously!
MwanaFalsafa1,
There are even more reasons for Tanzanians to be pensive and more caution on this political union which gives a huge land mass, but disproportionately less votes if we were to vote on nationalistic lines (which we would!). Look closely at the federation drafts and ask questions like: How would the Presidents/government's be elected? Would it be universal suffrage, proportional representation, equal representation of each state, according land mass (I dont think so), or population size? Keep in mind that in Uganda we can rig any election and secondly we need land really badly considering the rate at which we churn out kids. Our ruling class also has a great apetite for land.
Uganda's President promotes population growth in spite of all the advice he has received from population experts. More Ugandans = poorer Ugandans = easier votes to buy/rig. At the last elections the votes cost less than a kilo of salt. As I mentioned her above: Be VERY afraid.
(Source - Mostly from Encyclopedia of Nations and CIA World Fact Book)
Uganda: A landlocked country has a total area of 236,040 sq km (91,136 sq mi), of which 36,330 sq km (14,027 mi) is inland water. Population ia approximately 30 million. Population growth rate: 3.603% (2008 est.) Some estimates put Uganda's growth rate at 3rd highest in the world after Yemen and Niger.
Kenya 582,650 sq km (224,962 sq miles) Population estimate 39,002,772, population growth rate 2.691% (2009 est.)
Tanzania 945,087 sq km (364,900 square miles), rendering it slightly larger than twice the size of California. Population approximately 38 million, Population growth rate: 2.072% (2008 est.)
At least there is a smart person who thinks with logic rather than stupidly directed patriotism. National interests have to be considered here. I am not saying I'm against ever having a federation or that a federation would have its benefits BUT HAVE PEOPLE CONSIDERED THE POSSIBLY NEGATIVE EFFECTS? The problem with some people is that once they see the benefits(usually for themselves) they don't consider the possible consquences(usually affecting others to) & thats why we have rulers who put as through unneccessary problems. There are a lot of issues to be considered, why not get rid of all the doubts before moving foward? Lakini we Africans we have a few people who can see far or even consider the implications of some of our decision on the short term & long run. I wonder why some people are so eager to rush the federation without thinking over the whole issue but I guess there some people who are easily fooled by their governments & mistake a majority decision as the right decision POOR US. PROPAGANDA WILL BE THE END OF US. As long as the government says it & the media promotes it then we follow like cattles even without knowing why we are following.
Hi,
I introduced myself already as a Ugandan opposition activist in the Introduction Forum. I could not resist jumping in here. Forgive me if my arguments are very simplistic, am not a subject matter expert, just a hyper political observer/commentator focusing on Uganda. One thing apparent from this thread is the lack of trust of the motives for the Federation and perhaps that may be because we really do not know the motives. What is the overriding motive that has caused a sense of urgency for an East African political union? That motive is certainly top-down since I have not heard any clamour at the grassroots (at least not in Uganda) for a political federation for East Africa. So who is rushing the political federation and why?
An East African native wants to attend market day on either side of the border without a hassle. Do we need a political union for that? Maybe. It would take away the need for a visa and may be there would be less obstacles in building roads and bridges, movement would be easier, markets would be more accessible. So why don't we go ahead and do it - fast?
Look at the main proponents for the rushed political Union and be VERY afraid. We may have a common colonial culture, even common cultures that pre date colonialism, we certainly have a common interest in reaping from economies of scale but we also have very distinct post colonial POLITICAL cultures. I can understand the rush for a stronger economic union but I would be extremely cautious about rushing a political union that brings together a budding Tanzanian democracy, shaky Kenyan democracy and outright Ugandan dictatorship.
But then again, am a Ugandan opposition activist so I may be biased... If I cannot trust Museveni's administration to lead Uganda into the future I certainly would not endorse it to lead discussion of an East African political union any day. Take time to reflect on whether you can deal with opening up to our corruption, nepotism, militarism, without tough preconditions.
I would certainly stand with those who err of the side of caution.
Anne Mugisha