Russia report is out .Democratic party CNN and MSNBC bad day

Interference, Collusion, Crime, Indictments.., hivyo ni vitu tofauti sana, Investigation ilianza kwa premises ngumu sana ya Collusion ambayo ni ngumu kupata hard evidences, lakini haimaanishi Trump hajafanya makosa au watu wake hawakuwa involved na russians, all in all Trump bado ana kesi Lukuki, huyu jamaa ni CON Man na Mtakatishaji fedha mpiga madeal.., yaani viongozi wetu wa Africa bora kuliko huyu jamaa
Russians interfered in the 2016 American elections, no one is questioning that.

Mueller was checking whether trump's campaign colluded in the interference

If the collusion would be proved,trump and team would made a crime.

And the they would be indicted for the crime.

All these have just fallen like house of cards.
 
BBC News

Trump-Russia: Special counsel Robert Mueller delivers report

23 March 2019

Image captionPresident Donald Trump (left) has criticised Robert Mueller's (right) investigation as a "witch hunt"

Special Counsel Robert Mueller has submitted his long-awaited report on alleged collusion between Russia and President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign.

A justice department official said Mr Mueller's report did not recommend any further indictments.

The special counsel has already charged six former Trump aides and dozens of Russians.

The Attorney General William Barr will now summarise the report and decide how much to share with Congress.

Mr Barr told congressional leaders in a letter that he anticipated being able to inform them of the report's key findings over the weekend.

What might 'Mueller report' look like?

Trump Russia: The saga in 250 words

Who's who in the drama to end all dramas?

The report is intended to explain any prosecutorial decisions the special counsel has made in the 22 months since his appointment by deputy US Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

Mr Trump and other Republicans have repeatedly condemned the probe as a "witch hunt".

In his letter to Congress' judiciary committee leaders - Senators Lindsey Graham and Dianne Feinstein and Congressmen Jerrold Nadler and Doug Collins - Mr Barr confirmed there were no instances during the investigation where the Department of Justice had interfered with Mr Mueller's work.

The attorney general said he will now consult with Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein - who managed the inquiry prior to Mr Barr's appointment - and Mr Mueller "to determine what other information from the report can be released to Congress and the public".

"I remain committed to as much transparency as possible, and I will keep you informed as to the status of my review," he said.

Over the past 22 months, the special counsel has revealed how Russian agents and operatives allegedly obtained information about US elections to initiate a campaign to influence Americans, fund political activities in the US and hack emails of top Democrats to undermine Hillary Clinton's campaign.

Who is special counsel Robert Mueller?

What does the special counsel do?

Key questions answered in the Trump Russia probe

Mr Mueller was also investigating whether Mr Trump obstructed justice with his firing of FBI director James Comey, or by trying to mislead or end the inquiry.

Mr Trump has repeatedly said there was "no collusion" with Russia and "no obstruction".

The president refused to sit for an interview with Mr Mueller's team during the inquiry, but his lawyers submitted written answers to questions after months of negotiating terms.


Out with a letter, not a bang?


Is this how the Mueller investigation ends? Not with a bang, but with a letter?

The details of the final report have yet to be disclosed, but because Attorney General Barr has said there were no instances where he or his predecessors overrode the special counsel's prosecutorial decisions - and no new indictments have been announced - it seems possible that what we have seen with the criminal portion of the probe is what we're going to get.

There may still be politically damaging revelations to come, but Donald Trump has shrugged off many a political threat in his rise to the White House.

Without a criminal caseload directly related to "collusion" by members of the Trump campaign - the central thrust of the investigation - it seems certain the president and his White House surrogates will shout from the hilltops that their side has been exonerated.


This is far from the end of legal jeopardy for the president, his family, his aides and his business empire, of course.

Investigations at both the state and federal level into various financial and campaign finance violations grind on, not to mention the aggressive oversight coming down the pipe from the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives.

After today's developments, however, the president will continue to claim he is the victim of an unfounded "witch hunt".

His political adversaries, who were hoping for a courtroom coup de grace, will be left searching for a new silver bullet.


What's the reaction?


White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said in a statement: "The next steps are up to Attorney General Barr and we look forward to the process taking its course. The White House has not received or been briefed on the Special Counsel's report."

Mr Trump's personal lawyers Rudy Giuliani and Jay Sekulow echoed a similar sentiment, saying they were "pleased" the report had been delivered and trust Mr Barr to "determine the appropriate next steps".

