Eronda
JF-Expert Member
- Dec 16, 2025
- 872
- 489
The government’s financial arrangement for toll fee collection on the Entebbe Expressway has come under scrutiny, with citizens and analysts questioning whether the deal delivers value for money.
According to official figures, government projected UGX 146 billion in toll revenue over five years. However, a private contractor was hired at a cost of UGX 122 billion to manage toll collection. This leaves government with only UGX 24 billion in net revenue across the same period.
Capacity Concerns
Adding to the controversy, government admitted it had “no capacity” to purchase toll collection software valued at UGX 5 billion, which would have enabled direct management of toll fees. Instead, outsourcing was chosen, raising questions about why a relatively modest investment in software was overlooked in favor of a much larger contract.
Public Reaction
The figures have fueled sharp criticism, with many Ugandans asking government to “make it make sense.” Social media debates highlight concerns that the contractor’s cost nearly wipes out the expected revenue, undermining the purpose of toll collection.
Broader Implications
• Transparency: The deal has intensified calls for accountability in public-private partnerships.
• Economic Efficiency: Critics argue that investing in government-owned systems would have been more cost-effective.
• Public Trust: The arrangement risks eroding confidence in infrastructure financing and management.
Government’s Position
Officials defend the outsourcing decision, citing efficiency, technology, and risk management. They argue that private contractors bring expertise that government lacked. Yet, the revelation about the UGX 5 billion software gap has amplified doubts about whether outsourcing was the best option.
Watch: