Vatican recognises LGBT


Wanaoandika hizo document ndio hawa waliojitokeza wakafukuzwa kanisani , Jee ulipata kusomewa kanisani kwako habari yake ???


Defrocked gay Vatican priest says he has no regrets
 


Italian Cardinal Sends List Of Purportedly Gay Catholic Clergy To Vatican

A male escort’s list reportedly contains texts and photos from Italian priests and seminarians.



Ciro Luca / Reuters
Archbishop of Naples, Cardinal Crescenzio Sepe (L) holds a flask believed to contain drops of liquefied blood of San Gennaro in Naples Cathedral, Italy,

An Italian cardinal has decided to send Vatican officials a 1,200-page dossier that claims to identify 40 actively gay Catholic priests and seminarians in Italy.

Cardinal Cresenzio Sepe of Naples announced Thursday that he is forwarding a list compiled by male escort Francesco Mangiacapra to Vatican authorities. Mangiacapra’s dossier reportedly contains WhatsApp texts and photos that offer evidence that Catholic clergy members were interested in gay sex.

In a statement, Sepe said that none of the priests on Mangiacapra’s list were part of the Diocese of Naples. The cardinal forwarded the file to the Vatican because “those who have erred must pay the price, and be helped to repent for the harm done.”

Mangiacapra describes himself as a “gay escort,” according to the Associated Press. The list he compiled, of 34 priests and six seminarians, does not involve any accounts of sex with minors. “We’re talking about sins, not crimes,” Mangiacapra said, according to the diocesan statement.

The Roman Catholic Church maintains that “homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered” and teaches that LGBTQ Catholics are “called to chastity.” All ordained ministers of the church are expected to be celibate, although Eastern Catholic churches have different standards for priests.

Despite the church’s unchanging stance on homosexuality, some Vatican observers claim that many secretly gay clergy do work for the Catholic Church. The gay priests reportedly form alliances, leading to rumors of a “gay lobby,” an informal network of priests who keep each others’ secrets and help influence each others’ careers.

According to the AP, Mangiacapra came forward with his list because he wanted to expose the priests’ alleged hypocrisy.
 


Priest found guilty of raping dozens of children and a sled dog

In Canada, a Roman Catholic priest has been convicted for a multitude of heinous sex crimes including the rape of at least 12 boys, 10 girls, and a sled dog.

Earlier this month, the now defrocked Catholic priest, Belgian-born Eric Dejaeger, 67, was convicted of 31 counts of sexual offenses against children and one count of bestiality.

Dejaeger was found guilty of raping dozens of Inuit children and a sled dog in the Canadian Arctic, where he worked alongside other local priests for decades.

From 1978 to 1982, Dejaeger worked for the Catholic church in Igloolik in what was then the Northwest Territories.

Witness after witness told the court how Dejaeger had used his position with the church in Igloolik to coerce the local children into sexual activity, often threatening the children with hellfire or separation from their families if they told.

One witness described how he and his friend, about seven at the time, were raped one after the other by the priest. Another told how she was taped to Dejaeger’s bed and attacked from behind.

In all, Dejaeger was convicted of 24 counts of indecent assault, one of unlawful confinement, two of buggery, three of unlawful sexual intercourse, one of sexual assault and one of bestiality. The victims include 12 boys, 10 girls and a dog he abused in front of two children. Most were between the ages of eight and 12, although they could have been as young as four and as old as 18.
Dejaeger now faces a separate trial in Edmonton for similar crimes allegedly committed there. He will be sentenced on the Igloolik charges in January 2015.

 



Catholic Priest rapes a DOG, and 22 children



You’re not surprised, are you?

Catholic priests also rape animals, but this guy was actually caught.

As shown in this article, where the Catholic Church hid and protected a priest named Father DeJaeger, a Catholic priest was convicted of raping a dog, 12 boys, and 10 girls.

Remember, this wasn’t just one freak acting alone. The Catholic Church hid and protected him for 35 years before he was finally convicted. The article is worth reading to see the types of things that these Catholic priests do, but more importantly, the types of things that the Catholic Church will tolerate of their priests, since he “confessed” every single one of his rapes to at least one other priest.

