Kenya Election 2013 Petition...Uhuru and Ruto's victory upheld.

[mfianchi]

Waswahili ndivyo tulivyo hatuna jema hata moja. Raila alipokataa kweda mahakamani mwaka 2007 na kusababisha maafa kwa wakeya mkamlaani kwa nguvu zote.
Mwaka huu kabla ya uchaguzi mkakesha hapa na kumsihi asiyeridhika na matokeo aende mahakamani badala ya kwenda mitaani kama ilivyotokea 2007.
Sasa Raila ameamua kuchagua njia sahihi kabisa ya kikatiba lakini bado tena waswahili mnamlalamikia. Yani sijui watu mkoje aisee hata mfanyiwe nini hamridhiki.

Waswahili ni kama jiji la Dar Es Salaam,ikinyesha mvua mafuriko,jua likiwaka mjoto hadi vyupi vinalowana,hakuna jema kwa jiji la Dar.na miswahili (pamoja na Wakikuyu)ndivyo ilivyo

 

[Bantugbro]

Its all systems go as CORD does the final touches on this behemoth of a petition. This is going to be a shocker of biblical proportions as friends at the nerve center tell me. CORD already knows what they have and they simply need the information from IEBC for cross reference purposes. When the smoke clears and the dust is settled there will be no IEBC to run the next election for it will have to be overhauled. The resolve is firmly grounded as we know our 'cyber courts' have already adjudicated the case and if anything are saying 'Hakuna haja'. That's expected from somebody who is stealing from you because they don't want you to be aware of their pilfering ways.

I have confidence in the person of the Chief Justice Mr Willy Mutunga, a man appointed in a transparent vetting process by the JSC. He is a man of integrity who believes in the rule of law ever and has stood on the side of justice time and time again. Just yesterday he postponed the swearing of TSC commissioners because they have a case pending in court.

Standard Digital News - Kenya : Mutunga postpones TSC commissioners swearing in

So I said to myself if he has told these TSC chaps to hold on till their case is resolved, then somebody needs to tell those Jubilee fellows that the swearing in ceremony of the President-Select is not happening anytime soon. That is the how the law operates.

Thank God for the New Kenyan Constitution.

Now those who are keen know that the IEBC is starting from a very disadvantaged position when it comes to their ability to carry out an exercise of such huge magnitude. The ramifications not withstanding. The BVR failed and transmission mechanism put in place as a check and balance also failed. This is why the returning officers just walked casually into Bomas of Kenya with the forms showing tallying from various polling stations. Not accompanied or security whatsoever..mambo 'kienyeji styro!' These are not contested facts no matter how many excuses Mr Hassan tried to make. Hassan’s explanation has been that he used the manual stuff and relied on the form 36 which replaced the now infamous form 16. But Hassan should remember that the transmission requirement is part of the electoral laws for a reason. It provides the first check and balance in the system. It was recommended by the Kriegler team and enacted into law because in 2007, the the Returning Officers altered records so badly that even Mr. Kriegler agreed it was not possible to determine who won.

Therefore in as much as the final poll result had to come from the manual data, the constitution provided for that data to be cross checked with the provisional data transmitted directly from the voting location. Due to the failure of the transmission their is no provisional data to provide the check and balance that was supposed to be the first line of defense against electoral fraud. This posses a big problem for IEBC as they have directly contravened the constitution.

Now lets look at the rejected voters that kept on increasing steadily up to the 300K mark when the whole thing was called off. When Hassan was asked about he said that it was a bug multiplying things by 8. Now the problem becomes he will have to explain to the court how this whole thing works in the IT world. Now, I know I'm not IT guru but one thing I know for sure is that when you do something on the Internet there are 'always cyber footprints' that are left behind. If by any chance there is found any evidence of deliberate tampering to compromise the system (this is the word in the grapevine by the way) then IEBC are in for a serious spanking. This was too important an exercise for somebody to say they forgot to charge the batteries of the BVR kits and that's why they didn't work on the morning of the election. And we are supposed to believe such garbage!

