Geza Ulole
Platinum Member
- Oct 31, 2009
- 76,161
- 107,729
- Thread starter
-
- #501
Those in TZ goes at 40Km/hDamn at 80km/h that will be the largest theft of the Century
And those in Tanzania are 100 yrs old. Gosh i can't believe my eyez what Kenyan mafioso did to that country!Those in TZ goes at 40Km/h
Dont worry about them, no one will call you to try them, ooh, we will use the 80Km/h to multiply our economy by 2, i think by four years you will be finishing your 160 Km/hr to Morogoro. It will be nice to see you use your 160Km/h with our economy twice yoursAnd those in Tanzania are 100 yrs old. Gosh i can't believe my eyez what Kenyan mafioso did to that country!
eti four years,hehehe this bongolalas haven't started theirs😀Dont worry about them, no one will call you to try them, ooh, we will use the 80Km/h to multiply our economy by 2, i think by four years you will be finishing your 160 Km/hr to Morogoro. It will be nice to see you use your 160Km/h with our economy twice yours
At that 80km/hr carrying double the cargo(using double-stacked wagons) while yours at 120km/hr freight carrying half the cargo... at the end of a day ours would have moved more cargo than yours!Damn at 80km/h that will be the largest theft of the Century
Am using four to give them hope! You know, Merkez are high class guys!eti four years,hehehe this bongolalas haven't started theirs😀
Here is a puzzle u don't know, double stacked wagons means more fuel consumption due to wind resistance n since the standards of ur track curvature is ratio of 1200/800 means sharp corners hence lower speed n those engines of urs can't shunt longer cargo wagons unlike the standards for our curvature which is simply a radius 1000m in Tanzania meaning bigger circumference less sharp corners n hence ability to attach n pull countless wagons in a very long train n at higher speed!At that 80km/hr carrying double the cargo(using double-stacked wagons) while yours at a higher speed carrying half the cargo... at the end of a day ours would have moved more cargo than yours!
Here is a puzzle u don't know, double stacked wagons means more fuel consumption due to wind resistance n since the standards of ur track curvature is ratio of 1200/800 means sharp corners hence lower speed n those engines of urs can't shunt longer cargo wagons unlike the standards for curvature simply a radius 1000m in Tanzania meaning bigger circumference less sharp corners n hence pulling very long wagons n at higher speed!
Sent from my SM-J320F using JamiiForums mobile app
wacha upuzi, the Kenyan SGR freign will move at avg 80km for freight train, even with all those factors accounted for, that is a done deal!!!! They already did their calculation and everything at design stage....Wind included..... They wagons can be as long as the tanzanian ones, at 80km/hr wind will not affect that much.. kwahivyo all that has already been taken care of
On the other hand, if you do the math:
Lets assume both freight trains (Ke,Tz) will travel a similar distance of 400km in one day (24hrs) between point A and B, each movement from one point to the other counted as a 1 trip...
The Kenyan train carrying double the cargo of the tanzanian train... assume 100tons for kenya and 50tonnes for Tanzania..
Kenyan train moving at 80km/hr while Tanzanian freight moving at 120km/hr
using the formula Time taken = Distance/Speed
Tanzania time for a single trip = 400km/120kmhr == 3.3hrs
Kenya time for single trip =400/80kmhr == 5hrs
Now lets assume the two trains work continuously in 24hrs carrying cargo in each trip.........
For Tanzania where each trip is 3.3hrs, in 24hrs it would have done 24hr/3.3hr = 7.3trips
For Kenya where each trip takes 5hrs, in 24hrs it would have zigzagged 24hr/5 = 4.8trips
So in one busy day the Tanzanian freight train carrying single stacked containers with total 50 tones in each trip would have carried 50ton*7.3 = 365tons...
While the slower and heavier Kenyan freight train carrying double stacked containers totall 100tones in each trip would have carried 100ton*4.8 =480tons .....
Therefor the Kenyan cargo train would have carried 480 -365 = 115tonnes more than the Tanzanian one!!!!
this is just hypathetical, remember the Kenyans SGR has been designed to carry 22mln tonns a year while the Tanzaninn one is 17mln tonns a year meaning at a certain point the Tz rail wouldnt be able to compete even if they wanted to....
kila siku tunawaaambia, if you look at it in face value, it might look like Tanzanian or Ethiopia got a better deal but when you go to details, Kenyas SGR trumps all of them!!!!!
The same way my argument says about ur curvatures design that can't take 5km train! That's Physics my friend u r illiterate of! Aside unknown cant measure of ur track to support that double stacked cargo while for us is known! Ours is way superior to urs..wacha upuzi, the Kenyan SGR freign will move at avg 80km for freight train, even with all those factors accounted for, that is a done deal!!!! They already did their calculation and everything at design stage....Wind included..... They wagons can be as long as the tanzanian ones, at 80km/hr wind will not affect that much.. kwahivyo all that has already been taken care of
read this Cant (road/rail) - Wikipedia
On the other hand, if you do the math:
Lets assume both freight trains (Ke,Tz) will travel a similar distance of 400km in one day (24hrs) between point A and B, each movement from one point to the other counted as a 1 trip...
The Kenyan train carrying double the cargo of the tanzanian train... assume 100tons for kenya and 50tonnes for Tanzania..
Kenyan train moving at 80km/hr while Tanzanian freight moving at 120km/hr
using the formula Time taken = Distance/Speed
Tanzania time for a single trip = 400km/120kmhr == 3.3hrs
Kenya time for single trip =400/80kmhr == 5hrs
Now lets assume the two trains work continuously in 24hrs carrying cargo in each trip.........
For Tanzania where each trip is 3.3hrs, in 24hrs it would have done 24hr/3.3hr = 7.3trips
For Kenya where each trip takes 5hrs, in 24hrs it would have zigzagged 24hr/5 = 4.8trips
So in one busy day the Tanzanian freight train carrying single stacked containers with total 50 tones in each trip would have carried 50ton*7.3 = 365tons...
While the slower and heavier Kenyan freight train carrying double stacked containers totall 100tones in each trip would have carried 100ton*4.8 =480tons .....
Therefor the Kenyan cargo train would have carried 480 -365 = 115tonnes more than the Tanzanian one!!!!
this is just hypathetical, remember the Kenyans SGR has been designed to carry 22mln tonns a year while the Tanzaninn one is 17mln tonns a year meaning at a certain point the Tz rail wouldnt be able to compete even if they wanted to....
kila siku tunawaaambia, if you look at it in face value, it might look like Tanzanian or Ethiopia got a better deal but when you go to details, Kenyas SGR trumps all of them!!!!!
You saw the curvature in your dreams or what? Have you even seen the designing of the SGR Kenya? You mean you know more physics than those guys who are building SGR Kenya? Then Build the one from Dar is Slum to Morogoro because it seems Bongolalas have their money and brains too!! No need of MerkezThe same way my argument says about ur curvatures design that can't take 5km train! That's Physics my friend u r illiterate of! Aside the cant measure of ur track to support that double stacked cargo that is not known while for us is known! Ours is way superior to urs..
There are specifications for each n every rail track design for Uganda, Kenya, Ethiopia n Tanzania that i posted before n according to Ugandan govt explanations.You saw the curvature in your dreams or what? Have you even seen the designing of the SGR Kenya? You mean you know more physics than those guys who are building SGR Kenya? Then Build the one from Dar is Slum to Morogoro because it seems Bongolalas have their money and brains too!! No need of Merkez