Some of his techniques included:

  • dangling food in front of hungry children as allure
  • threatening them with hellfire
  • threatening to separate children from their families if they told anyone
Catholics will immediately defend the church, of course, and claimed that this was the only case of its kind.

However, if you read the internal document Crimen sollicitationis, which makes provisions for hiding pedophile priests and silencing the victims, it also makes a special provision for sex with animals. The document has been around since 1922, so there are enough priests caught having sex with animals that they had to put in this provision.

It essentially says that for the protection of the church, no matter who or what a priest has sex with, everyone must remain silent, using a phrase that would make any non-Catholic-priest puke:

  • “any perpetrated or attempted externally obscene act with pre-adolescent children or brute animals”
In other words, this certainly wasn’t one of the 1st priests to be caught raping an animal. Not only that, you have to imagine that anyone who does rape an animal makes a concerted effort not to get caught, so this priest and others that rape animals probably raped a lot of them, and never got caught.

Tip: keep your animals away from Catholic priests, and you are ready knew to keep your children away from them.


 
Kwanza huwezi ukaiita ni ndoa! Ndoa ni kati ya mwanaume na mwanamke! Hao Wa jinsia moja Waite jina kingine!


Kwani padri mngese utamwita jina gani ??

Father au Mother ???
 
Wanaoandika hizo document ndio hawa waliojitokeza wakafukuzwa kanisani , Jee ulipata kusomewa kanisani kwako habari yake ???


Defrocked gay Vatican priest says he has no regrets
Sibishani na wewe, Catholic wanataratibu zao na ktk kila maamuzi wanashirikisha kuanzia jumuia ndogo ndogo mpaka Jimbo, sasa wewe endelea kung'ang'ania hizo nyaraka ulizozitoa ktk source unayoijua wewe.Tatizo unahusisha matukio ya mtu mmoja mmoja na dhehebu lake unakosea, kila mtu ana tabia na matamanio yake ila dhehebu lina misingi yake iliyowekwa tangia vizazi na vizazi haitobadilika, hata ikitokea kiongozi akiwa na tabia zake mbovu (kanisa lina utaratibu wake wakumuadhibu). Sasa ww unapoliusisha kanisa na tabia ya mtu na kushangaa kwani wao ni binadam nao wanajaribiwa na shetani na ndio maana kuanzia masheikh, wachungaji, mapdri wote wanatabia zao mbovu nikisema nipost kama unavyo posti ww, zitakuwa fujo cha msingi ww kama ww ni kubaki ktk misingi ya Iman yako au ww utaacha kwenda kwenye nyumba ya ibada sababu tu kiongoza wako kafanya dhambi fulani.
 
Sibishani na wewe, Catholic wanataratibu zao na ktk kila maamuzi wanashirikisha kuanzia jumuia ndogo ndogo mpaka Jimbo, sasa wewe endelea kung'ang'ania hizo nyaraka ulizozitoa ktk source unayoijua wewe.

Taratibu zao kwani kila kitu huwa unaambiwa kanisani mwako ??

hata habari hii uliambiwa ??

By Ruth Gledhill, Religion Correspondent

THE hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church has published a teaching document instructing the faithful that some parts of the Bible are not actually true.

The Catholic bishops of England, Wales and Scotland are warning their five million worshippers, as well as any others drawn to the study of scripture, that they should not expect “total accuracy” from the Bible.

“We should not expect to find in Scripture full scientific accuracy or complete historical precision,” they say in The Gift of Scripture.

The document is timely, coming as it does amid the rise of the religious Right, in particular in the US.

Some Christians want a literal interpretation of the story of creation, as told in Genesis, taught alongside Darwin’s theory of evolution in schools, believing “intelligent design” to be an equally plausible theory of how the world began.

But the first 11 chapters of Genesis, in which two different and at times conflicting stories of creation are told, are among those that this country’s Catholic bishops insist cannot be “historical”. At most, they say, they may contain “historical traces”.

The document shows how far the Catholic Church has come since the 17th century, when Galileo was condemned as a heretic for flouting a near-universal belief in the divine inspiration of the Bible by advocating the Copernican view of the solar system. Only a century ago, Pope Pius X condemned Modernist Catholic scholars who adapted historical-critical methods of analysing ancient literature to the Bible.