Uhuru Kenyatta and his godfather Mwai Kibaki are busy trying to paint this crazy picture that the election is over lets move on. I beg to ask move on to what? This business of stealing elections needs to stop and it needs to stop now! We have to show these old geezers that that time is gone and this a new Kenya. I'm disappointed at Uhuru Kenyatta who I believed would be a breath of fresh air into Kenya's Presidency, yet he has chosen the same old archaic ways of stealing elections blatantly with the careless mta-do? posture. This is a very different Kenya! That is why Raila refused to accept the unilateral appointment of A. Visram as Chief Justice. If that had happened Uhuru Kenyatta would have been sworn in by now and a couple people locked up just to prove a point. Raila saved us that mess.

Thank God for The New Kenyan Constitution.

God Bless Kenya!

Lemmie get ready to go to the High Court.

Conclave...:A S shade:

 

[Ab-Titchaz]

Cord has a strong case, says lead lawyer Oraro


The Coalition for Reforms and Democracy (Cord) has said it is confident of overturning the election of Uhuru Kenyatta as president.

Cord's lead lawyer George Oraro said the coalition has enough evidence to prove its case at the Supreme Court.

"We (Cord) have a strong case and are sure we are going to overturn IEBC (Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission) move to declare Uhuru Kenyatta as President-elect," Mr Oraro said Saturday.

He said the IEBC had not provided all the information Cord needed but it had "sufficient evidence" to mount a strong case.

Mr Oraro said Prime Minister Raila Odinga is the petitioner in the case.

He named the respondents as IEBC, commission chairman Isaack Hassan, Mr Kenyatta and deputy-president elect William Ruto.

Mr Oraro said Cord has assembled five lawyers to argue its case before the Supreme Court. He said Cord was dissatisfied with the way vote counting was done and that party agents did not sign Form 36.

After court officials verified Cord's documents, the legal team was asked to deposit one million shillings as security and Sh550,000 for advertisement in local media.

Civil society group, AFRICOG, also filed a petition challenging the tallying process at the Bomas of Kenya.

Cord has a strong case, says lead lawyer Oraro - Politics - nation.co.ke

 

[Ab-Titchaz]

CORD files petition at Supreme Court

Nairobi, Kenya: CORD's lead lawyer George Oraro is confident of a strong case after filing a petition contesting Uhuru Kenyatta's declaration as the president elect.

Oraro said Prime Minister Raila Odinga is the petitioner in the case while Independent Electoral and Boundaries Comission (IEBC), Isaack Hassan(IEBC Chair), President elect Uhuru Kenyatta and deputy president elect William Ruto are the respondents.

Hassan is the returning officer of the presidential results.

Raila accuses IEBC of negligence and failure to conduct free and fair elections in the March 4 elections.

Addressing a press conference on Saturday, the PM said they have enough evidence to challenge IEBC results.

"I am not challenging the outcome of the IEBC results because I want to be declared President but rather let the will of the people prevail. We are going to court today. We have enough evidence", Raila said.

Standard Digital News - Kenya : CORD files petition at Supreme Court

 

[Ab-Titchaz]

​

 

[Julius Kaisari]

Ab-Titchaz ZeMarcopolo Nyani Ngabu Rutashubanyuma

What the Petitioner (PM RailaOdinga) is asking the court to do:

Set aside the results of the Presidential election as announced by IEBC on 9March 2013, and the declaration of Uhuru Kenyatta as President-elect and William Ruto as Deputy President-elect respectively, and declare asnull and void the whole electoral process leading to that declaration.

What the petition says:

· There was no free or fair presidential elections. Consequently no government could lawfully be formed by or from the purported declaration on 9th March 2013, of Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto as President-elect and Deputy President-elect respectively, by the IEBC and its chairman to the dishonor of the Kenyan people.

· The voter register was severally altered as to make it difficult to tell which one was used finally. For the purposes of the 4th March elections the registration of voters was carried out between 19November 2012 to 18th December, 2012, at the end of which the IEBC announced that 14,337,399 persons had registered as voters.

· In breach of the mandatory legal requirement, the IEBC has falsely, unlawfully and illegally in flagrant disregard of the law and its declaration of the result of the presidential election held on the 4th March, 2013 reflected the total number of registered voters as 14,352,533 well above the total number of registered voters as the date of closing of registration on 18th December, 2013.