Mr Nadler, a New York Democrat, acknowledged the investigation had concluded on Twitter, saying: "We look forward to getting the full Mueller report and related materials."


Earlier this month, the House of Representatives voted unanimously for a resolution demanding the Department of Justice release the full report to the public, signalling support within both parties to find out whether Mr Mueller discovered any criminal wrongdoing.

Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer also called for transparency in a joint statement, adding that the White House "must not be allowed to interfere".

"The Special Counsel's investigation focused on questions that go to the integrity of our democracy itself: whether foreign powers corruptly interfered in our elections, and whether unlawful means were used to hinder that investigation. The American people have a right to the truth."

Mr Graham, a South Carolina Republican and vocal Trump supporter, said he "always believed it was important that Mr Mueller be allowed to do his job without interference, and that has been accomplished".


What comes next?

What happens next is in Mr Barr's hands. Legally, the attorney general is under no obligation to release the report publicly, and his copy to Congress could contain redactions, but during his confirmation hearings before senators he vowed to release as much as he could.

And if he does provide Congress with the full details, members could leak the report to the public.

Seven legal headaches for the president

With the 2020 presidential elections looming, candidates are expected to campaign with promises of making the full report public. Many of the Democratic hopefuls - Beto O'Rourke, Bernie Sanders, Cory Booker, Amy Klobuchar, Kirsten Gillibrand, and Julian Castro - have called for the full release of the report.


The House of Representatives will also continue to investigate the administration, and they could ask Mr Mueller to testify or demand that Mr Barr provide relevant materials.



Sent using Jamii Forums mobile app
Usicheze na kitu inaitwa "The Presidency" na "Presidential Powers and Influence".
Tangu enzi za Nixon na 'Watergate' yake hakuna aliyerudia kosa.
Afu ujue Trump hamkumshinda Jasusi nguli Hillary Clinton bila msaada wa maana tena wa 'nje ya box' manake Obama pamoja na CIA chiefs wote walimsapoti Clinton..
Nusu ya FBI ilimsapoti Clinton na wengine hawakumpenda Trump na tabia zake.
Ingekuwa Afrika tungechonga saaaana...ila ukweli ndio huu.
Usicheze na Mamlaka.
 
Mueller is a professional investigator, just how he led to so many of trump associates fall and most awaiting their term jails, no less than indicting trump is expected or the whole thing was a waste of time
BUT he fell short of indicting Trump despite so many confessions of close associates, aides and lawyers.
Usicheze na dola + mamlaka.
Collabo yake ni mbaya na ya hatari.
 
All, all,all of the trump aides who were arraigned to american courts during the course of the investigations were indicted for reasons not related to trump's campaign collusion with the russians ...
Not directly but each played a key role in the Russian ploy
 
Russians interfered in the 2016 American elections, no one is questioning that.

Mueller was checking whether trump's campaign colluded in the interference

If the collusion would be proved,trump and team would made a crime.

And the they would be indicted for the crime.

All these have just fallen like house of cards.
Can a sitting president be indicted ? All these are political shenanigans, which don't change the fact that Trump is a Con Pathological liar, but the problem was done if framing Muller investigations, which he was given a very small scope, to check for collusion, not corruption or other crimes and even then this so called witch hunt has caught a lot of witches...
 
Can a sitting president be indicted ? All these are political shenanigans, which don't change the fact that Trump is a Con Pathological liar, but the problem was done if framing Muller investigations, which he was given a very small scope, to check for collusion, not corruption or other crimes and even then this so called witch hunt has caught a lot of witches...
Why has the manofats has been charged for crimes unrelated to collusion.

I think the scope was limitless
 
Can a sitting president be indicted ? All these are political shenanigans, which don't change the fact that Trump is a Con Pathological liar, but the problem was done if framing Muller investigations, which he was given a very small scope, to check for collusion, not corruption or other crimes and even then this so called witch hunt has caught a lot of witches...
Not sure about the American laws but if a seating president can not be indicted at least I know he can be impeached.

Now even the impeachment has evaporated.
 
Not sure about the American laws but if a seating president can not be indicted at least I know he can be impeached.

Now even the impeachment has evaporated.
Impeachment is a political issue if you have the numbers you can impeach anybody even for a tiny thing, they can say someone is not mentally fit to lead a country and vote to impeach you, Clinton was voted to impeached for lying under oath.., so even now, though it might be a political suicide democrats can decide to impeach Trump, Collusion or Not...
 