In the document, the bishops acknowledge their debt to biblical scholars. They say the Bible must be approached in the knowledge that it is “God’s word expressed in human language” and that proper acknowledgement should be given both to the word of God and its human dimensions.

They say the Church must offer the gospel in ways “appropriate to changing times, intelligible and attractive to our contemporaries”.

The Bible is true in passages relating to human salvation, they say, but continue: “We should not expect total accuracy from the Bible in other, secular matters.”

They go on to condemn fundamentalism for its “intransigent intolerance” and to warn of “significant dangers” involved in a fundamentalist approach.

“Such an approach is dangerous, for example, when people of one nation or group see in the Bible a mandate for their own superiority, and even consider themselves permitted by the Bible to use violence against others.”

Of the notorious anti-Jewish curse in Matthew 27:25, “His blood be on us and on our children”, a passage used to justify centuries of anti-Semitism, the bishops say these and other words must never be used again as a pretext to treat Jewish people with contempt. Describing this passage as an example of dramatic exaggeration, the bishops say they have had “tragic consequences” in encouraging hatred and persecution. “The attitudes and language of first-century quarrels between Jews and Jewish Christians should never again be emulated in relations between Jews and Christians.”

As examples of passages not to be taken literally, the bishops cite the early chapters of Genesis, comparing them with early creation legends from other cultures, especially from the ancient East. The bishops say it is clear that the primary purpose of these chapters was to provide religious teaching and that they could not be described as historical writing.

Similarly, they refute the apocalyptic prophecies of Revelation, the last book of the Christian Bible, in which the writer describes the work of the risen Jesus, the death of the Beast and the wedding feast of Christ the Lamb.

The bishops say: “Such symbolic language must be respected for what it is, and is not to be interpreted literally. We should not expect to discover in this book details about the end of the world, about how many will be saved and about when the end will come.”

In their foreword to the teaching document, the two most senior Catholics of the land, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, Archbishop of Westminster, and Cardinal Keith O’Brien, Archbishop of St Andrew’s and Edinburgh, explain its context.

They say people today are searching for what is worthwhile, what has real value, what can be trusted and what is really true.

The new teaching has been issued as part of the 40th anniversary celebrations of Dei Verbum, the Second Vatican Council document explaining the place of Scripture in revelation. In the past 40 years, Catholics have learnt more than ever before to cherish the Bible. “We have rediscovered the Bible as a precious treasure, both ancient and ever new.”

A Christian charity is sending a film about the Christmas story to every primary school in Britain after hearing of a young boy who asked his teacher why Mary and Joseph had named their baby after a swear word. The Breakout Trust raised £200,000 to make the 30-minute animated film, It’s a Boy. Steve Legg, head of the charity, said: “There are over 12 million children in the UK and only 756,000 of them go to church regularly.

That leaves a staggering number who are probably not receiving basic Christian teaching.”

The Times October 05, 2005
 
Ndio utaratibu wetu huo kama kanisa, lazima ushirikishe ngazi zote kuanzia ya juu mpaka ya chini.Moja ya source ya kuaminika ni hii News from the Vatican - News about the Church - Vatican News.
 
Ndio utaratibu wetu huo kama kanisa, lazima ushirikishe ngazi zote kuanzia ya juu mpaka ya chini.Moja ya source ya kuaminika ni hii News from the Vatican - News about the Church - Vatican News.


Habari hii uliambiwa ??



By Ruth Gledhill, Religion Correspondent

THE hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church has published a teaching document instructing the faithful that some parts of the Bible are not actually true.

The Catholic bishops of England, Wales and Scotland are warning their five million worshippers, as well as any others drawn to the study of scripture, that they should not expect “total accuracy” from the Bible.

“We should not expect to find in Scripture full scientific accuracy or complete historical precision,” they say in The Gift of Scripture.

The document is timely, coming as it does amid the rise of the religious Right, in particular in the US.

Some Christians want a literal interpretation of the story of creation, as told in Genesis, taught alongside Darwin’s theory of evolution in schools, believing “intelligent design” to be an equally plausible theory of how the world began.

But the first 11 chapters of Genesis, in which two different and at times conflicting stories of creation are told, are among those that this country’s Catholic bishops insist cannot be “historical”. At most, they say, they may contain “historical traces”.