Indeed, during February 2013, the IEBC announced that they had discovered approximately 20,000 persons who had double registered in the December registration, and accordingly reduced the register tally to 14,267,572 voters as displayed on its website. The illegally inflated March 2013 register exceeded this corrected figure by some 85,000 voters.

· The Petitioner avers that increasing the number of registered voters was intended to permit the IEBC to manipulate the presidential election held on 4th March, 2013 and their purported results and declaration, on 9th March, 2013 was null and void.

That by abandoning the process of electronic identification at the polling stations and releasing results based not on the safeguarded, agreed, determined and credible electoral process it had promised and committed to, and by which legitimate expectations accrued, but a process that failed so significantly, substantially and endemically, IEBC effectively failed to reflect the will of the Kenyan people at the election.

· Arising from the acts and omissions of the IEBC, Hon. RailaOdinga and indeed the people of Kenya, were deprived of a free and fair election devoid of manipulation, an expectation which was denied, thereby irreparably undermining the entire process and result as declared on 9th March, 2013.

· Because of the IEBC and its chairman's acts and omissions, the electoral process and the outcome thereof is so flawed in so fundamental and grave a sense, taken together or viewed separately, that it is difficult to tell whether the results were the true, lawful and proper expression of the Kenyan people's will.

· The EVID and BVR system and the electronic results transmission systems adopted by the First Respondent were so poorly selected, designed and implemented that they were destined to fail from inception, to the knowledge of the IEBC; the failure and collapse, on a catastrophic scale on the polling day, so fundamentally changed the system of polling and the number of votes cast, owing to inordinate and inexplicable delays at the polling stations thereby reverting Kenya to the discredited manual system, with all the attendant risks and opportunities for abuse and manipulation which in fact took place.

· The IEBC and its chairman's purported official tally of registered voters inexplicably and mysteriously grew overnight by a large proportion on the eve of the election, notwithstanding that registration had closed some thirty days and was by law not permitted to be opened or changed.

· The results as declared and recorded by IEBC contained wide spread instances of manipulation of the returns through manipulation of Form 36 and in some instances the votes cast exceeding the numbers of registered voters, in flagrant breach of the fundamental Constitutional principles (see examples below).

· Although a common register was to be - and indeed was - compiled for all the six levels of elections in the general elections of 4th March, 2013, it turned out from the results declared by IEBC that the total number of registered voters and votes cast in respect of the presidential elections in some instances exceeded that of the registered voters and those cast for Parliamentary elections after taking due account of any spoilt or rejected or disputed votes to the detriment of Raila Odinga.

The numerous instances of huge discrepancies in the total numbers of votes declared by the First and Second Respondent in the presidential election held on 4th March, 2013 is inexplicable upon any reasonable hypothesis other than the existence of actual ballot stuffing, multiple voting or gerrymandering or inflating of the numbers of votes in the tallying thereof by the IEBC or their officers or their condoning of or connivance in the same to the advantage of Uhuru and Ruto thereby rendering their alleged win invalid, illegal, null and void.


Anecdotal examples of widespread anomalies:

Glaring anomalies were observed in the process from voter registration, to transmission of results, to tallying.

(a) the result were declared on the basis of unsigned Form 36,
​

(b) multiplicity of Form 36, and variants of entries in some constituencies
​

(c) alterations on files and​

(d) brazen disregard by the IEBC of the entries on the files of constituencies which were eventually reflected in the final tally of Presidential election results and which were announced without signed verification Form 34s.​

Votes cast exceeded the number of registered voters, including Tiaty, Laisamis, Igembe Central, Buri, Chuka, IburiIgambaNgombe, Lari, Kapenguria, Saboti, Turbo, Marakwet West, Kajiado West, Bomet East, Mt Elgon, Langata and Aldai.

Results in Form 36 disclosed by the First Respondent were materially different from the results that were posted in the final tally of the presidential results published by the First Respondent. This included in Webuye East, Webuye West and Igembe Constituencies.