Why has the manofats has been charged for crimes unrelated to collusion.

I think the scope was limitless
Manafort was not indicted by Muller the case was forwarded to other Jurisdiction..., Muller scope was not limitless, and this was political they were crying that he was leading a witch hunt looking for crimes he was not asked to look for...
 
Impeachment is a political issue if you have the numbers you can impeach anybody even for a tiny thing, they can say someone is not mentally fit to lead a country and vote to impeach you, Clinton was voted to impeached for lying under oath.., so even now, though it might be a political suicide democrats can decide to impeach Trump, Collusion or Not...
Well, but they need something tangible to go to the public with.collusion crime was supposed to be ideal.
 
Manafort was not indicted by Muller the case was forwarded to other Jurisdiction..., Muller scope was not limitless, and this was political they were crying that he was leading a witch hunt looking for crimes he was not asked to look for...
Sure,he subcontracted other jurisdictions,right?
 
Well, but they need something tangible to go to the public with.collusion crime was supposed to be ideal.
That's a mistake from the begging they could have framed differently the investigation, by the way what is collusion anyway ?, and which Russians are we talking about Putin ?, if you ask me Don Junior meeting with those Russians asking for help is Collusion.., but then again what do I know....
 
That's a mistake from the begging they could have framed differently the investigation, by the way what is collusion anyway ?, and which Russians are we talking about Putin ?, if you ask me Don Junior meeting with those Russians asking for help is Collusion.., but then again what do I know....
Well, what I got out of all this is that trump hired people who were opportunists, Trump never asked them to solicit any kind of assistance from russians

A young man like George Papadopoulos didn't even know what he was supposed to do.But he got himself into Russia issues unprepared & un commissioned, He just mate someone in London and was asked to meet some Putin's relatives and made that a big issue,yet trump never corporated no wonder why he was firing aides like every day,they never focused on the campaign.
 
Not directly but each played a key role in the Russian ploy
I do not think so, I know the whole team developed some interests in the emails when the media brought trump's night life issues

It had to be a tit for tat at that moment
 
Well, what I got out of all this is that trump hired people who were opportunists, Trump never asked them to solicit any kind of assistance from russians

A young man like George Papadopoulos didn't even know what he was supposed to do.But he got himself into Russia issues unprepared & un commissioned, He just mate someone in London and was asked to meet some Putin's relatives and made that a big issue,yet trump never corporated no wonder why he was firing aides like every day,they never focused on the campaign.
Trump is a Con Man, and he is in the presidency just to make a quick buck..., so you believe Don Junior did not tell him about the meeting.., and if the case is proving that he knew something and since we are not in his head, then this thing can never be proven, the truth is Trump has been in bed with Russians for a long time because they were using his real estate business to launder money.., even if Trump knew about the meeting some lawyers might argue that is not colluding but it is gathering data about your political opponent, I tell you my friend Trump is a biggest Conman, who uses his office for his own benefits, he makes some of African leaders look like amateurs in this game of corruption..
 
Trump is a Con Man, and he is in the presidency just to make a quick buck..., so you believe Don Junior did not tell him about the meeting.., and if the case is proving that he knew something and since we are not in his head, then this thing can never be proven, the truth is Trump has been in bed with Russians for a long time because they were using his real estate business to launder money.., even if Trump knew about the meeting some lawyers might argue that is not colluding but it is gathering data about your political opponent, I tell you my friend Trump is a biggest Conman, who uses his office for his own benefits, he makes some of African leaders look like amateurs in this game of corruption..
But you do not have evidence for all these accusations ...
 
Interference, Collusion, Crime, Indictments.., hivyo ni vitu tofauti sana, Investigation ilianza kwa premises ngumu sana ya Collusion ambayo ni ngumu kupata hard evidences, lakini haimaanishi Trump hajafanya makosa au watu wake hawakuwa involved na russians, all in all Trump bado ana kesi Lukuki, huyu jamaa ni CON Man na Mtakatishaji fedha mpiga madeal.., yaani viongozi wetu wa Africa bora kuliko huyu jamaa
Obama weaponized FBI .if trump is cleared no collusion hiyo lawsuit itakayokuja .They will have to appoint a special counsel to investigate the COUP.Did you know Obama Chicago Mke wake Michelle alipiga simu kwa chief police eti hawaamii Chicago police Peleka FBI case watu wa Obama will handle .BIDEN May be investigate and Obama
 
Back
Top Bottom