The document shows how far the Catholic Church has come since the 17th century, when Galileo was condemned as a heretic for flouting a near-universal belief in the divine inspiration of the Bible by advocating the Copernican view of the solar system. Only a century ago, Pope Pius X condemned Modernist Catholic scholars who adapted historical-critical methods of analysing ancient literature to the Bible.

In the document, the bishops acknowledge their debt to biblical scholars. They say the Bible must be approached in the knowledge that it is “God’s word expressed in human language” and that proper acknowledgement should be given both to the word of God and its human dimensions.

They say the Church must offer the gospel in ways “appropriate to changing times, intelligible and attractive to our contemporaries”.

The Bible is true in passages relating to human salvation, they say, but continue: “We should not expect total accuracy from the Bible in other, secular matters.”

They go on to condemn fundamentalism for its “intransigent intolerance” and to warn of “significant dangers” involved in a fundamentalist approach.

“Such an approach is dangerous, for example, when people of one nation or group see in the Bible a mandate for their own superiority, and even consider themselves permitted by the Bible to use violence against others.”

Of the notorious anti-Jewish curse in Matthew 27:25, “His blood be on us and on our children”, a passage used to justify centuries of anti-Semitism, the bishops say these and other words must never be used again as a pretext to treat Jewish people with contempt. Describing this passage as an example of dramatic exaggeration, the bishops say they have had “tragic consequences” in encouraging hatred and persecution. “The attitudes and language of first-century quarrels between Jews and Jewish Christians should never again be emulated in relations between Jews and Christians.”

As examples of passages not to be taken literally, the bishops cite the early chapters of Genesis, comparing them with early creation legends from other cultures, especially from the ancient East. The bishops say it is clear that the primary purpose of these chapters was to provide religious teaching and that they could not be described as historical writing.

Similarly, they refute the apocalyptic prophecies of Revelation, the last book of the Christian Bible, in which the writer describes the work of the risen Jesus, the death of the Beast and the wedding feast of Christ the Lamb.

The bishops say: “Such symbolic language must be respected for what it is, and is not to be interpreted literally. We should not expect to discover in this book details about the end of the world, about how many will be saved and about when the end will come.”

In their foreword to the teaching document, the two most senior Catholics of the land, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, Archbishop of Westminster, and Cardinal Keith O’Brien, Archbishop of St Andrew’s and Edinburgh, explain its context.

They say people today are searching for what is worthwhile, what has real value, what can be trusted and what is really true.

The new teaching has been issued as part of the 40th anniversary celebrations of Dei Verbum, the Second Vatican Council document explaining the place of Scripture in revelation. In the past 40 years, Catholics have learnt more than ever before to cherish the Bible. “We have rediscovered the Bible as a precious treasure, both ancient and ever new.”

A Christian charity is sending a film about the Christmas story to every primary school in Britain after hearing of a young boy who asked his teacher why Mary and Joseph had named their baby after a swear word. The Breakout Trust raised £200,000 to make the 30-minute animated film, It’s a Boy. Steve Legg, head of the charity, said: “There are over 12 million children in the UK and only 756,000 of them go to church regularly.

That leaves a staggering number who are probably not receiving basic Christian teaching.”

The Times October 05, 2005
 
We sio mzima nimekupa na sources ya kuaminika sasa sijui unataka nini kwa hiyo kama kiongozi akilawiti au kulawitiwa ndio kanisa limeruhusu kulawitiana, mbona akili yako na imani yako ni ndogo sana, unashindwa kutofautisha dhambi ya mtu binafsi na misingi ya dini na sheria zake. Sasa endelea kubisha na hivyo vyanzo vyako vya kuokota but still Catholic ndio kanisa imara, kwani mfumo wake ni wakushirikisha wanajumuia wote kuanzia ngazi ya juu mpaka jumuia ndogo ndogo na mabadiliko yoyote lazima yatangazwe kupitia source niliyokuwekea. Au kwa hiyo ww kiongozi wa dhehebu lako akilawiti, ina maana hilo dhehebu linaruhusu kulawiti hebu jaribu kutofautisha kati ya dhehebu na matamanio ya mtu binafsi, kwani hao viongozi ni binadam na si malaika, wanajaribiwa na shetani kama unavyojaribiwa ww (Sijajua level yako ya elimu, ila mwalimu wako anapata tabu sana).
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…