Registered voter numbers in polling stations were inflated in Form 34 contrary to what was contained in Form 36. These included Kaproi Nursery School, Metipso Primary School, Maina Primary School, asaibul Primary School, Sewerwa Nursery School, Liter Secondary School, Chesongoch Catholic Church, Mungiwa Primary School, Chawich Primary School and Lemeuywo Primary School. In most of those circumstances, more votes were cast than the total number of registered voters.

More than two Form 36 reflecting different returns. These included Kikuyu Constituency, Juja Constituency, Chuka Constituency, Thika Constituency.

Alterations in Form 36 without acknowledgment including Kiambaa and Limuru Constituencies.

More valid votes cast in some constituencies reflected in Forms 36 than in Form 34 including in Chesumei, Emngwen and Ainamoi.

Different entries in two Forms 36 submitted in respect of the same constituency for example in Mathira Constituency.

Published results materially different from the results reflected in the County tallying, for example in Nakuru, not to mention the material variation between the verbal declaration made by the various Commissioners of IEBC at the national tallying centre allegedly after verification of results and the fiinal figures which are set out by the IEBC including those of South Imenti, Igembe South, Lagdera, North Imenti, Central Imenti, Boment East and Sigor.

***

Highlights/Quotes from the affidavit

" I believe that First and Second Respondents in breach of the Constitution, failed to establish systems which are accurate, secure, verifiable, accountable and/or transparent and indeed declared results which in many instances had no relation to votes cast at the polling station, developed methods which were opaque and intended to manipulate the results in the course of which the Petitioners' representatives were altogether excluded from the process."

" In the final tally, the total number of votes cast in the Presidential Elections differed materially from those declared by the First and Second Respondents for purposes of the Gubernatorial and Parliamentary elections which took place on the same date clearly attesting to my belief that massive electoral fraud and malpractice occurred or permitted to occur by the First and Second Respondents in contravention of the requirements of the Constitution and the legislative framework in place as regards the 4th March, 2013 presidential election."

Highlights/quotes from the petition/re electronic system:

"its failure and collapse, on a catastrophic scale on the polling day, so fundamentally changed the system of polling and the number of votes cast, owing to inordinate and inexplicable delays at the polling stations thereby reverting Kenya to the discredited manual system, with all the attendant risks and opportunities for abuse and manipulation which in fact took place; "

"Respondents in breach of the Constitution, failed to establish systems which are accurate, secure, verifiable, accountable and/or transparent and indeed declared results which in many instances had no relation to votes cast at the polling station, developed methods which were opaque and intended to manipulate the results in the course of which the Petitioners' representatives were altogether excluded from the process."

"the numerous instances of huge discrepancies in the total numbers of votes declared by the First and Second Respondent in the presidential election held on 4th March, 2013 is inexplicable upon any reasonable hypothesis other than the existence of actual ballot stuffing, multiple voting or gerrymandering or inflating of the numbers of votes in the tallying"

"A curious and very concerning feature of the First Respondent's conduct was that it allowed Kencall to co-host both its server and that of the TNA, which of course may compromise the integrity of the electoral process but at very least gives the very real impression that the TNA has access to sort of information which is at the very least initially confidential to the First Respondent."

 

[Dr. Job]

SUMMARY OF THE CORD PETITION


What the Petitioner (Hon. Raila Odinga) is asking the court to do:

Set aside the results of the Presidential election as announced by IEBC on 9 March 2013, and the declaration of Uhuru Kenyatta as President-elect and William Ruto as Deputy President-elect respectively, and declare as null and void the whole electoral process leading to that declaration.


What the petition says:

There was no free or fair presidential elections. Consequently no government could lawfully be formed by or from the purported declaration on 9th March 2013, of Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto as President-elect and Deputy President-elect respectively,
by the IEBC and its chairman to the dishonor of the Kenyan people.

The voter register was severally altered as to make it difficult to tell which one was used finally. For the purposes of the 4th March elections the registration of voters was carried out between 19 November 2012 to 18th December, 2012, at the end of which the
IEBC announced that 14,337,399 persons had registered as voters.

In breach of the mandatory legal requirement, the IEBC has falsely, unlawfully and illegally in flagrant disregard of the law and its declaration of the result of the presidential election held on the 4th March, 2013 reflected the total number of registered voters as 14,352,533 well above the total number of registered voters as the date of closing of registration on 18th December, 2013.

Indeed, during February 2013, the IEBC announced that they had discovered approximately 20,000 persons who had double registered
in the December registration, and accordingly reduced the register tally to 14,267,572 voters as displayed on its website. The illegally inflated March 2013 register exceeded this corrected figure by some 85,000 voters.

The Petitioner avers that increasing the number of registered voters was intended to permit the IEBC to manipulate the presidential election held on 4th March, 2013 and their purported results and declaration, on 9th March, 2013 was null and void. That by abandoning the process of electronic identification at the polling stations and releasing results based not on the safeguarded, agreed, determined and credible electoral process it had promised and committed to, and by which legitimate expectations accrued, but a process that failed so significantly, substantially and endemically, IEBC effectively failed to reflect the will of the Kenyan people at the election.

Arising from the acts and omissions of the IEBC, Hon. RailaOdinga and indeed the people of Kenya, were deprived of a free and fair election devoid of manipulation, an expectation which was denied, thereby irreparably undermining the entire process and result as declared on 9th March, 2013.

Because of the IEBC and its chairman’s acts and omissions, the electoral process and the outcome thereof is so flawed in so fundamental and grave a sense, taken together or viewed separately, that it is difficult to tell whether the results were the true, lawful and proper expression of the Kenyan people's will.

The EVID and BVR system and the electronic results transmission systems adopted by the First Respondent were so poorly selected, designed and implemented that they were destined to fail from inception, to the knowledge of the IEBC; the failure and collapse, on a catastrophic scale on the polling day, so fundamentally changed the system of polling and the number of votes cast, owing to inordinate and inexplicable delays at the polling stations thereby reverting Kenya to the discredited manual system, with all the attendant risks and opportunities for abuse and manipulation which in fact took place.

The IEBC and its chairman’s purported official tally of registered voters inexplicably and mysteriously grew overnight by a large proportion on the eve of the election, notwithstanding that registration had closed some thirty days and was by law not permitted to be opened or changed.

The results as declared and recorded by IEBC contained wide spread instances of manipulation of the returns through manipulation of Form 36 and in some instances the votes cast exceeding the numbers of registered voters, in flagrant breach of the fundamental Constitutional principles (see examples below).

Although a common register was to be -and indeed was -compiled for all the six levels of elections in the general elections of 4th March, 2013, it turned out from the results declared by IEBC that the total number of registered voters and votes cast in respect of the presidential elections in some instances exceeded that of the registered voters and those cast for Parliamentary elections after taking due account of any spoilt or rejected or disputed votes to the detriment of RailaOdinga.

The numerous instances of huge discrepancies in the total numbers of votes declared by the First and Second Respondent in the presidential election held on 4th March, 2013 is inexplicable upon any reasonable hypothesis other than the existence of actual ballot stuffing, multiple voting or gerrymandering or inflating of the numbers of votes in the tallying thereof by the IEBC or their officers or their condoning of or connivance in the same to the advantage of Uhuru and Ruto thereby rendering their alleged win invalid, illegal, null
and void.


Anecdotal examples of widespread anomalies:

Glaring anomalies were observed in the process from voter registration, to transmission of results, to tallying.

(a) the result were declared on the basis of unsigned Form 36,
​

(b) multiplicity of Form 36, and variants of entries in some constituencies
​

(c) alterations on files and
​

(d) brazen disregard by the IEBC of the entries on the files of constituencies which
​

were eventually reflected in the final tally of Presidential election results and which were announced without signed verification Form 34s.

Votes cast exceeded the number of registered voters, including Tiaty, Laisamis, Igembe Central, Buri, Chuka, Iburi, Igamba, Ngombe, Lari, Kapenguria, Saboti, Turbo, Marakwet West, Kajiado West, Bomet East, Mt Elgon, Langata and Aldai.

Results in Form 36 disclosed by the First Respondent were materially different from the results that were posted in the final tally of the presidential results published by the First Respondent. This included in Webuye East, Webuye West and Igembe Constituencies.

Registered voter numbers in polling stations were inflated in Form 34 contrary to what was contained in Form 36. These included
Kaproi Nursery School, Metipso Primary School, Maina Primary School, asaibul Primary School, Sewerwa Nursery School, Liter Secondary School, Chesongoch Catholic Church, Mungiwa Primary School, Chawich Primary School and Lemeuywo Primary School.

In most of those circumstances, more votes were cast than the total number of registered voters.

More than two Form 36 reflecting different returns.

These included Kikuyu Constituency, Juja Constituency, Chuka Constituency, Thika Constituency.

Alterations in Form 36 without acknowledgment including Kiambaa and Limuru Constituencies.

More valid votes cast in some constituencies reflected in Forms 36 than in Form 34 including in Chesumei, Emngwen and Ainamoi.

Different entries in two Forms 36 submitted in respect ofthe same constituency for example in Mathira Constituency.

Published results materially different from the results reflected in the County tallying, for example in Nakuru, not to mention the material variation between the verbal declaration made by the various Commissioners of IEBC at the national tallying centre allegedly after
verification of results and the fiinal figures which are set out by the IEBC including those of South Imenti, Igembe South, Lagdera, North Imenti, Central Imenti, Boment East and Sigor.


***


Highlights/Quotes from the affidavit

" I believe that First and Second Respondents in breach of the Constitution, failed to establish systems which are accurate, secure, verifiable, accountable and/or transparent and indeed declared results which in many instances had no relation to votes cast at the polling station, developed methods which were opaque and intended to manipulate the results in the course of which the Petitioners’ representatives were altogether excluded from the process."

" In the final tally, the total number of votes cast in the Presidential Elections differed materially from those declared by the First and Second Respondents for purposes of the Gubernatorial and Parliamentary elections which took place on the same date clearly attesting
to my belief that massive electoral fraud and malpractice occurred or permitted to occur by the First and Second Respondents in contravention of the requirements of the Constitution and the legislative framework in place as regards the 4th March, 2013 presidential election."


Highlights/quotes from the petition

re: electronic system:

"its failure and collapse, on a catastrophic scale on the polling day, so fundamentally changed the system of polling and the number of votes cast, owing to inordinate and inexplicable delays at the polling stations thereby reverting Kenya to the discredited manual system, with all the attendant risks and opportunities for abuse and manipulation which in fact took place"

"Respondents in breach of the Constitution, failed to establish systems which are accurate, secure, verifiable, accountable and/or transparent and indeed declared results which in many instances had no relation to votes cast at the polling station, developed methods which were opaque and intended to manipulate the results in the course of which the Petitioners’ representatives were altogether excluded from the process."

"the numerous instances of huge discrepancies in the total numbers of votes declared by the First and Second Respondent in the
presidential election held on 4th March, 2013 is inexplicable upon any reasonable hypothesis other than the existence of actual ballot stuffing, multiple voting or gerrymandering or inflating of the numbers of votes in the tallying"

"A curious and very concerning feature of the First Respondent's conduct was that it allowed Kencall to co-host both its server and that of the TNA, which of course may compromise the integrity of the electoral process but at very least gives the very real impression that the TNA has access to sort of information which is at the very least initially confidential to the First Respondent."




http://www.nation.co.ke/blob/view/-/1721868/data/477296/-/kuhmyd/-/Summary.pdf

 

[Malunde-Malundi]

Hatua moja mbele. Good the petition already registerednas valid one. Thanks RO

 

[Geza Ulole]

Those are strong grievances...I am pretty sure IEBC has a case to answer and they will be compelled to explain all those abnormalities of which i don't think they will walk free! I predict a repetition of a presidential vote

 

[Julius Kaisari]

Those are strong grievances...I am pretty sure IEBC has a case to answer and they will be compelled to explain all those abnormalities of which i don't think they will walk free! I predict a repetition of a presidential vote

Geza Ulole,
There is a cry there. The guys prepared rigging prior to election. What a Shame...! Walijificha chini tyranny of numbers, sasa kwanini kufanya uhuni wote huu?

 

[Utingo]

imagine IEBC wakasema walilazimishwa kumtangaza Uhuru.....!!!

 

[Geza Ulole]

Geza Ulole,
There is a cry there. The guys prepared rigging prior to election. What a Shame...! Walijificha chini tyranny of numbers, sasa kwanini kufanya uhuni wote huu?

hahah it does not make sense to use tyranny of number otherwise they prove to us Kikuyus and Kalenjins are over 50% population-wise and these tribes lack moderate and vibrant young individuals that voted on national issues and not on tribal lines, a 5% wouldn't have been that difficult for RAO to garner!

 

[Safari_ni_Safari]

SAFARICOM BOARD OF DIRECTORS?.


Nicholas Ng'ang'a – Chairman
Michael Joseph – Non-Executive Director
Robert Collymore – Executive Director
Nancy Macharia – Non-Executive Director
Susan Mudhune – Non-Executive Director
Nicholas Jonathan Read – Non-Executive Director
Joseph Kinyua – Non-Executive Director
Enid Muriuki – Company Secretary
John Tombleson - alternate to Nicholas Read
Esther Koimett – Non-Executive Director
Ahmed Essam – Non Executive Director
Sunil Sood – Non Executive Director

 

[omujubi]

huyu Odinga ni mbishi lakini tukumbuke kuwa huu 'ubishi' wa Wakenya ndio umefanya hata watodominate hata TZ.
ni huo huo ubishi wake uliopelekea katiba mpya na mageuzi mengi tunayoyaona hivi sasa Kenya yakitokea mpaka kufikia hatua ya kuziamini mahakama zao (maana hapa kwetu kwa sasa hivi sidhani kama mtu anaweza kupeleka kesi kama hii mahakamani). Let us wait and see what will come out!

 

[Mwita Maranya]

Aisee kazi ndio kwanza imeanza, wacha tutege macho na masikio tuone supreme court itaamua nini.

 

[omujubi]

SAFARICOM BOARD OF DIRECTORS?.


Nicholas Ng'ang'a – Chairman
Michael Joseph – Non-Executive Director
Robert Collymore – Executive Director Nancy Macharia – Non-Executive Director
Susan Mudhune – Non-Executive Director
Nicholas Jonathan Read – Non-Executive Director
Joseph Kinyua – Non-Executive DirectorEnid Muriuki – Company Secretary
John Tombleson - alternate to Nicholas Read
Esther Koimett – Non-Executive Director
Ahmed Essam – Non Executive Director
Sunil Sood – Non Executive Director

nimeelewa hizo red zinachomaanisha!

 

[Safari_ni_Safari]

nimeelewa hizo red zinachomaanisha!

Nilisahau wawili
Enid Muriuki – Company Secretary
Nancy Macharia – Non-Executive Director

 

[lane]

duh hapa sasa kazi ndio imeanza,

hapa IEBC wana cha kujibu aisee, na kwa vyovyote vile wakishindwa cha kujibu maana yake the whole process ni null and void meaning uchaguzi unarudiwa tena aisee.

Afrika demokrasia baado sana

 

[Rutashubanyuma]

"A curious and very concerning feature of the First Respondent's conduct was that it allowed Kencall to co-host both its server and that of the TNA, which of course may compromise the integrity of the electoral process but at very least gives the very real impression that the TNA has access to sort of information which is at the very least initially confidential to the First Respondent.

nonsense since when electoral result can be regarded as confidential?

 

[Rutashubanyuma]

" I believe that First and Second Respondents in breach of the Constitution, failed to establish systems which are accurate, secure, verifiable, accountable and/or transparent and indeed declared results which in many instances had no relation to votes cast at the polling station, developed methods which were opaque and intended to manipulate the results in the course of which the Petitioners' representatives were altogether excluded from the process."

nowhere in the Kenyan constitution IEBC is mandated to use high tech besides high tech is only facilitative but not mandatory! Kwa huu upuuzi hii kesi itatupwa tena kwa gharama zao!

technical failures have no connection to constitutional issues, at all. There could be other reasons why technical glitches occurred and physical tallying erased whatever errors that resulted from technical glitches. KWa huu utaniutani raila aanze tu kufunga virago vyake hakuna mahakama itakubaliana na hoja hizi ambazo hazina uhusiano na kutengua the will of Kenya voters.